Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jim Mitchell

Seaport Research Partners · covers Financial Services

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
68on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%3 of 68 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 68 of 68 questions from 8 companies

CCitigroup14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 14 challenging
C company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what are you seeing in consumer credit and consumer behavior and does it look like these favorable trends are continuing

Show response

Luchetti described stable credit with delinquencies and losses down YoY, subject to inflation and unemployment watch-outs.

Is there a time when you start to question 100 basis point buffer

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fraser said the buffer is unchanged for now, with upside tied to new stress models better reflecting Citi's risk.

Calendar 2026 Q1

But it does also highlight the low profitability of the consumer branch banking segment.

ChallengingMarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Luchetti acknowledged 10.8% ROTCE is below target but nearly doubled from a year ago. Revenue up 11%, expenses up 1%, 10 points of operating leverage. Path to higher returns is clear.

Any thoughts and detail on your exposures and how you are thinking about the credit risk there would be helpful.

Show response

Luchetti gave detailed breakdown: $22B loans, 98% IG, 100% securitized. Strong risk appetite framework, multi-product relationships, constant stress testing. Comprehensive risk disclosure.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you maybe kind of just dive into a little bit more on the drivers why you think that should be sustainable going forward

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mason cited three drivers: doing more with existing large multinationals globally, onboarding new clients, and growing relatively nascent commercial/middle market segment with a growing front-end platform.

are you still targeting a buffer around 100 bps? And if so, how quickly are you looking to get there

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mason confirmed 100bps buffer target equating to ~12.6% CET1. Currently 160bps above requirement. Expects to work toward 12.6% over next several quarters. 2026 buybacks expected to exceed $13B from 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is 4Q a decent jumping-off point for next year? Can you grow from that level

Show response

Mason cited operating deposit growth, branded card balance growth, trade lending momentum, investment portfolio rolling into higher rates, and disciplined deposit pricing as NII tailwinds into 2026.

the capital target of 12.8% and stepped-up buybacks this quarter. Is this a pace we should expect until you get to 12.8

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mason declined quarterly buyback guidance but confirmed continued progress on $20B program. CET1 at 13.2% expected to come down toward 12.8% over next couple of quarters, balancing growth investment with capital return.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you give us a sense of what you think the long-term return profile could look like roughly

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fraser and Mason outlined continued revenue momentum across all businesses, expense discipline through severance and stranded cost reduction, and capital optimization.

if I look at first half, $43.3 billion to get to $84, you're dropping $2.5 billion in the back half

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mason cited normal seasonality in markets business plus fewer rate cuts than originally expected, while maintaining $84B full-year target.

Calendar 2025 Q1

anything different given the strong start to the NII ex-markets story and seemingly some good momentum in deposit and loan growth

Show response

Mason cited operating deposit momentum in TTS, branded card balance growth, trade loan growth, and deposit repricing management as tailwinds.

are you seeing sort of demand already in terms of your balance sheet, whether it's raising liquidity and deposit flow

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Fraser noted clients bolstering balance sheets, accelerating imports for stockpiling, but pausing significant CapEx while awaiting clarity.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how much more is there to go beyond that in terms of eliminating parallel running parallel systems, reduce consultant spend

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mason confirmed the path to sub-60% efficiency by 2026 exit through revenue momentum, cost elimination, and transformation benefits.

can't help but ask about beyond 1Q. If we do sort of get this more certainty, maybe no increase in capital requirements

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mason expressed confidence in earnings momentum, targeting 13.1% CET1 with buybacks increasing as regulatory clarity emerges.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
JPM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there a time over the intermediate term where you think expense growth could slow a little

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dimon rejected the idea of perpetual operating leverage, said AI's benefits accrue to customers, and flagged a possible expense-growth slowdown in 2027 or 2028.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Has there been any pushing out of any pause on activity levels and pushing out of the pipeline?

