Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Austin Moeller
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 20on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%1 of 20 questions
- Companies
- 2questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 20 of 20 questions from 2 companies
ACHRArcher Aviation Inc.10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
can you just talk about some of the puts and takes and challenges to get to that point next year?
Show response
Tom Muniz said the underlying systems are similar to Midnight, same battery, electric motor and flight-control software, and noted the actual Midnight flight code flew Halo well in simulation, expressing confidence despite the hard work ahead.
for the Insitu acquisition, should we be thinking about this from the context of Boeing already manufactures a variety
Show response
Adam clarified Insitu manufactures its own drones, and Archer will produce and scale them, focusing on growing the core Group 1-4 portfolio to take advantage of increased demand rather than pushing them to other partners for now.
Calendar 2026 Q1
if you could comment on the opportunity to help improve the aerospace infrastructure with Palantir
Show response
Adam said Archer focuses on the software application layer (versus Palantir's integration layer), participating to help the industry flywheel expand even where near-term revenue is limited, while noting products it believes can eventually generate significant revenue.
can we talk about the restricted pipe significant that was issued for the midnight in the UAE -- and what kind of flight test can be performed under the restricted type certificate?
Show response
Adam explained the UAE restricted type certificate is an internationally recognized pathway allowing Midnight limited commercial operations, accelerating the Launch Edition program and generating early revenue and real-world flight experience in Abu Dhabi.
Calendar 2025 Q4
does that mean that you're essentially close to or through critical design review
Show response
Tom would not rule out further design changes before cert testing completes, but said Archer is comfortable with the aircraft architecture and sees no technology issues today; the larger, heavier design has positioned it well.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is Lilium silicon-dominant anode battery or the ducted fan technology more important to you?
Show response
Adam highlighted the ~300-patent addition and ducted-fan IP value but gave no specific timeline for incorporation, calling it a long-term enabler.
Calendar 2025 Q2
does that enable you to vertically integrate more carbon composites for the structures?
Show response
Adam framed the deal as standing up in-house composite R&D for defense, with technology expected to transfer to the civil application. Direct.
Calendar 2025 Q1
in the skinny budget, there was $1.2 billion added to FAA spending for personnel additions and infrastructure upgrades.
Show response
Adam said it was too early to judge the benefit but that Archer would welcome any additional FAA resources.
can you comment on the production scaling? And is that still on track for 2 aircraft per month by end of year?
Show response
Adam said output is balanced against internal testing needs and manufacturing lessons and did not directly confirm the 2-per-month target.
Calendar 2024 Q4
have you initiated or introduced a standardized fixed price contract value to deploy X number of aircraft
Show response
Adam said contracts will vary by country but gave a $10 million to $15 million per-aircraft rule of thumb.
LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you see an opportunity given the recent additions to the ground stations and the ground network
Show response
Confirmed active US and UK discussions to use the ground network for Space Force / space-domain-awareness data relay; direct.
what the capital might be required to support this and how much might be customer-funded R&D and CapEx?
Show response
Said the 500kg Nova-D is essentially fully funded to flight under contract; only heavier 3-engine variants would need incremental CapEx/IRAD; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how many GEO COMSATs do you expect to build for that program? And do you expect those satellites
Show response
Altemus said it is a design competition so order counts aren't set, but expects a multi-award and a replacement cycle; partial.
are you able to comment on the RFP and bid process for the light version of LTV
Show response
Altemus detailed the restructured crewed/uncrewed LTV task order with a proposal submitted late April and award expected May 22; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if you could talk about some of the operational changes that have been made at Lantaris
Show response
Altemus credited President Chris Johnson with streamlining production, removing onerous legacy terms, and right-sizing workforce and facilities.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what changes has Advent made within Lanteris to improve the margin profile of their manufacturing
Show response
Steve said troubled legacy programs are off the books and Lanteris has invested in the 300 Series for SDA Tranche 1/2, moving in a positive direction on efficiencies.
should we frame the strategy here as looking to gain more manufacturing capability left of launch
Show response
Steve confirmed the model: use Lanteris production and reliability to feed IM's own higher-margin data-network services, becoming its own customer for satellites.
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there still a CLPS contract expected to be awarded in November? Has that moved right?
Show response
Steve confirmed the CT4 CLPS award is still competitive and cited root-caused IM-2 sensor fixes carried into IM-3/IM-4 as grounds for confidence, without a firm win probability.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is there any risk of the LTV delivery on a Nova-D lander for either Artemis 3 or beyond being changed or delayed
Show response
Steve said the Nova-D/LTV flies on a Falcon 9 Heavy, so SLS changes pose no launch-vehicle risk to LTVS; procurement remains on track.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Has the data collected during IM-2 impacted your conversations with NASA or plans for the upsized Nova-D lander?
Show response
Steve said Nova-D remains in its design cycle toward preliminary design review and expects little change from the IM-2 hot-wash review.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ACHR Archer Aviation Inc. | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc. | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Product Launch8
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Innovation & R&D5
- M&A5
- Capex Investment3
- Regulation Policy3
- Margin3
- Demand2
- Cloud & AI1
- Geographic Expansion1
Show all 13 topics
- Supply Chain1
- Pricing1
- Revenue Growth1