Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Dan Brennan
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 59on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 2%1 of 59 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 59 of 59 questions from 7 companies
DHRDanaher Corporation14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there anything from a therapeutic area or geographic area that together you think it's more of a market issue
Show response
Rainer said there was no therapeutic/geographic commonality and the pushed volume is highly likely to ship in 2027; direct.
if these push outs don't come back in the fourth quarter, as you guys don't expect, is there some extra cushion
Show response
Matt reiterated the ~$100M+ shift, noted possible Q4 upside not in plan, and a mid-to-high-single-digit Q4 bioprocessing exit; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you just walk through the key levers to generate 5% growth next year, including what could push down or higher up
Show response
Gugino declined to discuss 2027 specifically but reiterated the ~300bp headwind fading mechanism that supports mid-single-digit exit rate in Q4 2026 without assuming end market improvement.
Where do you see the biggest opportunities? It's a question we get a lot from investors
Show response
Blair reiterated the 3-dimension acquisition framework and noted financial models are becoming more viable as multiples compress. Gugino added post-Masimo leverage of ~2.5x net debt/EBITDA comes down quickly on $5B+ annual FCF, enabling near-term M&A activity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you just unpack a little bit on the pharma piece? What you are seeing in life sciences
Show response
Pharma is largest Life Sciences end market, three consecutive quarters of growth from recovering MFN/tariff confidence. Upside from academic/government stabilization and biotech funding converting to orders.
would that imply a bit of a slowdown that you are starting the year at for consumables
Show response
Matt was emphatic: no change in consumables trajectory, upper end of high-single-digits. Equipment flat for year. Bioprocessing all-in high-single-digits. Any guide softness is D&M segment, not bioprocessing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Life Science is probably, I guess, 0. Could you unpack a little bit
Show response
Clinical/applied stable, pharma R&D modestly recovering. Academic/government is the anchor. Consumables businesses lapping headwinds from two large customer pullbacks. Upside possible but not assumed.
it's hard for us to parse what's really incremental, what's just shifting from one region to the other
Show response
Two drivers: general equipment replacement need as production volumes outpace capacity plus regionalization/reshoring. Brownfield first, greenfield takes years. Starting to see overhangs dissipate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I think you talked about the seventh consecutive quarter of a book to bill that was solidly over one
Show response
Rainer clarified trends are very comparable to prior quarters. Book-to-bill around one with lumpiness from equipment orders. Overall activity level is solid and consistent.
Could you just speak to kind of know, what's baked in for the 2025 guide, how we think about that low double digits continuing
Show response
Rainer expects non-respiratory reagents to sustain low to mid-teens growth driven by installed base expansion at large IDNs, increasing menu adoption, and MVP panel up over 75% in the US.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the full year guide would imply a nice step-up in the back half of the year. So just can you walk through some of the visibility
Show response
Matt pointed to normal H1/H2 seasonality of approximately 48/52 split, consistent with historical patterns. Puts and takes within segments but total revenue cadence similar to prior year.
any activity from the government in -- kind of reaction to the tariff wars
Show response
Rainer reported stability ex-VBP. No signs of China pushing out Western suppliers. Majority of China supply is either China-for-China or from non-U.S. plants, mitigating retaliation risk.
Calendar 2024 Q4
how do we think about the impact of Danaher's kind of your overall growth from these patent expirations
Show response
Rainer framed biosimilars as a clear tailwind, more volume drives bioprocessing growth. Regulators lock down processes, so biosimilar manufacturers use approved inputs, benefiting Danaher.
Can you just remind us, Rainer, of the linkage between orders and the forward growth for your Bioprocess business
Show response
Rainer confirmed strong orders support the guide and set up well for H2 2025, with mix of near-term and longer-lead orders across customer base.
AAgilent Technologies11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
So just China was substantially above what you guys expected 9% versus flat.
Show response
Padraig characterized Americas +10% and Asia strong, downplaying Europe's +2% growth on a tough comparison.
