Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brennan Hawken
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters; questions recorded in 8).
- Questions
- 111on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 14%16 of 111 questions
- Companies
- 17questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 111 of 111 questions from 17 companies
NTRSNorthern Trust11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
could you give us your updated thoughts on how you plan to use these proceeds?
Show response
O'Grady laid out a prioritized list: portfolio repositioning, RWA deployment, potential inorganic use, and buybacks, confirming the order was significant.
Calendar 2026 Q1
So Dave, you flagged strength as far as the deposit growth goes. And it looks like a lot of -- from the presentation, a lot of the deposit growth was driven by the servicing business. You also flag...
Show response
Fox explained a handful of very large clients did strategic repositioning, driving $9B in average deposit increase. Not core operational deposits and not there for long, but NTRS wants to accommodate. Expects to keep $4-5B of the $9B increase going forward.
Is the organic growth in that business less tied to deposits the way we normally think about that, and therefore, that's the divergence? And also maybe could you give a little color around your new...
Show response
O'Grady explained family office liquidity is actively managed across deposits, money market funds, and short-term treasuries, so deposit levels are less indicative of organic growth. Family Office Solutions leverages GFO capabilities for families without their own office; started in Central region, now rolling out to other regions.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you speak to what drove the lower cost on the IB side?
Show response
Fox attributed NIB growth to seasonality plus cash hoarding during 43-day government shutdown. Q4 NII is not a jumping-off point; Q1 will be lower. Wholesale funding rolloff enabled deposit cost reductions with more tools available.
Can you speak to your conviction in driving change across the organization? And like when you think the timing of some of this traction could start to come through in the financial results?
Show response
O'Grady cited early days of financial results from company-wide execution, with confidence to raise medium-term targets over a three-to-five-year timeframe. Pointed to positive operating leverage already demonstrated.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is that growth comment, like, an indication that it's gonna be more about profit growth than top line growth?
Show response
O'Grady confirmed focus on profitability over gross top-line growth in AS. Three levers: new business at accretive margins, improving or transitioning existing underperformers, and operational efficiency through client-centric capability model under COO.
did you guys see fee rate pressure in some of the other businesses this quarter as well
Show response
O'Grady acknowledged persistent fee pressure in asset management but nothing notable this quarter. On servicing side, no reduction in fee levels, and pricing discipline is prioritized to ensure accretive margins on new business.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'd like to explore your conviction that remaining an independent company is in the shareholders' best interest
Show response
O'Grady gave a thorough response: Board takes fiduciary duties seriously, performance divides into pre-investment period (32% margins, double-digit EPS growth) and investment period that has lagged, with One Northern Trust strategy producing proof points 1.5 years in.
why not re-underwrite some of these targets? You said you've been at the upper end of the new range
Show response
O'Grady explained their approach is to deliver within a range before setting higher targets, emphasizing that ROE alone isn't the goal, shareholders want both growth and returns, which is why organic growth is equally important to the strategy.
Calendar 2024 Q4
In the past, you guys have spoken to targeting keeping the expense growth in 2025 at 5% or better
Show response
Fox expressed strong conviction in the 5% target after four months in role, removing ambiguity from his earlier December conference comments.
Do you think that the ROE targets are ambitious enough? The lower-end of the range doesn't really suggest a ton of improvement
Show response
O'Grady defended the 10-15% ROE range as covering different market and capital environments, while emphasizing the balance between growth and returns.
GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
Is that the best way we should be thinking about your expectations for the full year?
Show response
Coleman said 30% is the current full-year estimate, helped by mix toward financing, while the market for talent remains competitive.
But the third quarter was perceived as a bit of a degrossing period. So curious whether or not you saw that?
