Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jon Chappell

Evercore ISI · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
49on tracked calls
Challenge rate
20%10 of 49 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 49 of 49 questions from 8 companies

CSXCSX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
CSX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

would you expect to see a kind of normal seasonal trend as we go through the second half of this year?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said PS&O initiatives continue, agreed incentive comp will largely offset the July union wage increase, and flagged fuel as the biggest swing factor with slightly better-than-normal seasonality into Q3.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is this a function of some of the index headwinds finally easing? Is it a mix benefit?

Show response

Maryclare explained export coal benchmarks stabilized vs Q4, domestic demand strong from power and data centers, uncertainty on utility closures.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is it kind of stabilized from this 4Q exit rate? Or is there some improvement baked into what's very important yield line item

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mary Claire discussed mix impacts with stronger growth in lower-RPU segments. Kevin added coal RPU comps ease after Q1 and should be more stable to slightly down, with longer domestic hauls from southern utility demand helping.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you help us think about the exit rate some of these important cost line items starting in 4Q and going into 2026

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Sean provided detailed Q3-to-Q4 walk: $30M severance/restructuring rolls off, $15M network disruption benefit, but other revenue normalizes down and incentive comp up $10-20M. Approximately $100M of non-recurring costs provide 2026 tailwind.

Calendar 2025 Q2

in prior quarters, you typically give the sequential outlook on coal RPU, which is obviously very important

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sean said Q3 coal RPU roughly similar to Q2 with possible modest decline. H1 commodity headwinds were $200M; H2 expected ~$100M with two-thirds in Q3. Q4 comps easier for year-over-year growth.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is that all incremental to what you've identified in January? And is that all ring-fenced to one Q

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sean broke down the $45M: $20-25M expected reroute costs plus $20-25M incremental from weather/congestion. Said the latter won't fully come out in Q2 given early April challenges but will improve.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do we think about it as 4% on average, but try to get the quarterly cadence more aligned with typically kind of lower cost per employee in the first quarter

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Sean provided detailed modeling framework: Q4 base plus $1,500 incentive comp add-back for H1 run rate, then add 4% for H2 wage inflation. Lower health and welfare costs may provide upside.

FDXFedEx7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 7 challenging
FDX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Is there any way to replicate, at least some broad based number what that market looks like today?

Show response

Carere said the space is an ecosystem hard to size precisely, but it is the fastest-growing of the four verticals across industrial and AI bases.

Calendar 2026 Q1

If you look at the margin at FedEx Freight, it's like at a 5-year low. I understand that the macro is not great

ChallengingMarginDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Marshall Witt acknowledged broader LTL market weakness and need to improve yield growth through customer experience, pricing discipline, and dedicated sales team. John Smith highlighted completion of dedicated LTL sales force hiring with data-driven personalized approach.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how much of that is completely new volume business, how much of that is related to kind of yield and some of the surcharges

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Carere clarified B2B was nearly half (not over half) of growth, driven by new acquisition, share of wallet, and strongest small business B2B quarter in years. Expects consistency Q1 through Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you have to get to the midpoint or even the low end of the full year revenue guide, the rate of change will have to accelerate from the 3%

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Carere bridged Q1 to full-year: USPS $280M headwind lapses in Q2, new customer onboarding still ramping (Amazon minimal in Q1), and Freight yields improve in back half. Called midpoint very realistic.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how much of that $170 million is at least as it relates to the first quarter? Is strictly revenue and how much of it is cost

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dietrich declined to break down revenue vs cost components of the $170M headwind, noting it's a fluid situation with capacity being redirected rather than simply removed. Subramaniam credited Tricolor for enabling the flex.

Calendar 2025 Q1

The higher inflation element of the cost side seems to be pretty new. Is there any way to quantify exactly how much

ChallengingCost PressureGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Dietrich acknowledged inflation as a constant factor but did not quantify the specific dollar impact on the guidance change, citing PT costs, volume-linked costs, and employee wages as ongoing pressures.

Calendar 2024 Q4

as it relates to tariffs, have you heard from your customers about any pull forward?