Calendar 2026 Q2
where do you think ideally, you have left a little cushion because the comps are getting more difficult
Show response
CFO outlined four confidence drivers for H2 and identified potential upsides: small/mid cap biotech conversion, A&G stabilization, Middle East normalization, and tariff refunds not embedded in guide.
super strong quarter. You know, you highlighted the Omnis and some other things. I know you bumped the guide a bit, but it does imply a decel
Show response
Simon May confirmed diagnostics as enterprise growth opportunity with Omnis ramping across all regions, double digit growth in both instruments and assays, and strong companion diagnostics demand in ADC modalities.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Just wondering how we might think about the rest of your guidance in terms of what would drive here to the higher end to lower end
Show response
Padraig cited robust funnels and best market share report. Adam detailed upside drivers: small/mid biotech spending, A&G stabilization, China stimulus. Downside: opposite of those three. Very comprehensive framework.
a little bit more color on how you're thinking about that going forward for the rest of the year?
Show response
Padraig highlighted 20% advanced materials growth from semiconductor reshoring, spectroscopy and GCMS tools critical in manufacturing supply chain. Number 1 market leader by far. Secular driver expected to continue throughout year.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Just any more color on the upgrade cycle as it progressing versus expectations. Is it ratable in '26?
Show response
Mike Zhang confirmed GC replacement cycle normalizing after years of underinvestment. Large aging installed base creates sustainable tailwind. New products under Ignite accelerating innovation pipeline. Generally longer cycle than LC.
do you feel like the guide fairly balances the puts and takes around the globe, or do you think there's some conservatism more so baked in?
Show response
Padraig described guide as prudent given macro uncertainty and tougher compares. Upside from biopharma recovery broadening, China stimulus excluded from guide, and small/mid biotech improving. Investments continuing in innovation and digital.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think I heard NASD growing kind of north of 20%. So can you just unpack a little bit on what the outlook calls for for kind of in the back half of the year and as we look ahead?
Show response
Padraig detailed pharma 9% with small molecule double-digit, Infinity III mid-teens, biopharma ex-NASD flat due to muted US spending. Simon confirmed NASD increasingly confident on double-digit full year, tentatively confident on FY2026 momentum.
Can you just unpack the three variables you kind of highlighted? Kinda how much are you spending? How much are you buying more inventory for yourself? How much was that a factor?
Show response
Padraig explained equal impact from three factors. Commercial investment positioned as proactive share gain during recovery. Rodney quantified 230bps YoY decline with tariffs/logistics at ~200bps. Direct.
Calendar 2024 Q4
In the Americas. I think you called that in the prepared remarks Americas Pharma XMASD was kind of maybe a weaker spot. You just unpack a little bit what's happening
Show response
Padraig gave a brief response without deep Americas pharma detail, noting CapEx budget uncertainty. Somewhat light on specifics.
what is your assumptions based upon for a market growth typically? Kinda what are you assuming? And kind of specifically, is it just pharma that's weaker?
Show response
Bob gave a comprehensive end market outlook: mid-single-digit long-term rates, below-trend FY2025 first half, normalized second half. Clear framework.
RVTYRevvity11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 1 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I'm just wondering how we might think within your new guide, what instruments and reagents do in the back half?
Show response
Management said instrument and reagent backlog is the strongest in 3-4 years with some deliveries pushed into Q3, and raised the full-year platforms outlook to mid-single-digit growth.
Calendar 2026 Q1
what kind of protection do you have, certainty of closing, things like that
Show response
Max expressed high confidence in closing. LOI signed, definitive agreements expected by end of Q2. Internal management-led buyer group provides strong coordination. Closing expected in 2027.
Can you just unpack a little bit the strength there? You mentioned GEL strength in the quarter
Show response
Max attributed strength to multiple factors: stronger underlying reagent performance, additional instrument placements, and better-than-expected GEL contribution. Full-year GEL unchanged at ~$20M. NBS business well outpacing birth rates.