Show response

Barnum described the IB pipeline as surprisingly resilient, noting some Q1 strength came from accelerated M&A closures. Cautioned that Middle East developments could impact deal execution.

does that start to impinge your ability to grow that as much as you want?

ChallengingRegulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Barnum directly confirmed G-SIB surcharge constrains Markets growth, particularly low-risk-density activities clients need. Dimon added JPM will find ways to serve clients while reducing G-SIB charge, calling it 'arbitrage.'

Calendar 2025 Q4

NPAs came down in commercial. So just trying to think what's your view there

Show response

Barnum said Q4 charge-offs were largely already provisioned. Slight increase in loss given default parameters. Nothing concerning broadly. Wholesale charge-off normalization similar to card normalization story, lumpy but not deterioration.

are you seeing any early signs of a broadening out of demand across other categories like traditional C and I mortgage, or auto

Show response

Barnum said home lending had a busy day on mortgage market moves. CCB story still about card. Modestly optimistic C&I outlook from global corporate environment and expansion strategies including new client acquisition.

Calendar 2025 Q3

where you see the most strength in the pipeline? And as we get rate cuts coming, do you feel that we are starting to see more activity pick up

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Barnum said IPO processes continued through volatility and now conditions more favorable. M&A announced activity busiest summer in long time. Not persuaded rate cuts alone will change sophisticated sponsor behavior.

other aspects whether it is in the markets business, or other marginal return activities before that you see opportunities to lean into growth to use up capital

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Barnum cautioned against extreme optimization. Said behavior already being shaped by high stock multiple and excess capital position. Wants franchise-accretive business, not just liquid par asset leverage.

Calendar 2025 Q2

it looks like you guys have done a lot to reduce your asset sensitivity to the short end of the curve. So can you talk about what you've been doing to change the positioning

MarginMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Barnum explained they added front-end duration to reduce exposure to recessionary rate scenario while accepting less upside in higher-rate scenarios. Said it's nearly impossible to get asset sensitivity to zero.

Do you see that -- is it really just a supply issue? Or how do you think about the demand/supply dynamic

Show response

Barnum said SLR reform is good and overdue but JPM not personally bound. Impact likely small on portfolio activity but could help low-risk market-making intermediation. Fully priced in by markets already.

Calendar 2025 Q1

this kind of volatility tends to drive -- as corporates and investors go to cash, tends to drive higher deposits. Did you see that trend in March and particularly in April

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Barnum said wholesale deposits outperformed but couldn't attribute to the environment. Dimon noted flight to safety may go to T-bills rather than deposits and that the 10-year risk-off trade is fundamentally different this time.

with four -- three to four cuts sort of mostly in the back half, June to December, how do you think about the trajectory of NII this year

MarginMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Barnum declined quarterly NII trajectory color. Acknowledged back-loaded cuts create headwind on exit rate into next year. Dimon interjected that the curve won't happen as priced.

Calendar 2024 Q4

maybe just talk about again what areas of the regulatory structure, if it were to change, would be most impactful for you

Show response

Barnum avoided speculating on specific changes. Dimon added that liquidity reform, competitive analysis, and reducing balkanized system were all priorities.

since the election, it seems like CEO confidence, business confidence has increased. So, are you starting to see any improvement in demand on lending

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Barnum acknowledged sentiment improvement but said loan growth has not materialized, attributing it to wide open capital markets and some residual caution.

STTState Street Corporation13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
STT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you expect any drag, I guess, in the very short term on pretax margins as you invest

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Woods said the plan is not back-end loaded, expecting positive operating leverage in each year of the medium-term outlook.

Calendar 2026 Q1

EMEA was the largest contributor to net flows in the first quarter

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

John cited fixed income and multi-asset as the primary drivers, along with strong performance in the low-cost ETF suite. ETF flows broadly were a major contributor.

