Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Brian Essex
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 35on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 35 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 35 of 35 questions from 6 companies
CRWDCrowdStrike8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how much of the momentum goes beyond next quarter, perhaps beyond the end of the year?
Show response
George called the durability absolutely there, citing customers held back on AI deployment by security concerns, and Burt pointed to the record Q3 pipeline and the 1,150-basis-point full-year growth-rate raise as evidence.
Calendar 2026 Q2
How much of the current AI tailwind might be incremental security spend and how much is maybe reallocation
Show response
George argued spend is incremental, tied to surging token budgets that did not exist two years ago, rather than reallocation of fixed budgets.
Calendar 2026 Q1
How much of the resurgence in growth there on the identity side is, I guess, renewal of CCP or Flex deals versus net new kind of emerging identity product
Show response
Kurtz acknowledged CCP drove initial identity adoption but cited threat landscape as durable driver. ITDR has compliance mandate, PAM well received, Falcon Shield protecting SaaS identities, and SGNL.ai acquisition adds zero standing privilege.
Calendar 2025 Q4
could you offer a little bit of color on how those segments are behaving as you kind of lap the initial CCP initiatives of last year
Show response
Kurtz confirmed all emerging products performed fantastically with strong CCP-to-renewal conversion. Podbere noted Onum and Pangea acquisitions were de minimis to Q3 results.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how you envision this competing against legacy solutions and also how you think it will either complement or potentially cannibalize what you're seeing on scale
Show response
Kurtz emphasized Onum as complementary, enabling in-pipeline detection and faster data streaming. CrowdStrike's free internal data pricing makes legacy SIEM displacement compelling.
Calendar 2025 Q2
How have things changed in Q1? Have plans materially changed the way that you're compensating quota-bearing reps
Show response
Kurtz confirmed sales force has moved past the outage with focus back on innovation and consolidation. Flex adoption burndown exceeding original expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
it seems as though cloud and identity decelerated at a faster rate than log scale. Is that a function of the incentives
Show response
Kurtz acknowledged identity and cloud were popular CCP choices, framing deceleration as seeding the customer base with CCP discounts that will renew at full price.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what tend to be some of the themes of customers that are churning off, and then, also on the better adoption side, what are some of the more durable factors
Show response
George acknowledged minor churn in small MSP segment but emphasized larger customers remain committed, with corporate business having its best quarter ever.
FTNTFortinet8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How much was contribution from sovereign SASE? There is focus on sovereign data centers and sovereign infrastructure
Show response
Ken revealed sovereign SASE is roughly equal to or larger than cloud-based SASE. Service providers in Europe are ramping sovereign SASE services with Fortinet products.
With regard to unified SASE billings, could you unpack that a little bit? How much is SD-WAN? How much is SASE?
Show response
Ken disclosed SASE is about 25% of billings and positioned Fortinet as a top-three and fastest-growing SASE player. Unified SASE grew 31%.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much of that was networking, like switches and access points versus more -- or firewall mix?
Show response
Christiane confirmed broad-based similar growth rates across firewalls, APs, and switches. Ken explained FortiLink technology linking switches and APs to FortiGate as a local SASE approach with hardware agents for internal segmentation, but noted FortiGate remains the key and largest component.
what percentage of your bill of materials is exposed to memory? And then how your contractor agreements, how long do you have those committed out?
Show response
Ken confirmed memory represents 10-20% of BOM, similar to system servers. Fortinet manages manufacturing components directly with suppliers rather than through third parties. Noted memory daily price tracker showed recent price declines. Maintains 6-month inventory buffer adjusted based on growth projections.
Calendar 2025 Q3
could you talk about the rate of SASE penetration or rate of penetration from SASE into your SD-WAN installed base?
Show response
Ken cited 15% large enterprise FortiSASE penetration from Slide 10 but noted significant additional adoption through service providers and channel partners that is harder to track. Growing displacement of competing SASE providers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What can we take away from the services guide? And what's embedded in the guidance for the year given the strength that you're seeing this quarter?
Show response
Christiane noted the billings-to-revenue conversion lag for services and prudent guidance approach. Ken highlighted product revenue acceleration as a leading indicator for future service revenue.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you unpack the dynamics behind the maintenance and services revenue? Just trying to understand it's a segment that I think we were expecting to kind of accelerate
Show response
Christiane attributed the sequential decline to 2 fewer calendar days vs Q4 and slower-than-expected ramp of acquired entity revenue streams. Ken added FortiGate billings growing above average as a positive forward indicator.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could unpack the assumptions behind that, you know, how much is upgrade growth of SecOps and SaaS, and how much is, you know, product-related refresh cycle
Show response
Christiana shared 10% product revenue growth assumption and described a more moderate billings trajectory through the year, but did not break out specific upgrade vs organic contribution.
PANWPalo Alto Networks7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
how much penetration do you think you can get into your install base with the Cyberark platform?
Show response
Nikesh emphasized both cost synergies (margins reverting to standalone within two quarters) and revenue upside, citing the new Modern PAM product and upsell of the traditional PAM base as expansion drivers.
