Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Avi Jaroslawicz
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 20on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 0%none of 20 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 20 of 20 questions from 6 companies
EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.11 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
But is there any potential that we could see them stay in kind of the 10% plus range or -- is that not realistic?
Show response
Directly ruled out a repeat of the 10.6% margin and walked through what the low, mid and high ends of guidance each imply.
Just wondering if there was anything kind of more unique that drove that strength?
Show response
Declined to name a specific driver, framing the result as the midpoint of a normal margin band rather than a discrete item.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just want to discuss this acceleration in organic growth that we saw here in Q1
Show response
Guzzi identified water/wastewater in Florida and food processing as the two pass-through areas, noting they affect margins by 10-15 bps but generate strong return on capital.
productivity and pricing together contributing about 5 percentage points to construction revenue growth this year
Show response
Guzzi confirmed pricing and productivity contribute 30-40% of growth, consistent with historical patterns, with no meaningful change from prior guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you've noted in the past that how much more of your revenue has grown than your headcount. Is that something that you expect is going to be able to continue this year
Show response
Nalbandian confirmed the 2-3x revenue-to-headcount growth trend held again in FY2025. Guzzi added that continued means-and-method sharing across the country will enable further productivity gains.
just without the U.K. business and with large projects continuing to grow and productivity continuing to grow, would have expected maybe a starting point of around flat for the year for operating m...
Show response
Guzzi noted the 40bp guidance range is tight for a business with 12,000 projects. High end equals flat (replicating record 9.4%), low end reflects potential mix shift from water/wastewater work which has lower margins due to prime contractor role with more subcontract and material content. Nalbandian framed midpoint as rolling 12-24 month average.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are you thinking that should be picking up at all in the near term just based on some of the backlog growth that you're seeing
Show response
Guzzi expects sustainable organic growth of high-single to low-double digits. Law of large numbers applies, 10% organic growth means adding $1.5-2B annually. Construction segments outpace non-res by 500-600 basis points over 5 years.
can you share some more color as to what made this maybe more unique than past situations
Show response
Guzzi noted this was a more difficult labor market than expected. Jobs are still profitable but margin came in below initial estimates due to learning curve in new geography.
Calendar 2025 Q2
do you still see opportunity to leverage that grow your volumes faster than your headcount
Show response
Guzzi confirmed continued capacity expansion in prefab, especially in electrical for data centers. 95% of prefab is for internal use. Fire life safety at 70% prefab volume.
is this the limit of what you were comfortable booking? How much more could you have booked with more capacity
Show response
Guzzi rejected the capacity-constraint framing, noting EMCOR manages strategically by market, site, and company rather than at aggregate capacity levels.
just when we think of the margins moving in bands, we've now seen, I believe, 5 quarters where the margins in the combined Construction segment was north of 12%
Show response
Nalbandian provided construction segment margin range of 12.25%-13.25% on a rolling 12-24 month basis.
ITWIllinois Tool Works3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you just talk about some of the thinking for leaving that range unchanged and just kind of wider than you typically would
Show response
Michael said well within ranges with one quarter left. Narrowed EPS range and explained lower tax rate offsets softer revenue. T&M biggest Q4 sequential pickup; lower auto builds factored in.
Calendar 2025 Q1
would you expect that to be more from a weaker macro impacting end markets or more from higher prices and price sensitivity
Show response
Michael said demand risk is entirely end-market driven, not price sensitivity. ITW's competitors are less favorably positioned. Confident in continued market outperformance.
when are you expecting price cost would be most favorable? Would it be like Q2 with higher pricing coming in sooner
Show response
Michael said normal slightly positive price-cost expected. Better positioned this time vs 2017-2018, so less lag. Any margin pressure from pricing lag is short-term and manageable.
CMICummins2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
if, for whatever reason, you don't do a pre-buy materialized this year that you'd expect retail demand may be still to be negative
Show response
Rumsey noted underlying freight recovery potential even without prebuy, citing two years of truckload carrier challenges. Wide range reflects prebuy timing uncertainty.
breaking down kind of market share gains versus market growth for 2024. How did those net against each other?
Show response
Smith indicated 2025 will track market rather than further share gains. 2025 medium-duty decline reflects weaker orders and depleting backlog.
PCARPaccar2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
When are customers telling you that they might start Pre-buying
Show response
Feight expects strong customer interest in Q4 planning with clarity potentially driving first quarter action if 35mg standard holds.
Is that pretty uniform by region, or are there any that are notably off of that point
Show response
Feight confirmed Q4 order book ~60-70% full uniformly across regions, with European market showing strong order intake.
DEDeere & Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you gaining share within the existing product portfolio? Or has it really been driven by these new products
Show response
Josh Beal attributed share growth to a combination of new products, technology adoption, dealer channel strength, and localization, noting the Casa John Deere event this year exceeded last year's record with over 20 new product launches. Highlighted harvest automation utilization over 80% in Brazil.
MLMMartin Marietta Materials1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
just curious how that's affecting your own capital planning and strategic decision-making
Show response
Ward framed policy changes as net positive for MLM: infrastructure focus, potential tariff benefits, rate cuts helping housing, and favorable M&A regulatory environment.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| ITW Illinois Tool Works | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| CMI Cummins | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| PCAR Paccar | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| DE Deere & Company | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MLM Martin Marietta Materials | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- EMEEMCOR Group, Inc. · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- ITWIllinois Tool Works · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- CMICummins · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- PCARPaccar · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- DEDeere & Company · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MLMMartin Marietta Materials · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin7
- Demand7
- Revenue Growth4
- Competitive Dynamics3
- Guidance Reliability3
- Pricing3
- Labor Market3
- Geographic Expansion2
- Regulation Policy2
- Product Launch1
Show all 15 topics
- Innovation & R&D1
- Capex Investment1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Macroeconomic1
- Capital Allocation1