How can any further optimization around pricing affect deposit growth from here

Show response

John anchored total deposits at $250-260B with noninterest-bearing slightly above 10% guide. Internal deposit drivers: AUCA growth (record this quarter), alternatives clients bringing more deposits with better mix. External: money supply growth, rate stability, and risk-off environments all supportive.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it seems like maybe the implied balance sheet is pretty flat

CreditCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

John confirmed balance sheet roughly flat to slightly smaller in 2026. Optimization includes running off high-cost wholesale funding dilutive to NIM, rotating commercial loans toward deep-relationship lending, and repricing investment portfolio. All designed to improve NIM while maintaining stable NII.

how do you think about the mix and growth in deposits?

Show response

John provided specific assumption: ~$150B total deposits (stable), with ~$25B (10%) in non-interest-bearing, slightly below Q4 peak but consistent with historical levels.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you flex downward to to maintain positive operating leverage?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

John noted markets business and NII can act as shock absorbers in downturns. Discretionary investment pace can be recalibrated. Want to protect 'crown jewels' and continue investing through downturns, but have multiple levers for maintaining profitability.

can you just talk about the environment versus what you're doing to grab share?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

John explained the integrated nature: FX overlaps with custody (flow business grows with AUCA), securities lending overlaps with investment management clients. Core strategic business provides stable base, with volatility as a toggle. Ron added volumes were up double digits year-over-year, reflecting share gains from building multiple trading venues and access points.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there anything kind of lumpy in there that may be not to get too excited about? Or do you feel like there's a real turn in sort of the organic growth in that space?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ron explained structural DC momentum (innovative target date products, consultant relationships) plus a large one-time mandate from existing APAC client. Bullish on DC segment as a sustained growth driver both in US and internationally.

do you think there's any acknowledgment of the Tier 1 leverage constraint? And do you think that could also be lowered in the future?

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ron acknowledged Tier 1 leverage is the current binding constraint after earlier SLR relief. Regulators may address it but other priorities (GSIB, stress tests) come first, possibly by year-end. Described current environment as constructive for large GSIBs.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how much flex do you have in the expense line if revenues are worse? Just be helpful to think about the range of outcomes there

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Ron cited multi-year transformation efforts, investment book flexibility, and technology substitution for labor as levers. Emphasized protecting service quality while having room to accelerate expense actions.

Are you seeing elevated deposit flows and sort of, you know, there's some good volatility for you guys in FX and sec lending and deposits

CreditMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark confirmed elevated deposit levels and additional trading from volatility in early April, consistent with typical uncertainty cycle behavior.

Calendar 2024 Q4

digging into the puts and takes on the NII guide, understand the asset sensitivity to non-US

CreditMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mark Keating gave comprehensive four-part framework covering deposit levels/mix, rate cuts, loan growth, and portfolio rollovers with specific numbers for each.

any sense of how deposits have acted in January, I guess, as a help

Show response

Deflected with 'too early to say', only a couple of weeks into the year. Acknowledged seasonal pattern of deposits declining from Q4 highs.

BACBank of America12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
BAC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you expand on the funding optimization point a little bit

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Alastair reiterated prior framework, legacy long-dated CDs and repo balances drifting lower, benefiting NIY while NII is roughly preserved. Estimated ~$100B of remaining optimization runway, though Brian cautioned that nominal footings matter less than composition of liabilities funding core loans.

Is that an early read on taking some share from private credit, given disruptions there

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Alastair attributed $5-10B of Q1 loan growth to revolver draws resuming after Q4 paydowns. Core middle-market activity and working capital builds across corporate America and internationally, framed as broad demand rather than private-credit share shift.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could we just drill down and look at NII ex markets

Show response

Alastair noted $100M of Q4 NII was a Global Markets geography shift from MMSA that will likely revert. Markets NII should grow with continued loan and balance sheet investment. Rate cuts benefit markets as liability-sensitive.

