Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Gavin Parsons
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 44on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 44 questions
- Companies
- 10questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 44 of 44 questions from 10 companies
TXTTextron8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Is that purely internal productivity? Or does that also include an assumption that the supply chain improves?
Show response
CFO quantified it as roughly a 50-50 split between internal producibility work and external supplier resolution.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what are the hurdles to getting this done? And is there a minimum return threshold you're looking forward to ensure it's not a dilutive transaction
Show response
Atherton said too early to comment on dilution specifics. New Textron's higher growth and stronger margins should support stronger valuation over time. Past attempts were deferred because industrial end markets were not in a strong enough position.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if I could just dig into the industrial margins a little bit, light in '25, but expanding in '26
Show response
Rosenberg said Kautex profitability improving despite end market challenges. TSV has tariff absorption headwinds. Golf remains steady. Cost reduction activities at TSV combined with stable golf are driving 2026 improvement.
Business jet demand is pretty strong overall, but it does seem like large cabin maybe is the strongest segment at the moment. Is there any opportunity there to add a larger aircraft to the Cessna f...
Show response
Atherton said three blockpoint upgrades jammed into year-end created bumpiness. Prefers one blockpoint and one clean sheet at a time. Current focus is Denali certification and entry into service, not a new large cabin platform.
Calendar 2025 Q2
once you get through Denali, any categories where you see the opportunity for new aircraft in aviation
Show response
Donnelly declined to comment on future aircraft programs beyond those already announced.
Is the second half of this year pretty normal? So as we think about going beyond '25, is that a good baseline
Show response
Donnelly confirmed strike disruptions behind them. Expects margin rates within guided range and expansion going into 2026.
Calendar 2024 Q4
anything you can give us on what you're expecting on net price and performance for '25
Show response
Donnelly said pricing positive but offset by inflation with minimal net spread. Margin recovery driven by factory performance improvement.
I was hoping you could give us some sense of how much of that excess cost you're absorbing in that 12% to 13% margin guide
Show response
Donnelly said the period expense was a Q4 issue only; FY2025 guide is built on normal volumes with no carryover from 2024 strike costs.
NOCNorthrop Grumman7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
have you had any additional conversations with customers about increasing the program of record beyond a 100 units
Show response
Kathy said the Air Force agreement allows acceleration into a larger program of record and expects a conclusion by year end.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you mind clarifying the b '21 investment comment you made, the the 2 billion to $3 billion Is that before or after an acceleration
Show response
Warden clarified $2-3B is specifically for the acceleration scenario, over a multi-year period to reach accelerated production rates.
Looks like you're absorbing higher CapEx in your free cash flow guidance this year, but do you still have line of sight to $4 billion in 2028
Show response
Warden deferred 2028 FCF target, saying B-21 acceleration and other pending awards will set CapEx profile. Capital deployment discipline unchanged; will update 2027-2028 as opportunities firm up.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you guys spend more on CapEx than most of your peers in the industry. I mean, does that enable more than maybe mid-single-digit growth over the long term
Show response
Warden said investment can enable above mid-single-digit growth, citing DS as case study where capacity investment translated to highest segment growth rates.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if that would allow you to reopen pricing on the LRIP or if that's only on future lots
Show response
Warden confirmed opportunity to earn improved returns on both remaining LRIP lots AND NTE units, with clarity expected in coming months.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Aeronautics margin pressure, not too much year over year in 2025, given the B-21 ramp, I mean is there any change in the dilution consideration
Show response
Crews confirmed core aeronautics drove double-digit returns in first three quarters, offsetting B-21 LRIP dilution to maintain mid-to-high 9% margins.
How big is the microelectronics business?
Show response
Warden declined to size it specifically, explaining most revenue shows up embedded in space and mission systems segments.
TDGTransDigm Group7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
usually, your aftermarket activity lags flight activity by maybe a couple of quarters.
Show response
Patrick acknowledged limited forward visibility, noting aftermarket books and ships about 50% in the same quarter and that predicting three to four quarters out is hard.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Was the destocking last year more specific to the first half or second half?
Show response
Mike said destocking was fairly uniformly distributed throughout FY2025, bouncing around a bit quarter to quarter but generally consistent.
does that suggest that your core growth is more like 9% or 10% for aftermarket?
