Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Andrew Percoco

Morgan Stanley · covers Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, Energy, Utilities

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters; questions recorded in 5).

Questions
27on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%3 of 27 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 27 of 27 questions from 8 companies

GMGeneral Motors6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
GM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you anticipating a mix shift more towards crossovers, understanding they're more profitable today

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barra rejected the predicted downshift to smaller vehicles, citing sustained full-size truck and SUV demand with GM building all it can sell.

get a better understanding of your thought process around sodium ion and what you see as the commercialization timeline

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barra framed sodium-ion as a capital-efficient partnership with Peak Energy for lower-cost grid storage, targeting production-validated cells in 2027, 2028.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how do you tap into that 35 million to 40 million other vehicles that don't currently have any subscription

Subscriber GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul acknowledged hardware limitations on the existing car park but framed it as sizing the future opportunity; SDV 2.0 expansion and cost improvements will expand addressable base.

What's some of the gating factors in expanding that? Is it regulatory? Is it your own kind of risk appetite

Innovation & R&DRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mary cited LIDAR mapping requirements and deliberate focus on highway and major road coverage; noted continuous expansion beyond initial launch footprint while prioritizing safety and trust.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you maybe just give us a roadmap for what improvements consumers might expect to see going forward

Innovation & R&DGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mary said unannounced features coming for Super Cruise. International expansion to Korea, Middle East, and Europe on track with no regulatory barriers expected. Full roadmap details not shared publicly.

Can you maybe just talk to I know it's obviously overnight some headlines that it might be going back to 25%. What would that mean for you?

Show response

Mary said guidance assumes Korea at 15%. If temporarily reverts to 25%, GM will work to offset the headwind. Paul added net tariffs expected lower in 2026 than 2025 from annualization of go-to-market and fixed cost savings, exceeding 40% offset.

LCIDLucid Group, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
LCID company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what your philosophy or your strategy is in terms of potentially consolidating Midsize production into AMP-1

ChallengingCapex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Napoli explained AMP-1 is designed for Air/Gravity and adding a Midsize line would create inefficiencies, hence the dedicated AMP-2 in Saudi Arabia.

What's the proportion for split between Gravity and Air within that?

Show response

Boussaid declined a category breakdown but confirmed most on-hand inventory is Gravity-related.

Calendar 2026 Q1

to what extent are you seeing any kind of incremental pressure there? And might that impact that path to profitability?

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Winterhoff said commodity pressure is very limited, with recent aluminum flat and DRAM small relative to BOM, no major impact versus year-end.

help provide a little bit more context around what some of the underlying assumptions are within that?

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Boussaid pointed to seasonality and stop-sale recovery, saying not to read through Q1 cash performance, but declined a specific cash-burn guide.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you just elaborate in terms of what your expectations are there?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winterhoff said Air/Gravity are large for Europe so limited near-term growth, with Europe becoming bigger once Midsize arrives.

can you just help us bridge some of the moving pieces for 2026? Obviously, you'll have an increase in production

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winterhoff detailed volume-driven fixed-cost absorption, productivity, quality/scrap reduction and BOM improvements as 2026 margin levers.

BEBloom Energy Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
BE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm just curious if you've seen any shift to the right in those types of conversations.

Guidance ReliabilityDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sridhar conceded individual projects may slip but argued the executable pool is deep enough to hold guidance. Answered the substance.

You mentioned 100-basis-point margin impact from tariffs, but you reiterated the gross margin guidance.

ChallengingTrade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sridhar clarified directly: the 29% guide stands and the 100bp is to be absorbed through cost reduction, not passed to customers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

should we expect to see more of those types of agreements in 2025, where it's with a large utility

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Sridhar confirmed multiple utility conversations and explained the ratepayer construct as the long pole, but explicitly declined to give timing.

Can you just talk about how you're thinking about funding this growth?

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Both Sridhar and Berenbaum answered directly on capital efficiency, tripling capacity for roughly $150 million, and no factoring in Q4.