Calendar 2025 Q4
given you had that anchored back then and things haven't improved, I'm just wondering if you could provide more color on this two to 3% framework and kind of what the potential upside could be as t...
Show response
Max outlined multiple upside paths: LS preclinical recovery not modeled, no material benefit assumed from software NPIs, more prudent NBS assumption vs recent outperformance, conservative China IDx. Below-line upside from tax planning also not assumed.
is it really just preclinical spending recovering that's gonna drive the strength in instruments and reagents? Are there any share potential there?
Show response
Max confirmed continued share gains in reagents over past couple years, expects continued execution on share capture.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Just kind of remind us how you're thinking about that business in the back half of the year
Show response
Max guided repro health to high-single-digit Q4 growth from Genomics England ramp and comp dynamics. GEL ~$10M in H2, mostly Q4.
could you give any color underneath the thought about reagents and instruments. I know you said grew and were weak
Show response
Prahlad highlighted 5 consecutive quarters of reagent growth and mid-single-digit pharma/biotech growth despite continued instrument pressure.
Calendar 2025 Q1
for US academic and government, you guys said 5% of revenues. What's kind of baked in now for the year from that front?
Show response
Clear quantification: 100bps academic headwind offset equally by software and reproductive health upside.
Just kind of wondering if you can unpack how you expect 2Q rest of year to play out for China
Show response
Max detailed China at low-single-digit growth for full year, with LS slight decline and Diagnostics mid-single-digit growth.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you seeing pharma pause? Are you seeing any shift in there kind of spending
Show response
Prahlad explicitly denied hearing pauses from customers; guidance conservatism is management prudence, not customer feedback.
Just can you give us some of the puts and takes on how the quarter ended up and kind of what goes into that outlook?
Show response
Max highlighted newborn screening as fastest-growing part of reproductive health, expected to continue in 2025.
TMOThermo Fisher Scientific8 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the bioproduction business. You've had a few really good organic growth quarters there
Show response
Marc pointed to differentiated capabilities across upstream and downstream, with no delays flagged.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just speak to a little bit what you're seeing in that part of the business? Has it been a bit of a drag on your business?
Show response
Marc noted good momentum in higher-tech lab reagents with signs of pickup but acknowledged difficulty segregating QA/QC vs research lab demand in their data.
are you seeing any signs of that? Just remind us how you think about what you're assuming for the rest of the year in U.S. academic and government?
Show response
Marc confirmed muted but improving U.S. A&G conditions, with funding flows improving post-budget passage. Assumption is greater stability improving modestly but not back to normal.
Calendar 2025 Q4
you want investors to like, 3% start at 3% for 2026 and around 1% the first quarter for organic. Is that right
Show response
Williamson confirmed Q1 organic revenue growth expected a couple of points below full year, largely driven by selling days and pharma services phasing.
is that just conservatism or maybe you were out punching the market in 2025
Show response
Casper said the prudent start reflects lessons learned, with biotech funding improvements creating a lag to spending that bodes well for strengthening through 2026 and into 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Anyway, just help frame sizing magnitude or just any way to kind of contemplate what this can mean for Thermo Fisher
Show response
Casper said reshoring creates incremental one-time demand from new equipment and lab stocking, mainly 2027-2028 for greenfield, with TMO positioned for higher share than existing base.
how much ultimately kind of the tariff changes occurred and kind of what's happening in 4Q
Show response
Williamson said Q4 tariff assumptions largely unchanged from prior guide despite US-Europe increases, not expecting a significant pickup like Q3.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what type of maybe pharma R&D growth or other kind of factors you would kind of be using in order to support that 4% growth
Show response
Casper said aggregate R&D spend isn't the key driver, rather it's holistic support across research, manufacturing, and clinical trials that positions TMO well.
TEMTempus AI, Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
do we think about the progression of Free Cash as we go through the year?
Show response
Jim expects significant Q2 improvement as payables normalize and Insights payments shift quarterly.
