Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Akash Tewari

Jefferies · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
32on tracked calls
Challenge rate
28%9 of 32 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 32 of 32 questions from 7 companies

BMYBristol Myers Squibb7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

You previously mentioned both bleeding events and AFib events need to mature for the trial to stop.

Show response

Massacesi gave the disclosed event thresholds for both endpoints and confirmed both must be met before database lock, with readout in first quarter 2027.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk about your confidence on the successor on study, which goes against POMALYST

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Cristian expressed high confidence in Successor1 based on Successor2 interim results and noted mezigdomide is more potent than iberdomide.

Can you talk about why you added that criteria for the study? And was it based on any issues you saw with the ADEPT II

Show response

Cristian explained biomarker selection reduces patient heterogeneity and increases confidence in enrolling true Alzheimer's patients despite slightly higher screening failures.

Calendar 2025 Q3

why hasn't the data been locked at this point? And why open more ex U.S. sites

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris declined to provide specifics on data lock or enrollment. Reiterated confidence in overall Cobenfy program citing external data, real-world feedback, and internal data.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What percentage of patients do you think for your upcoming AD Psychosis study get to that 150 or 200 mg dose

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Samit noted 4-dose escalation design with 200mg optional. Cautioned against directly comparing to 30-year-old xanomeline-only tolerability data. Conducting site reviews.

Calendar 2024 Q4

So what's the risk around the adjunct schizophrenia trial for KabEnfI? Because we haven't seen a lot of companies run that specific trial

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Samit pointed to 52-week EMERGE 4/5 data showing maintained efficacy with concomitant meds as supportive evidence for adjunct approach.

on the Camis label update, are you aiming for 6 months echo monitoring requirements

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam clarified EU label already updated to 6-month echo in maintenance phase, expecting similar U.S. PDUFA outcome to open COE capacity.

LLYLilly (Eli)6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
LLY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

it seems like your guidance is almost implying a deceleration in revs versus Q2 for the back half of the year

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Lucas Montarce explained one-off rebate adjustments, the 2025 OUS launch bolus not repeating, and normal European and U.S. seasonality.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk about some consumer analog you'd point investors towards when you're thinking about long-term penetration for both the US and OUS for your weight loss product

Show response

Dave acknowledged no perfect consumer analog exists, PDE/ED drugs had some overlap but different dynamics, cosmetics/aesthetics overlap but lack profound health benefits. Highlighted potential for subscription models, first-party data marketing, and platform-based differentiation. A million U.S. patients and hundreds of thousands more OUS already using DTC channels.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can Lilly achieve both goals of kind of preserving continuous innovation in obesity and having orfo be a drug for hundreds of millions of patients with the parity pricing model between the U.S. and...

ChallengingPricingGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dave outlined three-part framework: consumer self-pay channel is unique at scale in GLP-1s, proving long-term health benefit competes for healthcare dollars not consumer dollars, and these two goals are not in conflict. Emphasized we are literally scratching the surface of global treatment with tens or hundreds of millions more to reach.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What's Lilly's appetite to committing to launching new products at net parity pricing between the U.S. and Europe

PricingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dave supported long-term rebalancing via trade tools, not imported price controls. Favors on-ramp approach with new products, needs both European reimbursement increases and U.S. gross-to-net reform.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Would long-term net pricing have to approach insulin levels for that to become a reality?

Show response

Lucas reaffirmed pricing trends without long-term projections. Deferred to broader volume-over-price strategy and disciplined approach to optionality.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Are you implying that while you'll give additional discounts to the channel to improve access, that will be offset by improved adherence?

Show response

Lucas confirmed single-digit pricing erosion continues into 2025. Patrik added Mounjaro patients show longer adherence than Trulicity and Ozempic.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
MRK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

with sac-TMT, we've seen a signal regardless of PD-L1 expression with the OptiTROP-Lung05 and 06 data

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dean Li confirmed Merck will rethink the KEYNOTE-189 backbone and advance sac-TMT combos with both pembro and PD-1/VEGF.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I am kind of curious why your Trope-two development strategy seems to be relatively conservative

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dean pushed back on the characterization, citing 16 Phase III studies (11 first-in-class) for sac TMT and differentiated approaches in NSCLC and breast cancer.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what gets you more excited? The signal you're seeing with your TROP2 or the PD-1 VEGF class

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dean pushed back on bucketing all TROP2 ADCs together and emphasized sac-TMT differentiation, while saying PD-1/VEGF data will define its placement vs PD-1.

Calendar 2025 Q2

What's the right cadence when you think about this going forward, not only for the rest of 2025

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rob said WINREVAIR has been adding 400-500 patients per month steadily; Dean confirmed Hansoh GLP-1 moving to clinic this year as planned.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is a 25% tariff a reasonable expectation? Or do you expect the headline number to be higher

Show response

Rob declined to speculate on tariff magnitude or EPS impact, repeating that Merck is well-positioned under most scenarios.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What are the ballpark components of that $25 billion figure, particularly for the TROP2 and the Daiichi ADCs

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Rob attributed the $25B upgrade to added T-cell engager from Harpoon and stronger TROP2 conviction, noting subcu KEYTRUDA is incremental.

