Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brendan Lynch

Barclays · covers Real Estate

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
67on tracked calls
Challenge rate
9%6 of 67 questions
Companies
9questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 67 of 67 questions from 9 companies

CCICrown Castle14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
CCI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how should we assess the progress you guys are making on these initiatives and the best way that we can monitor it

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management said it is developing internal scorecards for cycle times and organic-growth benchmarks and may share longer-term best-in-class metrics in future guidance.

Calendar 2026 Q1

How should we think about that as competition that might be a little bit more urban, suburban focused

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said WiFi offloading is already utilized and not a new threat. No indications of significant capacity shift off operator networks beyond what's already occurring.

is there any upside potential from the satellite operators deploying at some terrestrial sites?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said CCI would welcome satellite operators as tenants if they build terrestrial networks, noting it would fill the gap DISH left.

how that might be at some risk of increased competition from satellite -- from broadband satellite?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said satellite's larger coverage areas and capacity limitations make urban/suburban fixed wireless displacement unlikely. CCI portfolio skews urban/suburban. FWA is now a real line of business driving incremental tower densification.

Calendar 2025 Q4

the potential for them to deploy more of it via software upgrade instead of new leasing might be a headwind

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO explained software upgrades apply only to pre-deployed frequencies on some sites. New spectrum bands (like 600 MHz) require new hardware. CFO added that data growth ultimately requires radio/antenna replacement regardless.

you've previously guided to a 4-5% growth through 2027. Obviously, with DISH, that doesn't seem achievable at this point

ChallengingRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO declined to provide multi-year growth outlook but noted mobile data growth, carrier spectrum deployments, and upcoming FCC auctions support improved growth beyond 2026 trough.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk about any ancillary services that would fall within the realm of tower exposure that you would be willing to or interested in scaling more?

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO mentioned shared power systems and other potential services, but said specifics are early in his tenure. Priority is inventorying opportunities with customers and ensuring good business returns.

Maybe you could just help us frame some of the risks that exist in the industry related to additional spectrum swaps or efficiency gains via technology or spectral efficiency?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO said key risk is uncertainty about what new spectrum owners plan to do, but noted spectrum deployment has historically correlated with incremental tower revenue from infill and capacity growth.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you provide any details on what might be planned to get you to the $45 million midpoint

Show response

CFO and CEO confirmed maintenance CapEx is lumpy with nothing specifically planned; just timing of normal tower maintenance spending.

should we expect that more costs are going to be moved over each quarter until the deal closes?

Show response

CEO said no systematic shift expected; allocations are largely complete with only minor adjustments possible. Costs directly attributable to fiber/small cell go to disco ops, shared costs stay.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if there's some sort of regulatory hiccup in one or two states, what would that actually mean for the deal?

M&ARegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO expressed confidence in regulatory approvals, noting buyers are aware the deal will likely close regardless. Expects no significant hiccups.

Can you quantify, even if broadly, how much of the growth you are reporting is stemming from MLAs versus demand that is above and beyond what the carriers have already contracted?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO revealed approximately 90% of 2025 growth is already contracted through MLAs, with upside potential from incremental activity beyond contracted levels.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you just clarify how we should think about that?

Revenue GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO clarified long-term churn range of 1-2% includes $20M annual Sprint churn (40-50bps) from 2026-2034, with ex-Sprint churn at 0.5-1.5%.

Maybe you could talk a little bit about the timeframe for the $3 billion of repurchases and your thought process around repurchases versus other option

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO said buyback execution depends on market conditions at close; prefers repurchases over special dividend but won't rule out special dividend long-term.

PSAPublic Storage12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
PSA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

you mentioned that you’ve got participation in your surveys up to 90,000. From just a few thousand a couple years ago

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Boyle answered the premise head-on, saying participation rose from more channels and property-level follow-up rather than any incentive.

you mentioned savings in payroll from your machine learning-based staffing models. What does that entail?

Labor MarketCost PressureInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fisher quantified it, hours down over 30% since inception and payroll down 1.8% in the quarter and 1.2% for the year, partly offset by new incentives.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you discuss some of the initiatives driving that outcome and how much is in your control

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management cited macro factors plus PS 4.0 customer experience focus and affordability but did not quantify internal vs external contribution

do you anticipate dynamics continuing to improve, or is there new supply or other challenges that could still emerge?

Competitive DynamicsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management confirmed supply absorption underway in challenged markets with sequential improvement despite still-negative year-over-year revenue

Calendar 2025 Q4

what the primary KPIs you are measuring when you think about the customer experience component of the platform enhancements

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Boyle pointed to operational metrics like move-ins, move-outs, tenant retention, and overall organic growth performance but didn't identify specific new KPIs.

just give us an update on what your appetite is to maybe test the waters in some of these international markets

Geographic ExpansionM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Boyle mentioned Australia, Western Europe (Shurgard), and growing global markets. International platforms are smaller scale without the data advantages of US operations. US remains by far the deepest market.