FFord Motor Company4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
F company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you engaging with the hyperscalers about direct off take?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Farley said demand is strong across a broad customer base beyond utilities and put Ford in roughly the third inning of selling out its 2028 20-GWh capacity.

Calendar 2026 Q1

So you essentially beat by $2.5 billion in the first quarter, of which a little bit over $1 billion is from IEEPA.

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

House reiterated the three drivers and said timing differences were intentionally excluded from the guide; did not give a detailed bridge.

Calendar 2025 Q4

hoping you can provide a little bit more context around your capital allocation decision there

Capital AllocationInnovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Farley positioned Ford Energy as high-growth adjacency with LFP technology advantage (CATL license) vs competitors importing with tariffs or using higher-cost lithium. 20 GWh capacity planned for 2027+. Customer-facing end-to-end solutions, not contract manufacturing.

when it comes to your autonomy strategy, sounds like you're trying to do a lot of that yourself. In-house. Can you maybe just elaborate on why that's the right decision?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Farley explained L3 in-house for two reasons: affordability (thousands per vehicle saved vs supplier solutions, enabling L3 on $30-35K vehicles not just luxury) and experience control for safety-critical highway driving. L4 strategy could be different, declined to elaborate.

TSLATesla, Inc.3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
TSLA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

there seems to be some evolving regulations at the state level, potentially around sensor requirements

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Lars gave a regulatory philosophy answer emphasizing performance-based rules rather than specifics.

are you seeing any suppliers willing to invest alongside you to set up domestic manufacturing

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Elon answered directly, citing Samsung, TSMC, Panasonic and Micron investments in fabs, cells and memory allocation.

Calendar 2025 Q4

hoping to get more information or you're hoping you could shed more light on what that looks like

Capital AllocationCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Vaibhav said the xAI investment is furtherance of Master Plan 4 and Tesla vehicles already use Grok. Musk added Grok will be key to managing a large autonomous fleet of 10M+ vehicles and orchestrating teams of Optimus robots, framing it as shareholder-requested.

GEVGE Vernova2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
GEV company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

since April second, since the implementation of the tariffs, since it appears the market's getting a lot more worried about a recession. Have you seen any change in behavior from your customers

MacroeconomicTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Strazik confirmed no change in customer behavior or growth trajectory since tariff announcement, emphasizing cost pressures require countermeasures but demand remains strong.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you maybe just give us your latest thoughts on how you're thinking about this incoming administration and how it might impact the outlook

MacroeconomicRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Strazik reframed beyond 48 hours to six weeks post-Analyst Day, highlighting strengthening demand diversity in gas and grid while noting wind remains soft.

Show 2 more companies
FSLRFirst Solar1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
FSLR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Just a little surprised I guess to see the level of volume downside in the guidance this quarter

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mark provided detailed framework explaining high end removes 700 MW book-and-bill, low end removes 2.5 GW total from Malaysia/Vietnam. Driven by tariff economics, not underlying demand.

RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
RIVN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

the level of maybe interest you're seeing in the commercial product since you launched that extended range version of the commercial vehicle?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

RJ said Amazon van volumes are ramping meaningfully as its EV infrastructure matures, and that Rivian remains focused on Amazon while other commercial opportunities develop.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GM General Motors60%none of 6 questions
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.617%1 of 6 questions
BE Bloom Energy Corporation425%1 of 4 questions
F Ford Motor Company40%none of 4 questions
TSLA Tesla, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
GEV GE Vernova2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
FSLR First Solar1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GM
    General Motors · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • LCID
    Lucid Group, Inc. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • BE
    Bloom Energy Corporation · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • F
    Ford Motor Company · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • TSLA
    Tesla, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • GEV
    GE Vernova · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • FSLR
    First Solar · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • RIVN
    Rivian Automotive, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q1450%2 of 4 questions3
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q2714%1 of 7 questions4
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand7
  • Innovation & R&D6
  • Capital Allocation6
  • Competitive Dynamics4
  • Capex Investment4
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Margin3
  • Supply Chain2
Show all 18 topics
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Inventory1
  • Product Launch1
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Revenue Growth1