Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Courtney Breen
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 44on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 9%4 of 44 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 44 of 44 questions from 8 companies
BMYBristol Myers Squibb8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
it would be great if you can kind of perhaps characterize those relative to what you're able to achieve through the year in 2025
Show response
David confirmed $1B achieved in 2025 with remaining $1B spread over 2026-2027. Savings enabled reinvestment in growth drivers including Orbital and pumitamig while still reducing cost basis.
Can you just help us understand kind of what is driving that primary change at that moment time relative to this new baseline on pricing
Show response
David provided $1.5-$2B step down guidance consistent with consensus. Chuck reminded that EU patents expire late in 2026, driving the decline.
Calendar 2025 Q3
What learnings are you taking from your first round in the PD-1 battle, the development and commercial kind of competition with Merck
Show response
Chris emphasized first/second-to-market lesson from PD-1. Adam cited community oncologist relationships (70% of prescribing), agility to pivot for new indications, and novel combination strategy.
Calendar 2025 Q2
a bit more context on kind of why this felt like it was the right time to announce this deal
Show response
Chris credited administration focus on cutting middlemen. Adam detailed September 8 launch at over 50% discount for uninsured patients. Chris noted exploring other products.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how you're approaching making those M&A decisions in the context of kind of internal success rates
Show response
Chris stated BD and internal pipeline are distinct tracks. No endogenous constraints needed before executing. Focus on science, value-add, and growth profile.
Bristol's perspective there in terms of committed capital expenditure going forward
Show response
Chris confirmed continued US R&D, technology and CapEx investment plans. Declined specifics but expressed hope trade policies enhance US competitiveness.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk a little bit about TA alignment, kind of what good looks like
Show response
Chris emphasized focus on core TAs, requiring science conviction plus financial discipline. Noted strong financial position provides strategic flexibility.
how you're expecting that to flow
Show response
Adam noted Cobenfy will be predominantly public-payer with Medicaid best price. Commercial under 10%, more common in bipolar and autism indications.
LLYLilly (Eli)7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you just help us understand the requirements and milestones ahead in ensuring that this is accepted as a BLA?
Show response
Dave Ricks confirmed active litigation and Lilly's position but gave no firm timeline, noting more CMC data is needed.
Calendar 2026 Q1
how does this compare to kind of a traditional primary care launch -- what things are you accelerating
Show response
Ilya Yuffa said this is following an accelerated path vs traditional primary care. Access coming faster than typical with 2 of 3 PBMs active by mid-May and Medicare Part D by July. DTC activating earlier than normal given existing GLP-1 familiarity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just help us understand if you're anticipating any kind of accelerated pathways that you might be able to access in these ex-US countries that would enable launch in 2026 for orforglipron
Show response
Patrik confirmed most international launches in 2027 with a few exceptions in late 2026 such as UAE referencing FDA approval. Consistent with prepared remarks guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you help us understand kind of the potential for expansion to the market with orfo? And should we expect to see a slowdown in getting new starts during the initial period of that orfo launch
Show response
Ken framed orforglipron as a generational opportunity reaching a much larger population, only 8.5M on incretins out of 170M who might benefit in the U.S. alone. Positioned it as both starter incretin and maintenance option post-injectable via ATTAIN-MAINTAIN. Emphasized market expansion, not cannibalization.
Calendar 2025 Q2
we do see that kind of nausea, vomiting, constipation all appear a bit higher in this ACHIEVE-1 study. Can you talk a little bit about the differences
Show response
Dan attributed differences to population differences (diabetes vs obesity). Emphasized profile is as good as it gets for GLP-1 monotherapy in oral form.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how many current patients on Zepbound are being covered by CVS Caremark today?
Show response
Patrik declined to share specific numbers, reiterating it's a subset of CVS plans with low employer opt-in. Pivoted to broader market momentum with 75% of new anti-obesity starts on Zepbound.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk a little bit more about kind of the potential positioning, particularly in the context of kind of that single injectable GLP-1
Show response
Dan set clear expectations that Orforglipron is indexed to single-acting GLP-1 efficacy, not tirzepatide. Patrik added positioning for needle-averse patients and non-refrigerated global markets.
PFEPfizer7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I just wanted to probe a little bit more on [ sigtolimod vedotin ] and positioning in that frontline setting, all comers relative to the Symbiotic-Lung-01 study
Show response
Chris Boshoff detailed multiple lung cancer shots on goal: SV+pembro first-line PD-L1 high (100% response in small cohort), second-line vs docetaxel mid-year readout, and 4404 VEGF/PD-1 data at ASCO.