Show response
Coleman confirmed some deleveraging with about 3% sequential financing growth but did not split balances from pricing.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Do you have any color on what proportion of your fixed financing exposure is tied to direct lending counterparts
Show response
Coleman reframed the question around asset class diversification rather than giving a specific percentage, noting the book spans residential, mortgages, consumer, private credit, and PE assets.
how big of a setback is the valuation reset and tighter financing markets that cohort
Show response
Solomon acknowledged sponsor activity was slower than expected but emphasized the business is now big, broad, and diversified enough that weak sponsors didn't materially affect overall performance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you help us maybe understand the right way we should be thinking about, like, platform's run rate after it closes
Show response
Solomon said Apple savings has no transition agreement yet and will continue. Platform Solutions expected small pretax loss for the year, immaterial to GS.
it looks like there's, you know, a negative year-over-year impact on the efficiency ratio
Show response
Solomon said Q4 distorted by Apple Card accounting and comp accrual timing. Full year shows clear operating leverage: revs +9%, pretax +19%, EPS +27%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was that just a timing change, or is there going to be contributions just the back half going forward
Show response
Coleman confirmed shift from Q4-only to spread throughout year. Transaction-based expenses remain biggest non-comp driver, correlated with activity.
is it more around the capital side or do you still have continued room on the profitability front
Show response
Coleman said scaling and fundraising drives management fee growth with improving marginal margin. HPI wind-down frees some capital but margin improvement is primary.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was hoping you could speak to lending penetration and where that sits versus your target within the wealth business
Show response
Coleman confirmed they grew wealth lending by $5 billion on the year but remain very low relative to peers with multiyear growth plan.
what's the right way to think about incremental margins on revenue growth as we move forward
Show response
Coleman outlined dual strategy: driving operating leverage while funding investment in engineering and technology through efficiency gains.
IVZInvesco10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the net revenue yield came in at 6 basis points better than the prior guidance
Show response
Dukes said the roughly 6 basis point net revenue yield and 6 basis point margin contribution match prior guidance after custodial, licensing and marketing costs.
And could you maybe help us understand how that compressed so much versus the average?
Show response
Dukes confirmed the 22.0 exit rate and attributed compression to late-quarter market and flow strength in lower-fee QQQ, QQQM and RSP.
Calendar 2026 Q1
What are some of the strategic priorities that investors should be thinking about?
Show response
Andrew outlined four priorities: personalization (ETFs, SMAs, models), income demand across geographies, non-U.S. growth in Asia and EMEA (now 33-40% of AUM), and private markets into wealth management and defined contribution globally.
what's a reasonable expectation that we could have for securities funding that you might be able to generate from that product?
Show response
Andrew confirmed securities lending eligibility but characterized the opportunity as not huge given position concentration. Not seen as a major revenue driver.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how should we think about the impact of the Qs and all the other moving pieces potentially impacting the comp ratio outlook?
Show response
Allison expects comp ratio to return within 38-42% range at the high end (around 40-41%), down from 42.7% in 2025, with QQQ revenue stabilization helping. Continued selective investment hiring enabled by QQQ revenue addition.
what's the right way to think about all those moving pieces and the impact to net revenue yield on a go-forward basis?
Show response
Allison explained QQQ adds stabilization to net revenue yield at 6 bps. Key modeling change: third-party fees as percentage of management fees moving from 13-14% to 22-23% range due to QQQ licensing and custodial fees.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are all three proposals progressing similarly, or is there any divergence in between one, two or three?
Show response
Allison confirmed all three proxy proposals are progressing consistently with no divergence.
I just want to confirm, is that considered a marketing expense of the fund, and is there any sort of spend threshold where over that it starts to become an operating expense for Invesco?
Show response
Allison confirmed proxy solicitation costs are fund marketing expenses, does not foresee them becoming Invesco operating expenses, especially if meeting proceeds on December 5 as scheduled.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the 1% increase that’s versus the $3 billion and $30 million adjusted reported base, just want to confirm that
Show response
Allison confirmed 1% expense growth vs $3.03B 2024 base, clarified $22M organizational charge was 2023, and noted implementation costs continue through 2026.
what has been the experience so far? What are your expectations for some of that operational – increased operational effectiveness?
Show response
Andrew noted early positive experience with first wave but too early for full assessment. Emphasized singular platform will drive efficiency and operating leverage.
RJFRaymond James Financial10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you did define the pipeline as encouraging as opposed to robust. Is that an actual change or a difference?