Calendar 2025 Q3

How do you evaluate though, if you cut too much?

ChallengingMarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Russell described a multi-year A/B testing process using customer service as the primary guidepost, with predictability tools guiding labor optimization by market and submarket.

Are you seeing any signs of improvement yet or any reason to be more optimistic that 2026 would be better than 2025 or 2024?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Boyle said housing has been relatively stable with rates a touch lower, but no meaningful shifts visible on the ground. Expects steady as she goes, maybe slightly better.

Calendar 2025 Q2

street rates seem to be stubbornly negative as implied by your guidance as well. Can you just talk about the dynamics

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Tom explained success with lower move-in rents has encouraged continued use of the strategy. Expects improvement in stronger markets first then broader recovery over time.

last year, the seasonal peak was very early. Was there any change in that?

Show response

Tom noted typical July occupancy peak and late May/early June move-in demand peak, with no unusual seasonal shifts.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you just walk us through, your thought process on these components, and where you're planning to be more stern versus more flexible?

Show response

Tom emphasized revenue optimization as the goal, not targeting specific occupancy or rate levels. Expects a relatively flat occupancy year.

any particular markets that you might be targeting, or an urban versus suburban SKU, or any other property characteristics

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Tom stated no geographic or urban/suburban bias; underwriting goes down to individual asset quality and contribution to market scale.

EXRExtra Space Storage11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
EXR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how quickly did you see that in actual customer behavior? How quickly did it impact the same-store NOI results?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Norman opened by calling it a mushy answer and said cycles have not behaved uniformly, then gave the demand and vacate pattern without a lead time.

How much further do you think you can go in terms of improving the average customer's behavior in the portfolio

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Margolis said there is no target and that he does not know how much runway is left, while pointing to the testing track record.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Maybe you could give us some high-level thoughts on the competitive impact to the market from PSA and NSA being combined?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Joe expects PSA to be a good operator and those stores will do better under unified platform. No fundamental change in competitive landscape, EXR already competed with all those stores. Motivation to keep improving.

Can you talk about how seller expectations have changed, if at all

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Joe said market pricing aggressive, last 2 material deals at sub-5% caps without sufficient growth. Capital buyers underwriting early recovery cycle. EXR guiding modestly on net basis but historically finds off-market deals to exceed guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How should we think about the transition of those kind of street rates improving and that finally flowing through down to same-store NOI

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Joe positioned positive rates as forward indicator not immediate impact. Jeff added property tax normalization in 2026 removes a significant NOI headwind in many markets.

What is your expectation for that line item going forward in 2026?

Show response

Jeff said health care pressure continues but is muted by payroll efficiencies and general staffing savings. Declined to give specific budget numbers but total payroll within overall expense expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just talk about how you might be distributing some of that marketing spending between ChatGPT and Grok and any other AI models

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Joe noted AI platforms not yet monetized, currently zero spend there, almost all goes to Google. Expects monetization to come eventually.

Calendar 2025 Q1

We're a few months on from the fires in Los Angeles. Can you give us an update on how it's impacting operations and customer behavior?

Show response

Joe noted no demand surge from fires unlike hurricanes; pricing restricted by state of emergency, estimated 20bp revenue headwind for the year.

the marketing spend. It was down 12.5% year-over-year at a time when you're increasing occupancy. How should we think about that marketing spend going forward

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Scott framed marketing as revenue optimization tool, not fixed cost. Savings from single-brand LSI conversion offset potential spend increases when demand opportunities arise.

Calendar 2024 Q4

we look at the ECRI opportunity for the coming year, perhaps you have some fertile ground just because of the increase in new customers that you've brought in

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Joe deflected slightly, described ECRI philosophy as unchanged rather than quantifying the specific opportunity from increased new customer volumes.

It looks like vacates were down about 4.4% year-over-year. Maybe talk a little bit about what you're doing differently to improve that retention?

Show response

Joe explained strategy of targeting long-term customers even at lower upfront revenue for higher lifetime customer value.

IRMIron Mountain7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
IRM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you give us some details on the size of the acquisition, the operating synergies you anticipate

Show response

Barry gave specifics: high-teens millions annual revenue, ~$7M H2 contribution, low-20s% EBITDA margin, paid a 5-7x multiple expected to synergize below 5x.

Calendar 2026 Q1

your price increases that you typically roll out at the beginning of the year, can you just give us some color on how that process went

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO emphasized value-based pricing approach independent of inflation. Revenue management actions implemented in late January with full Q1 benefit. Expects mid-single-digit-plus revenue management cadence consistent with prior year with some incremental service-line actions in H2.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I wanted to follow up on RIM organic constant currency storage growth of about 5.2%.