Can you speak to what you're seeing in terms of deposit pricing whether betas are worse, better or worse than expected

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Alastair confirmed full pass-through on corporate banking and wealth deposits. Consumer rate paid fell to 55bps given noninterest-bearing dominance. Consumer deposits growing for 3 quarters YoY. Wealth management deposits bottoming and poised to grow.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how many quarters of that do you expect

Show response

Alastair estimated balance sheet growth about 1% slower than loan/deposit growth over the next year as remaining wholesale funding is paid down, benefiting NIM without NII cost.

how do you think about the buffer where it is today and what prevents you from taking that down a little bit

Capital AllocationRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brian reiterated 50bps buffer target. Returned $7.3B in Q3. Awaiting rule finalization on averaging, G-SIB, and other changes expected in first half of next year before adjusting further.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is that different now? Or how do you think about that longer-term target

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Alastair confirmed 220-230bps NIM target unchanged. Q2 was diluted by high Global Markets balance sheet usage and large end-of-quarter commercial deposits, both NIM-dilutive but NII-slightly-positive.

Can you grow off that 4Q jumping off point in your mind

Show response

Alastair confirmed expectation to grow NII sequentially each quarter off Q4, benefiting from continued fixed rate asset repricing as a tailwind. Q1 typically affected by day count.

Calendar 2025 Q1

does that make it a little more difficult to reach that intermediate-term target NIM

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alastair confirmed 2.3% NIM target is unchanged, with rate cuts later in 2025 creating modest headwind in 2026 but manageable.

are you seeing across your business segments, you know, whether we've seen you've seen deposit you know, flight to safety flows

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Alastair reported constructive global markets activity and regular-way deposit flows, with no signs of stress similar to 2023 regional banking crisis.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what do you think you're doing differently that's generating that kind of consistent success in adding new accounts?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brian cited brand strength, digital capabilities, market expansion, and college campus strategy driving 92% primary checking account growth.

what areas do you see sort of slowing on the expense side given the, you know, your optimism on organic growth?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brian cited moderating markets-related incentive growth, completed remediation work, and continued headcount discipline as expense deceleration drivers.

RJFRaymond James Financial10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
RJF company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you discuss how much is being driven by [ TriState's ] platform versus your own private client business

Show response

Shoukry confirmed SBL growth nearly identical at approximately 30% across both Raymond James Bank and TriState platforms. 31% overall year-over-year growth described as truly phenomenal. Opportunity to continue growing on both platforms remains significant.

it looks like the deposit growth there has been pretty substantial since you acquired it, maybe over 50%

Show response

Shoukry confirmed TriState has been a contributor on all fronts: SBL/lending capability, diversified funding through deposit products, and organic growth. Leadership team still in place, independently branded, separately chartered. A great cultural fit addition to the Raymond James family.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how do you think about the combination of NII and RJBDP fees as we go forward for the rest of the year

Show response

Shoukry noted outcome depends heavily on rate trajectory (market pricing 0-2 cuts). Good deposit beta on existing balances provides NIM/RJBDP resiliency. ESP client sensitivity to rate levels uncertain as rates decline. Difficult to predict extent to which cash allocation preferences shift.

Is that just demand driven? Or are you actively looking to shrink those deposits

Show response

Shoukry confirmed ESP decline is demand-driven, not strategic shrinking. 100% deposit beta on ESP. Inflows decelerating as rates decline and clients prefer market investment over higher-yield savings. Consistent with industry-wide pattern for high-yield savings products.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is it pretty broad-based across all affiliation options? Or is it more concentrated in 1 specific segment

Show response

Shoukry confirmed broad-based success across all channels with independent channel seeing the highest acceleration rate. Employee and independent RIA options also performing well.

can you kind of give us a sense of at least a ballpark of the level of growth you're seeing in fee-based flows

