Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Edward Snyder

Charter Equity Research · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
20on tracked calls
Challenge rate
15%3 of 20 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 20 of 20 questions from 2 companies

SWKSSkyworks Solutions19 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 19 challenging
SWKS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How much of that is content shifts that we’ve been playing with in the past?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO quantified the improvement from 20-25% to low teens and framed the prior-year comparison including the 14th week.

why should we expect that in the next year or so the content wind is going to be at your back

Innovation & R&DCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO endorsed the analyst thesis in general terms without providing supporting detail or quantification.

Calendar 2026 Q1

that's why the guidance is $4 billion over 2030 because there's not going to be many other choices once this gets done? Or even if the merger didn't go through, you'd still think you'd have $1 bill...

Competitive DynamicsM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phil firmly stated the Android win has nothing to do with the Qorvo merger. Multigenerational commitment reflects technology merit. Would not have guided to $1B through 2030 without confidence in stickiness.

is there any reason why you would change that strategy of maybe reentering maybe high end in China or trying to compete for the Galaxy more aggressively

Competitive DynamicsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phil reiterated strategy of profitable growth only. Will engage where customers value their technology and economics make sense for both sides. Will not pursue designs that are extremely dilutive or negative. Financially disciplined resource allocation unchanged.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I'm a little confused. You mentioned that you defended your stock stock. You've got some good content gains, but you think they may offset by mix

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Phil explained content varies by model and it is very hard to predict model mix. Defended key sockets and gained from architecture changes but blended outcome depends on which models sell. Best estimate is flat on a blended basis.

do you have a socket in Japan? I know you're underutilized in a couple of your factories

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Phil noted products in demand are at capacity with demand exceeding supply. Pockets of underutilization relate to technology changes rather than demand weakness. Declined to discuss specific factory loading but indicated gross margin guide reflects best knowledge of mix, costs, and pricing.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how much of the strength that you're seeing there is due to, say, mix versus units?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Phil confirmed benefit from both mix and units but declined to quantify the split. Noted demand depends on mix within current generation and between phone generations. Will continue guiding one quarter at a time.

Are we still kind of in that range, too? Or should we be thinking about maybe gains in modules that you had shared previously

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Phil acknowledged content direction has been declining. Too early to comment on next year's down-selection outcome. Described highly competitive environment but expressed confidence in technology and products being delivered.

Your accounts receivables shot up. It's the second highest going back for, I don't know, at least 5 or 6 years

ChallengingMarginDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Philip Carter confirmed nothing unusual in AR increase. Attributed entirely to revenue linearity and collection timing in the September quarter product launch window.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if the trends that they've talked about, other companies like Qualcomm have talked about and other folks have hinted at, if they actually play out as expected with the mix starts favoring an intern...

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil confirmed more RF content available on internal modem phones versus external modem. Internal modem shift provides natural content tailwind. Multiple factors including phone model mix and geography also affect blended content.

is it a rational assumption to assume that if that volume picks up on that phone, the mix starts favoring you and it's large enough to start splitting you to get a bigger chunk of that?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil agreed the assumption is fair all else equal but cautioned that phone mix variability makes it not guaranteed. Confirmed natural tailwind as internal modem share grows.

Do you feel like this year is probably your low point in content at your largest customer, given all the other trends?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil acknowledged unfavorable down-selections and expressed laser focus on changing trajectory from downward to upward. Did not explicitly confirm this year as the trough.

When are we likely to see the first results of that? Is it something we're going to see in a quarter or 2?

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil ruled out near-term impact from Woburn closure due to long lead time product transitions. Confirmed Woburn is all GaAs technology, split between Mobile and Broad Markets applications.

Calendar 2025 Q1

is it fair to assume that you think your content will bottom end of this year and then maybe make a slow recovery?

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Phil identified three tailwinds: better product execution, secular trend toward more RF content, and potential baseband-related content opportunities. Could not confirm specific timeline.

between the lower utilization and some of the advances you made in filters reducing the die size, is it fair to assume

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Phil clarified the socket was a jump ball split, not a total loss. Kris confirmed ample capacity exists for upside scenarios without incremental production CapEx.

Calendar 2024 Q4

So actually, you are competitive for that socket, and now it's going into be horse trading from here on now, right? You didn't lose the whole thing?

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kris confirmed Skyworks is competitive in the socket and did not lose it entirely. BAW filter technology is at gold standard level. Competition intensified as competitors cross swim lanes.

I'd like to get a feel for if you think it is a target you can hit given how -- which that part is in BAW filters

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kris clarified the content loss is from dual-sourcing on one key socket, not total loss. Company won back some previously lost sockets. Developing more products than ever for next-gen phone.

Calendar 2024 Q3

what's the prospect for that in the next, let's say year or so in terms of it becoming a larger customer for you

Competitive DynamicsRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kris provided customer concentration data. Liam acknowledged opportunity with Samsung but gave no specifics on design win pipeline or timing.

What's your view of - let me put it this way, the long term say 2025 to 2026 in terms of your ability to getting back content

Revenue GrowthCloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Snyder pressed on content trajectory and AI impact on RF frontend. Liam gave qualitative assurances but avoided specific content or dollar figures.

AVGOBroadcom Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
AVGO company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

now you are seeing AI finally hit the enterprises, and you are seeing cloud take off with the programming

Show response

Hock argued most enterprise/consumer AI demand still funnels back to a few frontier-model labs (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini) that buy Broadcom compute, even as enterprise adoption is early.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SWKS Skyworks Solutions1916%3 of 19 questions
AVGO Broadcom Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SWKS
    Skyworks Solutions · 19 questions
    16%3 of 19 questions
  • AVGO
    Broadcom Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q4250%1 of 2 questions1
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions1
2025 Q3333%1 of 3 questions1
2025 Q4250%1 of 2 questions1
2026 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 1 company
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  8. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Competitive Dynamics16
  • Revenue Growth9
  • Demand4
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Margin3
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • M&A1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capex Investment1