Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Asad Haider
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q3 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 40on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 10%4 of 40 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 40 of 40 questions from 6 companies
BMYBristol Myers Squibb9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So just perhaps just level set us on expectations as we sharpen our pencils ahead of this readout.
Show response
Massacesi covered mechanism, the two-dose design and PPF timing; Lenkowsky added the tolerability-driven commercial case. Filing strategy went unaddressed.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just given how consequential the clinical readouts at the end of this year are going to be for the company
Show response
Cristian provided extensive detail on pipeline readouts including CELMoDs, Milvexian, Cobenfy, and Admilparant with confidence unchanged across all programs.
how do the timing of these readouts impact the company's BD strategy as you think about the different outcomes
Show response
Boerner stated BD is not impacted by readout timing, emphasized size-agnostic approach with financial flexibility for multiple deal sizes.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Do you believe you're still on track for the 30% to 40% patient conversion by 2028
Show response
Adam noted J-code received last July accelerated adoption. Seeing uptake across monotherapy and combination settings in RCC, GI, and melanoma.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Any updated thoughts on the shape of this over the next couple of years in the context of the potential R&D expenses associated with the development of BNT327
Show response
David outlined $1B savings in 2025, $2B by 2027, with clear line of sight to 2026 pushes and pulls. Chris emphasized balancing investment for growth with financial discipline.
Could you share with us any early thoughts on the pipeline and if there are programs that you're particularly encouraged by
Show response
Cristian highlighted milvexian as potentially first/only Factor XIa in AF and ACS, admilparant with 60%+ lung function improvement in IPF, protein degradation platform with 10+ drugs in clinic, and CD19 CAR-T for autoimmune.
Calendar 2025 Q2
remind us on how we should be thinking about the read across from that trial to ADEPT-1 and ADEPT-4 in 2026
Show response
Samit clarified ADEPT-1 is relapse prevention (36-week), ADEPT-4 focuses on biomarker-positive patients. Two of three must be positive for filing.
updated thoughts on costs and margins as it relates to your goal of shortening the depth of earnings
Show response
David detailed productivity initiatives ($1.5B reallocated + $2B new) enabling investment. Phase III programs completing frees resources for Cobenfy and BioNTech trials.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what's driving this renewed emphasis on BD? If you could unpack that a little bit more
Show response
Chris clarified BD focus unchanged. Not size-constrained. Filters: core TA strengthening, rightful science ownership, financial discipline, growth profile improvement.
JNJJohnson & Johnson8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
you now feel more urgency to add to high growth areas via M&A and med tech
Show response
Wolk said the urgency is to fix the existing vision, surgery and cardiovascular portfolio; Schmid called Abiomed a temporary headwind.
I just want to be clear that refers to internal investments and not M&A.
Show response
Joe Wolk confirmed the target assumes no inorganic additions and rests on internal strategic investments.
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you can provide any update on prescriber count relative to the last update of 4,500 prescribers
Show response
Jennifer Taubert gave specifics: 6,000 prescribers, over 50% commercial coverage within 90 days, and distinct ICOTYDE/TREMFYA positioning.
Calendar 2026 Q1
any updated views on what you see as the key product variances versus the Street looking towards the end of the decade
Show response
Duato highlighted ICOTYDE, RYBREVANT and INLEXZO as underestimated products already marketed. Emphasized MedTech catalysts including PFA catheters, Impella ECP and OTTAVA. Stated double-digit growth target does not depend on M&A, driven entirely by existing portfolio and pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could just maybe double click a little bit more on what the key levers are to bridge to that double-digit growth profile from where we sit today
Show response
Duato walked through all six business areas: oncology $50B by 2030, TREMFYA $10B+ peak, icotide launch 2026, SPRAVATO 60%+ growth, cardiovascular $9B at 15% growth, OTTAVA submission, and Vision share gains. Emphasized dozen derisked launches.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you just maybe double-click a little bit more on how you're going to be balancing capital allocation priorities?
Show response
Duato detailed capital deployment across TREMFYA IBD, Inlexo, CARVYKTI, robotic surgery, and EP. Taubert cited 16% ex-STELARA growth with key 2026 disconnects in TREMFYA and SPRAVATO.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you have sufficient capacity today to manufacture for the U.S. market in the U.S.