Calendar 2026 Q2
How are your customers evaluating that as they look at kind of the elevated threat environment they have
Show response
Nikesh pointed to native firewalls in hyperscalers for AI traffic inspection, then deferred specific capability detail to Lee Klarich.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are customers focused on this yet? Is this going to require some evangelism on your part
Show response
Lee cited harvest-now-decrypt-later urgency, uncertain quantum timelines, and multi-year migration effort as drivers. PANW started PQC work years ago, has cross-stack visibility advantage. Nikesh noted short-term cipher translation solution unlike Y2K.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how much of that is share shift, how much of that is pricing increase, and how much of that might be refresh
Show response
Nikesh attributed growth to hardware at steady 5-8% plus software firewall inflection driven by AI requiring cloud-delivered security. Software driving hardware-to-software transformation.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what you're seeing in cloud security as an example, and win rates as you're able to provide know, code to cloud to SOC security
Show response
Nikesh dismissed point solutions as extinct. Lee Klarich confirmed AI-connected platforms deliver better outcomes and improved win rates in cloud security.
if you if you look against a point solution, vendor like a whiz in the cloud security space, are you starting to see the improvement in win rates
Show response
Lee confirmed improving win rates. Nikesh added cloud security will shift toward runtime and agents, where PANW is better positioned than legacy CNAP players.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I want to ask about the integration between Cortex and Cloud. And I wanted to understand when did that kind of hit the market. Is it typically led by Cortex or Cloud?
Show response
Nikesh outlined three cloud security layers (CNAP, CDR, network) and positioned Cortex CDR as the future growth driver. Lee Klarich detailed how Prisma Cloud posture data feeds CDR for real-time protection.
ZSZscaler7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I want to ask about the health of the Red Canary business
Show response
Jay said Red Canary was acquired for agentic SecOps technology and a decade of MDR expertise, now integrated into the Agentic SOC solution launching next week. Kevin said the company took a conservative approach to recognized ARR, was pleased to maintain the book despite elevated MDR-style churn in fiscal 2026, and expects no separate net new ARR contribution from Red Canary in fiscal 2027 as it folds into the integrated offering. He expects continued higher MDR churn on renewals, all contemplated in the guide.
Calendar 2026 Q2
when you comment about some of the tailwinds in your business on the back of the emergence of these foundation models
Show response
Jay described unprecedented inbound demand driven by frontier AI models finding vulnerabilities. Not factoring meaningful impact in Q4 but expects impact in FY27. Specific short-term opportunities include ZPA upsells for zero trust access to all users and deception technology uptake.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you beginning to see any attach to budgets outside of security? How are CIOs thinking about funding some of these projects?
Show response
Jay said CIOs feel urgency to implement AI security. Budget comes from security or as 4-6% of AI project budgets, viewed as nominal. Not seeing budgets as an issue for AI security projects. Requires C-level engagement where Zscaler has strong relationships.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you give us a sense for organic net new ARR in the quarter?
Show response
Kevin confirmed organic growth consistent with Q4 and beat internal expectations but didn't give specific number. Jay described three acquisition layers: Avalor (data fabric), Red Canary (agentic AI for SecOps), SPLX (red teaming for AI security portfolio).
Calendar 2025 Q3
are they primarily focused on what you've done combining, like, Avalor and Red Canary for more of a streaming-based analytics platform
Show response
Jay described two buckets: SecOps (combining Avalor data fabric + Red Canary agentic AI for outcomes-based pricing vs data volume) and IT Ops (ZDX with agentic technology for user performance and machine-to-machine agent detection).
Calendar 2025 Q1
How are enterprises viewing getting their data estate in order before they pursue agentic utilization
Show response
Jay explained they do inline classification at ZIA and scan data at rest in OneDrive/SharePoint. Data protection ACV grew 40% YoY. Single policy engine across channels.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you help us understand where you are in terms of progress with Avalor
Show response
Jay detailed Avalor-powered products: Risk 360, unified vulnerability management. Building breach prediction and threat hunting. 500B daily transactions provide data advantage.
IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
where is the spending coming from? What's at risk of getting trimmed as companies focus on adopting AI-based technology
Show response
Arvind said IT budgets grow 2-3pts above GDP. Run/maintain vs new project ratio shifting from 70/30 to 60/40, benefiting IBM's automation and hybrid portfolios.
Calendar 2025 Q2
could you frame out how you think IBM is positioned to address the shift in spending priorities of the administration
Show response
Arvind said administration shifting from cost-cutting to modernization and AI deployment, citing the AI action plan. IBM engaged with agencies at highest levels on modernization.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what do you anticipate from a macro perspective on for an impact on the mainframe cycle
Show response
Arvind expects strong z17 cycle through 2025 and H1 2026, with volatility potentially accelerating client purchases. IBM offers leasing through its financing business.
AIC3.ai, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I would love to get some thoughts about how you approach that cost reduction, where those reductions kind of manifested
Show response
Hitesh said the cuts spanned all functions and locations, benchmarked against software peers, with sales and marketing reductions mostly from the sales force. Direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Are there a few north stars that you could point to where, you know, you're setting expectations
Show response
Stephen pointed to the IPD motion, rigorous qualification and fast value delivery, and named bookings as the leading indicator. Direct.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CRWD CrowdStrike | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| FTNT Fortinet | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| PANW Palo Alto Networks | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| ZS Zscaler | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| IBM International Business Machines Corporation | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| AI C3.ai, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CRWDCrowdStrike · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- FTNTFortinet · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- PANWPalo Alto Networks · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- ZSZscaler · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- IBMInternational Business Machines Corporation · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- AIC3.ai, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
- 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Cloud & AI12
- Revenue Growth10
- Demand8
- Innovation & R&D7
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Guidance Reliability5
- Subscriber Growth5
- Macroeconomic3
- M&A3
- Product Launch3
Show all 15 topics
- Margin2
- Cost Pressure1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Trade Tariffs1
- Regulation Policy1