Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Asad Haider

Goldman Sachs · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q3 (7 quarters).

Questions
40on tracked calls
Challenge rate
10%4 of 40 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 40 of 40 questions from 6 companies

BMYBristol Myers Squibb9 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

So just perhaps just level set us on expectations as we sharpen our pencils ahead of this readout.

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Massacesi covered mechanism, the two-dose design and PPF timing; Lenkowsky added the tolerability-driven commercial case. Filing strategy went unaddressed.

Calendar 2026 Q1

just given how consequential the clinical readouts at the end of this year are going to be for the company

Show response

Cristian provided extensive detail on pipeline readouts including CELMoDs, Milvexian, Cobenfy, and Admilparant with confidence unchanged across all programs.

how do the timing of these readouts impact the company's BD strategy as you think about the different outcomes

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Boerner stated BD is not impacted by readout timing, emphasized size-agnostic approach with financial flexibility for multiple deal sizes.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Do you believe you're still on track for the 30% to 40% patient conversion by 2028

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Adam noted J-code received last July accelerated adoption. Seeing uptake across monotherapy and combination settings in RCC, GI, and melanoma.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Any updated thoughts on the shape of this over the next couple of years in the context of the potential R&D expenses associated with the development of BNT327

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

David outlined $1B savings in 2025, $2B by 2027, with clear line of sight to 2026 pushes and pulls. Chris emphasized balancing investment for growth with financial discipline.

Could you share with us any early thoughts on the pipeline and if there are programs that you're particularly encouraged by

Show response

Cristian highlighted milvexian as potentially first/only Factor XIa in AF and ACS, admilparant with 60%+ lung function improvement in IPF, protein degradation platform with 10+ drugs in clinic, and CD19 CAR-T for autoimmune.

Calendar 2025 Q2

remind us on how we should be thinking about the read across from that trial to ADEPT-1 and ADEPT-4 in 2026

Show response

Samit clarified ADEPT-1 is relapse prevention (36-week), ADEPT-4 focuses on biomarker-positive patients. Two of three must be positive for filing.

updated thoughts on costs and margins as it relates to your goal of shortening the depth of earnings

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David detailed productivity initiatives ($1.5B reallocated + $2B new) enabling investment. Phase III programs completing frees resources for Cobenfy and BioNTech trials.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what's driving this renewed emphasis on BD? If you could unpack that a little bit more

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chris clarified BD focus unchanged. Not size-constrained. Filters: core TA strengthening, rightful science ownership, financial discipline, growth profile improvement.

JNJJohnson & Johnson8 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
JNJ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

you now feel more urgency to add to high growth areas via M&A and med tech

Show response

Wolk said the urgency is to fix the existing vision, surgery and cardiovascular portfolio; Schmid called Abiomed a temporary headwind.

I just want to be clear that refers to internal investments and not M&A.

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Joe Wolk confirmed the target assumes no inorganic additions and rests on internal strategic investments.

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you can provide any update on prescriber count relative to the last update of 4,500 prescribers

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jennifer Taubert gave specifics: 6,000 prescribers, over 50% commercial coverage within 90 days, and distinct ICOTYDE/TREMFYA positioning.

Calendar 2026 Q1

any updated views on what you see as the key product variances versus the Street looking towards the end of the decade

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Duato highlighted ICOTYDE, RYBREVANT and INLEXZO as underestimated products already marketed. Emphasized MedTech catalysts including PFA catheters, Impella ECP and OTTAVA. Stated double-digit growth target does not depend on M&A, driven entirely by existing portfolio and pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could just maybe double click a little bit more on what the key levers are to bridge to that double-digit growth profile from where we sit today

Revenue GrowthCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Duato walked through all six business areas: oncology $50B by 2030, TREMFYA $10B+ peak, icotide launch 2026, SPRAVATO 60%+ growth, cardiovascular $9B at 15% growth, OTTAVA submission, and Vision share gains. Emphasized dozen derisked launches.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you just maybe double-click a little bit more on how you're going to be balancing capital allocation priorities?

Capital AllocationRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Duato detailed capital deployment across TREMFYA IBD, Inlexo, CARVYKTI, robotic surgery, and EP. Taubert cited 16% ex-STELARA growth with key 2026 disconnects in TREMFYA and SPRAVATO.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you have sufficient capacity today to manufacture for the U.S. market in the U.S.