Subscriber GrowthRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Reilly (Executive Chair) noted fee-based flows outpacing overall asset growth. Now at 65% fee-based penetration, industry-leading. Long-term shift toward advisory relationships but many clients maintain both fee-based and commission accounts.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just update your NII sensitivity? You highlighted some asset turnover in the low-yielding AFS book

Show response

Shoukry argued dynamic effects of rate cuts could be NII-positive through increased loan demand for both SBL and corporate. AFS-to-loan remix also a tailwind. Static sensitivity analysis available but dynamic view more realistic.

we just don't expect to get to 10% without deals? Or can you kind of push that ratio down from here

ChallengingCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Shoukry confirmed 10% target will be reached through growth investments (organic + acquisitions), not buybacks alone. Current buyback pace keeps ratios stable, not declining. M&A opportunities may arise in volatility.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is it fair to think the trajectory on NII could start to get a little better beyond next quarter

Show response

Reilly confirmed NII tailwind thesis beyond Q2 headwind of two fewer billing days. Growing assets plus stable rates should drive NII improvement.

Can you give any sense on the timeframe around when those books could start to get back to kind of current market rates

Show response

Oorlog detailed $1.5 billion in AFS maturities over next 12 months ($500M next quarter), being redeployed into higher-yielding loans, turning from headwind to tailwind.

NTRSNorthern Trust4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
NTRS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you feeling better, worse on sort of the organic growth acceleration that you're trying to get

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

O'Grady expressed confidence but acknowledged early-stage nature of initiatives and the one-by-one client acquisition nature of wealth business vs institutional mandates.

Is that more of an effort to make that relationship stickier or is there also a material revenue pickup as they convert?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

O'Grady identified three benefits: enhanced service levels, ability to win more business from outsourcing demand, and improved scalability of the bespoke UHNW offering.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how do you think about the organic growth from here, the trade-off between that and the improving incremental margins?

Show response

O'Grady explained disciplined bidding with higher-margin business and improved pricing conditions in the market.

pricing, you feel has been better as companies just focus more on margins. Is that the takeaway?

Show response

O'Grady confirmed pricing is better and the 2024 new business portfolio is intentionally higher-margin with 12-18 month onboarding.

Show 2 more companies
BNYBNY Mellon1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
BNY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

you mentioned earlier that you might have had record new business wins

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO disclosed 2024 fee growth split as two-thirds market/currency and one-third organic, expressing determination to grind the organic share higher through cross-selling, innovation, and platform breadth.

GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
GS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

is that FICC-- is that the FICC is already operating at a high level? Or do you see opportunities

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Coleman said FICC has multiple subcomponents with different dynamics. Solomon cautioned Q1 2024 was extraordinary making comps difficult.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
C Citigroup147%1 of 14 questions
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co.138%1 of 13 questions
STT State Street Corporation130%none of 13 questions
BAC Bank of America120%none of 12 questions
RJF Raymond James Financial1010%1 of 10 questions
NTRS Northern Trust40%none of 4 questions
BNY BNY Mellon1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • C
    Citigroup · 14 questions
    7%1 of 14 questions
  • JPM
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. · 13 questions
    8%1 of 13 questions
  • STT
    State Street Corporation · 13 questions
    0%none of 13 questions
  • BAC
    Bank of America · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • RJF
    Raymond James Financial · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • NTRS
    Northern Trust · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • BNY
    BNY Mellon · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • GS
    The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4120%none of 12 questions6
2025 Q1147%1 of 14 questions8
2025 Q2100%none of 10 questions5
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions4
2025 Q4100%none of 10 questions5
2026 Q11020%2 of 10 questions5
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q412 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 12 questions) · 6 companies
  2. 2025 Q114 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 5 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand19
  • Margin19
  • Revenue Growth18
  • Credit14
  • Capital Allocation11
  • Macroeconomic8
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Cost Pressure5
  • Regulation Policy5
  • Pricing3
Show all 15 topics
  • M&A2
  • Subscriber Growth2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Geographic Expansion1