Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Andre Madrid

BTIG · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
10on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 10 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 10 of 10 questions from 2 companies

RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

could we get an update on the Mars Telecommunications Orbiter program?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Beck said Rocket Lab feels strongly positioned for NASA's Mars Telecommunications Orbiter given its level of capability and experience but is awaiting NASA's procurement process, hopefully with news this month.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how much of Space Systems revenue is being consumed internally versus third parties this year?

Show response

Spice said the internal-versus-merchant split varies by product (solar mostly merchant, electric propulsion initially internal), all serving both.

Calendar 2025 Q3

when does the shutdown pose a significant risk to your internal '26 outlook and beyond?

Regulation PolicyCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Beck said the shutdown has not dramatically affected Rocket Lab; a large SDA payment arrived Friday and program need is expanding.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was just wondering if you guys are looking at doing something similar as opposed to doing any M&A.

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Beck said vertical integration means Rocket Lab needs fewer partnerships to deliver a Golden Dome solution.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can we get another update maybe on Electron reusability, some milestones to look forward to?

Product LaunchCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Beck said Electron reusability is paused to concentrate engineers on Neutron, given Neutron's much larger sticker price.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you maybe walk us through how you'd expect this application to really contribute to the business through the years?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Beck deflected on applications timing, emphasizing Neutron as the prerequisite needle-mover for a constellation.

GDGeneral Dynamics4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
GD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you maybe tell us what the book-to-bill was for the quarter and for the year? And how are you thinking about demand moving into '26

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Danny confirmed European Land Systems Q4 book-to-bill over 4:1, expects ELS to be fastest-growing Combat segment with real acceleration in 2027 and beyond as long-cycle programs move to production

I know back at AUSA in October, you highlighted some of the demand that you're seeing around UGVs. We've seen them being used to extreme effect in Eastern Europe right now

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Noted US Army modernization transition toward advanced unmanned systems, mobile protected firepower, and GPS-denied capabilities, confirmed GD has invested to support growth but declined to set specific UGV benchmark

Calendar 2025 Q1

I think some of your peers pointed out a slower pace of contract awards in the first quarter. Did you see anything of this nature?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Aiken noted Technologies had encouraging 1.1x book-to-bill despite industry sluggishness, characterized solicitation slowdown as not aberrationally different from past transitions

do you think there's a reluctance moving forward for allies to work with U.S. contractors?

Trade TariffsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Distinguished GD's European Land Systems as locally run and sourced, insulated from buy-local pressures, confirmed increased European demand in Q1

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
GD General Dynamics40%none of 4 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • GD
    General Dynamics · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand4
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Product Launch2
  • Credit1
  • M&A1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Trade Tariffs1
Show all 11 topics
  • Capital Allocation1