Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Edward Snyder
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 20on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 15%3 of 20 questions
- Companies
- 2questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 20 of 20 questions from 2 companies
SWKSSkyworks Solutions19 questions · 8 reporting periods · 3 of 19 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How much of that is content shifts that we’ve been playing with in the past?
Show response
CFO quantified the improvement from 20-25% to low teens and framed the prior-year comparison including the 14th week.
why should we expect that in the next year or so the content wind is going to be at your back
Show response
CEO endorsed the analyst thesis in general terms without providing supporting detail or quantification.
Calendar 2026 Q1
that's why the guidance is $4 billion over 2030 because there's not going to be many other choices once this gets done? Or even if the merger didn't go through, you'd still think you'd have $1 bill...
Show response
Phil firmly stated the Android win has nothing to do with the Qorvo merger. Multigenerational commitment reflects technology merit. Would not have guided to $1B through 2030 without confidence in stickiness.
is there any reason why you would change that strategy of maybe reentering maybe high end in China or trying to compete for the Galaxy more aggressively
Show response
Phil reiterated strategy of profitable growth only. Will engage where customers value their technology and economics make sense for both sides. Will not pursue designs that are extremely dilutive or negative. Financially disciplined resource allocation unchanged.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm a little confused. You mentioned that you defended your stock stock. You've got some good content gains, but you think they may offset by mix
Show response
Phil explained content varies by model and it is very hard to predict model mix. Defended key sockets and gained from architecture changes but blended outcome depends on which models sell. Best estimate is flat on a blended basis.
do you have a socket in Japan? I know you're underutilized in a couple of your factories
Show response
Phil noted products in demand are at capacity with demand exceeding supply. Pockets of underutilization relate to technology changes rather than demand weakness. Declined to discuss specific factory loading but indicated gross margin guide reflects best knowledge of mix, costs, and pricing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how much of the strength that you're seeing there is due to, say, mix versus units?
Show response
Phil confirmed benefit from both mix and units but declined to quantify the split. Noted demand depends on mix within current generation and between phone generations. Will continue guiding one quarter at a time.
Are we still kind of in that range, too? Or should we be thinking about maybe gains in modules that you had shared previously
Show response
Phil acknowledged content direction has been declining. Too early to comment on next year's down-selection outcome. Described highly competitive environment but expressed confidence in technology and products being delivered.
Your accounts receivables shot up. It's the second highest going back for, I don't know, at least 5 or 6 years
Show response
Philip Carter confirmed nothing unusual in AR increase. Attributed entirely to revenue linearity and collection timing in the September quarter product launch window.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if the trends that they've talked about, other companies like Qualcomm have talked about and other folks have hinted at, if they actually play out as expected with the mix starts favoring an intern...
Show response
Phil confirmed more RF content available on internal modem phones versus external modem. Internal modem shift provides natural content tailwind. Multiple factors including phone model mix and geography also affect blended content.
is it a rational assumption to assume that if that volume picks up on that phone, the mix starts favoring you and it's large enough to start splitting you to get a bigger chunk of that?
Show response
Phil agreed the assumption is fair all else equal but cautioned that phone mix variability makes it not guaranteed. Confirmed natural tailwind as internal modem share grows.
Do you feel like this year is probably your low point in content at your largest customer, given all the other trends?
Show response
Phil acknowledged unfavorable down-selections and expressed laser focus on changing trajectory from downward to upward. Did not explicitly confirm this year as the trough.
When are we likely to see the first results of that? Is it something we're going to see in a quarter or 2?
Show response
Phil ruled out near-term impact from Woburn closure due to long lead time product transitions. Confirmed Woburn is all GaAs technology, split between Mobile and Broad Markets applications.
Calendar 2025 Q1
is it fair to assume that you think your content will bottom end of this year and then maybe make a slow recovery?
Show response
Phil identified three tailwinds: better product execution, secular trend toward more RF content, and potential baseband-related content opportunities. Could not confirm specific timeline.
between the lower utilization and some of the advances you made in filters reducing the die size, is it fair to assume
Show response
Phil clarified the socket was a jump ball split, not a total loss. Kris confirmed ample capacity exists for upside scenarios without incremental production CapEx.
Calendar 2024 Q4
So actually, you are competitive for that socket, and now it's going into be horse trading from here on now, right? You didn't lose the whole thing?
Show response
Kris confirmed Skyworks is competitive in the socket and did not lose it entirely. BAW filter technology is at gold standard level. Competition intensified as competitors cross swim lanes.
I'd like to get a feel for if you think it is a target you can hit given how -- which that part is in BAW filters
Show response
Kris clarified the content loss is from dual-sourcing on one key socket, not total loss. Company won back some previously lost sockets. Developing more products than ever for next-gen phone.
Calendar 2024 Q3
what's the prospect for that in the next, let's say year or so in terms of it becoming a larger customer for you
Show response
Kris provided customer concentration data. Liam acknowledged opportunity with Samsung but gave no specifics on design win pipeline or timing.
What's your view of - let me put it this way, the long term say 2025 to 2026 in terms of your ability to getting back content
Show response
Snyder pressed on content trajectory and AI impact on RF frontend. Liam gave qualitative assurances but avoided specific content or dollar figures.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
now you are seeing AI finally hit the enterprises, and you are seeing cloud take off with the programming
Show response
Hock argued most enterprise/consumer AI demand still funnels back to a few frontier-model labs (Anthropic, OpenAI, Gemini) that buy Broadcom compute, even as enterprise adoption is early.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 19 | 16%3 of 19 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 50%1 of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Competitive Dynamics16
- Revenue Growth9
- Demand4
- Cloud & AI3
- Margin3
- Innovation & R&D2
- Cost Pressure2
- M&A1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Capex Investment1