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Duato noted uncertainty on tariff outcomes but emphasized tax policies already creating jobs. Reiterated $55B US investment commitment with goal to manufacture all US-consumed medicines domestically.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Are you able to provide any quantitative framing on your views as it relates to the extent to which you think this erosion gets smoothed

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Taubert noted ex-STELARA business growing over 12%. Duato emphasized this resilience as unprecedented in the healthcare industry. Reed highlighted TREMFYA superiority data.

PFEPfizer7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 7 challenging
PFE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Just curious as to what you're expecting in terms of the long-term trajectory of the franchise

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Albert gave high-level COVID dynamics (vaccines steadier than Paxlovid) and stressed offsetting the shortfall, but offered no specific long-term franchise numbers.

Calendar 2026 Q1

just level set us on any updated thoughts on bridging the gap around how we should be thinking about the levers to drive this growth against the stacked LOEs?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Albert explained the CAGR is risk-adjusted across multiple pipeline assets, LOEs now reduced to $14-15B from $17B with Vyndamax settlement, and launched products at $3.1B/quarter growing 22%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what innings are we in in terms of just portfolio pruning or realignment, noting that you've also recently announced a new reorganization

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bourla confirmed pipeline pruning largely complete; Boshoff cited $500M R&D savings reinvested in Phase III programs with ~20 pivotal studies in 2026; Denton highlighted ViiV as non-strategic asset monetization example and new sterile injectable/biosimilar unit focused on productivity.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What's the plan if Metsera doesn't work out for some reason? And then second, on 2026, any early framing on guidance pushes and pulls

ChallengingM&ACapital AllocationGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Denton confirmed significant BD resources across all four therapeutic areas; deferred 2026 specifics, noting investments in Metsera and 3SBio carry over as dilution; guidance expected by year-end. Baum added very active China pipeline efforts.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what could cause large swings to those expectations from here?

Regulation PolicyTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bourla confirmed all scenarios modeled with probabilities and mitigation plans, but declined to share specifics during active negotiations.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just double click on how competitive dynamics are playing out in that market relative to your own expectations?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Malik detailed 31% US growth with 70%+ new patient start growth YoY and 20% sequential; competition principally from Attruby on newly diagnosed patients; Alexandre added 36% international growth with 52% patient treatment increase.

can you remind us the timelines on when we will start to see more data?

Show response

Boshoff confirmed Phase 2 data expected early 2026; Baum identified biggest disconnects in two ADCs (SV and PDL1V), C.diff vaccine, CDK4, and ponsegromab.

ABBVAbbVie6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
ABBV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what are we gonna learn about tMAb a in the upcoming readouts? And where do you see this ADC differentiating from others like Merck's sac TMT or AstraZeneca's data DXP

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Roopal detailed AbbVie's three on-market ADCs and a c-Met biomarker-directed differentiation strategy for tMAb-A across colorectal, lung, ovarian, and head-and-neck, positioning PD-1/VEGF as a combination partner with data expected at World Lung.

Calendar 2026 Q1

as you think about doing -- building a broader portfolio around 295, just what might that look like in the context of Rob's earlier comments

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rob outlined interest in assets augmenting weight loss with tolerability, orals, muscle preservation. Highlighted potential psoriasis/obesity combos leveraging immunology franchise and aesthetics channel synergies.

how that triangulates with your calculus of no longer updating mid-term guidance for these products

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rob confirmed upside to consensus in every year, growing each year. Expects Skyrizi and Rinvoq to exceed peak consensus. Wouldn't rule out future long-term guidance update but emphasized current strength doesn't necessitate it.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how you see the oncology portfolio evolving from here. With respect to novel combos

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Roopal Thakkar outlined ADC strategy: tmAbA + PD-1/VEGF combinations in CRC and lung, with expansion to head/neck and ovarian. Biomarker approach for patient selection. KRAS interest in lung/CRC/pancreatic. 969 bispecific ADC for prostate cancer. Jeff Stewart quantified TrenibotE: potential to double new patient inflow at peak, with high conversion rate to full-strength BOTOX. Revenue impact gating heavily into 2027 after 12,000 injector training.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Just curious as to what your latest thinking is on business development. You've always referenced BD priorities that are geared towards the 2030s

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rob Michael confirmed financial wherewithal for late-stage deals but no need given current portfolio growth visibility into next decade. Focus areas: B-cell depletion and oral peptides (immunology), trispecifics and in vivo CAR-T (oncology), mood disorders and Alzheimer's (neuroscience), siRNA platform (cross-therapeutic), and obesity. 30+ deals executed in 18+ months with balanced allocation across core areas.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Just one bigger picture question on the oncology franchise, maybe for Roopal. You've mentioned that you're watching the PD-1 VEGF class

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Roopal Thakkar interested in PD-1/VEGF assets that can partner with internal ADC platform. Emphasized AbbVie's ADC strategy: good target with high tumor vs healthy tissue expression, biomarker-enabled patient selection, and topo warhead platform with low spill (minimal alopecia, stomatitis, diarrhea).