Show response
Duato noted uncertainty on tariff outcomes but emphasized tax policies already creating jobs. Reiterated $55B US investment commitment with goal to manufacture all US-consumed medicines domestically.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you able to provide any quantitative framing on your views as it relates to the extent to which you think this erosion gets smoothed
Show response
Taubert noted ex-STELARA business growing over 12%. Duato emphasized this resilience as unprecedented in the healthcare industry. Reed highlighted TREMFYA superiority data.
PFEPfizer7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Just curious as to what you're expecting in terms of the long-term trajectory of the franchise
Show response
Albert gave high-level COVID dynamics (vaccines steadier than Paxlovid) and stressed offsetting the shortfall, but offered no specific long-term franchise numbers.
Calendar 2026 Q1
just level set us on any updated thoughts on bridging the gap around how we should be thinking about the levers to drive this growth against the stacked LOEs?
Show response
Albert explained the CAGR is risk-adjusted across multiple pipeline assets, LOEs now reduced to $14-15B from $17B with Vyndamax settlement, and launched products at $3.1B/quarter growing 22%.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what innings are we in in terms of just portfolio pruning or realignment, noting that you've also recently announced a new reorganization
Show response
Bourla confirmed pipeline pruning largely complete; Boshoff cited $500M R&D savings reinvested in Phase III programs with ~20 pivotal studies in 2026; Denton highlighted ViiV as non-strategic asset monetization example and new sterile injectable/biosimilar unit focused on productivity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What's the plan if Metsera doesn't work out for some reason? And then second, on 2026, any early framing on guidance pushes and pulls
Show response
Denton confirmed significant BD resources across all four therapeutic areas; deferred 2026 specifics, noting investments in Metsera and 3SBio carry over as dilution; guidance expected by year-end. Baum added very active China pipeline efforts.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what could cause large swings to those expectations from here?
Show response
Bourla confirmed all scenarios modeled with probabilities and mitigation plans, but declined to share specifics during active negotiations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you just double click on how competitive dynamics are playing out in that market relative to your own expectations?
Show response
Malik detailed 31% US growth with 70%+ new patient start growth YoY and 20% sequential; competition principally from Attruby on newly diagnosed patients; Alexandre added 36% international growth with 52% patient treatment increase.
can you remind us the timelines on when we will start to see more data?
Show response
Boshoff confirmed Phase 2 data expected early 2026; Baum identified biggest disconnects in two ADCs (SV and PDL1V), C.diff vaccine, CDK4, and ponsegromab.
ABBVAbbVie6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what are we gonna learn about tMAb a in the upcoming readouts? And where do you see this ADC differentiating from others like Merck's sac TMT or AstraZeneca's data DXP
Show response
Roopal detailed AbbVie's three on-market ADCs and a c-Met biomarker-directed differentiation strategy for tMAb-A across colorectal, lung, ovarian, and head-and-neck, positioning PD-1/VEGF as a combination partner with data expected at World Lung.
Calendar 2026 Q1
as you think about doing -- building a broader portfolio around 295, just what might that look like in the context of Rob's earlier comments
Show response
Rob outlined interest in assets augmenting weight loss with tolerability, orals, muscle preservation. Highlighted potential psoriasis/obesity combos leveraging immunology franchise and aesthetics channel synergies.
how that triangulates with your calculus of no longer updating mid-term guidance for these products
Show response
Rob confirmed upside to consensus in every year, growing each year. Expects Skyrizi and Rinvoq to exceed peak consensus. Wouldn't rule out future long-term guidance update but emphasized current strength doesn't necessitate it.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you see the oncology portfolio evolving from here. With respect to novel combos
Show response
Roopal Thakkar outlined ADC strategy: tmAbA + PD-1/VEGF combinations in CRC and lung, with expansion to head/neck and ovarian. Biomarker approach for patient selection. KRAS interest in lung/CRC/pancreatic. 969 bispecific ADC for prostate cancer. Jeff Stewart quantified TrenibotE: potential to double new patient inflow at peak, with high conversion rate to full-strength BOTOX. Revenue impact gating heavily into 2027 after 12,000 injector training.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Just curious as to what your latest thinking is on business development. You've always referenced BD priorities that are geared towards the 2030s
Show response
Rob Michael confirmed financial wherewithal for late-stage deals but no need given current portfolio growth visibility into next decade. Focus areas: B-cell depletion and oral peptides (immunology), trispecifics and in vivo CAR-T (oncology), mood disorders and Alzheimer's (neuroscience), siRNA platform (cross-therapeutic), and obesity. 30+ deals executed in 18+ months with balanced allocation across core areas.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just one bigger picture question on the oncology franchise, maybe for Roopal. You've mentioned that you're watching the PD-1 VEGF class
Show response
Roopal Thakkar interested in PD-1/VEGF assets that can partner with internal ADC platform. Emphasized AbbVie's ADC strategy: good target with high tumor vs healthy tissue expression, biomarker-enabled patient selection, and topo warhead platform with low spill (minimal alopecia, stomatitis, diarrhea).