Revenue GrowthPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Barry said Q4 sequential storage dip was FX and data management comp. Core physical business up 8% YoY. Revenue management actions already in marketplace for 2026. Expecting mid-single-digit RIM growth.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you talk about what would get you to the high end versus what might be the low end of what you might be able to capture?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Bill said contract value is volume-dependent based on agreed pricing. Preparing for tax season with positive customer feedback on model capabilities.

Calendar 2025 Q2

maybe just help us understand the kind of puts and takes there. If I recall correctly, it was announced on the first quarter call

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Barry confirmed $1M Q2 revenue, sub-$5M expected in Q3. Treasury went out for larger longer-term contract. Most revenue expected in 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the volume was up quite a bit in the quarter. Can you talk about what triggered that? Did downstream pricing or something else change in the market

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bill attributed growth to consistently winning more enterprise business, not pricing changes. Pricing was flat to slightly down.

Calendar 2024 Q4

If the US were to implement tighter restrictions on exporting IT hardware to China, how do you think that would affect the ALM business?

Trade TariffsCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bill explained components are multi-generation old and exempt. Company diversifying away from China and shifting toward enterprise redeployment.

SBACSBA Communications7 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
SBAC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

maybe you could just kind of scope the order of magnitude of what this opportunity might be

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CEO said it is premature to size D2D but a terrestrial component will be needed; carrier cost focus has had some near-term impact.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you give any concrete examples of how AI being deployed at a tower site is advantageous relative to in a traditional data center?

Show response

AI applications with high uplink demand require ultra-low latency achievable only with compute closer to users. Distributed micro data centers may be easier to power and resource than large centralized facilities. As long as latency matters, edge compute becomes more important.

Can you just kind of walk through some of those details and what the cap rate was that you paid?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Guatemala land under Millicom towers purchased at approximately 7x multiple. Attractive and accretive valuation while also controlling risk on those properties.

Calendar 2025 Q3

The FCC is considering auctioning 180 megahertz in , I think, it's 3.9 to 4.2 gigahertz band. Are there any carriers that would be able to acquire the spectrum and deploy it via software upgrade

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

3.9-4.2 GHz band would require incremental antennas and radios, not software-only upgrades. Massive MIMO deployment likely needed. Positive for tower companies as it drives new equipment installations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you give any details about these assets in particular and why you didn't think you're going to be able to scale more meaningfully in the Canadian market?

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Canadian carriers own their sites (e.g., TELUS captive tower company), limiting acquisition opportunities. Sale realized valuation well above public company multiple. Other markets evaluated individually; prefer to scale (like Central America) rather than exit.

To what extent are you seeing this now? And any outlook for the relatively near term would be helpful as well

Show response

AI embedded in devices observed by SBA's engineering team but hard to quantify from tower company's position in value chain. Comments are thematic based on carrier conversations.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk about the potential for more spectrum auctions over the next couple of years?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cavanagh supports FCC spectrum auctions but notes deployment is years away even if auctions accelerate. Near-term carrier focus is on optimizing and maximizing existing spectrum holdings.

BXPBXP, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
BXP company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are there any other buildings in the portfolio like Reservoir Place that could capture demand

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Cited 105 Winter Street and Reservoir Place as precedents and flagged Northern Virginia candidates, while stressing nothing is imminent.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how can we get confidence that this cycle in the next 5 to 10 years, you're going to be better than the last 20 or so

ChallengingDemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Doug couldn't promise the next 5 years will be better than the last 20 but noted AI discourse doesn't match market reality. New AI companies replacing tech titans as demand source. COVID created a supply shock through subleases, now being absorbed. Hilary added that Midtown South Q1 2026 captured as much AI demand as the entire first half of 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q4

We have, however, seen a number of announcements from Fortune 500 companies suggesting they will be shrinking headcount

ChallengingLabor MarketDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Owen acknowledged layoff announcements can't be positive but BXP's renewal data shows clients growing not shrinking over recent years. Believes many layoffs involve business unit closures and non-office roles, not premier workplace positions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

your view on the new office tower above South Station in Boston and how that might impact leasing dynamics in the market

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Doug said South Station tower launched at wrong time with financial district competition. In discussions with a large financial institution to relocate (not grow). Economics differ from occupancy success. Back Bay at 3% vacancy in competitive set is where BXP sees development opportunity (171 Dartmouth Street). Bryan noted limited transfer of tenants from Back Bay.

Calendar 2025 Q2

When you look back at past cycles, how common is it for tenants to start negotiations so early?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Doug said it is common for larger tenants to look 2-3 years ahead in tightening markets. Supply constraints in Back Bay and Midtown are driving clients to protect their footprints proactively.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you just talk about when that might be finalized and when the actual development process might be able to begin

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Doug explained entitlement and zoning processes are time-consuming with jurisdictions, transportation, and state involvement. Development unlikely before 2026-2027 for pulled assets.

