Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Atif Malik
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters).
- Questions
- 54on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 6%3 of 54 questions
- Companies
- 15questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 9with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 54 of 54 questions from 15 companies
LRCXLam Research9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you seeing anything in your conversations with the memory makers that are pointing to some sort of an oversupply
Show response
Archer rebutted the oversupply premise by pointing to ongoing installed-base upgrades and pivoted to the DRAM and foundry logic story.
Taiwan was a record revenue year. Can you just talk about your foundry share gains at three nanometer and two nanometer?
Show response
Declined on customer-concentration grounds and answered with generic technology positioning rather than share data.
Calendar 2026 Q1
something has changed versus 90 days ago, you guys are talking about NAND growing through the year
Show response
Tim explained AI data center demand acceleration plus years of underinvestment with roughly 2/3 of installed base still on 100-layer tech needing 200+ layer upgrades.
customer down payments at [indiscernible] level in 4 years. And you're also talking about WFE growing in next year
Show response
Doug explained declining down payments reflect smaller customers concentrated in China, while the fastest-growing global multinational customers don't require them.
Calendar 2025 Q4
when do you see the volume adoption of 4F from 6F2? And can you talk about your SAM market share when you moved to four S Square?
Show response
Tim said 4F² volume production is likely toward end of decade, after the next big wave of fab openings. Aqara is well-suited for high aspect ratio features across 4F², gate-all-around, and CFET.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is it safe to assume that the CSBG business snaps back next year in a more meaningful way, given the restrictions
Show response
Doug declined next year specifics but cited growing chamber count, Equipment Intelligence and cobots as structural tailwinds for CSBG.
Calendar 2025 Q1
One of your North American customers is going through some major restructuring and we get from investors if you guys have baked in
Show response
Doug said Lam typically knows about customer changes well in advance and has contemplated everything seen in the totality of the market.
Calendar 2024 Q4
a quick clarification that $100 billion WFE number is unrestricted WFE, meaning it includes your expectations
Show response
Doug confirmed the $100 billion WFE figure is all-in, including both 2024 and 2025 restricted customers.
Calendar 2024 Q3
It sounds like you're expecting China WFE to come down, but not as much as your peer that reported last week
Show response
Management declined a direct peer comparison, noting different tool lead times and that peers grew more in China than Lam did.
AAPLApple Inc.8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
some of the industry pundits are comparing the iPhone 17 upgrade cycle to the 2020-2021 year as some of the iPhone 12, 30 users upgrade
Show response
Cook declined to compare cycles, calling the iPhone 17 family unique with compelling features. Parekh added the product resonated with multiple cohorts across older and newer devices.
How long will these supply impact your ability to ship to true demand
Show response
Cook specified the constraint is 3-nanometer production for the latest SoCs, a direct result of 23% growth far exceeding internal estimates, but declined to predict when supply-demand will balance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Does the consumer reception and iPhone Air gives you a feel on perhaps the foldable corn market? Or are the 2 form factors very different
Show response
Cook dismissed iPhone Air as a proxy for foldable demand, declining model-level specifics but expressing overall thrill with iPhone reception driving the double-digit December growth guide.
Will you continue to use a 3-pronged approach with your own foundation models and partner with other LLM providers and maybe potential M&A
Show response
Cook confirmed continuing with own foundation models on-device and in PCC, with several in development, and openness to M&A that accelerates the roadmap.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is the focus still around enterprises on Vision Pro? Or are you thinking of broadening the use cases and maybe tying it to more of your devices
Show response
Cook highlighted visionOS 26 updates and enterprise traction with CAE but declined to discuss the roadmap or directly address competitive pressure from Meta/Xiaomi glasses.
Do you feel like you need to accelerate your AI road map or just keep the organic focus
Show response
Cook revealed approximately seven acquisitions in the current year at a pace of one every several weeks, expressing openness to M&A of any size that accelerates the roadmap.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How do you guys see the potential tariff impact to your product for consumer demand under Trump 2.0 you guys did find under Trump 1.0
Show response
Cook gave a one-sentence non-answer, declining to comment on tariff implications beyond acknowledging they are monitoring.
Do you guys see the upgraded series expected in April as something that will, let's say, be the killer application among the suite of features
Show response
Cook avoided singling out Siri as the killer app, instead suggesting different features appeal to different users, noting Siri improvements coming over the next several months.
AMATApplied Materials7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how does that fit with your JV with Besi, what is the adoption time line for large panel packaging
Show response
Gary positioned NEXX as part of broader packaging strategy including hybrid bonding and EPIC Center. Declined to give specific timeline for large body architectures but noted tremendous industry focus.
you said there are 10 new projects in the pipeline, and there's a lot of investor interest in Terafab
Show response
Brice corrected that it was more than 10 new projects but declined to name any specific customers or timelines.
