Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Ben Bollin

Cleveland Research · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
30on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%1 of 30 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 30 of 30 questions from 5 companies

GRMNGarmin13 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 13 challenging
GRMN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

how are you thinking about the overall balance sheet and working capital strategy with that backdrop

Capital AllocationSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Doug framed inventory as a strategic business tool, used to increase safety stock for key components and ensure product availability. Emphasized managing the full supply chain including commodities.

Could you discuss what you're seeing with respect to demand around new deliveries versus the retrofit opportunities

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Cliff noted OEM deliveries were the stronger growth contributor vs aftermarket. Aircraft makers are sitting on high backlog with no hesitation on new purchases. Their objective is to keep feeding backlog while incrementally growing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Have you seen any change in behavior of your retail partners as they've recognized that hardware costs are going up broadly in other consumer electronics

Show response

Cliff didn't address pull-forward directly but said retailers are enthusiastic about carrying Garmin, with higher engagement during the holiday season. Brick-and-mortar sentiment very positive as customers actively buy in stores.

Is this for 2027 model years, so it commences in late '26. Is this commencing in later '27 for 2028 model year

Show response

Cliff confirmed limited, inconsequential Mercedes contributions in late 2026 with the real ramp beginning early 2027. Described it as a very aggressive program with significant volumes over the life of the contract.

Calendar 2025 Q3

advanced process nodes where any availability issues, you feel good on your ability to source memory, components

Supply ChainInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cliff acknowledged some semiconductor market impact from AI/data center demand. Expects long-term benefit from higher-performance processors and denser memory configurations for Garmin products.

what you're seeing with respect to Auto on the accrued incremental warranty costs that you're seeing

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cliff described the warranty accrual as isolated and already addressed. Long-term margin targets unchanged: mid-to-upper teens gross margin and mid-single-digit operating margin at scale.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Receivables and inventory up. Decent amount year over year in sequential. Talked a little bit about the trend there

Capital AllocationInventoryTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Doug confirmed working capital on plan. Inventory increased deliberately for demand support and tariff risk mitigation. Receivables reflect sales growth. Full-year FCF target of $1.2B maintained.

Could you talk a little bit about how you're thinking about subscription momentum, the materiality, the progress

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Cliff confirmed subscriptions growing in every segment: outdoor (inReach), fitness (Bounce, Connect Plus), aviation (cockpit content). Won't disclose specifics until 10% revenue threshold is hit.

Calendar 2025 Q1

when you look at the guidance within Fitness, 1Q run rate, a bit below how you're guiding the year

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cliff cited two factors: greater FX benefit for fitness due to international revenue weighting, and upcoming new product releases that will boost revenue through the year.

Any thoughts on the dynamics you're seeing across geos that are contributing to the relative performance levels

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Cliff explained Americas weighed down by lower marine/aviation growth. EMEA strong on wearables. Auto OEM European deliveries from Poland factory grew significantly YoY.

Calendar 2024 Q4

the way we should think about the margin of this business, supposed gross and EBIT margin, and how it scales over time

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cliff reiterated mid-teens gross margin and mid-single-digit operating margin targets. Mentioned largest auto OEM win to date coming in 2027 plus smaller global wins.

the performance in EMEA has been really remarkable. Last couple of years. I'm curious

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cliff attributed EMEA strength to wearables market position, noting Garmin is the strong number two player in major European countries versus number three in Americas.

curious how you think about flat gross margins when you know, outdoor fitness, aviation growing its percentage of mix

Show response

Doug acknowledged favorable mix but cited many variables (component costs, overhead per unit). No major differences expected by segment. Somewhat vague on the specific offsets.

MSIMotorola Solutions9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
MSI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what you see happening with the timing of Congress passing funding for DHS. Any influence on the backlog rev rec during the quarter

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Greg noted strong federal position with $148M DHS order in Q1 funded through OB3 Act. Expects comparable growth in 2026 federal business, immaterial impact from D.C. dynamics, all implied in guide.

when we think about near-term opportunity associated with World Cup, how should we think about that capture opportunity or incrementality

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Greg dimensioned World Cup at approximately $40 million all-in across city sites. More than half earmarked for counter-UAS systems. Also driven APX NEXT refreshes and SmartConnect business.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Could you talk about how that is contributing to visibility

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jack cited Vancouver area as biggest World Cup deal to date. Opportunities include network refresh, fixed video, and drone/counter-drone with BRINC and SkySafe. Silvus technology applicable under special temporary authorization. Federal grant money available but planning and execution at local level.

