Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Aron Ceccarelli

Berenberg · covers Basic Materials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q2 (3 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 7 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
7on tracked calls
Challenge rate
14%1 of 7 questionsLimited sample
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 7 of 7 questions from 4 companies

SHWThe Sherwin-Williams Company3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
SHW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I am trying to understand what gives you confidence on the upper end of the guidance today considering that volumes probably have decreased a little bit

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Heidi cited team discipline, share gains, and new business wins as drivers of PCG confidence; Al noted the Q2 margin decline was ~120bps ex prior-year gain and FX losses.

Calendar 2025 Q1

You mentioned that the contribution from pricing in Q2 will be smaller and the comparable base becomes a bit tougher in Q2. So just trying to understand, where do you expect volume growth to come b...

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Al pointed to res repaint and P&M momentum as volume drivers; commercial and property maintenance expected not to get worse; new res bouncing along.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you elaborate a little bit on the level of profitability of your market shares gains?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Al pushed back on the premise, saying new accounts vary by maturity, some come in at competitor price points then move up as they recognize Sherwin's ecosystem value. Heidi added res repaint is the clearest example of trading contractors up.

CFCF Industries2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
CF company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Do you see these products as a growing risk to traditional nitrogen producers? Or do you expect farmers to adopt them as a complementary solution?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bert expressed skepticism citing inconsistent field results after decades of monitoring. Tony reframed biologicals as yield-enhancement rather than nitrogen replacement, arguing increased yield is worth more to growers than saving a small portion of nitrogen cost.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Does it include potentially Mitsui as well and therefore, you are not going to go ahead with the second plant

Capex InvestmentM&ATranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tony clarified they moved from a smaller 1.2M ton SMR with Mitsui alone to a larger 1.4M ton ATR with both Mitsui and JERA as potential partners.

MOSMosaic Company (The)1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MOS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

How should we think about the earnings power of this business in a mid-cycle scenario

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Luciano laid out a long-term Fertilizantes EBITDA framework: distribution at $300-500M (13M tons at $30-40/ton), production at $300-350M (4M tons at $75-80/ton), plus coproducts ~$160M annually. Also disclosed China business at ~$30M in H1 with potential to double or triple quickly. Biosciences targeting $250M EBITDA long-term, gated by regulatory approvals.

PPGPPG Industries1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PPG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

you slightly revised down your organic sales growth guidance for both Architectural Paints and Industrial Coatings

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Knavish explained Architectural downgrade driven by Europe, now assuming current state plus share gains with no market recovery built in. Any stimulus (tariff agreement, Ukraine/Middle East progress) would be upside. Morales called Industrial adjustment 'more rounding in terms of percentages,' related to Q2 China softness.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SHW The Sherwin-Williams Company333%1 of 3 questions
CF CF Industries2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MOS Mosaic Company (The)1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PPG PPG Industries1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SHW
    The Sherwin-Williams Company · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • CF
    CF Industries · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MOS
    Mosaic Company (The) · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PPG
    PPG Industries · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q2425%1 of 4 questions4
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Demand2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Capex Investment1
  • M&A1