Loading…
Loading…
there was about 1.7 gigawatts of existing customer expansion cited in some of the large tariff testimony. That's incremental to the 3 gigawatts. Is that correct?
are there anything in that bill that could lead to incremental investments for the Ameren utilities
how meaningful is that? Is there any sort of time line? Maybe just put it in the context with the 2.3 gigawatts you're referencing
how confident are you on the time line that’s proposed and then the total cost of the $16.2 billion
Could that be done without additional equity to offset the $300 million? Is there another way for you to accomplish that?
do you see the cadence of your rate case filings changing? And then a follow-on to that would just be kind of the earned returns that you expect
is the GenCo model generating additional pipeline opportunities, conversations beyond NiSource, particularly in that Midwest region?
How should we think about the relationship with the AEP and the cadence of those transmission projects stacking up in the future backlog
can we talk about some of the other CapEx opportunities you have as you roll forward or update in the fall
Will those 2 items need to be contemplated and assessed in this upcoming CapEx update?
I suppose that could ramp up closer to that 3.5 gigawatts, maybe towards the latter half of that plan?
on the recent MISO capacity auction results, could we get your thoughts on your base generation CapEx spend or any upside CapEx maybe for data centers?