Show response
Paul clarified no change in meaning and explained the delay is sector-specific (AI concerns hitting tech deals); addressed directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
why we're seeing operating leverage negative despite pretty decent revenue growth
Show response
Shoukry explained negative operating leverage as mix shift: independent channel payouts higher than employee because independents cover own overhead, real estate, health insurance. Recruiting skewed toward independent side over last year. Additionally, tiered payout systems mean higher production pushes advisers up the payout grid.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Did you see that -- did that impact you guys were you guys able capitalize on some of that movement
Show response
Shoukry declined to comment on specific competitor M&A, noting friendly competitors doing good jobs retaining advisers. Emphasized broad-based strength across wires, regionals, and other independents. Largest addressable market across all affiliation options with decades of experience in each.
it sounds like you guys are setting up for solid revenue growth as we come into the coming year. Is that fair
Show response
Shoukry pointed to prior quarter's $500M+ Capital Markets revenue and ~17.5% pretax margin showing significant operating leverage. Expressed disappointment if Capital Markets doesn't improve meaningfully above $380M level for the rest of the year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is pace sustainable? Are you actually seeing maybe a little bit more demand as we see rates come down
Show response
Shoukry confirmed lower rates driving more SBL demand as floating-rate loans become more attractive. Momentum and growth continuing into FY2026 start. See significant tailwinds for continued SBL balance growth.
How should we be thinking about that line? And how much of that balance is going to grow when we move into 2026
Show response
Shoukry deferred FY2026 non-comp guidance to next earnings call. Budget process ongoing. Growth-correlated items like FDIC insurance and sub-advisory fees will naturally rise. Pointed to 20%+ margin target as the guidepost.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How should we think about C&I loan growth going forward? And how are you thinking about that as you think about moving into the fiscal
Show response
Reilly noted C&I new origination still muted with extremely tight spreads. Won't force growth below risk-adjusted return thresholds. Hopes for volume and spread normalization in 2025.
the revenue side of that is really primarily moves with the policy rate, and so therefore, the offset partial offset would be the deposit beta
Show response
Reilly confirmed deposit beta ~35% on sweep balances, ~100% on ESP. Expects similar deposit beta dynamics on the way down as on the way up.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Is this a good sign that sponsors are beginning to reengage in the mid-market space? Or were there some lumpy results
Show response
Reilly confirmed general sponsor reengagement across sectors. New mandates and engagement discussions beyond existing inventory. Backlog looks good for near term.
Should we just assume that that's a roughly 100 beta product as we see cuts?
Show response
Shoukry confirmed ESP is roughly 100% deposit beta. Noted roughly half of total balances are higher-rate, higher-beta products providing protection to downside rates.
BNYBNY Mellon9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Are you seeing still pricing pressure? Or is there wider divergences in between the different offerings
Show response
Dermot said pricing pressure has eased versus 2-3 years ago as a lower cost to serve and differentiated service let BNY hold pricing better.
can you talk about incentives and how you have changed compensation structures and incentives within the, organization
Show response
Robin attributed rising comp per employee to deliberate workforce repositioning and more dynamic talent, funded by better overall workforce management.
Calendar 2026 Q1
we had really robust year-over-year both DARTs and AUC growth, but the revenue growth was not quite as robust
Show response
CFO noted Q1 was volume-driven from clients rehedging and rebalancing amid macro uncertainty. Reaffirmed mid-single-digit net new asset growth commitment. Archer integration into Wealth Solutions expected to drive more capabilities.
The deposit trends were stronger than expected. I was hoping maybe you could speak to quarter-to-date trends and around betas
Show response
CFO attributed elevated deposits to macro uncertainty driving higher client liquidity. More non-interest-bearing than anticipated. Euro/sterling only ~25% of portfolio; betas peaked at 80% on way up, expected symmetric going down.
Calendar 2025 Q4
conservative outlook? Or was there some over-earning or onetime items that might have elevated the baseline
Show response
CFO expects higher organic growth in 2026 from commercial model flywheel and new Chief Product and Innovation Officer. CEO pushed back on over-earning framing, noting uncertainty in composition between NII and fees but confidence in total revenue guide.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you also landed a nice Wove win recently with the TIAA wealth management business
Show response
CFO attributed DARTs softness to seasonal Q3 after elevated Q2 Liberation Day activity. Over 50 Wove clients signed, deconversion now behind them, and net new asset growth expected to reaccelerate.