Calendar 2025 Q4
How do we think about 2027 as these studies start to annualize? And then kind of combining that with the element you just raised, Albert, of the AI investment
Show response
Denton declined 2027 guidance but noted BD transactions increased R&D workload while $11B investment drives more productivity; AI and digital tools enabling more programs at similar cost; Bourla emphasized productivity gains not from program cuts but from AI deployment.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what factors supported Pfizer in garnering that unprecedented early termination of the waiting period from the U.S. Federal Trade Commission
Show response
Bourla noted FTC made their own decision; Denton framed it as demonstrating deal strength and competitive benefits for patients and pricing; Bourla added Novo deal is epitome of antitrust conflict given dominant position.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk about kind of whether they still rank near the top or how you're seeing kind of opportunities out there
Show response
Bourla confirmed interest across oncology, vaccines, internal medicine/cardiometabolic/obesity, and I&I; highlighted abundant China opportunities; committed to disciplined capital allocation.
where you are kind of reallocating and investing versus where you're able to pull back
Show response
Alexandre detailed international focus on key market-brand combinations driving growth while reducing spend on non-core; Malik cited single agency consolidation, resource reallocation, and technology driving 20% cost per NBRx decrease.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you can provide any comments on inventory and kind of work that you're doing already to bring inventory into the US?
Show response
Bourla confirmed inventory buildup and increasing monthly preparations but no specifics; Boshoff listed upcoming catalysts (Padcev MIBC, ELREXFIO, sasanlimab) and referenced IR 'flashes' instead of a dedicated R&D day.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you talk about whether these are similar or different to how oncology was set up earlier this year -- earlier last year?
Show response
Boshoff explained all four units mirror oncology's end-to-end structure; Baum emphasized improved portfolio prioritization and commercial lens applied earlier in development.
GILDGilead Sciences6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
understand a little bit more about the HIV treatment strength specifically kind of looking at Biktalvi
Show response
Mercier attributed Q2 HIV treatment softness to ACA tax subsidy elimination pushing patients out of coverage, and expects the market to rebound to the typical 2 to 3% growth.
Calendar 2025 Q4
should we be thinking about the $800 million as a floor or as kind of a guide for 2026
Show response
Johanna pushed back on modeling assumptions, clarifying that guidance assumes acceleration of new patient additions plus returning patients for second injection. Account-level pull-through still in progress. Expects strong, consistent, durable long-term growth. DTC campaign expected to have significant impact on awareness and demand.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I want to, I guess, zoom out a little bit to the White House deals and drug pricing, but particularly in the context of your HIV portfolio and higher Medicaid exposure
Show response
Dan described constructive multi-topic engagement with the administration. Highlighted PEPFAR partnership for lenacapavir. Emphasized US-centric IP and tax footprint: 80%+ IP, 90% taxes, $32B investment commitment. Limited tariff transfer pricing exposure versus peers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Why didn't you raise the launch expectations or the guidance as you thought about kind of the Yeztugo launch for the remainder of this year
Show response
Johanna cited two reasons: only 6 weeks in, and need to see covered lives increase over next 1-2 quarters as medical exceptions convert to formulary coverage.
Calendar 2025 Q1
whether there is any potential for an expedited PK or PD package relative to an efficacy trial or what might be needed
Show response
Dietmar acknowledged PK-based approach as a possibility but declined to confirm specific study design. Company still evaluating different trial design options.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how you think kind of TROP2, DLL3, B7-H3 and all the other kind of targets that are being chased after in this space
Show response
Dietmar positioned TROP2 as potentially foundational in second-line SCLC with breakthrough designation, noted mixed B7-H3 data and DLL3 as interesting but unproven.
MRNAModerna6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is this enrollment, is this an efficacy, or is this an events situation?
Show response
Hoge attributed the norovirus interim shortfall to slower case accrual, an events/epidemiology issue rather than enrollment; a third season will be run.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you help us kind of understand the parameter here
Show response
CFO explained Moderna ships to Merck at COGS plus markup, then takes 50% profit share, naturally somewhat greater than 50% of economics. Stage 1 now >30% of lung diagnoses, growing due to screening improvements.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you just remind us or share with us what percentage of patients
Show response
Hoge confirmed >50% were 65+ with >10% above 75. Superiority consistent across populations and even stronger in frail/high-risk. INT regulatory: productive engagement with FDA (CBER), Merck as BLA sponsor.