LLYLilly (Eli)6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
LLY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

In the U.S., the launch curve has been somewhat slower than anticipated

ChallengingProduct LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ilya Yuffa pivoted to positive leading indicators (near-doubling of volume, 1 in 4 new starts) rather than directly explaining the slow start.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What's your level of confidence on that launch curve framing in the context of the early experience

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ilya Yuffa cited 20,000+ patients treated with 80% new to class. Three growth catalysts: HCP familiarity, access expansion at 2 of 3 major PBMs by mid-May, and consumer awareness with full DTC TV launch in Q3.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you just talk about what you're seeing in the contracting environment broadly speaking across the incretin portfolio

Show response

Ilya detailed: Zepbound covered in 2 of 3 large PBMs, pricing transparent for 2026 across Part D and DTC channels, $2.99 Zepbound entry price driving increased utilization. Oral market uptake encouraging and expansive. Orforglipron to be priced similar to oral semaglutide.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are the learnings from this for the orforglipron ramp next year as it relates to the elasticity of demand across different price points

Show response

Ilya highlighted 15% sequential market growth with significant DTC volume. Patrik added U.K. price raise confirmed expected consumer elasticity and export arbitrage dynamics. Orforglipron positioned for different OUS need, lower BMI patients who don't need tirzepatide-level efficacy, no refrigeration required.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Where do you think this could stabilize? And how is that segment changing the landscape on pricing?

Show response

Lucas highlighted 1.1M TRx in Q2 and strong growth trajectory. Still views LillyDirect as hedge/bridge while employer access improves but acknowledged it's contributing meaningfully to performance.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what is your expectation on market share dynamics in the next weeks and months from the CVS formulary loss?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Dave framed CVS move as unsurprising given Zepbound's share gains. Noted CVS templated plans have low employer opt-in rates. Focus remains on innovation and differentiation.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
MRK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

on the PD-1/VEGF bispecific program, just any updates on how the pace of that development is progressing

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Dean Li outlined a focused PD-1/VEGF strategy and stressed TL1A's clean safety profile enables future combinations.

Calendar 2026 Q1

where you still see the biggest gaps in your portfolio that could benefit from more BD as you scan the therapeutic landscape

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rob Davis reiterated science-first BD approach with a $1B-$15B sweet spot but capacity for larger deals, highlighting oncology, immunology, and cardiometabolic as the three most active areas.

Calendar 2025 Q3

any updated framing on what you're looking for would be helpful

Show response

Rob reiterated $1B-$15B BD sweet spot across all therapeutic areas and rejected transformative synergy-driven deals as disruptive to Merck's pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q2

speak to your level of confidence on the demand dynamics from that channel in the current environment

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Dean reiterated the FDA's high bar for single-dose GARDASIL; Caroline confirmed no more China shipments in 2025, with 2026 schedule TBD, and expects US ex-dosing growth.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb90%none of 9 questions
JNJ Johnson & Johnson80%none of 8 questions
PFE Pfizer729%2 of 7 questions
ABBV AbbVie617%1 of 6 questions
LLY Lilly (Eli)617%1 of 6 questions
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.40%none of 4 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • JNJ
    Johnson & Johnson · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • PFE
    Pfizer · 7 questions
    29%2 of 7 questions
  • ABBV
    AbbVie · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • LLY
    Lilly (Eli) · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • MRK
    Merck & Co., Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q270%none of 7 questions6
2025 Q3714%1 of 7 questions6
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions5
2026 Q1825%2 of 8 questions6
2026 Q2617%1 of 6 questions6
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2026 Q18 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • M&A11
  • Capital Allocation10
  • Innovation & R&D10
  • Demand10
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Product Launch5
  • Pricing4
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Cost Pressure2
Show all 14 topics
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Margin1
  • Supply Chain1