What early trends have you seen on the back of that? And how should we be thinking about modeling those revenue lines
Show response
CFO noted no step-function change in securities lending specifically. CEO reframed the opportunity as broader capital markets activity driving corporate trust, depository receipts, and debt capital markets more than lending alone.
Calendar 2024 Q4
we saw a really solid rebound in net-new assets at Pershing this quarter
Show response
CFO reiterated mid-single-digit NNA growth target across RIAs, broker-dealers, and banks, citing 36 Wove clients and 41 signed contracts as evidence of momentum.
Could you maybe help us understand what you would think the trajectory would look like
Show response
CFO attributed NII confidence to proactive balance sheet management across CIO, GLS, and treasury functions, with NIBs expected in $44-46B range for full year.
IBKRInteractive Brokers Group9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm curious what the early read is on the impact of those tools on volumes and engagement.
Show response
Galik reported strong early interest, with clients connecting chatbots before any public announcement, and outlined the human-in-the-loop approach.
Calendar 2026 Q1
You touched on the non-U.S. dollar sensitivity to rates with 1/3 of those balances there
Show response
Paul declined to provide the currency-level breakdown, only explaining why they differentiate USD vs non-USD in their disclosures.
are the upside and downside scenarios symmetrical? Or do they differ if rates are moving up
Show response
Paul confirmed rough symmetry, noting minor asymmetry only when crossing from positive to negative rate territory in certain non-USD currencies.
Calendar 2025 Q4
It seemed as though the decline in the amount paid, the yield did not come down quite as much as we were looking for. Just some color around some of those dynamics, and what might have caused the l...
Show response
Paul explained the repricing lag: segregated cash assets retain slightly higher rates due to residual duration, while customer credit balance interest resets immediately to lower overnight rates, creating a temporary favorable spread.
I believe the comment period for your bank charter application ended today. Could you maybe update us on that process, what you have heard back from the regulators, and what kind of impact we shoul...
Show response
Paul outlined the OCC process: pre-filing discussions, official application filed, now awaiting approval. The rationale is that a National Trust Charter Bank enables mutual fund and ETF custody that broker-dealer regulations currently prohibit, with operational target by year-end.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you talk about how the trajectory that played out in the quarter? What impact we could expect if we were to see capital markets activity ramp, as is broadly expected, and what kind of benefit...
Show response
Paul explained securities lending specials tend to correlate with IPO and M&A activity, emphasizing IBKR has built systems to optimize when hard-to-borrow opportunities arise, but cautioned it is not cyclically predictable.
Whether you book Marcus, several years ago, Thomas had suggested that AI would lead to higher trading volumes. So I don't know whether or not you have any visibility or any idea about whether or no...
Show response
Milan acknowledged the theoretical case that AI tools should lead to faster research and trading decisions, but admitted IBKR has no visibility into whether AI is actually driving current volume increases. Thomas quipped he did not recall making the original prediction.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Margin balances have really shown very, very solid growth despite the volatility in the market
Show response
Milan attributed growth to risk-on client positioning and expects balances to be maintained or grow slightly, correlated with stock market direction.
some of the different cohorts of your customer base, advisers are a larger portion. When we think about penetration
Show response
Milan acknowledged most FAs don't use margin but prop traders and sophisticated individuals continue deploying leverage aggressively.
Show 11 more companies
STTState Street Corporation9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You priced it at 10 basis points, which was a pretty narrow spread above Nasdaq's
Show response
O'Hanley framed QNDX as rounding out the product line for wealth/buy-and-hold, aided by being both servicer and sponsor.
Calendar 2026 Q1
could you share your perspective on active ETF platform fees and why the impact would be manageable
Show response
Ron emphasized the value comparison is active mutual fund vs active ETF, which favors ETFs. STT benefits from ETF growth globally, early in Europe where take-up is accelerating, and in Middle East where platforms skip mutual funds entirely for ETFs. STT positioned as both sponsor and servicer.
Are those hikes included in your updated outlook?
Show response
John confirmed one ECB hike assumed, BOE and Fed on hold. Sensitivity roughly $5M per quarter per rate move. US dollar betas 75-80% symmetric; euro betas ~50%, also expected to be symmetric up and down.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what should we be thinking about for loan growth?
