Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brian Kinstlinger

Alliance Global Partners · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 7 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
7on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 7 questionsLimited sample
Companies
1questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 7 of 7 questions from 1 company

RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
RGTI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

When is a reasonable time frame where we can expect to see that impact fidelity?

Show response

Management said coherence time is 25 to 30 microseconds and a 2-3x improvement is practical near term, with fidelity gains expected before year-end.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the $100 million investment in the U.K. are those people, infrastructure offices? And then will that be expensed

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Management said the $100M UK spend spans several years covering headcount, systems and facilities under the ProQure program.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what the evaluation process was like. I think you said in Japan, maybe you weren't sure of the other modalities.

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management said Rigetti's open modular architecture and chiplet upgradeability differentiate it versus IBM, IQM and QuantWare.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what progress you are making currently on fidelity and when you expect to achieve 99.7% medium 2-qubit gate fidelity

Show response

Management expressed high confidence from 9-qubit chiplet data in hitting the year-end and 2026 fidelity milestones.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is there some combination of your 4 metrics that begin to drive revenue or larger scale orders in your opinion?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management said current sales are one-off research contracts with government and academic customers, not yet a scalable revenue driver.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you speak to the progress you're making on tiling? And do you think that these time frames are still reasonable?

Show response

Management expressed confidence in reaching 36 qubits mid-year and 100-plus qubits by year-end via the chiplet approach.

Calendar 2024 Q4

given the challenges that all of the superconducting OEMs have, is their approach scaling also through tiling?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management said IBM is also considering tiling while Google's scaling approach remains unclear.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
  • RGTI
    Rigetti Computing, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q110%none of 1 question1
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Demand2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Revenue Growth1