Show 3 more companies
AMTAmerican Tower4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
AMT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

There are some press reports out there about DC construction being delayed in North Carolina. Seems there's a kind of growing wave of

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Steve drew parallels to tower permitting challenges from his early career. Leveraging AMT's government affairs and zoning teams to help CoreSite navigate restrictions. No projects scrapped or significantly delayed so far.

Can you give us some color on what that actually looks like in terms of potential coloc and amendment growth and cancellations

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rod outlined Brazil trajectory: negative organic growth in 2026 peaking, returning to lower single-digit positive in 2027, normalizing by 2028+. Three well-capitalized carriers all investing more in networks.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How should we think about that long-term growth going forward, we get back into about 4.5%

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Steve said 2021 guide was based on conditions at the time; DISH exit and USM-TMO deal not foreseen. Everything else playing out as expected. Long-term algorithm intact: mid-single-digit developed markets, higher emerging markets, double-digit CoreSite revenue, expanding margins. Confident in delivery even in 3-carrier market.

Can you describe to what extent you're seeing actual inferencing demand and specifically low latency inferencing demand at CoreSite

Show response

Steve confirmed inferencing is a leading new use case with demand exceeding supply. AMT being selective on counterparty names to manage business model risk. Curating mix of cloud, networks, enterprises and inferencing. Could do more if they had more space.

CBRECBRE Group4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
CBRE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

on the local facilities management growth, I think it was in the high-teens, it seems to outpace enterprise growth.

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Giamartino attributed the outperformance to new market expansion, citing 20% to 30% U.S. growth and low-teens growth in the more mature UK business.

I anticipate any impacts on your data center business from the growing NIMBYism that we are seeing in the market?

Regulation PolicyCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Sulentic acknowledged NIMBYism, water, power, supply chain and hiring constraints, then argued demand still outruns them and siting will shift accordingly.

Calendar 2026 Q1

How is the Pearce acquisition trending versus the $90 million of EBITDA contribution you had originally anticipated for 2026

Show response

Emma confirmed Pearce performing in line with expectations but noted seasonal revenue skew. Ex-Pearce BOE revenue growth was mid-teens. Bob highlighted geographic expansion opportunities: T&T growing US data center PM, while CBRE's white space business expanding into Europe and Asia.

How should we think about the steady state contribution, understanding it's going to be lumpy

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bob clarified $900M is all Trammell Crow embedded profits (not just land), with replenishment matching monetization pace. Being measured on data center land outlook given power, water, entitlement, and public opposition challenges.

PLDPrologis2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
PLD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

talk a little bit about some of the elements of NIMBYism that are rising kind of like with the moratorium in New York

Regulation PolicyCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Letter acknowledged entitlement risk as a growing issue but framed it as a barrier to supply, citing 110 offices and local community relationships.

Calendar 2026 Q1

It looks like turnover costs per square foot are coming down, I think now about 7.3% of lease value, but free rent has ticked up a bit. So how should we think about the evolution of concessions goi...

Show response

Tim attributed elevated free rent to West region mix, expects normalization to ~3% of lease value as occupancies build.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CCI Crown Castle1414%2 of 14 questions
PSA Public Storage1217%2 of 12 questions
EXR Extra Space Storage110%none of 11 questions
IRM Iron Mountain70%none of 7 questions
SBAC SBA Communications70%none of 7 questions
BXP BXP, Inc.633%2 of 6 questions
AMT American Tower40%none of 4 questions
CBRE CBRE Group40%none of 4 questions
PLD Prologis2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CCI
    Crown Castle · 14 questions
    14%2 of 14 questions
  • PSA
    Public Storage · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • EXR
    Extra Space Storage · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • IRM
    Iron Mountain · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • SBAC
    SBA Communications · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • BXP
    BXP, Inc. · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • AMT
    American Tower · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CBRE
    CBRE Group · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • PLD
    Prologis · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q480%none of 8 questions5
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q2911%1 of 9 questions6
2025 Q3714%1 of 7 questions5
2025 Q41030%3 of 10 questions6
2026 Q1166%1 of 16 questions9
2026 Q2110%none of 11 questions8
  1. 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 6 companies
  4. 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 5 companies
  5. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 30% (3 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2026 Q116 questions · challenge rate 6% (1 of 16 questions) · 9 companies
  7. 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 8 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand26
  • Competitive Dynamics16
  • Revenue Growth13
  • Innovation & R&D9
  • M&A9
  • Pricing8
  • Regulation Policy7
  • Cloud & AI6
  • Capex Investment5
  • Geographic Expansion5
Show all 19 topics
  • Margin5
  • Capital Allocation4
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Labor Market2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Supply Chain1
  • Trade Tariffs1