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brie acknowledged some possible pull-forward from ports in December but said it's hard to separate from consumer demand during peak. Raj emphasized FedEx's agility and customs clearance expertise.

JBHTJ.B. Hunt7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
JBHT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is that a number now for volume in the second half of the year that continues to build off of that 12%?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Darren declined a volume forecast, stressing disciplined growth and strong demand while flagging drayage/driver capacity as a constraint.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does it feel today that there is a better pricing opportunity, whether it be for 2026 or 2027, than you maybe anticipated back in January

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Spencer described capacity as having inverted with regulatory enforcement accelerating. Cited pattern matching to 2017-2018 ELD cycle and 2020-2022 demand cycle: spot moves first, then contract highway (3-6 months), then intermodal (6-12 months). Nick confirmed big shift from first to second half of bid season with customers more willing on rate increases. Darren noted 7% Eastern growth on top of 13% comp proves road-to-rail conversion.

Calendar 2025 Q4

when would we need to see kind of this continuation of the last six weeks holding into

Show response

Darren said intermodal expecting normal Q1 seasonality but encouraged by January. Nick Hobbs said need consistency in overall market, not just JBHT volumes, before signaling on rates. Shelley noted caution from false starts in previous years. Brad Delco noted market tightness in Q1 is unique and worth watching.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you look at revenue per load in both intermodal and you had a pretty nice sequential improvement

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Darren Field explained Q3 reflects fully implemented bid season with positive headhaul pricing offset by negative backhaul pricing, netting to -1% reported. TransCon volumes up sequentially contributing to mix shift. Nick Hobbs attributed ICS improvement to targeting harder, less commoditized freight.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Think about the revenue per load cadence for the next four quarters. Like the cake is baked in the mid-26

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Darren confirmed core pricing slightly positive but mix (Eastern growth vs flat TransCon) heavily influencing reported yields. Brad Delco noted 30bps sequential margin improvement despite yield decline.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if that's one of the scenarios that you're potentially considering, how does J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. manage your assets

Trade TariffsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Spencer said they will not change pricing direction based on import decline fears. Noted that customers are already aggressively shifting country of origin sourcing.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what steps can you take that are in your own control that you can start improving both of those metrics without getting more help from the broader market

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Shelley Simpson identified three controllable levers: improving intermodal network balance (loaded vs empty), continued cost control, and scaling revenue into the existing cost base.

ODFLOld Dominion Freight Line7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
ODFL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

we have been hearing a lot about freight shifting from a tight TL market to LTL? Are you seeing that?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Direct answer with a stage read and a specific reason: no meaningful weight per shipment change yet in 3PL managed business.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Do you get a sense that there was any pull forward into the first quarter? And does that help framing kind of the way you're thinking about the second quarter

Show response

Marty directly denied pull forward, attributing volume improvement to truckload reversion. Adam added optimism from customers through the balance of the year, expecting continued sequential improvement.

Calendar 2025 Q4

If you took that February, March midpoint of one q enrolled seasonality going forward, where would that put your tonnage on a year-over-year basis?

Show response

Adam outlined Q2 normal seasonality: +7% sequential revenue, 300-350bp OR improvement. That would put Q2 OR roughly flat YoY. Declined to do full-year OR math but noted 10-year average net income growth of ~15% despite 3-year freight recession. Referenced 300+bp OR improvement years in strong demand environments.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm pretty sure you still put in your annual wage increase on September 1. So was this a function of headcount numbers coming down

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Headcount down ~6% YoY vs shipments down ~8%. Normal attrition expected to continue in Q4. Combined salary and operating supplies typically increase ~170bp Q3 to Q4.

Calendar 2025 Q2

operating supplies and expenses have actually improved by 80 basis points as a percentage of revenue in 2Q. So did something happen in 2Q that really helped you

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Fleet reduction removed older high-repair-cost equipment. Cost per mile improved after double-digit increases in 2022-2023. Q3 pressure expected from higher fuel prices.

Calendar 2025 Q1

If you could just provide the breakdown of that on tonnage and yield ex fuel understanding there's a few days left

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam guided Q2 rev per hundredweight ex-fuel at 5-5.5%, a slight acceleration. Successfully getting increases through bids. Market share maintained at 12-13%.

