Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Craig Ellis

B. Riley Securities · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
24on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 24 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 24 of 24 questions from 5 companies

IONQIonQ, Inc.7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
IONQ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What are the key milestones that you want to be able to check off?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

de Masi said the chip was the hard part; the rest (enclosure, kit) is a solved problem, with commissioning on track for H1 2027.

is the engagement that you're seeing post-executive order, really government entities? Or is it also enterprise customers?

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Singh said demand is broad-based across government and data-heavy enterprises, especially financial services, as Q-Day urgency rises.

Calendar 2026 Q1

as you look at what that means and how customers are engaging what are the revenue implications of that

Revenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

de Masi declined revenue specifics, citing three levers: pushing single-chip qubit counts, merchant-supplier reach, and networked quantum computers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

What should we keep in mind with the notable engineering milestones from here to bring that to market?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Singh said A, B, and C tape-outs are done and the feature-rich D tape-out is in progress, following a semiconductor development path.

Can you help give us some color on some of the things that are driving revenues to that level

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Singh cited globalization, compute organic growth possibly exceeding 100%, plus networking, security, and sensing demand.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what application areas are you seeing being most popular presently?

DemandProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

de Masi cited power grid optimization, Golden Dome, defense logistics, and quantum cybersecurity/QKD spanning government and Fortune 500.

Can you just talk about the timing with which the company might be able to realize those?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Singh said large solution deals take a few years to execute and deferred specifics until 2026 guidance, cautioning against modeling them now.

QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
QBTS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what are you hearing from your 100 commercial customers on where they want to engage with that road map system capabilities?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Baratz said a handful of customers want the 8- or 17-qubit gate systems now via cloud or purchase, with preliminary sales possible in 2026, more likely 2027.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you can give us any color on what you see in the pipeline on the system side and with that all-you-can-eat newer offering

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Baratz said R&D and go-to-market investments are playing out as planned, with a robust and growing system-sales and QCaaS pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q3

an expectation that was set 3 months ago, which was that the company would increase investment moderately about 15% half-on-half

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Markovich reaffirmed ~15% sequential OpEx growth weighted to R&D; Baratz cited gate-model and Advantage3 acceleration and enterprise-license interest.

Calendar 2025 Q2

understand the types of M&A that the company believes would make sense

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Baratz declined to disclose the M&A strategy but said it is now a priority focused on accelerating R&D and product development, potentially including gate model and quantum AI.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you just provide more color on the opportunity that you see in that area?

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Baratz said D-Wave would pursue blockchain only via a partner; he sees blockchain and AI driving the system-sale model more than QCaaS.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is this something that you can expect to continue across 2025 with perhaps more of these system sales in the pipeline, and what could potential revenues there look like?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mayur stood in for Craig Ellis. Baratz confirmed three other institutions in discussion but gave no system-sale revenue guidance; Markovich said system margins exceed the 72.8% consolidated non-GAAP gross margin.

RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
RGTI company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what are you seeing in terms of engagement across the various platforms?

Show response

Management said cloud engagement is high but too early to quantify a month after the 108-qubit launch.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I'm wondering if you could just tell us a little bit more about that.

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management said already-booked orders should drive a significant year-over-year sales increase in 2026, with more Novera orders in the pipeline.

Calendar 2025 Q3

does that rev rec fairly ratably across 12 quarters? Or how do we think about rev rec?

Show response

The CFO said the AFRL contract recognizes ratably over three years, with a small amount already in Q3.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you just talk about the things that you're able to do with some of those entities to position the business best

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Management said it stays actively engaged with DOE and DoD and its roadmap has not been materially impacted by the funding delay.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what specifically are they looking for in Stage A? What boxes does Rigetti need to check to move on to the next phase

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management said executing the disclosed chiplet/fidelity roadmap should be enough to reach DARPA Phase B.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you just give us an update on where things stand federally in the US and your views on what that might be able to do?

Regulation PolicyMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management gave a direct read on the $2.5 billion DOE bill and DARPA funding timing, expecting appropriations in 2025.

MCHPMicrochip Technology3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MCHP company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

just share an example or two of what those changes are and more importantly, help us understand when would investors see the benefit

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rich described the MPLAB AI coding assistant providing 40%+ productivity improvement. Also developing AI product recommenders and TSS board-level design support tools.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you help us understand where the team is in assessing the right level of front-end and back-end capacity

Capex InvestmentCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Steve said the capacity assessment is far along but deferred disclosure to the March 3 investor day.

Is it correct that the next maturity beyond that would be in March of 2028

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Eric confirmed $1.2B September 2025 maturity is next, then $1B in March 2028. Credit line renewal is standard process.

SWKSSkyworks Solutions2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
SWKS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you remind us what fiscal second quarter seasonality is in the eyes of Skyworks

Show response

Philip Carter confirmed normal seasonality expected. FY25 free cash flow benefited from inventory drawdown that will not repeat in FY26. Expects some inventory build near year-end. Low channel inventory provides good visibility.

do you feel like you have the right team in place across all the other functions or do you expect there to be additional changes

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Phil expressed full confidence in current leadership team. No additional changes anticipated across product, manufacturing, operations, or other functions.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
IONQ IonQ, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.60%none of 6 questions
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
MCHP Microchip Technology30%none of 3 questions
SWKS Skyworks Solutions2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • IONQ
    IonQ, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • QBTS
    D-Wave Quantum Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • RGTI
    Rigetti Computing, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • MCHP
    Microchip Technology · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • SWKS
    Skyworks Solutions · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q360%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  4. 2025 Q36 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand10
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Regulation Policy4
  • Product Launch3
  • Capex Investment3
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Cloud & AI1
Show all 15 topics
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Inventory1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • M&A1
  • Macroeconomic1