Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

David Westenberg

Piper Sandler · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
24on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 24 questions
Companies
6questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 24 of 24 questions from 6 companies

DGXQuest Diagnostics6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
DGX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Maybe a couple on oncology. First, the field partnership, if you can maybe speak to early adoption there?

Product LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Davis declined to give Shield volumes and reframed toward Haystack clinical evidence and assay performance.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how should we think about test per patient right now and where it could go in the next 5 to 10 years?

Innovation & R&DDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Jim described future physical: wearable data + labs done before doctor visit, fed into AI engine producing reports for both patient and physician. Cited March Nature article from Google Health/Fitbit/Quest study on biomarker-biometric linkage. Expects increasing trend of consumers testing biomarkers longitudinally.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you believe that could be a key part of consumer health? And then are there any strategies to participate in that market?

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Jim said Quest is working on home collection beyond fingerpricks. Self-collect for STDs and HPV currently requires PSC visit but future plans for home use.

Calendar 2025 Q2

It looks like it contracted by about 5% over the last few years, and then government has kinda gone up. Is some of that LifeLab

M&ALabor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Sam confirmed payer mix shift driven by LifeLabs revenue addition. Jim said wage inflation steady at 3-4%, attrition in mid-teens approaching pre-pandemic levels.

Calendar 2025 Q1

on the collaboration with Google Cloud to streamline data management and you generate GenAI to personalize customer experience

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jim detailed benefits: improved data analytics for pharma/CRO clients, faster employee database searches, AI-based chat for physicians and patients, and test menu navigation via GenAI.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How do you expect those acquisitions to enhance the revenue stream? And how should we think about as they lap the organic revenue growth

Show response

Jim detailed 6% acquisition contribution in 2025, with over two-thirds from LifeLabs. Sam clarified LifeLabs integration is lighter (standalone entity), and tuck-in M&A capital allocated for 2025.

ZTSZoetis5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
ZTS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Can you clarify how much of the Q2 deterioration now is market contraction versus maybe some competitive pressure?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Wetteny declined to split the deterioration precisely but said both macro and competitive factors are meaningfully impactful and converge; cited category visits down and Cytopoint as largely macro.

Calendar 2025 Q4

can you talk about some of the changes you can make in terms of pricing and strategy to maybe bundle with clinics or anything to kind of drive volume versus what you have seen in prior years?

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Wetteny confirmed no significant shift in pricing approach. Product-by-product, market-by-market value-based pricing remains consistent. Leveraging broad portfolio to drive volumes with customers where legally allowed. Pipeline innovation provides additional leverage.

Calendar 2025 Q2

are there any strategies that are to actively leverage and promote Cytopoint, the injectable alternative in order to maintain and potentially grow market share in the overall dermatology franchise

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kristin highlighted 3 differentiated offerings: Apoquel (10+ years safety data), Apoquel Chew (convenient, no food required), and Cytopoint (long-acting injectable). Long-acting Cytopoint approval expected in 12-36 months. Wetteny added $20M undertreated dogs are already medicalized.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you tell whether or not there is any potential backlogs or delays in the FDA?

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kristin confirmed no pipeline delays at FDA or USDA despite workforce cuts, and described active engagement with administration to shape regulatory environment.

Amazon is, now selling some of the online drugs probably, I think it’s just singles right now, but maybe get a broad spectrum

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kristin cited 40% retail growth and 21% US share from alternative channels. Wetteny added economics are neutral to positive and company is well positioned across all channels.

ILMNIllumina, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ILMN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

What is the assumption in your guidance for academic both consumables and instruments?

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jacob highlighted deeper academic core-lab relationships, Dr. Eric Green's hire, and Illumina's tradition of delivering output above spec as a customer benefit.

Calendar 2025 Q2

can you talk about spending patterns that you've seen from clinical customers

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jacob said most clinical customers expand assays rather than just cut cost when moving to X; Ankur reiterated the transition is lumpy, not linear.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Would you be able to kind of quantify on a kind of percentage basis, which is happening here

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jacob framed mid-throughput weakness as macro-driven with some competition; Ankur confirmed performance obligations up double digits year-over-year.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What are the customers getting in this? Can this collaboration turn into something bigger

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jacob described DRAGEN on GPU and foundational-model enablement as a network-effect driver beyond genomics.

LHLabCorp4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
LH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

over the longer term, I wanted to get your kind of thoughts on self-collection and cost of goods sold and margin.

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Adam gave a balanced answer, framing self-collection as complementary to phlebotomy rather than a replacement, with different economics on each path.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could we see some investments from you over the next couple of years and some DTC efforts? And how should we think about the magnitude of that growth

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adam confirmed continued investment in OnDemand and consumer advertising. Decided not to compete in some consumer segments where pricing floor is uncertain. Prioritizing specialty areas with strong reimbursement, higher margins, and medical unmet need over volume-driven consumer plays.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How do you see that market shaking out over the next few years? I mean, currently, liquid and CGP NGS tend to be fairly oligopolistic

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Adam confirmed 3-4x growth rate in specialty areas has been consistent (not accelerating). Oncology strategy broken into three pillars: screening (follower), therapy selection (leader), MRD monitoring (aspiring leader). Scale and breadth as competitive advantages.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk about reimbursement or expectations on time lines and reimbursement? I know Invitae had reimbursement but it also had some IP fights

Innovation & R&DM&ATranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Adam addressed accretion coming from cost takeout and best-of-best asset selection on MRD. Did not directly address IP disputes or reimbursement timelines.

IDXXIdexx Laboratories3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
IDXX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you talk about what's essentially been driving it between market growth share gains versus just higher utilization

Geographic ExpansionTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Jay explained international markets are earlier in diagnostics adoption with blood work at ~1/3 US levels. Andrew confirmed no meaningful tariff pull-forward in order patterns due to paper-run revenue model.

Calendar 2025 Q1

whether or not they are gravitate toward 360 or a capital purchase

DemandCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jay noted 360 remains the majority placement vehicle. EVI was double-digit globally with strong competitive and greenfield catalyst quality across US and international.

Are you seeing, at least the data I think is suggesting there might be a little bit more cats than dogs in the pet adoption trend?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Jay confirmed some cat mix shift and highlighted IDXX's SDMA and fecal antigen products as well-positioned for cat care. Pet population flat YoY at ~3% CAGR vs 2019.

TEMTempus AI, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
TEM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Do you believe that the health care system can effectively start to reimburse for really the challenges

Regulation PolicyPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Eric argued AI reimbursement must eventually come and Tempus is well positioned when it does.

Calendar 2024 Q4

can you just kind of remind us the normal seasonality in the business as we go through the year?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Jim explained Genomics follows lab seasonality while Data is back-half weighted to pharma budgets.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
DGX Quest Diagnostics60%none of 6 questions
ZTS Zoetis50%none of 5 questions
ILMN Illumina, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
LH LabCorp40%none of 4 questions
IDXX Idexx Laboratories30%none of 3 questions
TEM Tempus AI, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • DGX
    Quest Diagnostics · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • ZTS
    Zoetis · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • ILMN
    Illumina, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • LH
    LabCorp · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • IDXX
    Idexx Laboratories · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • TEM
    Tempus AI, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions4
2025 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2025 Q250%none of 5 questions5
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions2
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  3. 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand11
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Revenue Growth4
  • Cloud & AI3
  • M&A3
  • Product Launch2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Pricing2
  • Regulation Policy2
Show all 16 topics
  • Margin1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Labor Market1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Trade Tariffs1