Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Avi Jaroslawicz

UBS · covers Industrials, Basic Materials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
20on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 20 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 20 of 20 questions from 6 companies

EMEEMCOR Group, Inc.11 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
EME company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

But is there any potential that we could see them stay in kind of the 10% plus range or -- is that not realistic?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Directly ruled out a repeat of the 10.6% margin and walked through what the low, mid and high ends of guidance each imply.

Just wondering if there was anything kind of more unique that drove that strength?

Show response

Declined to name a specific driver, framing the result as the midpoint of a normal margin band rather than a discrete item.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I just want to discuss this acceleration in organic growth that we saw here in Q1

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Guzzi identified water/wastewater in Florida and food processing as the two pass-through areas, noting they affect margins by 10-15 bps but generate strong return on capital.

productivity and pricing together contributing about 5 percentage points to construction revenue growth this year

Show response

Guzzi confirmed pricing and productivity contribute 30-40% of growth, consistent with historical patterns, with no meaningful change from prior guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

you've noted in the past that how much more of your revenue has grown than your headcount. Is that something that you expect is going to be able to continue this year

Labor MarketMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Nalbandian confirmed the 2-3x revenue-to-headcount growth trend held again in FY2025. Guzzi added that continued means-and-method sharing across the country will enable further productivity gains.

just without the U.K. business and with large projects continuing to grow and productivity continuing to grow, would have expected maybe a starting point of around flat for the year for operating m...

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Guzzi noted the 40bp guidance range is tight for a business with 12,000 projects. High end equals flat (replicating record 9.4%), low end reflects potential mix shift from water/wastewater work which has lower margins due to prime contractor role with more subcontract and material content. Nalbandian framed midpoint as rolling 12-24 month average.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Are you thinking that should be picking up at all in the near term just based on some of the backlog growth that you're seeing

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Guzzi expects sustainable organic growth of high-single to low-double digits. Law of large numbers applies, 10% organic growth means adding $1.5-2B annually. Construction segments outpace non-res by 500-600 basis points over 5 years.

can you share some more color as to what made this maybe more unique than past situations

MarginLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Guzzi noted this was a more difficult labor market than expected. Jobs are still profitable but margin came in below initial estimates due to learning curve in new geography.

Calendar 2025 Q2

do you still see opportunity to leverage that grow your volumes faster than your headcount

Innovation & R&DCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Guzzi confirmed continued capacity expansion in prefab, especially in electrical for data centers. 95% of prefab is for internal use. Fire life safety at 70% prefab volume.

is this the limit of what you were comfortable booking? How much more could you have booked with more capacity

DemandLabor MarketTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Guzzi rejected the capacity-constraint framing, noting EMCOR manages strategically by market, site, and company rather than at aggregate capacity levels.

just when we think of the margins moving in bands, we've now seen, I believe, 5 quarters where the margins in the combined Construction segment was north of 12%

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Nalbandian provided construction segment margin range of 12.25%-13.25% on a rolling 12-24 month basis.

ITWIllinois Tool Works3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
ITW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you just talk about some of the thinking for leaving that range unchanged and just kind of wider than you typically would

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Michael said well within ranges with one quarter left. Narrowed EPS range and explained lower tax rate offsets softer revenue. T&M biggest Q4 sequential pickup; lower auto builds factored in.

Calendar 2025 Q1

would you expect that to be more from a weaker macro impacting end markets or more from higher prices and price sensitivity

Show response

Michael said demand risk is entirely end-market driven, not price sensitivity. ITW's competitors are less favorably positioned. Confident in continued market outperformance.

when are you expecting price cost would be most favorable? Would it be like Q2 with higher pricing coming in sooner

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Michael said normal slightly positive price-cost expected. Better positioned this time vs 2017-2018, so less lag. Any margin pressure from pricing lag is short-term and manageable.

CMICummins2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
CMI company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

if, for whatever reason, you don't do a pre-buy materialized this year that you'd expect retail demand may be still to be negative

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Rumsey noted underlying freight recovery potential even without prebuy, citing two years of truckload carrier challenges. Wide range reflects prebuy timing uncertainty.

breaking down kind of market share gains versus market growth for 2024. How did those net against each other?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Smith indicated 2025 will track market rather than further share gains. 2025 medium-duty decline reflects weaker orders and depleting backlog.

PCARPaccar2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
PCAR company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

When are customers telling you that they might start Pre-buying

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Feight expects strong customer interest in Q4 planning with clarity potentially driving first quarter action if 35mg standard holds.

Is that pretty uniform by region, or are there any that are notably off of that point

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Feight confirmed Q4 order book ~60-70% full uniformly across regions, with European market showing strong order intake.

DEDeere & Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
DE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

are you gaining share within the existing product portfolio? Or has it really been driven by these new products

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Josh Beal attributed share growth to a combination of new products, technology adoption, dealer channel strength, and localization, noting the Casa John Deere event this year exceeded last year's record with over 20 new product launches. Highlighted harvest automation utilization over 80% in Brazil.

MLMMartin Marietta Materials1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
MLM company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

just curious how that's affecting your own capital planning and strategic decision-making

Regulation PolicyCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Ward framed policy changes as net positive for MLM: infrastructure focus, potential tariff benefits, rate cuts helping housing, and favorable M&A regulatory environment.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.110%none of 11 questions
ITW Illinois Tool Works30%none of 3 questions
CMI Cummins2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PCAR Paccar2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
DE Deere & Company1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
MLM Martin Marietta Materials1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • EME
    EMCOR Group, Inc. · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • ITW
    Illinois Tool Works · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • CMI
    Cummins · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PCAR
    Paccar · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • DE
    Deere & Company · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • MLM
    Martin Marietta Materials · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions1
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin7
  • Demand7
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Pricing3
  • Labor Market3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Product Launch1
Show all 15 topics
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Capex Investment1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Capital Allocation1