Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Charles Rhyee
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 42on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 7%3 of 42 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 42 of 42 questions from 8 companies
CRLCharles River Laboratories9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
You said part of it is due to a proposed tax legislation change. Do we know when that will actually be finalized?
Show response
Coleman said the tax headwind relates to proposed Mauritius legislation expected to be confirmed imminently; if it does not happen there would be EPS upside.
is that the right kind of run rate we should think about as we look forward into '27?
Show response
Coleman clarified Q4 will be the highest DSA margin (not revenue) quarter on lower NHP costs, guiding about 200bps sequential margin improvement in Q3 and about 300bps in Q4.
Calendar 2026 Q1
biotech kind of highest levels you've seen in the last 2 years, maybe more large pharma kind of slowly rebounding
Show response
Birgit said go-to-market strategy is balanced across pharma and biotech with customized client-centric approach. Pricing environment described as stable with no meaningful changes. Investing in technology tools, training, and Apollo platform to deepen share of wallet.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Maybe if I could just ask about the guide for coming up here, understanding the headwinds that you kind of laid out, particularly for the first quarter
Show response
Mike Nau outlined three drivers of sequential margin improvement: continued cost savings and efficiency initiatives, lower NHP sourcing costs from KF acquisition, and improving demand trends converting Q4 bookings to revenue.
the extra sourcing cost where you kind of had because of the greater-than-normal number of study starts, so you had to kind of go outside
Show response
Mike confirmed it is a combination: KF will provide meaningful cost relief in H2 2026, and the company has had more time to plan for increased demand. Q1 stock comp headwind from CEO transition is also temporary.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just want to make sure, is there anything else that I'm missing or as I think about sort of the factors driving that
Show response
Pease confirmed the three H2 margin headwinds: DSA hiring, CDMO commercial revenue non-recurrence, and July 1 merit increases (approximately 3.5% salary increase). No other material factors.
is there any benefits to DSA margins with the DOJ investigation concluding?
Show response
Pease explained the NHP inventory write-off was non-GAAPed; now that animals can be used, costs will flow through as normal operating expense, essentially unwinding the prior non-GAAP treatment.
Calendar 2025 Q1
any update on -- for CDMO, the FDA's Form 483 would be helpful
Show response
Foster said FDA engagement on the 483 is going well, with ongoing back-and-forth on improvements, giving confidence that facilities will be ready for future commercial clients.
Can you talk about sort of risks to cancellations maybe ticking back up, given sort of the short time cycles and the quick study starts
Show response
Foster explained cancellation decline is a positive stability indicator; backlogs are sufficient but not over-extended like the 18-month peak when clients saved slots without corresponding studies. Does not see a return to elevated cancellations.
CORCencora8 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how mature is that as an opportunity for OneOncology because is this maybe -- are we still like in early innings?
Show response
Bob said clinical trials are a driver of MSO profitability and growth; RCA is in the later innings of its build-out and mature, while OneOncology is in earlier innings with significant runway. Community oncology offers cost-effective, accessible trial access, aiding both patients and manufacturer trial accrual.
Calendar 2026 Q1
was that -- how do we understand that kind of speed of conversion that might have been sort of outside your expectations
Show response
Bob acknowledged faster-than-expected Part D brand-to-biosimilar conversion at large mail order customer. Impact is revenue not profit. Jim confirmed no other material customer losses beyond oncology and grocery. Smaller customer movements contemplated in guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it right to think that this $30 million amount is an ongoing kind of an NCI piece that we should be modeling
Show response
Jim confirmed UUG below-the-line items are ongoing. OneOncology ownership now 92%, with practices/management retaining 8%. Share repurchases paused for deleveraging, but long-term capital deployment priorities unchanged.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you normalize for those, the core growth is actually still quite strong, probably north of 20-something percent by our estimation
Show response
Jim confirmed FY26 US OI guidance ex the net RCA/customer-loss headwind is 10-12%. Capital deployment priorities unchanged, OneOncology full ownership is highly likely and included in long-term guidance. Law of large numbers acknowledged.
