Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Cory Kasimov
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 14on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 14%2 of 14 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 14 of 14 questions from 4 companies
MRNAModerna6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the immunogenicity data that you have that kind of gives you confidence that intismeran works as well in low TMB
Show response
Berman said RCC immunogenicity data is not available yet, pointing to pancreatic immunogenicity and TMB-independent Phase 2 melanoma results for confidence.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how critical is it to demonstrate an overall survival benefit in Interpath-001
Show response
Hoge argued RFS includes survival and tends to correlate with OS. Five-year Phase II update at ASCO will include RFS, DMFS and OS data. Phase III will follow OS but will take time to mature to Phase II-level data.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Are you surprised at all by the low case accruals here? Or is this kind of anticipated
Show response
Hoge noted 2-season design was always a possibility. No change to commercial target product profile; burden of disease well-established globally.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what does this suggest about what you're learning about the product, where it might be best suited to work and your evolving confidence
Show response
Hoge emphasized adjuvant remains primary bet but manufacturing improvements enable metastatic indication. Over 1,000 patients treated across intismeran studies.
Are you surprised at all by the low case accruals here? Or is this kind of anticipated
Show response
Hoge noted 2-season design was always a possibility. No change to commercial target product profile; burden of disease well-established globally.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what possible changes have you seen in the past month that has caused the bump to expense guidance already
Show response
CFO clarified no change occurred; confusion was between GAAP costs (including SBC/D&A) and cash costs which remain unchanged.
REGNRegeneron Pharmaceuticals4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
curious what you make of the debate and how you're trying to mitigate this in your trials going forward
Show response
Yancopoulos directly addressed infection concerns, citing data showing infection risk decreases with longer treatment as bone marrow function improves.
Calendar 2025 Q3
can you outline how you see the commercial opportunity evolving for gMG and what your plans are in Europe
Show response
Yancopoulos detailed competitive positioning: most convenient dosing (SC every 3 months), stable deep control throughout dosing period, and potential safety advantage from partial complement inhibition. McCourt confirmed launch readiness and called it a highly differentiated product for a large indication with high unmet need.
Calendar 2025 Q2
your thoughts on the competitive OX40 ligand data shared thus far and how you believe this potentially competes
Show response
Yancopoulos argued Dupixent targets a largely vestigial immune pathway while OX40 and JAK approaches attack fundamental immune mechanisms more broadly, requiring far longer safety track records. Schleifer added that Dupixent's cross-indication reach in patients with comorbidities is a commercial advantage.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How critical is it that the product also hits an overall survival in addition to the DFS you top lined
Show response
Yancopoulos noted few survival events in early-stage population but expressed confidence in the data package. McCourt estimated approximately 10,000 US patients may benefit from adjuvant CSCC.
VRTXVertex Pharmaceuticals3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what kind of data would be necessary in that interim analysis to file for accelerated approval?
Show response
Reshma: FDA agreement allows an accelerated-approval filing on 1-year GFR at the interim; proteinuria also reviewed.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what is needed in this population for a clinically meaningful benefit to justify advancement in this patient segment?
Show response
Reshma set an explicit bar of 20-50% proteinuria improvement on top of standard of care for AMPLIFIED, with results expected in the second half of 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how you view the risk of potential hypogamma adverse events and how this could ultimately impact the label, if at all
Show response
Reshma detailed RUBY-3 80mg IgAN safety data: zero SAEs related to infection at any IgG level, a single patient below 300mg IgG threshold with no serious infection, and average IgG levels within normal range around 700mg.
ALNYAlnylam Pharmaceuticals1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
how do you think about the evolution of pricing as another silencer enters the picture
Show response
CCO noted Wainua is slightly more premium than AMVUTTRA and no significant pricing shift anticipated. First-line payer access has improved in 2026 vs 2025.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| MRNA Moderna | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| REGN Regeneron Pharmaceuticals | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| VRTX Vertex Pharmaceuticals | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions |
| ALNY Alnylam Pharmaceuticals | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q4 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D12
- Competitive Dynamics3
- Product Launch2
- Pricing1
- Cost Pressure1
- Revenue Growth1