Show response
John expects continued but moderating loan growth in 2026. Core growth in subscription finance, fund finance, and CLOs remains solid. Some thinner-relationship commercial loans being allowed to run off or sold. Capital being rotated to highest-return deep-relationship lending.
how long of a process is it going to be transitioning from on-prem to SaaS when you hit that tipping point
Show response
John said transition takes one to two years as contracts turn over. Ron argued they are already at the tipping point, fewer on-prem renewals remaining, clients actively incentivized to move to cloud. 2026 guide has few if any significant on-prem renewals. SaaS recurring revenue growing 11%.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you speak to where reinvestment rates versus roll off rates are? How much you're picking up?
Show response
John provided specific metrics: ~$5B quarterly cash flows reinvested at 75-100bps pickup (maturing low 3s, reinvesting high 3s/low 4s). US approximately $2M per Fed cut per quarter, near neutral. Terminated hedge benefit newly presenting in Q4 and continuing into 2026. Spot deposit levels entering Q4 above Q3 averages.
it does, at least in the minds of a lot of investors, seem to suggest that Aladdin picking up some momentum
Show response
Ron differentiated Charles River standalone vs integrated Alpha offering. STT is largest operator of competing front-office platforms as middle/back office provider. Still significant insourced market to convert. Added wealth front-end (portfolio construction) paired with Apex custody creates out-year revenue opportunity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
could you speak to the types of loans that you are adding, the efforts involved
Show response
Eric detailed loan portfolio as primarily cap call financing, BDC lending, and CLO support for private market clients, with strong credit characteristics and cross-sell value.
The deposit betas here recently, so the euro and the sterling, the pound sterling looked a little bit lower than what you guys normally talk about
Show response
Eric explained US dollar betas of 60-65% are representative. Euro and sterling fluctuations are due to smaller pool sizes where mix and client volume changes distort averages.
AMPAmeriprise Financial7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Comerica advisers were expected to be a headwind this quarter, and you flagged that in your prepared remarks
Show response
Gave the $19B total exiting by end of Q3 but declined to size the specific quarterly magnitude, citing client confidentiality.
Calendar 2026 Q1
have you considered looking at some of these tools within your own network? And how are you considering that development that's likely to come down the pike
Show response
Jim explained sweep cash is a very small earnings contributor. Average cash balance is $6,000 at transactional levels. Core margin comes from wealth management fees and transactions, not cash. Will evaluate new capabilities but not a major concern.
is it reasonable just to take that $18 billion and kind of like allocate it across four quarters and call it a day
Show response
Jim and Walter confirmed $18B total Comerica assets. Cannot predict exact quarterly distribution but expect all out by end of Q3. Financial impact immaterial beyond the make-whole already booked.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you speak to what portion of expense growth we should expect to come from investments? And how long a duration those investments will take
Show response
Jim emphasized investments are continuous, not one tranche. Reengineering offsets a significant portion. Largest expense growth driver is volume. Leading technology platform across industry.
I'd love to drill into the bank channel. We see continued consolidation among the regional banks
Show response
Jim noted continued growth in financial institutions business despite consolidation. Comerica relationship strong but Fifth Third decision pending. Walter emphasized contractual protections.
Calendar 2024 Q4
it sounds like now you're working towards stability in that NII number as a constructive outcome
Show response
Walter was qualitatively positive but didn't directly confirm stability target. Cited 87% fixed positioning and willingness to continue adjusting crediting rates.
How should we be thinking about the loan growth as maybe also a partial offset within the bank as we move through 2025?
Show response
Jim outlined product roadmap: fixed pledge loans in Q1, HELOCs in Q2, CDs, and checking accounts later in the year. Residential mortgage still leading.
APOApollo Global Management5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 2 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
updated expectations for the timing of the first close and when we should think about management fee activation
Show response
Kelly cited $12 billion for Fund XI and tied fee activation to Fund X being fully invested, penciled for the latter part of the first half.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was a bit surprised that the funding agreement flows were so resilient given the spread dynamics in the quarter
Show response
Kelly clarified no public funding agreements were issued due to unattractive spreads, but private funding agreements at attractive spreads compensated. Retail annuities are expected to remain around current levels.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Cost of funds though has steadily gone up. We hear about competition in some of those markets.
