Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Craig Mailman

Citigroup · covers Real Estate

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
25on tracked calls
Challenge rate
12%3 of 25 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 25 of 25 questions from 5 companies

FRTFederal Realty Investment Trust6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
FRT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how anyone's making these numbers pencil on an IRR basis unless they are just accepting lower returns in this environment.

ChallengingMacroeconomicM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Skeptically asked how buyers make deals pencil on IRR amid sticky rates and compressing cap rates. Management pivoted to the micro, arguing capital now recognizes value-add retail beyond triple-net and grocery-anchored formats.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could you just bridge the $1.88 to get to sort of the $1.845 next quarter? And $1.855 in 3Q? Like how much of the $0.02 to the benefit of earlier timing is nonrecurring?

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Q1-to-Q2 FFO bridge and nonrecurring items identification

Calendar 2025 Q4

Just curious, Don, as you guys ramp up the sales here and acquisitions take a little bit longer or more back-end weighted in a given year.

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Tax efficiency of asset sales and special dividend potential

Calendar 2025 Q2

what the IRR accretion that you guys are playing at over time and how long that takes to play out

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO targeting ~9% unlevered IRRs on acquisitions, noting historical performance has exceeded targets. What they buy has higher IRRs than what they sell, even before cap rate differentials.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can I just clarify the distance you have in the market? Was it 250 overall with 150 under contract?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed $250M in market, $150M under contract. Would consider buybacks at the right price but bias remains growing the company through acquisitions/development.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what the appetite or capacity is to do, you know, several hundred million dollar deal.

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed appetite for large mixed-use but emphasized IRR discipline regardless of format. Joint venture partnerships possible for bigger acquisitions; balance sheet approach remains balanced.

SPGSimon Property Group6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 6 challenging
SPG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

is there a way to, I guess, create a step function in earnings growth from here

ChallengingCapital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Eli said the balance sheet with $9.3 billion of liquidity lets them do development, buybacks and accretive acquisitions, but they will not chase deals just to add scale, citing the Brickell acquisition's year-one yield running over 100 basis points above underwriting.

Calendar 2026 Q1

How much development do you think you could handle at one time and continue to source new entitlements

Capex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Significant capital excess capacity. Human resources can be added accretively. Main constraint is local municipality approval timelines. Under 5x levered with 1 turn = $6B+ capacity.

Calendar 2025 Q4

The the tenor of the conversations maybe as you're talking to retailers and you know, their demand and appetite

Show response

David said A assets have higher demand but making a lot of progress in Bs. Leasing is an art, not pricing power. Class B getting easier to lease than 12 months ago. Southdale cited as B-to-A transformation.

Calendar 2025 Q3

do you feel like you guys are losing a little bit of momentum in the ability to push net effectives at the value side

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

David said value center traffic up but conversion lagging. Low OCRs and strong demand. Outlet consumer more cautious. Lower gas prices could help. More juice left in the orange.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Would you still kind of point us to that midpoint of guidance? Maybe update us on your views today of how you're feeling about the macro

Guidance ReliabilityTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

David said still cautious. 2026 may feel better once tariff costs are absorbed. Brian noted raising bottom end is consistent with their history at this point in the year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm just interested in where you think kind of retailers stand from an inventory perspective in terms of when they do start to run-out

Trade TariffsSupply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

David praised de-minimis elimination. Said retailers have about a month to decide on China Q4 inventory. No material pull-forward seen in SPG data. European retailers unaffected.

KIMKimco Realty5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
KIM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what's the time frame that we should be thinking about to get kind of the kind of acceleration above maybe 5%

Revenue GrowthCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Conor cited 5% then 6%+ FFO growth over the past two years and multiple levers (SNO pipeline, 14,000 entitlements, margin); Glenn clarified the dividend-vs-FFO base math.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Does it give you more flexibility to I guess, negotiate tougher or remerchandise at a more aggressive pace

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jamieson prioritized cash flow over occupancy. May create vacancy to add grocery given 15 active projects with 25% small shop rent premiums. Flynn emphasized economic occupancy lift improving margins, triple net recovery, and free cash flow in early innings.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what ends up being the AFFO contribution relative to that 100 basis points as kind of the CapEx differential plays into it

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Cooper confirmed AFFO analysis incorporates CapEx and leasing costs on multitenant acquisitions. Rent increases and growth from recycled assets far outweigh additional capital needs. AFFO should continue to be positive and growing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what kind of resources do you guys plan to put into this initiative?