I am curious, is that contributing at all to what you are seeing in backlog behavior today as making price changes

Show response

Jason clarified MSI did not reprice existing contracts during COVID. Pricing opportunities exist with new products like D-Series and at renewals. No residual backlog effect from prior pricing actions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

could you talk a little bit about the sales motion with Silvus. How does that look versus other technologies in the portfolio

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jack described three sales facets: longer-cycle program of record pursuits, non-traditional DoD procurement trials (especially unmanned systems including Class 1 drones), and leveraging MSI's 120-country relationships for international expansion. Silvus backlog was $200M at close.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you maybe compare and contrast it to your existing sales motion

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jack described expanding from small US-focused team to global coverage. Adding channel sales, government affairs lobbying. Similar playbook to video space entry.

How do you think budgets are coming together into fiscal '26 just any high-level thoughts on what you're hearing

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jack confirmed state and local FY26 budgets look very good. Revenue sources healthy across property, sales, and income taxes. Selling environment remains strong, informing confidence in H2 and beyond.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what you're seeing into the current and a state budget cycle with respect to federal grant awards

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jack confirmed very good budget environment. Income, sales, property tax receipts up. Pipeline robust heading into second half. D series infrastructure refresh creating additional excitement.

If you see any similarities between the current environment and kind of where we are in that cycle versus what we saw then

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Greg said current environment feels more steady state than stimulus-driven cycles. ARPA was less than 1% of 2024 North American orders. More quick-turn business with supply chain normalized.

ANETArista Networks4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ANET company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

where you think enterprise is in terms of their ability to consume inference and create agents

Show response

Jayshree characterized enterprise AI as early stage with low-thousands GPU clusters for inference and agentic AI. Called it the calm before the storm, expecting 2+ years to fully develop.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what you're seeing from these cloud customers around engineering and delivery lead times, how that has evolved

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jayshree noted large customers providing early forecasts pre-PO for planning, while campus business has shorter days/weeks planning cycles that Todd's team is optimizing.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Could you share a little more detail what does that look like? Does this relate to the absolute size of their deployments

Trade TariffsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chantelle explained tariff uncertainty may cause customers to pull in purchases, creating additional variability in product deferred revenue balances.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm interested in your thoughts on your enterprise strategy within G2000 and how that may be evolving as it looks like refresh opportunities are intensifying

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jayshree noted strongest-ever product portfolio with natural trickle-down from high-end data center to campus, with new international leadership being added.

CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
CSCO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

where do you see the customer budget coming from? What are they doing to fund this stuff?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Robbins said customers treat last-day-of-support remediation as non-optional and fund it by moving dollars into IT; Patterson said lead times are healthy.

Calendar 2026 Q2

Could you talk a little bit about what that's solving for top line, OpEx efficiency? Just what you're seeing from that

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Chuck explained Circuit enables Cisco-specific guardrails, combines public and proprietary data, delivers independent agents per employee. Customers doing similar for inferencing and agentic applications.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how do you think about this relative to the late 90s with respect to the Internet build-out

Cloud & AIMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Robbins noted key differences from dot-com: faster pace of transition, spending concentrated in highly profitable companies with strong balance sheets rather than speculative startups.

AAPLApple Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
AAPL company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

I'm interested in your thoughts and how you would have us think about the average useful life of these devices in the wild

Show response

Cook described a range of user types from early adopters to those who hold devices much longer, and acknowledged COVID-era purchases as a significant future upgrade opportunity.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GRMN Garmin138%1 of 13 questions
MSI Motorola Solutions90%none of 9 questions
ANET Arista Networks40%none of 4 questions
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
AAPL Apple Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GRMN
    Garmin · 13 questions
    8%1 of 13 questions
  • MSI
    Motorola Solutions · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • ANET
    Arista Networks · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CSCO
    Cisco Systems, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • AAPL
    Apple Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4520%1 of 5 questions3
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  8. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand16
  • Macroeconomic5
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Geographic Expansion4
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Supply Chain3
  • Margin3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Capital Allocation2
Show all 18 topics
  • Inventory2
  • M&A2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Regulation Policy1
  • Pricing1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Product Launch1