Show response
Rowan explained cost of funds is market-determined. New entrants paying premiums in broker channels. Apollo wins through OpEx advantage and origination spread. Kelly guided net spread 120-125bp for 2026 including ARI benefit.
Calendar 2025 Q3
The returns have gotten better, but they still have run below that 11% level.
Show response
Rowan attributed the gap to cash drag in AAA (10.9% LTM vs 11% target) and excess capital at Athora. PIC acquisition expected to be highly accretive to Athora investment and close the gap.
Calendar 2024 Q4
The fundraising was really quite strong. I want to say $12 billion, up about 50% versus last year. So really picking up and that's in a market where we're seeing increased competition.
Show response
Zelter detailed 11 semi-liquid products with six at $1B+, international expansion plans in Europe, Korea, Japan, Australia, and future D.C. solutions and insurance-wrapped products.
ARESAres Management Corporation5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
What factors have helped support spreads and economics in the middle market?
Show response
Mike said gross-to-net has been consistent; about 75% of U.S. direct-lending deployment went to incumbents, and improving spreads as retail-heavy competitors pull back should normalize the metric.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Based on your expectations today, where do you see those trends shifting and what primary factors are going to drive that
Show response
Arougheti highlighted the firm's 5% selectivity rate and that roughly half of deployment comes from incumbent portfolio relationships. Acknowledged slightly drier liquidity posture ahead of expected spread widening.
Calendar 2025 Q4
was there actually negative catch-up fees in the fourth quarter or was just the prior quarter's revised down
Show response
Jarrod explained quarterly catch-up mechanics for infrastructure secondaries fund, full year number includes amounts that were in prior quarter catch-ups. Mike noted APAC wealth exposure is single-digit percentage, mostly Australia/New Zealand, with early Japan successes expected to continue.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was there anything in particular in the quarter that caused the pickup in fundraising on wealth to be particularly noteworthy
Show response
Mike attributed Q3 strength partly to meaningful Japan market launch with high initial demand, plus front-loaded demand from new funds (ACI, SME). Q4 shaping up as second highest quarter but likely below Q3 peak due to those one-time boosts.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how should we think about potential magnitude for that, and what are the primary factors driving it?
Show response
Jarrod outlined 0-150bps FRE margin expansion target. Key drivers: net deployment pace, AREIT/AIREIT fundraising recovery, and full-year benefit of wealth channel AUM. Deployment pace is the primary variable.
BXBlackstone Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
So we have been waiting for recovery and realizations for some time.
Show response
Gray drew a parallel to the post-2009 recovery, expressing confidence that lower short rates and a reopening IPO market point to a realization pickup into 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
quarter-over-quarter base fee growth has slowed in recent quarters. We understand you have several large funds on sea holidays
Show response
Chae indicated stock-based comp growth rate will be materially lower for full year vs Q1. On fees, expects moderate sequential growth in Q1-Q2 followed by acceleration in second half as drawdown funds activate.
Calendar 2025 Q4
In the perpetual wealth management strategies, what does the AUM base look like across geographies? Particularly interested in what the exposure is as far as Asia goes
Show response
Gray said US dominates perpetual wealth AUM, Japan is the strongest international market, with recent success in Canada. Also present in Hong Kong and Singapore but declined to give specific breakdowns.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What I'm really curious about is what is the feedback you're hearing from the wealth management channel, given the big reaction in the public markets around some of this?
Show response
Gray said wealth channel understands floating-rate mechanics and that lower rates reduce yields, and the conflation of bank credit issues with private credit is misplaced.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is it possible to quantify what impact you saw from spread tightening working through the FRPR line here this quarter?
Show response
Chae quantified the rate sensitivity while Gray noted spread tightening is not a major driver given floating-rate portfolio, with overall BCRED growing 18%.