LLYLilly (Eli)6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In the U.S., the launch curve has been somewhat slower than anticipated
Show response
Ilya Yuffa pivoted to positive leading indicators (near-doubling of volume, 1 in 4 new starts) rather than directly explaining the slow start.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What's your level of confidence on that launch curve framing in the context of the early experience
Show response
Ilya Yuffa cited 20,000+ patients treated with 80% new to class. Three growth catalysts: HCP familiarity, access expansion at 2 of 3 major PBMs by mid-May, and consumer awareness with full DTC TV launch in Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you just talk about what you're seeing in the contracting environment broadly speaking across the incretin portfolio
Show response
Ilya detailed: Zepbound covered in 2 of 3 large PBMs, pricing transparent for 2026 across Part D and DTC channels, $2.99 Zepbound entry price driving increased utilization. Oral market uptake encouraging and expansive. Orforglipron to be priced similar to oral semaglutide.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what are the learnings from this for the orforglipron ramp next year as it relates to the elasticity of demand across different price points
Show response
Ilya highlighted 15% sequential market growth with significant DTC volume. Patrik added U.K. price raise confirmed expected consumer elasticity and export arbitrage dynamics. Orforglipron positioned for different OUS need, lower BMI patients who don't need tirzepatide-level efficacy, no refrigeration required.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Where do you think this could stabilize? And how is that segment changing the landscape on pricing?
Show response
Lucas highlighted 1.1M TRx in Q2 and strong growth trajectory. Still views LillyDirect as hedge/bridge while employer access improves but acknowledged it's contributing meaningfully to performance.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is your expectation on market share dynamics in the next weeks and months from the CVS formulary loss?
Show response
Dave framed CVS move as unsurprising given Zepbound's share gains. Noted CVS templated plans have low employer opt-in rates. Focus remains on innovation and differentiation.
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the PD-1/VEGF bispecific program, just any updates on how the pace of that development is progressing
Show response
Dean Li outlined a focused PD-1/VEGF strategy and stressed TL1A's clean safety profile enables future combinations.
Calendar 2026 Q1
where you still see the biggest gaps in your portfolio that could benefit from more BD as you scan the therapeutic landscape
Show response
Rob Davis reiterated science-first BD approach with a $1B-$15B sweet spot but capacity for larger deals, highlighting oncology, immunology, and cardiometabolic as the three most active areas.
Calendar 2025 Q3
any updated framing on what you're looking for would be helpful
Show response
Rob reiterated $1B-$15B BD sweet spot across all therapeutic areas and rejected transformative synergy-driven deals as disruptive to Merck's pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q2
speak to your level of confidence on the demand dynamics from that channel in the current environment
Show response
Dean reiterated the FDA's high bar for single-dose GARDASIL; Caroline confirmed no more China shipments in 2025, with 2026 schedule TBD, and expects US ex-dosing growth.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| PFE Pfizer | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| LLY Lilly (Eli) | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- BMYBristol Myers Squibb · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- JNJJohnson & Johnson · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- PFEPfizer · 7 questions29%2 of 7 questions
- ABBVAbbVie · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- LLYLilly (Eli) · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- MRKMerck & Co., Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- M&A11
- Capital Allocation10
- Innovation & R&D10
- Demand10
- Revenue Growth8
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Product Launch5
- Pricing4
- Guidance Reliability3
- Cost Pressure2
Show all 14 topics
- Trade Tariffs2
- Regulation Policy2
- Margin1
- Supply Chain1