Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Carter Gould

Cantor Fitzgerald · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).

Questions
22on tracked calls
Challenge rate
32%7 of 22 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 22 of 22 questions from 8 companies

REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 3 of 5 challenging
REGN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was wondering if you kind of use that as an opportunity to step back and reassess your solid tumor portfolio

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCapex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Yancopoulos acknowledged the miss and said Regeneron will take more shots in solid tumors, but did not address the spend or prioritization question directly.

Calendar 2026 Q1

should we think about that as more of a convenience play sort of with the co-administration

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Yancopoulos confirmed both convenience and label expansion possibilities and highlighted potential safety advantages over existing agents.

Calendar 2025 Q3

you framed it remaining committing to that funding until the end of the year, which I guess sort of alluded

ChallengingDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Schleifer acknowledged the implicit question about the program's future. Said they don't want to signal unconditional support that discourages others from contributing. Will reassess strategy fresh next year to determine best approach for helping patients.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you help us think about if there's been -- if you've delivered any matching funds yet

Show response

Schleifer said the matching program has only been in place about a month with no useful information to share yet. Haven't heard of any major contributions through the grapevine. Watching the space very closely and hoping their contribution will stimulate others.

Calendar 2025 Q1

this is your fourth CRL and as well as a delay in the past sort of 12 months

ChallengingRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Schleifer took personal responsibility but defended regulatory and manufacturing teams. Attributed CRLs to FDA's increased post-COVID scrutiny of contract manufacturers, not internal failings.

GILDGilead Sciences4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
GILD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is it fair to assume those comments are anchoring on aperture adherence around 50% still

Product LaunchSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Joanna clarified adherence vs persistency distinction: adherence inherently near 100% with Q6-month dosing. Persistency showing strong early trends with patients returning for second injection.

Calendar 2025 Q3

we've seen pretty volatile scripts over here the past couple of weeks. And I guess my question is, are the TRx that we're seeing reflective of what you're seeing

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Johanna acknowledged IQVIA week-to-week volatility is real and will take a couple of quarters to stabilize. Advised combining SP intakes and buy-and-bill reports. Directionally aligned but some accounts missing from tracking.

Calendar 2025 Q2

your continued confidence on anito-cel approvability based on a single-arm study

ChallengingRegulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Company representative confirmed ongoing FDA dialogue with no major shifts from prior communications. Declined to disclose specific regulatory strategy details. Continue to target 2026 launch.

Calendar 2025 Q1

there have been a number of cuts across HHS, CDC to start the year across various teams, divisions. Raising uncertainty around potential disruptions

Regulation PolicyProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Dan emphasized no disruptions seen to date. Johanna highlighted Gilead's own market development initiatives maintaining PrEP awareness. Dietmar confirmed FDA interactions on track.

ABBVAbbVie3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
ABBV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

In the past, you have talked about the speed, not the not waiting potentially for the full phase 3 data or phase 2 data before moving to phase 3. Is that still in the cards?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Roopal confirmed the platform study anchors on SKYRIZI with a higher dose of the alpha-4 beta-7 antibody plus a TL1A arm, that co-formulation is the intended launch form, and that interim snapshots could enable a move to Phase 3 as early as the first half of 2028.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Obviously, you raised the guide there. Should we think about that being primarily driven by U.S. or OUS

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jeff Stewart attributed the raise largely to international demand, with first full year running at $400M internationally. US Medicare ramp expected in latter part of year. 24-hour symptom control drives quality of life impact and transformational feedback from movement disorder specialists.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Wanted to get a sense understanding of your expectations and flexibility, if need be to take actions outside the US

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rob Michael expressed support for balanced affordability policies while cautioning against reference pricing. Jeff Stewart described BoNT/E as both market stimulator and premium product opportunity via co-admin with BOTOX.

BMYBristol Myers Squibb3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
BMY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you address those discussions and say definitively, whether you've gone back and added more patients since enrollment was completed

ChallengingInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Chris declined to address enrollment specifics. Noted it's practically November so results are imminent.

Calendar 2025 Q2

IP is under attack across the industry from multiple sources, but most notably compounding

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Chris acknowledged sustained IP pressure from multiple fronts. BMY's IP leadership team leads industry efforts. Never take eye off the ball on IP protection.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the extent to which uncertainty around tariffs, FDA, drug pricing environment are sort of stage gates

Show response

Chris dismissed exogenous constraints, emphasizing financial strength and strategic flexibility as more important factors driving BD capacity.

MRKMerck & Co., Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
MRK company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can this reach your targets if it ultimately requires every 4-week dosing? Or put differently, are there reasons you have conviction

ChallengingInnovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Dean Li acknowledged the dosing concern directly, confirming they are considering longer intervals beyond the initial q4w focus, while emphasizing that 4-week dosing is the priority for FDA labeling.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how does Merck think about the importance and speed it may need to pursue combinations on the back of those data

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Dean acknowledged the field will move to combinations (bispecifics, orals) and signaled Merck has a robust plan for 'being next' but declined to disclose specifics on a public call.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wanted to ask you around your confidence in ultimately hitting on OS in the 022 study

Show response

Dean framed OS as critical for both FDA and patients and expressed confidence in WELIREG's broad portfolio program across RCC.

PFEPfizer2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
PFE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

should investors have any expectation around a comprehensive deal that addresses the President's objectives across MFN and tariffs

Regulation PolicyTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bourla confirmed discussions cover MFN, tariffs, PBM reform, 340B, and pill penalty; 340B expected to exceed $62 billion this year; wants resolution quickly.

Is Vyndaqel U.S. growth behind us?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsDemandPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Malik confirmed leading first-line share, good TRx momentum, but expects GTN pressure from Medicare Part D and access contracting; international grew 32% with significant expansion potential.

Show 2 more companies
AMGNAmgen Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
AMGN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Are you taking actions or advocating either on your own or in conjunction with peers to address persistent unlawful compounding?

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bradway explained MariTide as an antibody is not subject to compounding pathways that affect peptides. Both he and Gordon expressed concern about compounding continuing despite resolved supply situations.

LLYLilly (Eli)1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LLY company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

anything you can share there around if you think potential MFN legislation is a priority or possibility in the coming balance of the year?

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Dave acknowledged pricing risk but focused on IRA small molecule fix in current reconciliation process. Argued MFN requires PBM reform context and that real answer is Europe paying more for R&D.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals560%3 of 5 questions
GILD Gilead Sciences425%1 of 4 questions
ABBV AbbVie30%none of 3 questions
BMY Bristol Myers Squibb333%1 of 3 questions
MRK Merck & Co., Inc.333%1 of 3 questions
PFE Pfizer2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
AMGN Amgen Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LLY Lilly (Eli)1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • REGN
    Regeneron Pharmaceuticals · 5 questions
    60%3 of 5 questions
  • GILD
    Gilead Sciences · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • ABBV
    AbbVie · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • BMY
    Bristol Myers Squibb · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • MRK
    Merck & Co., Inc. · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • PFE
    Pfizer · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • AMGN
    Amgen Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LLY
    Lilly (Eli) · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q1520%1 of 5 questions5
2025 Q2729%2 of 7 questions6
2025 Q3450%2 of 4 questions4
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q1333%1 of 3 questions3
2026 Q2250%1 of 2 questions2
  1. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  2. 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Regulation Policy8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Product Launch5
  • Demand5
  • Pricing5
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • M&A1