Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ari Terjanian

Cleveland Research · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 (5 quarters; questions recorded in 4).

Limited coverage. Only 6 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
6on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 6 questionsLimited sample
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 6 of 6 questions from 2 companies

NTAPNetApp5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NTAP company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

it seems like topics was down year over year. It seems like it's been trending that way. How sustainable is that?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Wissam expects OpEx to be potentially slightly higher in H2 as company continues investing in business growth.

What do you think drove some of the larger deal activity this quarter? Was it execution or maybe there's some pull forward ahead of potential shortages?

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

George firmly attributed large deal activity to execution, not supply chain pull-forward. Strength helped offset steep US public sector decline from shutdown.

Calendar 2025 Q3

just any update on, you know, the all-flash kind of competitive landscape and what you're seeing out there?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

George acknowledged competitive environment but attributed any relative softness to higher US public sector exposure. No adverse competitive patterns in Q1. No tariff-related pricing actions taken (wait-and-see mode). New system pricing performing well in mix. Cost compares get more benign through rest of FY26.

Calendar 2025 Q1

any more updates on dynamics we're seeing with VMware and Broadcom and customers contemplating new architectures

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

George confirmed multiple pathways for VMware customers: optimize existing, migrate to cloud, or use on-prem alternatives like Microsoft/Red Hat.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is that 100, is that deals in the quarter? And if so, that like what drove the doubling from 50 last quarter

Show response

George attributed the increase to broader field and partner engagement plus pipeline maturation from long sales cycles.

PEverpure, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
P company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

Just on the coming GTC conference, like, just any more color on the decision to enter here?

Cloud & AIProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO said Pure modified its product within its R&D budget to meet HPC/AI-training performance needs and will showcase FlashBlade advances at NVIDIA GTC.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NTAP NetApp50%none of 5 questions
P Everpure, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NTAP
    NetApp · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • P
    Everpure, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI3
  • Demand2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Margin1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Pricing1
  • Product Launch1