Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Dave Williams

StoneX · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2025 Q4 (5 quarters).

Questions
20on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 20 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 20 of 20 questions from 4 companies

IONQIonQ, Inc.9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
IONQ company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

are there major step function potential investments that need to be made in order to hit that road map?

Capital AllocationM&ATranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Singh said SkyWater's Texas/Florida/Minnesota capacity exceeds IonQ's near-term needs, requiring mainly tooling and quantum-ready clean-room upgrades rather than major fab buildout; de Masi noted bespoke tooling is typically funded via customer commercial agreements and the largest near-term investment is paying off SkyWater's assumed debt at close; Singh added SkyWater's CapEx-to-revenue is low single digits.

what would that look like if you could ship everything that you could build in maybe '26 from a unit perspective?

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Singh said IonQ is scaling capacity and investing in deployment engineers; Tempo is built in the Seattle factory and the chip-based 256 (2027) will leverage lower-cost mature-node fabs, so manufacturing capacity is adequate to meet 2026 demand even though demand is exceeding supply.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how you see that and maybe any thoughts there that you might provide just on that -- the Helios system.

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ballance argued IonQ's physical qubits outperform rivals' logical qubits and cited scalability, reliability, and semiconductor-fab manufacturing.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how should we think about the OpEx trends and maybe the breakeven point there?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kramer prioritized roadmap acceleration over near-term breakeven, saying contracting the roadmap saves money long term.

Is there a way you kind of rank order what gets you most energized and maybe where you're most excited?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

de Masi declined to rank, framing computing plus networking as an integrated moat across technical roadmap and commercialization.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Can you maybe give us any update on in terms of the revenue we should expect from that

Show response

Kramer said the deals strengthen future revenue and are accretive over time but gave no specific figures, noting interim investment periods.

help me understand the quantum internet and how do you maybe envision that playing out longer-term

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Chapman explained repeaters/quantum memory extend network range and described ground and space-based build-out with Capella.

Calendar 2024 Q4

on the $500 million that you announced today, is that targeted for anything in particular

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Chapman said the raise funds the new networking TAM (targeted to be first to cash-flow positive) plus the applications business.

how we should be thinking about going forward, just kind of the consolidation that we should anticipate

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Asked about consolidation and the patent portfolio; de Masi framed quantum as increasingly a bigger-company's game, both defensively and offensively.

RGTIRigetti Computing, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
RGTI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you talk maybe a little bit about the progress and anything that's maybe developed over the last quarter

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Management described the hybrid vision of quantum as a GPU accelerator for simultaneous computing but gave limited quarter-specific progress.

Calendar 2025 Q3

can you maybe talk around what is maybe holding that up and when you think we might have an answer

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Management confirmed Rigetti was not in DARPA's initial Phase B group but received constructive feedback on error correction and coupling.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how confident are you in being able to parlay that on the 100-qubit chip?

Show response

Management expressed high confidence in a 100-plus qubit system at 99.5% fidelity by year-end via the chiplet approach.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you give us a little more information about that? I know this is Phase 1, but how do you expect that to proceed?

Regulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Management said 15 superconducting companies including IBM advanced to Stage A, with narrowing expected in later phases.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Can you talk a little bit about what that means relative to maybe some of your competitors?

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Management cited close to 230 patents, the open modular architecture, and chiplets as key differentiators versus IBM and Google.

QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
QBTS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

where that is coming from, and really what you are hearing from customers

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Baratz declined revenue timing given varied recognition but said the system-sale pipeline is robust and QCaaS deals are getting larger.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think you can play into that?

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Baratz framed defense work as solving hard problems today; the next Davidson step is securing the system for classified applications.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could speak to the cryogenic news and the importance of that towards your road map

Show response

Baratz said superconducting interconnect, developed faster than expected via NASA JPL, is key to scaling both multi-chip annealing and the gate-model program.

Calendar 2024 Q4

does this change anything on your go-to-market strategy?

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Markovich said areas could be scaled faster but they were still evaluating; Baratz cited multi-chip scaling, the gate-model program, and a larger go-to-market team.

ONON Semiconductor2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
ON company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you kind of give us a revenue run rate to get that full capacity utilization

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Trent said it depends on product mix and internal vs external sourcing. Said the upside path should be very similar to the downside path in terms of linearity.

Could we see that shift back into maybe the more domestic side given the tariff situation?

Competitive DynamicsTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

El-Khoury said local Chinese SiC suppliers aren't competing at ON's performance level. Competition is global peers. Trench architecture keeps technology lead.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
IONQ IonQ, Inc.90%none of 9 questions
RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.50%none of 5 questions
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc.40%none of 4 questions
ON ON Semiconductor2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • IONQ
    IonQ, Inc. · 9 questions
    0%none of 9 questions
  • RGTI
    Rigetti Computing, Inc. · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • QBTS
    D-Wave Quantum Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • ON
    ON Semiconductor · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q440%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q150%none of 5 questions3
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q440%none of 4 questions3
  1. 2024 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q15 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  5. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Competitive Dynamics5
  • Capital Allocation3
  • M&A3
  • Demand3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Margin2
  • Supply Chain1
  • Cloud & AI1
Show all 14 topics
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Product Launch1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Capex Investment1