Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brad Hewitt
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 21on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%1 of 21 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 21 of 21 questions from 4 companies
ZBRAZebra Technologies11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
curious if you could elaborate a bit more on what drove the implicit organic growth guidance range for the rest of the year
Show response
Burns said growth is truly broad-based across regions, verticals, and segments. Manufacturing turning from laggard to contributor with double-digit machine vision growth. Elo demand strong. Trade show conversations positive across NRF, logistics, and healthcare. Would be at top end of outlook except for memory constraints. Customer investments continuing across all verticals.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you see channel inventories as they stand today and
Show response
Winters confirmed channel inventories in good shape, similar to year-ago levels measured by days on hand. Some quarter-to-quarter variability expected but no material full-year changes embedded in guide.
have you guys seen any change in customer willingness to go ahead with projects versus three months ago
Show response
Burns said tariffs have fully flowed through customer supply chains and are no longer a topic in conversations. Customers have raised prices where needed. Memory is now the bigger supply-side challenge. No one holding back projects due to tariffs.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how dynamic is that number? Should we think of that as more of a minimum threshold? And then how do you think about cadence of deployment and why not execute this as an ASR
Show response
Winters said $500M is the commitment spread over next 4 quarters. Will be dynamic, taking advantage of stock volatility. Open market preferred over ASR for better timing control. Committed now given strong balance sheet profile exiting the year at current leverage levels.
is that margin outlook embedding a little bit of conservatism? Or is there anything that you would expect to limit the drop-through in Q4
Show response
Winters attributed lower incrementals to typical Q4 large deal mix, which carries lower margins. Nothing unusual in the timing or margin profile to call out.
Calendar 2025 Q2
should we assume the focus is more on bolt-on deals and perhaps modest buybacks in the near term until pro forma leverage comes down
Show response
Burns said near-term focus is integrating Elo. Capital allocation priorities unchanged: organic growth first, then strategic M&A, then shareholder returns. Already returned $250M via buybacks YTD. Will continue looking for strategic M&A but Elo integration is the priority.
what has been the historical organic growth profile of the business, particularly from 2019 through 2024. And then how would you describe the potential scope of revenue synergies
Show response
Winters said Elo's historical growth profile overlaps Zebra's long-term trajectory. $25M synergy target has cost levers (real estate, consulting, supply base) and go-to-market levers (international expansion, cross-selling). Revenue synergies could push toward top end of 5-7% framework.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Should we expect that you may look to maintain or maybe even accelerate the pace of buybacks throughout the rest of the year
Show response
Winters confirmed buyback pace is higher than normal YTD at $200M to capitalize on volatility. Expects to remain active for the balance of the year.
can you clarify the tariff rates you're assuming for the various countries as well as the impact and duration of the exemptions
Show response
Winters detailed: 140% China tariff, 10% other Asia, but electronics exemption covers most mobile computing (~2/3 of China imports). USMCA exemption for Mexico production. Guide assumes current rates with no changes.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it looks like your gross margin on the service and software side of the business stepped down sequentially, and has been in a bit of a downtrend
Show response
Winters attributed the Q4 dip to timing of repair volumes. Expects continued margin expansion in services/software but at a slower pace than the last four years.
it appears that you're embedding about 30% organic incremental margins in 2025. I know the long-term framework is 30% incrementals or better
Show response
Winters explained the $20M tariff headwind depresses first-half margins, with substantial sequential improvement expected Q2-to-Q3 and full mitigation by Q4.
NDSNNordson Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
IPS revenue was much better than typical sequential seasonality
Show response
CEO attributed IPS strength to packaging and precision ag growth plus the removal of polymer processing and automotive drag. CFO framed the 3% organic growth as the underlying run rate that was previously masked by the drag from weaker end markets.
does that give you confidence that perhaps your electronics business as a whole can outperform the mid-single-digit long-term outlook
Show response
CEO emphasized through-cycle thinking, higher than mid-single-digit in up-cycle years like now, but the business will inevitably have down periods. Current strong performance is embedded in the guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you quantify how backlog trended sequentially?
Show response
CFO explained sequential backlog decline as normal seasonality driven by holiday schedules, emphasizing the year-over-year comparison (up 5%) as the more meaningful metric.
is it fair to assume roughly normal seasonality for 2026?
Show response
CFO confirmed normal seasonal pattern expected with Q1 as lowest quarter building sequentially through the year. CEO added minor Chinese New Year timing impact shifting from Q1 to Q2.
Calendar 2025 Q3
your outlook is for organic sales to be flat to slightly down year-over-year in Q4. I think that would imply a little bit of a deceleration on a 3-year stack basis
Show response
CFO explained Q4 guidance implies modest sequential uptick from Q3 but tougher year-over-year comps in systems businesses (plastics), not a true deceleration in underlying momentum.
is that segment sort of at a normalized run rate in the 24% to 25% zone
Show response
CEO confirmed 24-25% ATS EBITDA margin is reasonable at current revenue levels with incrementals slightly better than company average, but cautioned against extrapolating higher given 14-15% of revenue invested in R&D.
FTVFortive2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could walk through your assumptions by segment both for Q2 and the back half of the year in terms of core growth and margins
Show response
Declined specific margin guidance due to tariff dynamics. Directionally: New Fortive low-single+ to mid-single core growth unchanged; PT now down low-single for full year.
you guys called out the mid-single-digit core growth in FAL in Q1. Just curious if you could break that down between the two businesses
Show response
FAL led by ServiceChannel with strong NDR and enterprise wins. Gordian mostly on track with some government hesitancy. Procurement was double-digits at Gordian in Q1.
VLTOVeralto2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it fair to assume organic growth accelerates each quarter through the year and then Q4 given the easy comp you're kind of comfortably in the mid-single digit zone?
Show response
CFO confirmed sequential revenue build consistent with historical averages at 24% in Q1. 3-day shipping math creates H1 comp headwinds and H2 tailwinds. Underlying demand patterns unchanged throughout the year.
what you're assuming for the price contribution to growth in 2026, both consolidated and by segment? And how much of that is carryover versus incremental pricing?
Show response
CFO confirmed 2026 pricing expected near 200 basis points, at high end of historical 100-200bps range. Mix of carryover from 2025 pricing actions plus regular incremental price increases.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| ZBRA Zebra Technologies | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| NDSN Nordson Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| FTV Fortive | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| VLTO Veralto | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth8
- Guidance Reliability5
- Margin5
- Demand4
- Trade Tariffs3
- Capital Allocation3
- M&A2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Cloud & AI1
- Pricing1
Show all 13 topics
- Inventory1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1