Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Brian Schwartz

Oppenheimer · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 (5 quarters; questions recorded in 3).

Limited coverage. Only 5 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
5on tracked calls
Challenge rate
20%1 of 5 questionsLimited sample
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
3with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 5 of 5 questions from 3 companies

NOWServiceNow2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
NOW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

if we think about the percentage of AI inferencing and training workloads that are gonna run on the platform in 2026? How do you think that mix would break out between those workloads running on Se...

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Amit said inferencing is a small fraction of overall workload cost. Most value is in context, data management, integration, and workflow orchestration on top of inference. Long-term expects more frontier models for inference but Now LLM retains role for sovereign, private, and on-prem requirements.

Calendar 2025 Q1

When you talk to executives, how do you think focus and priorities within the different software markets is changing versus past macro disruptions?

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bill said CEOs now manage a two-sided coin: OpEx reduction for potential revenue downturn while simultaneously investing in AI-driven business model innovation. Platform consolidation onto fewer vendors is accelerating.

SOUNSoundHound AI, Inc.2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
SOUN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

how you see the durability of the enterprise AI business as we enter this agentic era?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Argued software-automation disruption is a tailwind and faster AI development helps SoundHound reinvent.

Are you looking to show improvement in terms of the efficiency and the EBITDA margin 2026?

MarginCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Guided to year-over-year EBITDA improvement and P&L leverage while reinvesting for growth.

PATHUiPath Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
PATH company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

is it possible to compare the ASPs on these type of deals versus the other products in the suite

PricingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Daniel said agentic deals can be larger and open new per-use-case pricing, citing the quarter's largest deal, but noted ASPs are early.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
NOW ServiceNow2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
PATH UiPath Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • NOW
    ServiceNow · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • SOUN
    SoundHound AI, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • PATH
    UiPath Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q3No questions recorded——
2025 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  4. 2025 Q3No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Margin1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Pricing1
  • Product Launch1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Demand1