Calendar 2026 Q1
you mentioned the NAND modest growth less than 10% of WFE. Are you expecting any capacity additions in NAND this year?
Show response
Brice confirmed NAND is overwhelmingly upgrades, not greenfield, as technology density improvements allow meeting demand without adding wafer starts.
Can you talk about your confidence in maintaining your market share at that inflection? And when will the decisions come out?
Show response
Gary expressed very high confidence in continued DRAM share growth at both 6F-squared and 4F-squared, citing a decade of market share gains and strong positioning.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if the assumption is that the domestic China spending is coming down next year, why wouldn't this number be lower than mid-25%
Show response
Brice acknowledged China has been stronger than forecast for two consecutive years, making predictions difficult. Gary noted China has been almost 40% of WFE and should normalize back to about 1/3 over time as elevated spending moderates.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you also comment on the silicon systems? Do they return to sequential growth in the July quarter
Show response
Brice deferred specifics on July semi systems growth but emphasized leading-edge acceleration and ICAPS uncertainty, noting China ICAPS forecasts change every quarter.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you talked about China being 20% of your sales on a normalized basis next year. Is that still your view?
Show response
Brice firmly corrected the 20% figure, confirming 30% is the normalized China share across all businesses including Semi Systems, Services, and Display.
KLACKLA Corporation7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You called out visibility of investments into 2027 and what signs, if any, that it is advanced payments or deposits
Show response
Answered the confidence question but sidestepped the specific advance-payment or deposit mechanics the analyst asked about.
one of your customers, SpaceX, publicly, Terrafab, has talked about improving FAB manufacturing efficiencies cutting
Show response
Explicitly declined to comment on the named customer engagement, offering only a general statement about KLA being on the list.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Are you stronger on the logic or the side or the HPM side? And what are your thoughts about hybrid bonding adoption?
Show response
Rick noted strength primarily in logic-side packaging for AI applications, with front-end tools adapted for back-end. Bren added margin profile improving as customers demand more capability.
Can you talk about your full year outlook on the services for this year?
Show response
Bren guided total service growth around 10% for 2025, below the long-term model, with semi-PC service at low double digits versus mid-teens in 2024.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Were those like trailing edge logic projects or was it a DRAM contribution in those sales?
Show response
Bren confirmed the entire $500 million export control impact was from logic, with very little to no memory exposure.
How are you guys leaning into the two struggling foundries and what impact that could have both this year
Show response
Rick acknowledged bulk of CapEx is directed at the leading foundry, with engagement continuing at others but not a material portion of current business.
Calendar 2024 Q3
is it possible to understand how big your wafer and reticle inspection business in China
Show response
Higgins said wafer/reticle inspection has been 25%-35% of China systems business over the past two years, without disclosing the dollar amount.
ANETArista Networks5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I’m wondering how far out your visibility with customers is extending.
Show response
Chantelle said Arista keeps about two quarters of visibility and is guiding to supply it is confident it can secure, with upside if supply releases.
Calendar 2025 Q3
who is driving the decision-making on networking hardware on these announcements
Show response
Jayshree confirmed stable share with AI titans, noting joint decision-making between LLM companies (specs) and cloud titans (procurement/infrastructure).
Calendar 2025 Q2
Curious if you have any sense how big this TAM is in 3 years
Show response
Jayshree noted scale-up port density ratio of 8:1 to 10:1 versus scale-out but lower dollar value per port due to simpler functionality. Deferred to Analyst Day.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you give us a bit more color – are you seeing any pull forward because of the concern on tariffs
Show response
Chantelle acknowledged some pull-forward but characterized it as not significant or material to the Q2 guidance.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you are reiterating $750 million AI back-end sales this year despite the stalled or the fifth customer
Show response
Jayshree confirmed confidence in $750M AI back-end from 3 customers deploying 100K GPUs. TAM breakdown: ~1/3 AI, 1/3 DC/cloud, 1/3 campus of $70B 2028 TAM.
KEYSKeysight Technologies3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm curious if you have some sort of a TAM number for these new kind of projects
Show response
CEO declined to size NTN TAM but noted networks becoming multidimensional (terrestrial, airborne, satellite) as part of 6G vision. Positioned well through standards work and recent quarter wins.
can you talk about the linearity of the orders in Q1? And are you expecting orders to outpace revenues in Q2
Show response
CFO confirmed strong demand sustained throughout Q1 with no unusual linearity. Q2 orders and revenue expected close together (near 1:1) as some bigger deals ship.
Calendar 2025 Q4
why wouldn't it be faster if the AI guys are supporting faster adoption of 6G
Show response
CEO noted standards maturity in 2028-29 before global deployments. Kailesh added Keysight is enabling operators to evaluate AI accelerators in RAN environments and launched concurrent compute/connectivity solutions.