Calendar 2025 Q2
What is the lead time generally for projects that come in for you? Is that like a year ahead of time
Show response
Bob noted project lead times are variable by size, market, and type of work. Confirmed they have good visibility on future growth tracking but did not provide specific timeframes.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Can you talk a little bit more about what you're seeing here? Obviously, there's a lot going on in the pharma market, particularly with potential tariffs
Show response
Jim acknowledged clinical trial softness pressuring specialty logistics and consulting, with rebound slower than expected. Reduced international OI guidance but expressed confidence in end-to-end positioning for eventual demand recovery.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Just wanted to understand how that launch is going for you, and what kind of opportunity do you see biosimilar Eylea being
Show response
Bob highlighted healthy market dynamics with continuous innovation plus biosimilars. Noted Part B biosimilar adoption is faster than Part D based on oncology experience.
Calendar 2024 Q3
what is the real benefit to owning the MSOs for you beyond just at the distribution? Is it really just a services business
Show response
Bob expressed respect for governmental review process and framed MSO model as enhancing patient access, cost effectiveness, and supporting community providers.
CICigna7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
there's been a lot of concerns about IDR and maybe sort of talk about your exposure, related to that and stop-loss
Show response
Brian called IDR impact manageable within CHC pricing while flagging $15B of industry-wide abuse; Ann explained the biosimilar economic shift from PBS to Specialty and said stop-loss is tracking in line. Direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how much of the results we saw in the quarter were driven by formulary changes really to try to drive biosimilar adoption
Show response
Brian detailed HUMIRA and STELARA $0 out-of-pocket programs driving biosimilar adoption, plus generic Revlimid upcoming. David emphasized AI-driven personalized conversion strategies with high NPS.
Calendar 2025 Q4
is that aligned with the launch of the new rebate-free model is the first just sort of clarification question
Show response
Brian confirmed launch plan unchanged by FTC agreement. David clarified no liability if adoption falls short of targets; model will be standard offering but choice remains. GPO relocation is separate from rebate-free model transition.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you maybe give us a sense here on what the dialogue might be like in Washington between yourselves and other -- and some of your peers
Show response
David outlined three categories of action: public-private partnership (prior auth reform, fertility access), sustained innovation (GLP-1 programs, Encircle with 10M+ individuals), and step-function transformation (rebate-free model). Emphasized nonpartisan, fact-based engagement.
Calendar 2025 Q2
You talked about a lot on CuraScript and just curious sort of what does this market look like when you're selling into health systems, in particular
Show response
Brian explained CuraScript doesn't compete with traditional wholesalers, focused on medical benefit specialty. Stelara biosimilar launched in May with $0 patient OOP, early returns encouraging. CuraScript is also distribution vehicle for Quallent biosimilars.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are, in your view, some of the more simple steps that could be done to maybe assuage some of these concerns about potential conflicts of interest
Show response
David outlined five approaches: fact-based engagement, client voice advocacy, transparency, continued innovation, and regulatory/legal action as last resort.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is that related to GLP-1s at all? And related to that, as we think about the Evernorth guide going forward, you are starting at a 3% operating income growth
Show response
Brian clarified stop loss pressure from specialty injectables like Keytruda and Ocrevus, not GLP-1s. Evernorth 2025 normalized growth within 5-8% after adjusting for VillageMD, stranded overhead, and investments.
MCKMcKesson Corporation6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
when you look at the AOI growth here, it's actually a little bit above the LRP targets of 5% to 8%
Show response
Britt explained above-LRP performance driven by specialty pharma growth and operating efficiency, with OpEx as percentage of gross profit down 293 basis points in FY26.
Calendar 2025 Q4
some of your competitors are, you know, kind of seeing maybe a little bit more deceleration in performance on a year over year basis
Show response
Brian attributed outperformance to clear long-standing strategy, focused management team, good capital deployment with Prism Vision and Florida Cancer additions, and day-to-day execution with continuous improvement mindset.
Calendar 2025 Q3
when we were thinking about the tax rate for the year, if I remember when you first gave guidance, you said -- you gave the range
Show response
Britt explained full-year tax guidance narrowed from 17-19% to 18-19% due to slightly higher second half rate. Provided specific Q3 guidance of 23-25% with Q4 expected lower from discrete timing.
Calendar 2025 Q2
have any of these recent prior authorization initiatives undertaken by insurers had any impact on the segment
Show response
Brian noted one payer shifted preferred product but McKesson benefits from serving both programs, maintaining overall prior auth volumes. No material behavior changes observed.
Calendar 2025 Q1
free cash flow guide down from last year, can you help us bridge one of the pieces there
Show response
Britt attributed the year-over-year decline to timing effects from quarter-end day and minor non-operational items, emphasizing the guidance remains historically strong.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Can you give us an estimate of maybe what that market share might look like following the addition of FCS?