Show response
Mike acknowledged about half the 5-6pp peer growth gap comes from distributor and airline inventory lumpiness. Difficult to quantify precisely since airline inventory data is limited. Distributor data is tracked but airline data is less detailed.
Calendar 2025 Q3
On the 200 basis points of M&A dilution
Show response
Mike confirmed Simmonds and Servotronics are coming in at lower margins than the typical TransDigm acquisition. But in the fullness of time, both businesses have great potential for significant margin improvement.
do you feel like on a volume basis, you're pretty aligned with OEMs at this point?
Show response
Mike said destocking was a temporary phenomenon that lasted a quarter or two. Does not expect further headwind. FY2026 OEM guidance has a wider bracket than typical due to ramp-up challenges and unforeseen events in past two years.
Calendar 2024 Q3
it looks like dedicated freight flights returned to growth a couple of months ago. Give a sense for roughly how long that tend to take
Show response
Mike expected freight to transition to positive growth in FY2025 as it laps easier comps, estimating a couple of quarters for the transition.
have you guys acted as any buffer between kind of Boeing and your smaller tier suppliers to prevent the whipsaw
Show response
Mike indicated TDG generally avoids over-stressing small suppliers and expects operating units to have inventory ready to step up when rates recover.
LDOSLeidos6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I apologize if I missed your expectation for the timing of the RFP. Are you still expecting that this year?
Show response
Bell expects the draft RFP any day, a formal RFP 30-45-60 days later, and bids near year-end with decisions early next year; the current regions contract is likely extended up to 6 months.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you hold and expand the mid-thirteen percent EBITDA margin beyond 26
Show response
Cage pointed to Homeland and Defense as longer-term margin expansion opportunities. Bell added the Enterprise Transformation office led by Will Johnson will drive overhead reductions, and Entrust is expected to be margin accretive. Both confirmed margin expansion journey is not complete.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I would just love to clarify what you're assuming for the shutdown impact in 4Q
Show response
Cage explained wider ranges accommodate shutdown extension risk; quick resolution points to high end of guidance. Cash collections could leak into 2026. Investment focused on prototypes, AI, Huntsville capacity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
funded, maybe has been trending a little lighter. Any dynamics to call out there
Show response
Cage attributed lighter funded backlog to procurement slowdowns and incremental funding shifts, calling it a symptom of the environment. Bell emphasized line of sight to funding sources and confidence in cash flowing to contracts.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Have you already taken that out of backlog and does the GSA review complete?
Show response
Cage confirmed contracts not removed from backlog; some de-scopes occurred. Bell emphasized guidance reiteration already incorporates possible revenue degradation from administration actions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
will you be able to still grow EBITDA and free cash flow through that contract transition?
Show response
Cage directly confirmed EBITDA growth expectation through the VBA transition horizon, citing growth pillars and other health/civil momentum areas. Will provide through-2028 view at Investor Day.
LMTLockheed Martin4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
whether anything changes operationally or financially when you firm up the UCaaS into true multiyears
Show response
Management said the UCAs already enable full-speed ramp and supplier alignment; converting to multiyear procurements will finalize delivery schedules and profit mechanisms.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is there any customer support or CapEx reimbursement in your operating cash flow? And then on the PAC-3 and THAAD frameworks, could you talk a little bit more about how those are structured, maybe ...
Show response
Evan confirmed customer partnership on cash flow terms with elevated working capital benefits to offset CapEx. Jim described profit-sharing incentive structure where above-target performance triggers reinvestment back into spare parts, tooling, and factory equipment rather than pure profit extraction.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is there a way to quantify what say, 100 basis points step up in CapEx would convert to in terms of revenue growth?
Show response
Evan noted historical 2.5% of revenue CapEx ratio likely holds for prior trending, but potential munitions scale-up could require more capital investment. More clarity in January.
Calendar 2024 Q4
given a lot of moving pieces in cash flow like the F-35 inventory unwind pension contribution recovery, Lot 18 cash timing
Show response
Jay bridged from $6.1B adjusted to $6.7B midpoint via ~$1B F-35 delivery benefit net of $600M lower international advances ($400M net), plus tax benefits and cash-based net income improvement.