Show 9 more companies
NVDANVIDIA Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you can touch on the importance of CUDA as now more of the investment dollars in AI are coming from inference workloads
Show response
Jensen argued CUDA plus NVLink 72 deliver the best inference performance per watt, and that inference performance now directly equals customer revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q1
April quarter is the bottom
Show response
Colette said Blackwell's many configurations and materials give multiple levers for cost improvement once peak ramp eases, and called tariffs an unknown awaiting USG plans on timing and scope.
Calendar 2024 Q4
on the last earnings call, you mentioned that sovereign demand is in low double-digit billions. Can you provide an update on that
Show response
Colette confirmed sovereign AI pipeline is intact but did not update the specific dollar figure. On gaming, she attributed supply constraints to the data center ramp priority, expecting improvement in the new calendar year.
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How should we think about OpEx growth relative to that overall 40% market growth you talked about in the next few years?
Show response
Hu said AMD will keep OpEx growth below top-line revenue growth to drive operating leverage toward its earnings targets.
how do you expect the sales to grow in the fast inference market this year into next year?
Show response
Su said the inference market is growing substantially, with the Cerebras fast-inference solution becoming available in Q4 and extending into 2027.
CIENCiena Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are you seeing an acceleration over there?
Show response
Gary confirmed accelerated customer engagement post-acquisition. Scott detailed two product families: linear retimer (FY2026 opportunity) and optical CPO (FY2027+). Strong cultural fit and customer reception.
what else is driving sustainable outlook for operating margins of 17%
Show response
Mark cited two drivers: 800G pluggable yield improvements reducing unit costs through FY2026, and pricing discussions with customers yielding higher exit-rate margins in second half.
MUMicron Technology, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Are these for both DRAM and NAND? And if you can just split them out?
Show response
Confirmed SCAs span DRAM and NAND through 2030 but declined to break out the split beyond rough bit-volume color.
if you can confirm that your China sales exposure is fairly minimal
Show response
Confirmed China exposure has been declining and is expected to reach single digits in fiscal 2027.
TERTeradyne2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you more optimistic on new HBM qualifications in Korea? Or is it HBM4 that's driving the improved outlook?
Show response
Memory snapback is about quarterly timing, not changed full-year view. HBM4 capacity demand primarily in Q4 with timing uncertain between Q4 and Q1.
Is that packaging technology the driver where you feel like you can insert your testers?
Show response
GPU opportunity driven by customers wanting supply chain resilience, not packaging technology per se. Packaging changes do drive more wafer-level test investment.
ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
There is a bit of discussion in terms of its timing. If you can share your thoughts on the volume of that
Show response
Management said rack-level connectivity remains largely copper near term, limiting co-packaged optics disruption to their products.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you guys seeing any impact of AI, GenAI on your software growth and renewals?
Show response
Hock said there is no negative AI impact; rising CPU/GPU core counts are accelerating VMware growth, and he expects no impact on the hypervisor-level software products.
MRVLMarvell Technology1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
has your thinking about the sales contribution mix from the two programs at this customer ramp changed from 90 days ago?
Show response
Matt declined to comment on customer-specific program dynamics, deferring to AWS for their own plans. Confirmed Marvell is prepared to support all requirements with manufacturing and supply already aligned.
TXNTexas Instruments1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I have a question on the data center sales that doubled year-over-year. Can you talk about your full year outlook?
Show response
Haviv sees 800-volt architectures adding conversion stages and expanding the TAM, benefiting both Analog and Embedded content.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| LRCX Lam Research | 9 | 22%2 of 9 questions |
| AAPL Apple Inc. | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| AMAT Applied Materials | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| KLAC KLA Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| ANET Arista Networks | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| KEYS Keysight Technologies | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| CIEN Ciena Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- LRCXLam Research · 9 questions22%2 of 9 questions
- AAPLApple Inc. · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- AMATApplied Materials · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- KLACKLA Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- ANETArista Networks · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- KEYSKeysight Technologies · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- NVDANVIDIA Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- CIENCiena Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MUMicron Technology, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 15 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TER Teradyne | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ALAB Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TXN Texas Instruments | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- TERTeradyne · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ALABAstera Labs, Inc. Common Stock · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TXNTexas Instruments · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2024 Q4 | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions | 7 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 9% (1 of 11 questions) · 7 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand21
- Competitive Dynamics16
- Cloud & AI15
- Innovation & R&D14
- Trade Tariffs7
- Product Launch6
- Revenue Growth6
- Geographic Expansion4
- Capex Investment4
- M&A3
Show all 18 topics
- Margin3
- Supply Chain3
- Regulation Policy3
- Macroeconomic2
- Cost Pressure2
- Guidance Reliability1
- Credit1
- Capital Allocation1