Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brian Chin

Stifel · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 (5 quarters).

Questions
26on tracked calls
Challenge rate
4%1 of 26 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 26 of 26 questions from 5 companies

TERTeradyne11 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
TER company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Is that an example of your test platform outperforming their internal tester?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

New HDD customer complementing rather than fully replacing captive test. HDD revenue expected to double 2025 to 2026. In SoC, one big player has captive strategy expected to change over next few years as foundry broadens customer base. Memory captive strategy likely more persistent.

I was wondering if you could outline maybe a few catalysts for GPU share gain over the next few years in terms of Teradyne's platform differentiation

Competitive DynamicsCloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Four key differentiators: more resilient supply chain with shorter lead times, better reliability and uptime in production, next-gen instruments in beta with more power and memory, and superior mission-mode testing capability for defect detection.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you give us a sense of how significantly weighted that was the second half and maybe 4Q this year

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

View changed dramatically between January (optimistic) and March (pessimistic from uncertainty) to year-end. Compute and networking significantly stronger than expected. Mobile and auto/industrial weaker. Memory strengthened but less than compute.

In Industrial Robotics, do you expect Q4 to ship some positive seasonality Q-on-Q?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Seasonal uplift expected in Q4 robotics but not a hockey stick. SLT Titan system designed with significant upgradability across AI accelerator generations within power envelope. SLT incumbency advantage similar to but slightly weaker than ATE.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how are you sizing the overall compute TAM this year and also a subsegment of that, the VIP SAM

DemandCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Upside to VIP SAM from $400M and to total compute TAM, especially in merchant GPU space. Not providing formal TAM estimate currently.

Would you attribute any of the uptick in test utilization rates to any pull forward of supply chain activity?

ChallengingDemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Pull-forward hasn't had meaningful effect on Teradyne. Customers pulling forward end product demand were absorbing it with existing test capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q1

When you size the VIP TAM at around $600 million in '26 and potentially $800 million in 2028, were you including SLT?

Cloud & AIDemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

VIP TAM figures are ATE-only. SLT could add 10-30% of total TAM on top. Will provide updated SLT TAM estimate in January.

are you anticipating more meaningful advanced back-end test and packaging lines to be onshored here in the states?

Trade TariffsSupply ChainCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Onshoring changes ship-to location but not total test demand. Testers purchased at point of wafer volume need, unlike front-end fabs.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you decompose sort of how that $4.9 billion TAM for 2025 breaks down across Compute, Mobile, et cetera

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Provided full breakdowns for both 2024 ($4.6B) and 2025 ($4.9B) SOC TAM across Compute, Mobile, Auto/Industrial and service.

can you give us maybe a better sense of where Semiconductor Test cell utilization rates are now versus a year ago

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

About 10% utilization increase year-on-year exiting 2024. Business mix already shifting from upgrades to system sales, past tipping point.

Would you mind unpacking a little bit what you mean by consolidating the go-to-market?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Unified marketing, sales and service across UR and MiR. 50 largest partners already sell both; single coverage improves efficiency and customer experience.

AMATApplied Materials5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
AMAT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

I also heard something about thinking that at full scale, gate-all-around could be something like 300,000 wafer per month

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Brice confirmed approximately 100K wafer starts installed or to be installed by quarter end on gate-all-around nodes, with the build-out in the first 3 innings. Subsequent nodes will follow.

Calendar 2025 Q2

what's your view on pacing here and whether this could cause these investments perhaps to spread out over a longer horizon

Capex InvestmentMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Brice noted datacenter growing 20% with AI components at 40%, leading-edge fabs at 100% utilization, and gate-all-around as a significant performance improvement supporting a strong node. Recent announcements from CSPs and foundries show continued energy.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I think you previously disclosed that $549 million reduction in backlog for the fiscal year in a filing

Trade TariffsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Brice confirmed the $549M backlog reduction covers more than the fiscal year; the 12-month impact was about $380M, consistent with the $400M annual estimate.

Calendar 2024 Q4

ASML earlier today was upbeat on its outlook for AI-driven DRAM spending overall

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Gary sees litho and materials engineering as complementary, with 4F-squared DRAM focused near-term and 3D DRAM further out, both increasing materials engineering intensity.

is it reasonable that China could go below 30% in '25 if areas like leading-edge foundry or DRAM improve

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Brice noted China variability depends on ICAPS health, as DRAM/NAND is mostly served and leading-edge restricted; watching automotive, industrial, and analog signals.

KLACKLA Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
KLAC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

How much of your continued optimism on market and KLA growth in packaging next year involves expansion opportunities in HBM packaging?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bren expressed confidence in packaging share gains across both logic and HBM memory, with positive trends in both segments expected to continue into 2026.

how much of that second half outlook is tied to new cleanroom space availability

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bren acknowledged some space constraints could affect timing into second half 2026 and 2027 with new memory fabs coming online, but does not see it as a major gating factor currently.

Calendar 2025 Q2

your near-term opportunity set in advanced packaging was particularly in 2.5D or CoWoS packaging rather than in HBM. Is that the case?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bren confirmed share gains primarily in CoWoS logic packaging with increasing HBM momentum, driven by inspection applications with high sampling rates rather than metrology.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you comment on the magnitude of residual spending you still see with them besides R&D and technology development?

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick gave a brief answer indicating KLA has derisked spending from non-leading foundries in their 2025 plan, suggesting limited dependence on those customers.

how about the process control intensity going from 2 nanometer [indiscernible] around to 16A?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Rick said it's too early to model 16A intensity but noted the fundamental shift toward larger, higher-value die with higher density creates growing opportunities for process control.

LRCXLam Research3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
LRCX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Of the $8 billion in WFE spending, on a kind of rough cut, could you partition that across on a percentage basis, advanced logic, DRAM and NAND?

Capex InvestmentCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Doug revealed more than half of the $8B WFE per $100B data center spend comes from memory (enterprise SSDs and HBM), with GPUs and accelerators as the remainder.

Calendar 2025 Q2

is that for a 400-layer application?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tim declined to specify the exact layer count but confirmed the Vantex win is multigenerational, covering current through next couple of technology nodes.

Calendar 2024 Q4

For trying to resist deposition in development, can you remind us of the SAM or maybe revenue potential

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Doug highlighted the DQR production tool-of-record decision as a major milestone, though near-term dollars will be modest in 2025.

MUMicron Technology, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
MU company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Does this shipment mix actually closely match your internal production mix? Meaning that it's not just you're holding back inventory, but structurally, you've shifted a high majority of your DRAM p...

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sadana confirmed the structural production shift to leading-edge products is real, with leading-edge nodes very constrained and capacity dedicated to fast HBM ramp.

Do you expect maybe some of these other suppliers to follow more quickly this time, similar actions or lag like they did previously?

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Sadana declined to speculate on competitor actions but emphasized Micron's own decisive supply reduction to align supply with demand.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TER Teradyne119%1 of 11 questions
AMAT Applied Materials50%none of 5 questions
KLAC KLA Corporation50%none of 5 questions
LRCX Lam Research30%none of 3 questions
MU Micron Technology, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TER
    Teradyne · 11 questions
    9%1 of 11 questions
  • AMAT
    Applied Materials · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • KLAC
    KLA Corporation · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • LRCX
    Lam Research · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • MU
    Micron Technology, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4100%none of 10 questions5
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q2520%1 of 5 questions4
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q410 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics11
  • Demand11
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Capex Investment7
  • Cloud & AI5
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Supply Chain3
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Product Launch1
Show all 11 topics
  • Geographic Expansion1