Calendar 2025 Q3
are there more cuts that you can make going forward to that R&D plan? Or would that require actually stopping of programs
Show response
Hoge confirmed further reductions expected without additional program stops, driven by sunsetting of existing Phase III infectious disease investments. Early-stage work continues as less capital-intensive.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Could you imagine a world where patients might get kind of an INT twice in the course of their disease state if they were to progress
Show response
Hoge confirmed sequential use possible with updated neoantigens reflecting tumor evolution. On headcount, Bancel cited manufacturing productivity, R&D trial wind-downs, and G&A across the board. Still hiring ~150 positions.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Could you imagine a world where patients might get kind of an INT twice in the course of their disease state if they were to progress
Show response
Hoge confirmed possible sequential use with updated neoantigens reflecting tumor evolution. Called this speculative but conceptually sound.
AMGNAmgen Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I wanted to ask what you guys are seeing on [ SOTYKTU's ] impact in the dermatology market with regard to Otezla.
Show response
Gordon said Otezla remains a first-stop systemic agent with new entrants competing after it; volume is holding up well, with some price pressure from 340B exposure.
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you describe how you might think about the role of this product in the market? Is it only post maritide weight loss? Or how should we be thinking about that switching opportunity
Show response
Gordon positioned MariTide as both a start therapy and a long-term maintenance option with monthly, Q8W, or quarterly dosing flexibility. Also acknowledged switching opportunity from patients on other therapies wanting more convenient and well-tolerated regimen.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you explain kind of why you think this is a better paradigm to be using? Or how you expect kind of physicians to select that right dose for the patient
Show response
Bradner explained the antibody pharmacology enables smooth escalation with the 21mg starting dose having very low GI risk. Phase III studies multiple target doses to provide graded dose-response understanding.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you just talk a little bit about kind of how you anticipate this market evolving as we think about the oral PCSK9s and Merck's CORALreef lipids trial
Show response
Gordon emphasized Repatha's proven outcomes data as competitive moat beyond LDL-lowering, noting the VESALIUS primary prevention readout as a key differentiator.
Show 2 more companies
MRKMerck & Co., Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I would love to hear a little bit about how you're thinking about which dose you might consider.
Show response
Dean Li targeted up to 80% LDL reduction with a rosuvastatin combination and said GLP-1 combos are possible but not yet in trials.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How different do you expect that to be in 5 years' time? And how much of that could be attributed to product mix
Show response
Rob said pipeline-driven mix will skew more US-weighted but declined to quantify MFN pricing impact on the 50/50 split.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how you're planning on reallocating in the context of KEYTRUDA SG&A relative to the newer opportunities
Show response
Rob said oncology spend overall will grow via reallocation from KEYTRUDA to the broader portfolio of tissue-targeting agents, ADCs, and small molecules.
Calendar 2024 Q4
whether there's any risk of write-off as we think about the inventory that's sitting in the channel at Zhifei
Show response
Caroline said Zhifei owns the inventory so Merck write-off risk is extremely low; majority of the $400M Part D impact is pricing, not volume.
ABBVAbbVie2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
how different do you expect that to be in 5 years' time? How much of that might be down to the product mix
Show response
Rob Michael suggested pre-Humira 2/3-1/3 US/OUS split as directional guide vs current 75/25, driven more by portfolio mix than pricing assumptions. Jeff Stewart called Rinvoq IBD label expansion a clear net incremental positive, noting the 1-2 punch of Skyrizi and Rinvoq in-play share leadership as IBD paradigm shifts away from TNF-first approach.
Calendar 2025 Q1
whether you have enough inventory in the US to support products like Rinvoq, Botox, Vraylar or Humira for the rest of this year
Show response
Rob Michael declined to speculate without policy details, citing AbbVie's track record of transparency once details are known. Jeff Stewart said BoNT/E pricing analysis would come closer to 2026 launch.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| BMY Bristol Myers Squibb | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| LLY Lilly (Eli) | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| PFE Pfizer | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| GILD Gilead Sciences | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| MRNA Moderna | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| AMGN Amgen Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| MRK Merck & Co., Inc. | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
| ABBV AbbVie | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- BMYBristol Myers Squibb · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- LLYLilly (Eli) · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- PFEPfizer · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- GILDGilead Sciences · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- MRNAModerna · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- AMGNAmgen Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- MRKMerck & Co., Inc. · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
- ABBVAbbVie · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 8 | 25%2 of 8 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
- 2024 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q28 questions · challenge rate 25% (2 of 8 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Innovation & R&D17
- Product Launch11
- Competitive Dynamics10
- Regulation Policy10
- Pricing7
- Demand6
- Cost Pressure4
- M&A4
- Revenue Growth3
- Capex Investment3
Show all 16 topics
- Trade Tariffs3
- Margin2
- Capital Allocation2
- Supply Chain2
- Geographic Expansion1
- Inventory1