Calendar 2024 Q4

do we expect, you know, four service centers or less in 2025? And, you know, if we do get that inflection second half of the year

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam said openings will be demand-driven. Over 30% excess capacity means no urgency, but several facilities near completion ready to activate quickly.

UNPUnion Pacific Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 4 of 7 challenging
UNP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

You raised the EPS guide versus 3 months ago while also raising the outlook for your most important cost line item

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Hamann attributed the raised EPS guide to stronger volumes and efficient handling, without isolating a single driver.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what kind of volume growth can the current system handle without needing to add extra resources

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Eric, Kenny, and Jim detailed latent capacity from train length improvements, terminal investments, and operating 24% fewer trains than 2019 at higher volumes with over 100 parked locomotives available.

Calendar 2025 Q4

You said price may not be a driver of improving margins in 2026 and the accelerated inflation

ChallengingMarginPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jennifer explained coal pricing tailwinds won't repeat, weak domestic intermodal market limits pricing, but Eric's productivity gains and more favorable business mix in 2026 will drive OR improvement.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you be as nimble and reap as much productivity if volumes continue to be weaker than expected

ChallengingCost PressureM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Eric detailed the volume-down playbook: maintain all buffers, adjust transportation plan for crew and train starts, rightsize locomotive and car fleets, then adjust hiring by geography if prolonged weakness persists.

Calendar 2025 Q2

why now potentially think on a multiyear distraction that could potentially sidetrack the organic momentum that you're already building

ChallengingM&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jim framed the NS discussions as forward-looking evolution, arguing that strong fundamentals enable pursuing what's possible rather than standing still.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Do you keep a level of resiliency in case things are kind of short-lived and kinda just focus on service and making sure you're prepared for the upturn

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Eric detailed the systematic approach: first fill latent capacity, then combo trains, then add/remove symbols, supported by the new adaptive planning technology.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what are some of the other initiatives you're looking at '25 to kind of maintain or manage that cost inflation

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim Vena detailed over 75 productivity initiatives spanning terminal automation, workforce scheduling, purchase services, and technology deployment.

CHRWC.H. Robinson6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
CHRW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how much of that improvement in Global Forwarding is C. H. specific that's sticky through cycle

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Damon attributed Global Forwarding's performance to Lean AI and lean principles rather than market tailwinds, calling the ~30% mid-cycle margin sustainable.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you give more tangible evidence of how you've managed these first 2 quarters differently than from prior up cycles

ChallengingMarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

NAST president said lean AI tools now identify supply chain breaking points same day vs weeks/months previously. Conversations with customers happen in real-time with disciplined decisions together. CFO added they change strategies hundreds of times a month with surgical revenue management.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if there's any way to give any tangible evidence or any way to kind of explain why it would be shorter and maybe less painful this time around

ChallengingMarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

NAST president said Q4 tested these capabilities during spot spike and they handled it better than the market and better than they would have historically. Cost-of-hire advantage widened during the quarter. Key question is what demand signal looks like, confident they'll manage squeeze faster with real demand recovery.

Calendar 2025 Q3

On this '26 updated operating income bridge, you already spoke to some of the challenges in Global Forwarding. I think when you introduced this, you had said Global Forwarding would be kind of run ...

Guidance ReliabilityM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO clarified incremental pressure is from truckload rates not recovering as expected, not GF rates. GF performing as expected. M&A bar extremely high; 2026 walk over-indexed to organic. When inorganic move happens, it will be obvious to investors. CEO emphasized disciplined and measured approach.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you just remind us about your capabilities of some of the financial offerings, fintech, so to speak

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

NAST president described Robinson Financial partnership with Triumph for carrier payments. Ecosystem approach combining most loads, best people, and financial support to differentiate.

Calendar 2024 Q4

how do you think about balancing this desire to win back the Robinson share or, again better while still keeping some of these profitability threshold

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO emphasized operating model provides flexibility for either slow burn or aggressive turn. NAST president added pricing and costing engines give them tools to win share in any market.