BENFranklin Resources4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you talk about what sort of flows you are seeing on a quarterly basis
Show response
Jenny: ~$200M/month across three evergreen strategies (secondary PE, real estate debt, real estate equity), each over $1B. Demand consistent. Lexington filing likely second half of fiscal year, potentially July. Daniel: no slowdown in evergreen fundraising, no BDC or heavy software exposure. Raised in line or higher across all evergreens over past two years.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Would you have any expectations for EFR, either both in the coming quarter and then if you have a view maybe for the balance of the year
Show response
Matt guided EFR stable next quarter at mid-37bp. Last two quarters have upside potential from alternative asset fundraisings (Lexington flagship). Stable baseline with episodic upside from flagship fundraisings.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Maybe what caused the timing for the first close to slip? What are your updated expectations for size?
Show response
Jenny clarified first close was always a stretch to include. Fundraising environment more difficult than historically. Scale matters in secondaries, few firms have Lexington's advantage for larger deals. Target approximately $25B. First close expected first half of calendar 2026. Strong demand for secondaries as PE distributing at half historical cash flow.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is that coming out of the full year and will that ramp through the year?
Show response
Matt clarified $200-250M is exit run rate by end of FY2026. Efforts transcend Western, reviewing overall company. Gave detailed Q2 quarterly guidance: comp $815-820M, IS&T $150M, occupancy $70-75M, G&A ~$190M.
MSMorgan Stanley4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
What are you hearing from the field around the temperature on some of these non-traded BDCs
Show response
Ted noted net buying across alt sub-asset classes in Q1 despite headlines, emphasizing FA discipline on diversification and that performing asset managers will be rewarded.
how should we think about cash and then net new? And what the expected impact is on that this year
Show response
Sharon confirmed tax day impact was as expected and highlighted strong SBL start to Q2 with continued investment in digital lending tools and automation.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how long has it taken before we see some of the recycling out of those yield oriented cash equivalents
Show response
Sharon detailed three positive trends: cash flowing into market products, fixed-income maturities sitting in sweeps awaiting deployment, and less activity into cash alternatives.
Could you talk a little bit below the surface around what you're seeing on the loan side?
Show response
Sharon explained SBL paydown pace declined and line usage increased, driven by rising markets and tax-related activity. Capabilities viewed as sufficient.
SCHWCharles Schwab Corporation4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
an announcement that JPMorgan has made in rolling out a product to reduce the friction around brokerage cash
Show response
Wurster pushed back firmly, citing existing proactive cash optimization efforts, multiple reasons clients choose sweep cash, and Schwab's many monetization levers including future fee-based agentic advisory offers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you maybe speak to the differences that you've seen in trends between Advisor Services and Investor Services in recent quarters
Show response
Rick broke down ~33% retail NNA growth vs >42% in Advisor Services. Cited crypto, workplace, and branch/FC investments as future retail accelerants. Advisor Services winning across all dimensions with scale and breadth advantages.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How are you thinking about redeployment and reinvestment? Should we be thinking that securities will be -- the likely target
Show response
Mike confirmed securities reinvestment in 2-4 year duration range plus client lending. BDA provides additional flexibility for interest rate risk, capital, and liquidity management.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Could you speak specifically to appetite if we end up seeing TD? TD has sort of made some public comments about their stake
Show response
Mike was non-committal for obvious reasons but signaled historical precedent of participating in similar situations without making any definitive commitment.
TROWT. Rowe Price4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 3 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
It was pretty standard disclosure for all [indiscernible] disclosed the software exposure across the portfolio. I don't think you talked about it
Show response
Glenn disclosed 15-20% software credit allocation, in line with market. Detailed continuous AI risk underwriting with rating tools. Highlighted 30bp default rate vs 2.25% market average over 25 years.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Were there any particular factors that caused the misses, and how are you adjusting your offering
Show response
Rob explained M&A-driven losses and broader shift from fully active to blend/hybrid. Pipeline robust but concentrated in blended offerings.
Calendar 2025 Q3
it's still down pretty substantially versus even just 6 months ago, the performance versus the benchmarks
Show response
Eric candidly acknowledged narrow market headwinds but also stock selection errors and omissions. Noted portfolio manager changes made where warranted.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is that the case in could you let us know what date that is and what's your market assumptions? And also if I had real estate, cost
Show response
Jen disclosed $20-30M HQ move impact and noted ongoing evaluation of excess real estate capacity.