Calendar 2025 Q4
any update on the first-gen CRC assay? I know it's sitting at MolDX.
Show response
Eric said MolDX timing is uncertain but the assay is not a near-term needle-mover given tumor-informed mix.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just can you fill us in a little bit about why disclose this?
Show response
Eric said they highlight deals when they bundle to a notable level; TCV is in a strong spot.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just elaborate on the strong core Genomic volumes in the quarter?
Show response
Eric attributed widespread volume gains to sales-force efficiency and technology improvements.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I know some competitors have talked about some weather-induced issues in the first quarter.
Show response
Eric downplayed weather effects, emphasizing durable ~20% unit growth at scale.
Calendar 2024 Q4
we've got Data growing in kind of the mid-30s plus with the genomics organic growing in the mid-20s
Show response
Jim validated the modeling framework and noted ASP tailwinds lift genomics revenue above volume.
WATWaters Corporation5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
is there anything in the quarter itself -- I know there's a bunch of things that went right. Anything in the quarter itself that would lead you to believe it was temporary
Show response
Management sees CDMO and battery testing trends continuing but maintained conservatism on China, citing only two data points.
So what's kind of assumed in the back half of the year there? Any color? I know you talked about book-to-bill ahead of one there
Show response
Management described exceptional funnels across large pharma and CDMOs while maintaining conservative 5% instrument growth assumption.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are you seeing from pharma now, like as they contemplate possible tariffs later in the year? Are they trying to accelerate orders now
Show response
Management reiterated no pull-forward or behavior change from tariffs, with growth driven by replacement cycle fundamentals.
beyond QA/QC part of the portfolio, excuse me, because you talked about mid-teens growth and the rest of the pharma a little bit slower
Show response
Management acknowledged continued pressure on biotech, drug discovery and CROs, representing less than 20% of pharma business.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think you said 4% for 2025? Just confirm that maybe feels a little conservative
Show response
Management confirmed historical pattern of 7-8% instrument growth during replacement cycles but wants to start with prudence.
Show 1 more company
ILMNIllumina, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you maybe unpack a little bit the guide this year, particularly on the clinical side
Show response
Jacob described a distribution of customers with regulated assays staying on 6K longer, and no deceleration expected in the clinical growth opportunity.
Calendar 2025 Q3
the 900 basis points of like sequential increase of volume on the X from 55 to 64
Show response
Jacob cautioned against overinterpreting a single quarter's conversion pace and said research recovery needs budget approval and predictable grant flow into 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you just remind us on the broader U.S. academic kind of customer base?
Show response
Ankur confirmed the ~15% academic decline assumption is unchanged; Jacob attributed mid-throughput softness to macro, not competition.
Calendar 2024 Q4
give us some color on what you're seeing in volumes and elasticity and kind of what's contemplated for 2025
Show response
Jacob confirmed X-transition volume above trend, guiding to mid-20% long-term growth; pull-through detail on the slide.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| DHR Danaher Corporation | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| A Agilent Technologies | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| RVTY Revvity | 11 | 9%1 of 11 questions |
| TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions |
| TEM Tempus AI, Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| WAT Waters Corporation | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| ILMN Illumina, Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
- DHRDanaher Corporation · 14 questions0%none of 14 questions
- AAgilent Technologies · 11 questions0%none of 11 questions
- RVTYRevvity · 11 questions9%1 of 11 questions
- TMOThermo Fisher Scientific · 8 questions0%none of 8 questions
- TEMTempus AI, Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- WATWaters Corporation · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- ILMNIllumina, Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 0%none of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q49 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q49 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q110 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 10 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q26 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand32
- Revenue Growth29
- Guidance Reliability16
- Product Launch10
- Geographic Expansion6
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Regulation Policy5
- Trade Tariffs4
- Capex Investment3
- M&A2
Show all 14 topics
- Capital Allocation2
- Margin2
- Supply Chain1
- Cost Pressure1