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Teichman described multidisciplinary approach with ROI-focused investment calculus. Three focus areas: robotic process automation and agentic AI governance, proprietary data visualization tool, and internal natural language chatbot using OpenAI GPT models.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you talk a little bit about what the opportunity set looks like today? And then maybe put some thoughts around, you know, sources of funds

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Cooper outlined match-funding strategy through ground lease dispositions and entitlement monetization. No additional equity planned. $15-25M structured investment check sizes. Cohen noted $140M free cash flow after dividends and CapEx.

REGRegency Centers5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
REG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

What the potential sustainability or acceleration is even from here, to put capital to work and continue to drive the

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Palmer affirmed sustainability and credited team experience, relationships, and cost of capital, but did not address how falling cap rates change replacement cost rent math.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Can you talk about which projects are now slated to start this year, and the overall leasing activity?

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike clarified guidance is spend not starts. Nick cited $800M+ started over last 3 years with $1B+ expected over next 3. Raised spend expectations based on higher anticipated starts. Continued upward momentum in pipeline sourcing.

Calendar 2025 Q4

How much more room do you guys think you have kind of to push there given the demand?

Show response

Alan refused to cap shop occupancy upside, grew 70 bps YoY despite being at peak. Proactive leasing of occupied space driven by merchandising upgrades and rent growth. Amazon term fees TBD on case-by-case basis. Mike clarified no term fees in guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Is there room to push that lease rate higher? Or are we going to close the gap to the historical spread by just commencing

Revenue GrowthCreditTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Alan attributed the leased-rate dip to 10 Rite Aid boxes returned in Q3. Sees anchor upside (98% leased, pipeline includes Five Below, HomeGoods, Ulta). Mike noted all debt forms considered.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how are you thinking about keeping powder dry until things maybe we get better visibility on what ultimately plays out from a tariff perspective

Capital AllocationMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Lisa emphasized the A rating is intentional for offensive capacity. Development remains best use of free cash flow; compelling acquisitions will be acted on.

PLDPrologis3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
PLD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

how much of that start guide into data centers versus warehouses

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Arndt would not break down by project but described small handful of starts feeling relatively imminent given stage of leasing. Expects starts this quarter and certainly in first half. 40% of overall $4 billion to $5 billion owned and managed range expected in data center. Opportunity to outperform in both logistics and data centers. Logistics starts still below strong run rate with improving spec environment. Data center could rise if more turnkey format chosen given higher appetite from customers. Letter added $42 billion of opportunity in land bank with nearly 40% ready to go.

Calendar 2025 Q3

when we should really start to see that average occupancy inflect quickly back up into 95%

Show response

Arndt said DC growth framing as same-store not how they think about it. Focus on value creation reinvestment back into core business. May retain some interest from capitalization exploration but contributions to base rent and same-store will be relatively small. All investments viewed from total return and value creation perspective. On occupancy said market at seven and a half percent vacant today expected to hang here as demand normalizes over coming years presenting recovery opportunity. Enter this phase at substantially lower market vacancy compared to prior cycles by hundreds of basis points setting up rent dynamic and optimism.

Calendar 2025 Q2

One of the hallmarks here is diversity

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Referenced in Moghadam response to Blaine where he described differential between markets where tenants comfortable versus choppy and how FOMO can change dynamics very quickly. Moghadam emphasized taking full picture approach looking at lease signings pipeline build-to-suit dialogues and customer engagement together rather than any single metric.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
FRT Federal Realty Investment Trust617%1 of 6 questions
SPG Simon Property Group633%2 of 6 questions
KIM Kimco Realty50%none of 5 questions
REG Regency Centers50%none of 5 questions
PLD Prologis30%none of 3 questions
  • FRT
    Federal Realty Investment Trust · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • SPG
    Simon Property Group · 6 questions
    33%2 of 6 questions
  • KIM
    Kimco Realty · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • REG
    Regency Centers · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • PLD
    Prologis · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q230%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q3425%1 of 4 questions4
2025 Q450%none of 5 questions5
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions4
2026 Q2450%2 of 4 questions4
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q34 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  7. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 50% (2 of 4 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capital Allocation10
  • Demand7
  • M&A5
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Capex Investment4
  • Pricing3
  • Macroeconomic2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Cloud & AI2
Show all 15 topics
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Margin1
  • Credit1
  • Supply Chain1