Show response
Brian described the growth playbook (anchor sites, recruiting, MSAs) but did not give a specific market-share figure.
CAHCardinal Health5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Should we think about this delta being sort of entirely just lapping new customers and M&A and understanding we have contribution from Solaris
Show response
Aaron confirmed H2 laps $10B new customers and ION/GIA acquisitions. Internal forecast now incorporates stronger demand than originally anticipated for H2 but still not outsized. Solaris distribution not assumed. If outsized demand persists, that's upside opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q2
The extra expenses, these were not part of the kind of investments that you talked about at Analyst Day. And then secondly, when we think about the $0.05 change for the liability, is that also incl...
Show response
Aaron confirmed Q4 items were NOT the Investor Day investments, they were ordinary course items (bad debt, contractual resolutions) in last weeks of quarter. On liability classification, directed to the $0.20 raise framework (half liability, half underlying) and noted GIA closed in February.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is it fair to think that we should think predominantly that the pharma segment is what's going to be the primary driver here
Show response
Aaron described double-digit FY26 EPS growth driven by Pharma momentum, Other business secular tailwinds, M&A contributions, with GMPD at least consistent with FY25.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Does the new administration and sort of the, kind of yielding of tariffs all over the place here. Is that looking to accelerate
Show response
Jason noted FDA approval constraints limit reshoring speed. Even at 50% tariffs, commoditized products may not return to US due to cost differentials.
Calendar 2024 Q3
Are you saying just those are just hurricane related and has distribution kind of -- everything kind of picked back up since
Show response
Jason clarified no meaningful hurricane impact on GMPD. Forward guidance assumes normal utilization environment, more consistent with long-term targets.
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc.5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
you guys have kind of indicated that you could have expected 14 of the top 20 to retain 13, 14.
Show response
Paul reaffirmed only 4 decisions remain and they expect to win the majority, declining to predict before decisions are final.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you're seeing the overall competitive landscape kind of shaping up currently
Show response
Peter said there are area-specific competitors but no one attempting a full Development Cloud. Core platform commonality and first-mover advantage from 2012. Must compete with themselves through excellence and humility.
what's the average number of these Development Cloud products do they have on average
Show response
Peter said penetration varies by product: eTMF has 20 of top 20, but RTSM, eCOA, and safety have none or few enterprise standard selections yet. First LIMS early adopter at top 20. Still surprisingly early with more applications being added.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Has this been maybe part of the driver of growth for Development Cloud or maybe is the reverse finally having something like Development Cloud available
Show response
Peter said Development Cloud has played a small part in the shift to functional outsourcing by enabling more efficient integrated tech stacks for large pharma.
Calendar 2024 Q4
maybe talk about a little bit more where you think you are in your journey in adding data sources to Compass and data cloud
Show response
Peter said Veeva has the strongest data network in the industry, powering both Compass and Crossix with patient-first data and accurate multi-source matching.
Show 2 more companies
CVSCVS Health1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
if we think this gets adopted more broadly--and I think back to the Blue Shield of California contract
Show response
Joyner defended integrated model citing 300,000+ patients, 4M+ prescriptions, and 10,000 specialty patients at risk. Noted other states rejecting similar approaches.
IQVIQVIA1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2024 Q4
within the 2025 outlook, how you see those kind of separate parts of it
Show response
Info ~1% steady growth; analytics/consulting recovered from negative to mid-single digits; real world and tech back to double digits in Q4. 55 FDA approvals in 2023 drove demand recovery.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CRL Charles River Laboratories | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| COR Cencora | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions |
| CI Cigna | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| CAH Cardinal Health | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| VEEV Veeva Systems Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| CVS CVS Health | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| IQV IQVIA | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- CRLCharles River Laboratories · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- CORCencora · 8 questions13%1 of 8 questions
- CICigna · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- MCKMcKesson Corporation · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- CAHCardinal Health · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- VEEVVeeva Systems Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- CVSCVS Health · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- IQVIQVIA · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2024 Q4 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions | 4 |
- 2024 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2024 Q45 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q18 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics17
- Demand10
- Regulation Policy10
- Margin9
- Guidance Reliability7
- Revenue Growth7
- Cost Pressure5
- M&A4
- Innovation & R&D3
- Product Launch3
Show all 15 topics
- Pricing3
- Capital Allocation2
- Supply Chain2
- Trade Tariffs1
- Geographic Expansion1