Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brad Hewitt

Wolfe Research · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q1 (6 quarters).

Questions
21on tracked calls
Challenge rate
5%1 of 21 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 21 of 21 questions from 4 companies

ZBRAZebra Technologies11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
ZBRA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

curious if you could elaborate a bit more on what drove the implicit organic growth guidance range for the rest of the year

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Burns said growth is truly broad-based across regions, verticals, and segments. Manufacturing turning from laggard to contributor with double-digit machine vision growth. Elo demand strong. Trade show conversations positive across NRF, logistics, and healthcare. Would be at top end of outlook except for memory constraints. Customer investments continuing across all verticals.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how you see channel inventories as they stand today and

Show response

Winters confirmed channel inventories in good shape, similar to year-ago levels measured by days on hand. Some quarter-to-quarter variability expected but no material full-year changes embedded in guide.

have you guys seen any change in customer willingness to go ahead with projects versus three months ago

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Burns said tariffs have fully flowed through customer supply chains and are no longer a topic in conversations. Customers have raised prices where needed. Memory is now the bigger supply-side challenge. No one holding back projects due to tariffs.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how dynamic is that number? Should we think of that as more of a minimum threshold? And then how do you think about cadence of deployment and why not execute this as an ASR

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Winters said $500M is the commitment spread over next 4 quarters. Will be dynamic, taking advantage of stock volatility. Open market preferred over ASR for better timing control. Committed now given strong balance sheet profile exiting the year at current leverage levels.

is that margin outlook embedding a little bit of conservatism? Or is there anything that you would expect to limit the drop-through in Q4

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Winters attributed lower incrementals to typical Q4 large deal mix, which carries lower margins. Nothing unusual in the timing or margin profile to call out.

Calendar 2025 Q2

should we assume the focus is more on bolt-on deals and perhaps modest buybacks in the near term until pro forma leverage comes down

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Burns said near-term focus is integrating Elo. Capital allocation priorities unchanged: organic growth first, then strategic M&A, then shareholder returns. Already returned $250M via buybacks YTD. Will continue looking for strategic M&A but Elo integration is the priority.

what has been the historical organic growth profile of the business, particularly from 2019 through 2024. And then how would you describe the potential scope of revenue synergies

Show response

Winters said Elo's historical growth profile overlaps Zebra's long-term trajectory. $25M synergy target has cost levers (real estate, consulting, supply base) and go-to-market levers (international expansion, cross-selling). Revenue synergies could push toward top end of 5-7% framework.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Should we expect that you may look to maintain or maybe even accelerate the pace of buybacks throughout the rest of the year

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Winters confirmed buyback pace is higher than normal YTD at $200M to capitalize on volatility. Expects to remain active for the balance of the year.

can you clarify the tariff rates you're assuming for the various countries as well as the impact and duration of the exemptions

Show response

Winters detailed: 140% China tariff, 10% other Asia, but electronics exemption covers most mobile computing (~2/3 of China imports). USMCA exemption for Mexico production. Guide assumes current rates with no changes.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it looks like your gross margin on the service and software side of the business stepped down sequentially, and has been in a bit of a downtrend

Show response

Winters attributed the Q4 dip to timing of repair volumes. Expects continued margin expansion in services/software but at a slower pace than the last four years.

it appears that you're embedding about 30% organic incremental margins in 2025. I know the long-term framework is 30% incrementals or better

MarginTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Winters explained the $20M tariff headwind depresses first-half margins, with substantial sequential improvement expected Q2-to-Q3 and full mitigation by Q4.

NDSNNordson Corporation6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
NDSN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

IPS revenue was much better than typical sequential seasonality

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO attributed IPS strength to packaging and precision ag growth plus the removal of polymer processing and automotive drag. CFO framed the 3% organic growth as the underlying run rate that was previously masked by the drag from weaker end markets.

does that give you confidence that perhaps your electronics business as a whole can outperform the mid-single-digit long-term outlook

Show response

CEO emphasized through-cycle thinking, higher than mid-single-digit in up-cycle years like now, but the business will inevitably have down periods. Current strong performance is embedded in the guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

could you quantify how backlog trended sequentially?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO explained sequential backlog decline as normal seasonality driven by holiday schedules, emphasizing the year-over-year comparison (up 5%) as the more meaningful metric.

is it fair to assume roughly normal seasonality for 2026?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed normal seasonal pattern expected with Q1 as lowest quarter building sequentially through the year. CEO added minor Chinese New Year timing impact shifting from Q1 to Q2.

Calendar 2025 Q3

your outlook is for organic sales to be flat to slightly down year-over-year in Q4. I think that would imply a little bit of a deceleration on a 3-year stack basis

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO explained Q4 guidance implies modest sequential uptick from Q3 but tougher year-over-year comps in systems businesses (plastics), not a true deceleration in underlying momentum.

is that segment sort of at a normalized run rate in the 24% to 25% zone

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO confirmed 24-25% ATS EBITDA margin is reasonable at current revenue levels with incrementals slightly better than company average, but cautioned against extrapolating higher given 14-15% of revenue invested in R&D.

FTVFortive2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
FTV company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you could walk through your assumptions by segment both for Q2 and the back half of the year in terms of core growth and margins

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Declined specific margin guidance due to tariff dynamics. Directionally: New Fortive low-single+ to mid-single core growth unchanged; PT now down low-single for full year.

you guys called out the mid-single-digit core growth in FAL in Q1. Just curious if you could break that down between the two businesses

Revenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

FAL led by ServiceChannel with strong NDR and enterprise wins. Gordian mostly on track with some government hesitancy. Procurement was double-digits at Gordian in Q1.

VLTOVeralto2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
VLTO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

is it fair to assume organic growth accelerates each quarter through the year and then Q4 given the easy comp you're kind of comfortably in the mid-single digit zone?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed sequential revenue build consistent with historical averages at 24% in Q1. 3-day shipping math creates H1 comp headwinds and H2 tailwinds. Underlying demand patterns unchanged throughout the year.

what you're assuming for the price contribution to growth in 2026, both consolidated and by segment? And how much of that is carryover versus incremental pricing?

Show response

CFO confirmed 2026 pricing expected near 200 basis points, at high end of historical 100-200bps range. Mix of carryover from 2025 pricing actions plus regular incremental price increases.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ZBRA Zebra Technologies119%1 of 11 questions
NDSN Nordson Corporation60%none of 6 questions
FTV Fortive2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
VLTO Veralto2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies · 11 questions
    9%1 of 11 questions
  • NDSN
    Nordson Corporation · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • FTV
    Fortive · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • VLTO
    Veralto · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4250%1 of 2 questions1
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q340%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q460%none of 6 questions3
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth8
  • Guidance Reliability5
  • Margin5
  • Demand4
  • Trade Tariffs3
  • Capital Allocation3
  • M&A2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Pricing1
Show all 13 topics
  • Inventory1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Regulation Policy1