PFEPfizer5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
PFE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

There's been a proposal from the CMS to cut reimbursement for 340B hospital payments from ASP plus 6 to ASP minus 33%.

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Albert backed 340B reform but declined to predict enactment odds or the final shape, citing uncertainty; a partial answer on portfolio impact.

Calendar 2025 Q4

the data in second line plus NSCLC has been pretty underwhelming so far versus docetaxel. Your team confident that you can deliver a superior profile with your upcoming Phase three

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Boshoff acknowledged no ADC has shown benefit over docetaxel in second-line but cited 30%+ response rate and 16.3-month mOS in Phase II; SV plus pembro showed 57% ORR and 90%+ DCR; first-line study is event-driven with slower-than-expected events; readout expected first half 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I had a question on your upcoming Phase III EZH2 readout in CRPC. I'm surprised the study is more prominently flagged given the potential to extend the XTANDI franchise

ChallengingInnovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Boshoff cited prior randomized PFS data supporting the program; three Phase III studies ongoing; first readout in post-abiraterone mCRPC expected in coming months; ASCO food effect data confirmed comparable dose with reduced GI AEs.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Would it be fair to say that the bottom line earnings impact would be a single-digit percent basis with reasonable mitigation steps?

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bourla refused to quantify potential tariff impact, stated detailed contingency plans exist but focus is on preventing tariffs rather than mitigating them.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you don't actually test your bilayer formulation until the second half of your weight loss trial. Is that what your team is waiting on

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bourla declined to confirm formulation technology details, stating they cannot disclose; Boshoff added nothing further.

REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
REGN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you talk about the co-formulation here? How are you able to deliver both drugs in a single auto-injector

Innovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Yancopoulos credited formulations team that delivered EYLEA/EYLEA HD with solving the co-formulation challenge. Same volume as standard GLP auto-injector. Schleifer declined to comment on partnering discussions but said they are always open-minded to value-enhancing deals.

Calendar 2025 Q3

your team has retooled your commercial strategy on EYLEA, and it seems related to kind of price

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Schleifer declined to discuss rebate strategy or ground-level competitive tactics. McCourt attributed EYLEA HD performance to product profile and clinical efficacy. Schleifer added that significant upswing requires label enhancements. McCourt guided moderate to high single digit sequential demand growth for HD.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Interestingly, the ASP actually hasn't declined that much, suggesting Amgen may be offering deferred discounts

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Schleifer hinted that Amgen's deferred rebate practices may be driving PAVBLU success and said they are looking into it. Emphasized EYLEA's 100 million injection track record and positioned EYLEA HD as the real answer to biosimilar competition.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you comment on what percent of your U.S. patient base received funding in 2024

Show response

Schleifer firmly declined all questions connecting charitable contributions to EYLEA volumes, citing regulatory restrictions. Reiterated matching program concept without committing to timeline.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Regeneron is the only company that's shown an incremental benefit in a total knee replacement study versus Eliquis

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Yancopoulos explained dual-antibody strategy: 7508 (catalytic domain) for maximum anticoagulation, 9933 (A2 domain) for patients with highest bleeding risk. Designed for different patients and indications.

AMGNAmgen Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What's the baseline LDL-C in the OCEAN trial you are planning? Or, like, is it in the same level?

Show response

Gordon said OCEAN(a) targets Lp(a) >200 for a higher-risk group and argued Lp(a) elevation is a risk factor independent of LDL-C; did not state a specific OCEAN LDL-C baseline.

Calendar 2026 Q1

you are making an interesting bet, splitting it up into systemic and symptomatic patients. What kind of drove that decision?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jay explained the heterogeneous disease presentation warranted separate studies to capture distinct clinical outcomes. Differentiated dazodalibep's CD40L mechanism from discontinued Novartis CD40 approach.

Show 1 more company
GILDGilead Sciences1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
GILD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

How much of that NPV was driven by ovarian and the signal you are seeing there for 040 versus the potential to take this into lung

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management outlined multiple value sources: ovarian cancer alone justifies the deal, the P5 linker and ALCO-5 platform technologies provide differentiation, and TUB-30 adds broader tumor-type potential.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb729%2 of 7 questions
LLY Lilly (Eli)633%2 of 6 questions
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.633%2 of 6 questions
PFE Pfizer560%3 of 5 questions
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals50%none of 5 questions
AMGN Amgen Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
GILD Gilead Sciences1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 7 questions
    29%2 of 7 questions
  • LLY
    Lilly (Eli) · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • MRK
    Merck & Co., Inc. · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • PFE
    Pfizer · 5 questions
    60%3 of 5 questions
  • REGN
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • GILD
    Gilead Sciences · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4617%1 of 6 questions5
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q2425%1 of 4 questions4
2025 Q3580%4 of 5 questions5
2025 Q4450%2 of 4 questions4
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q2520%1 of 5 questions5
  1. 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 80% (4 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D19
  • Competitive Dynamics11
  • Pricing8
  • Demand4
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Product Launch2
  • Margin2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Revenue Growth1
Show all 13 topics
  • M&A1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Geographic Expansion1