KKRKKR3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it really is quite hockey stick looking really. So I'd love to know what drives the confidence
Show response
Reaffirmed confidence and cited ~20 businesses with differentiated exposures, but acknowledged work remains and gave no specific bridge to the target.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how is the potential for further delays in monetization and realizations going across with the LP community
Show response
Scott differentiated between delayed strategic exits and LP sentiment, noting KKR is best-in-class DPI. Rob emphasized forward monetization guide of $1.4B+ is highest in history. LPs are happy, driving record PE fundraise.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you help us understand what will drive that? Talking with investors, there's a little bit of a view that it's a black box
Show response
Rob explained ~20 businesses in Strategic Holdings generating different levels of growth and free cash flow. Key driver: deleveraging from larger original capital structures generating more free cash flow for dividends. Confident in $350M+ for 2026 and even more confident in $1.1B+ by February 2030. Greater disclosure expected as business scales.
BLKBlackRock2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Curious to hear your plans around that and the NASDAQ complex, and whether you are considering a fee holiday
Show response
Martin cited regulatory filing restrictions limiting detail beyond SEC filing. Highlighted existing $25B NASDAQ 100 ETF franchise outside U.S. and ability to port proven growth franchises across geographies.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you're adjusting the approach to integration in order to maintain that One BlackRock, Inc. approach even though these businesses are rather different?
Show response
Larry emphasized GIP already fully integrated within 6 months. HPS progressing well at 3 months post-close. Insurance relationships expanding across HPS/GIP capabilities. Differentiated from competitors who keep acquisitions siloed as boutiques.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NTRS Northern Trust | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions |
| GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| IVZ Invesco | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| RJF Raymond James Financial | 10 | 30%3 of 10 questions |
| BNY BNY Mellon | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| IBKR Interactive Brokers Group | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| STT State Street Corporation | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
| AMP Ameriprise Financial | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| APO Apollo Global Management | 5 | 40%2 of 5 questions |
| ARES Ares Management Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
- NTRSNorthern Trust · 11 questions27%3 of 11 questions
- GSThe Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. · 10 questions10%1 of 10 questions
- IVZInvesco · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- RJFRaymond James Financial · 10 questions30%3 of 10 questions
- BNYBNY Mellon · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- IBKRInteractive Brokers Group · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- STTState Street Corporation · 9 questions11%1 of 9 questions
- AMPAmeriprise Financial · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- APOApollo Global Management · 5 questions40%2 of 5 questions
- ARESAres Management Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
Show all 17 companies
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| BX Blackstone Inc. | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| BEN Franklin Resources | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MS Morgan Stanley | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| SCHW Charles Schwab Corporation | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| TROW T. Rowe Price | 4 | 75%3 of 4 questions |
| KKR KKR | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| BLK BlackRock | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- BXBlackstone Inc. · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- BENFranklin Resources · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MSMorgan Stanley · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- SCHWCharles Schwab Corporation · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- TROWT. Rowe Price · 4 questions75%3 of 4 questions
- KKRKKR · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- BLKBlackRock · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 24 | 8%2 of 24 questions | 15 |
| 2025 Q1 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2025 Q2 | 2 | 100%2 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 21 | 14%3 of 21 questions | 14 |
| 2025 Q4 | 22 | 18%4 of 22 questions | 15 |
| 2026 Q1 | 25 | 8%2 of 25 questions | 17 |
| 2026 Q2 | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q424 questions · challenge rate 8% (2 of 24 questions) · 15 companies
- 2025 Q1No questions recorded
- 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 100% (2 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q321 questions · challenge rate 14% (3 of 21 questions) · 14 companies
- 2025 Q422 questions · challenge rate 18% (4 of 22 questions) · 15 companies
- 2026 Q125 questions · challenge rate 8% (2 of 25 questions) · 17 companies
- 2026 Q213 questions · challenge rate 15% (2 of 13 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand27
- Revenue Growth26
- Competitive Dynamics26
- Margin25
- Credit21
- Cost Pressure14
- Capital Allocation12
- Pricing10
- Innovation & R&D10
- Guidance Reliability7
Show all 20 topics
- Macroeconomic7
- Product Launch6
- M&A5
- Subscriber Growth5
- Cloud & AI3
- Geographic Expansion3
- Labor Market2
- Fx2
- Capex Investment2
- Regulation Policy1