Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Carter Gould
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).
- Questions
- 22on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 32%7 of 22 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 6with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 22 of 22 questions from 8 companies
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was wondering if you kind of use that as an opportunity to step back and reassess your solid tumor portfolio
Show response
Yancopoulos acknowledged the miss and said Regeneron will take more shots in solid tumors, but did not address the spend or prioritization question directly.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should we think about that as more of a convenience play sort of with the co-administration
Show response
Yancopoulos confirmed both convenience and label expansion possibilities and highlighted potential safety advantages over existing agents.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you framed it remaining committing to that funding until the end of the year, which I guess sort of alluded
Show response
Schleifer acknowledged the implicit question about the program's future. Said they don't want to signal unconditional support that discourages others from contributing. Will reassess strategy fresh next year to determine best approach for helping patients.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you help us think about if there's been -- if you've delivered any matching funds yet
Show response
Schleifer said the matching program has only been in place about a month with no useful information to share yet. Haven't heard of any major contributions through the grapevine. Watching the space very closely and hoping their contribution will stimulate others.
Calendar 2025 Q1
this is your fourth CRL and as well as a delay in the past sort of 12 months
Show response
Schleifer took personal responsibility but defended regulatory and manufacturing teams. Attributed CRLs to FDA's increased post-COVID scrutiny of contract manufacturers, not internal failings.
GILDGilead Sciences4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is it fair to assume those comments are anchoring on aperture adherence around 50% still
Show response
Joanna clarified adherence vs persistency distinction: adherence inherently near 100% with Q6-month dosing. Persistency showing strong early trends with patients returning for second injection.
Calendar 2025 Q3
we've seen pretty volatile scripts over here the past couple of weeks. And I guess my question is, are the TRx that we're seeing reflective of what you're seeing
Show response
Johanna acknowledged IQVIA week-to-week volatility is real and will take a couple of quarters to stabilize. Advised combining SP intakes and buy-and-bill reports. Directionally aligned but some accounts missing from tracking.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your continued confidence on anito-cel approvability based on a single-arm study
Show response
Company representative confirmed ongoing FDA dialogue with no major shifts from prior communications. Declined to disclose specific regulatory strategy details. Continue to target 2026 launch.
Calendar 2025 Q1
there have been a number of cuts across HHS, CDC to start the year across various teams, divisions. Raising uncertainty around potential disruptions
Show response
Dan emphasized no disruptions seen to date. Johanna highlighted Gilead's own market development initiatives maintaining PrEP awareness. Dietmar confirmed FDA interactions on track.
ABBVAbbVie3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In the past, you have talked about the speed, not the not waiting potentially for the full phase 3 data or phase 2 data before moving to phase 3. Is that still in the cards?
Show response
Roopal confirmed the platform study anchors on SKYRIZI with a higher dose of the alpha-4 beta-7 antibody plus a TL1A arm, that co-formulation is the intended launch form, and that interim snapshots could enable a move to Phase 3 as early as the first half of 2028.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Obviously, you raised the guide there. Should we think about that being primarily driven by U.S. or OUS
Show response
Jeff Stewart attributed the raise largely to international demand, with first full year running at $400M internationally. US Medicare ramp expected in latter part of year. 24-hour symptom control drives quality of life impact and transformational feedback from movement disorder specialists.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Wanted to get a sense understanding of your expectations and flexibility, if need be to take actions outside the US
Show response
Rob Michael expressed support for balanced affordability policies while cautioning against reference pricing. Jeff Stewart described BoNT/E as both market stimulator and premium product opportunity via co-admin with BOTOX.
BMYBristol Myers Squibb3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you address those discussions and say definitively, whether you've gone back and added more patients since enrollment was completed
Show response
Chris declined to address enrollment specifics. Noted it's practically November so results are imminent.
Calendar 2025 Q2
IP is under attack across the industry from multiple sources, but most notably compounding
Show response
Chris acknowledged sustained IP pressure from multiple fronts. BMY's IP leadership team leads industry efforts. Never take eye off the ball on IP protection.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the extent to which uncertainty around tariffs, FDA, drug pricing environment are sort of stage gates
Show response
Chris dismissed exogenous constraints, emphasizing financial strength and strategic flexibility as more important factors driving BD capacity.
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
can this reach your targets if it ultimately requires every 4-week dosing? Or put differently, are there reasons you have conviction
Show response
Dean Li acknowledged the dosing concern directly, confirming they are considering longer intervals beyond the initial q4w focus, while emphasizing that 4-week dosing is the priority for FDA labeling.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how does Merck think about the importance and speed it may need to pursue combinations on the back of those data
Show response
Dean acknowledged the field will move to combinations (bispecifics, orals) and signaled Merck has a robust plan for 'being next' but declined to disclose specifics on a public call.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to ask you around your confidence in ultimately hitting on OS in the 022 study
Show response
Dean framed OS as critical for both FDA and patients and expressed confidence in WELIREG's broad portfolio program across RCC.
PFEPfizer2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
should investors have any expectation around a comprehensive deal that addresses the President's objectives across MFN and tariffs
Show response
Bourla confirmed discussions cover MFN, tariffs, PBM reform, 340B, and pill penalty; 340B expected to exceed $62 billion this year; wants resolution quickly.
Is Vyndaqel U.S. growth behind us?
Show response
Malik confirmed leading first-line share, good TRx momentum, but expects GTN pressure from Medicare Part D and access contracting; international grew 32% with significant expansion potential.
Show 2 more companies
AMGNAmgen Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Are you taking actions or advocating either on your own or in conjunction with peers to address persistent unlawful compounding?
Show response
Bradway explained MariTide as an antibody is not subject to compounding pathways that affect peptides. Both he and Gordon expressed concern about compounding continuing despite resolved supply situations.
LLYLilly (Eli)1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
anything you can share there around if you think potential MFN legislation is a priority or possibility in the coming balance of the year?
Show response
Dave acknowledged pricing risk but focused on IRA small molecule fix in current reconciliation process. Argued MFN requires PBM reform context and that real answer is Europe paying more for R&D.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 5 | 60%3 of 5 questions |
| GILD Gilead Sciences | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| PFE Pfizer | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LLY Lilly (Eli) | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals · 5 questions60%3 of 5 questions
- GILDGilead Sciences · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- ABBVAbbVie · 3 questions0%none of 3 questions
- BMYBristol Myers Squibb · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- MRKMerck & Co., Inc. · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- PFEPfizer · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- AMGNAmgen Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- LLYLilly (Eli) · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 50%2 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D8
- Regulation Policy8
- Competitive Dynamics7
- Product Launch5
- Demand5
- Pricing5
- Trade Tariffs2
- Capex Investment1
- Subscriber Growth1
- M&A1