Show 2 more companies
NSCNorfolk Southern Railway4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
NSC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I can't find another time where your fuel consumption was down 4Q to 1Q, especially given weather

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

John acknowledged some accounting adjustments benefited the sequential number but confirmed genuine sequential improvement from precision fueling and energy management programs stretching over several years.

you're in this tight little range all year last year, about 19.3 to 19.4, stepped down about 300 in 1Q. What happened?

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

John attributed headcount reduction to zero-based plan restructuring of train starts and crew productivity gains. Mark added complexity of managing 90 different crew bases with varying hiring needs.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you also said you expect the headwinds to persist. If we look at export benchmarks and even your Eastern peer last week made it seem like the coal RPU pressure would stop at least sequentially

PricingMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CMO clarified sequential coal RPU likely flat but year-over-year still double-digit down for both met and utility export. Expects persistence through Q4 and into early next year. Volume degradation now beginning from poor pricing environment.

Calendar 2025 Q1

As we think about getting to the $150 million and more importantly, the plus component of that $150 million

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed labor productivity and fuel efficiency as biggest Q1 drivers, with purchase services and equipment rents also contributing. COO added freight car maintenance, loss and damage, and materials management improvements.

UPSUnited Parcel Service4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
UPS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How do you feel about the capacity on the go forward? Do you think that you're in a situation where you're rightsized

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dykes said capacity is at the intended level and automation adds scaling flexibility; Tome quantified the automation gain in packages.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Was there something temporary in 1Q that enabled you to beat by so much relative to what you were expecting

Revenue GrowthTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Brian said China-U.S. declines were less severe than expected and some trade lane recovery is emerging. Caution on Q2 due to lapping liberation Day and de minimis changes, plus Middle East conflict adding network costs.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I thought we're supposed to be around 30% at this point. So maybe just help us understand where you are as we think about exit rate in 4Q?

ChallengingDemandCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Carol explained total Amazon decline lower than 30% because retained volume (returns) is growing. Exited volume is on plan. Unknown executive detailed best production rates in 12-20 years across network. Brian confirmed margin expansion on 12.3% ADV decline demonstrates strong execution.

Calendar 2024 Q4

we're kind of hearing in the market and Carol highlighted some of the challenges on kind of core volume of some pricing pressure overall

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Carol cited strong Q4 keep rates. Brian broke down RPP growth: one-third base rate, one-third customer mix (SMB shift), one-third premium product wins. 96% of deals under $10M priced through Deal Manager.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CSX CSX Corporation70%none of 7 questions
FDX FedEx743%3 of 7 questions
JBHT J.B. Hunt70%none of 7 questions
ODFL Old Dominion Freight Line70%none of 7 questions
UNP Union Pacific Corporation757%4 of 7 questions
CHRW C.H. Robinson633%2 of 6 questions
NSC Norfolk Southern Railway40%none of 4 questions
UPS United Parcel Service425%1 of 4 questions
  • CSX
    CSX Corporation · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • FDX
    FedEx · 7 questions
    43%3 of 7 questions
  • JBHT
    J.B. Hunt · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • ODFL
    Old Dominion Freight Line · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • UNP
    Union Pacific Corporation · 7 questions
    57%4 of 7 questions
  • CHRW
    C.H. Robinson · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • NSC
    Norfolk Southern Railway · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • UPS
    United Parcel Service · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q470%none of 7 questions7
2025 Q1617%1 of 6 questions6
2025 Q2617%1 of 6 questions6
2025 Q3838%3 of 8 questions8
2025 Q4633%2 of 6 questions6
2026 Q1922%2 of 9 questions8
2026 Q2714%1 of 7 questions7
  1. 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 7 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 38% (3 of 8 questions) · 8 companies
  5. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 33% (2 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 22% (2 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
  7. 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 7 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cost Pressure16
  • Margin13
  • Demand12
  • Pricing12
  • Competitive Dynamics10
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • Capex Investment4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Trade Tariffs4
Show all 15 topics
  • Labor Market3
  • M&A3
  • Supply Chain2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Macroeconomic1