Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Austin Moeller

Canaccord Genuity · covers Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
20on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%1 of 20 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 20 of 20 questions from 2 companies

ACHRArcher Aviation Inc.10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
ACHR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you just talk about some of the puts and takes and challenges to get to that point next year?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Tom Muniz said the underlying systems are similar to Midnight, same battery, electric motor and flight-control software, and noted the actual Midnight flight code flew Halo well in simulation, expressing confidence despite the hard work ahead.

for the Insitu acquisition, should we be thinking about this from the context of Boeing already manufactures a variety

Show response

Adam clarified Insitu manufactures its own drones, and Archer will produce and scale them, focusing on growing the core Group 1-4 portfolio to take advantage of increased demand rather than pushing them to other partners for now.

Calendar 2026 Q1

if you could comment on the opportunity to help improve the aerospace infrastructure with Palantir

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam said Archer focuses on the software application layer (versus Palantir's integration layer), participating to help the industry flywheel expand even where near-term revenue is limited, while noting products it believes can eventually generate significant revenue.

can we talk about the restricted pipe significant that was issued for the midnight in the UAE -- and what kind of flight test can be performed under the restricted type certificate?

Regulation PolicyGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam explained the UAE restricted type certificate is an internationally recognized pathway allowing Midnight limited commercial operations, accelerating the Launch Edition program and generating early revenue and real-world flight experience in Abu Dhabi.

Calendar 2025 Q4

does that mean that you're essentially close to or through critical design review

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tom would not rule out further design changes before cert testing completes, but said Archer is comfortable with the aircraft architecture and sees no technology issues today; the larger, heavier design has positioned it well.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is Lilium silicon-dominant anode battery or the ducted fan technology more important to you?

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Adam highlighted the ~300-patent addition and ducted-fan IP value but gave no specific timeline for incorporation, calling it a long-term enabler.

Calendar 2025 Q2

does that enable you to vertically integrate more carbon composites for the structures?

Show response

Adam framed the deal as standing up in-house composite R&D for defense, with technology expected to transfer to the civil application. Direct.

Calendar 2025 Q1

in the skinny budget, there was $1.2 billion added to FAA spending for personnel additions and infrastructure upgrades.

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam said it was too early to judge the benefit but that Archer would welcome any additional FAA resources.

can you comment on the production scaling? And is that still on track for 2 aircraft per month by end of year?

Capex InvestmentProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Adam said output is balanced against internal testing needs and manufacturing lessons and did not directly confirm the 2-per-month target.

Calendar 2024 Q4

have you initiated or introduced a standardized fixed price contract value to deploy X number of aircraft

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam said contracts will vary by country but gave a $10 million to $15 million per-aircraft rule of thumb.

LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.10 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
LUNR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you see an opportunity given the recent additions to the ground stations and the ground network

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed active US and UK discussions to use the ground network for Space Force / space-domain-awareness data relay; direct.

what the capital might be required to support this and how much might be customer-funded R&D and CapEx?

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Said the 500kg Nova-D is essentially fully funded to flight under contract; only heavier 3-engine variants would need incremental CapEx/IRAD; direct.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how many GEO COMSATs do you expect to build for that program? And do you expect those satellites

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Altemus said it is a design competition so order counts aren't set, but expects a multi-award and a replacement cycle; partial.

are you able to comment on the RFP and bid process for the light version of LTV

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Altemus detailed the restructured crewed/uncrewed LTV task order with a proposal submitted late April and award expected May 22; direct.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could talk about some of the operational changes that have been made at Lantaris

Show response

Altemus credited President Chris Johnson with streamlining production, removing onerous legacy terms, and right-sizing workforce and facilities.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what changes has Advent made within Lanteris to improve the margin profile of their manufacturing

Show response

Steve said troubled legacy programs are off the books and Lanteris has invested in the 300 Series for SDA Tranche 1/2, moving in a positive direction on efficiencies.

should we frame the strategy here as looking to gain more manufacturing capability left of launch

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve confirmed the model: use Lanteris production and reliability to feed IM's own higher-margin data-network services, becoming its own customer for satellites.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is there still a CLPS contract expected to be awarded in November? Has that moved right?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Steve confirmed the CT4 CLPS award is still competitive and cited root-caused IM-2 sensor fixes carried into IM-3/IM-4 as grounds for confidence, without a firm win probability.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is there any risk of the LTV delivery on a Nova-D lander for either Artemis 3 or beyond being changed or delayed

ChallengingRegulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Steve said the Nova-D/LTV flies on a Falcon 9 Heavy, so SLS changes pose no launch-vehicle risk to LTVS; procurement remains on track.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Has the data collected during IM-2 impacted your conversations with NASA or plans for the upsized Nova-D lander?

Product LaunchInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Steve said Nova-D remains in its design cycle toward preliminary design review and expects little change from the IM-2 hot-wash review.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ACHR Archer Aviation Inc.100%none of 10 questions
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.1010%1 of 10 questions
  • ACHR
    Archer Aviation Inc. · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • LUNR
    Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q1333%1 of 3 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Product Launch8
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Innovation & R&D5
  • M&A5
  • Capex Investment3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Margin3
  • Demand2
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Geographic Expansion1
Show all 13 topics
  • Supply Chain1
  • Pricing1
  • Revenue Growth1