GEGE Aerospace3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
CFM56 retirements trending lower than expected, 2%, despite successful LEAP deliveries. Expecting that to pick up to 3% or 4%
Show response
Larry said 2025 retirements ended at about 1.6%, now expecting 2% in 2026, better than prior 2-3% range. CFM56 shop visits in 2,300-2,400 range through 2028 with no big decline expected even into 2030. Driven by demand keeping fleets in service.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Obviously strong CES order growth in the quarter, but you still do have that conservatism in the second half of the year
Show response
Larry said departures were up 4% in Q2 in line with Q1, full-year low single digits. No change in customer behavior on fleet plans or skylines. Called the 2H view 'a touch conservative' but comfortable with it.
Calendar 2024 Q4
where the bottlenecks or the pain points still are and if that's a linear improvement through '25
Show response
Larry said no step function improvement expected; progress will come in fits and starts with 500+ GE resources embedded in the supply base.
Show 4 more companies
RTXRTX Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
I guess I wanted to ask about 2026 free cash flow conversion.
Show response
Mitchill described $8-8.5B baseline FCF ex-powder metal. FCF guide held due to inventory stocking for growth and some Q4-to-Q3 advance timing shifts. Long-term 90-100% conversion target.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What's the right medium-term margin rate for Pratt?
Show response
Mitchill said Pratt margins should expand sequentially through 2025-2027 toward low-to-mid-teens. V2500 shop visits and mix trending higher than expected a year ago.
Calendar 2025 Q1
given you did 10.7% in the first quarter with $15 million of productivity, I guess, first, is there anything abnormal in that margin?
Show response
Mitchill confirmed path to 12%+ Raytheon margins with favorable international mix trend. On track for $100M full-year productivity improvement, aided by supply chain health.
BAThe Boeing Company2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
you're restricted from looking at all of BDS previously. So have you been able to get under the hood of all those programs
Show response
Malave doing strategic, operational, and financial reviews across BDS programs. Not a deep-dive EAC circumvention but holistic baselining. Team improving each day and focused on customer commitments.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I just wanted to follow up on that BCA margin question a little bit with the price side of that, the price-cost mix
Show response
Management said backlog has embedded escalation, supply contracts signed through end of decade. Inventory at $87.5 billion is too high but was deliberate investment in stability.
GDGeneral Dynamics2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
Did you book any G800s in the first quarter?
Show response
Confirmed G800 orders booked in Q1 with additional interest post-certification, noted G650 end of production will further stimulate G800 demand
you mentioned the improvement in the G700 margin was 1Q better than your plan. And do you still expect a step down in the 2Q and 3Q margin?
Show response
Confirmed Q2/Q3 margin step-down still expected per January guidance, will update at Q2 if trajectory changes
LHXL3Harris2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
What's a good baseline for the Aerojet margin?
Show response
Bedingfield cited development programs (NGI, Sentinel, GPI) keeping margins in mid-12s range. New contracts expected to deliver better economic margins to fund capacity investment.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you size the drag on revenue growth from the LHX NeXt savings outperformance?
Show response
Bedingfield quantified about half of incremental LHX NeXt savings as revenue headwind and confirmed CAS is in 2025 but not in 2026 framework.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TXT Textron | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| NOC Northrop Grumman | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TDG TransDigm Group | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| LDOS Leidos | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| LMT Lockheed Martin | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| GE GE Aerospace | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| BA The Boeing Company | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| GD General Dynamics | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LHX L3Harris | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- TXTTextron · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- NOCNorthrop Grumman · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- TDGTransDigm Group · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- LDOSLeidos · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- LMTLockheed Martin · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- GEGE Aerospace · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- RTXRTX Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- BAThe Boeing Company · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- GDGeneral Dynamics · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- LHXL3Harris · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin15
- Demand12
- Revenue Growth12
- Product Launch7
- Capital Allocation6
- Capex Investment5
- Supply Chain4
- Cost Pressure4
- Regulation Policy3
- Pricing3
Show all 15 topics
- Guidance Reliability2
- Inventory2
- M&A2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Competitive Dynamics1