Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Edward Yang

Oppenheimer · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q2 – 2026 Q2 (5 quarters).

Questions
11on tracked calls
Challenge rate
9%1 of 11 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 11 of 11 questions from 3 companies

QQnity Electronics, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Q company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

can you give us an early view into 2027 growth? Your long-term model was for 7% growth, but you grew 10% last year

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Goss declined a 2027 number but pointed to durable secular demand and customer capacity coming online, saying 2027 is stacking up nicely.

Could you just remind us on your margin profile? Across your data center business versus auto and electronics?

Show response

Goss gave segment margins (semi mid-30s, ICS high-20s); Kemp added qualitatively that AI data centers carry the strongest margins and consumer the lowest.

Calendar 2026 Q1

the memory market is working out very well for you right now. But there is some labor unrest

ChallengingSupply ChainLabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kemp acknowledged monitoring situation but offered no new specifics beyond existing scenario planning and rapid response capabilities.

It sounds like that's sustainable, but just wondering where that ceiling can go?

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kemp highlighted favorable mix driving ICS margins higher, from mid-20s to mid-to-high 20s. Goss attributed semi margin softness to mature node product mix.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I just wanted to come back to the level of conservatism that's embedded in the 2026 revenue guide around 6.5% or so

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO anchored guidance to mid-single-digit MSI plus content outperformance. Memory market uncertainty and wait-and-see approach on capacity timing explain the gap vs Q1 run rate.

is it fair to say that you're not really seeing any offsets necessarily from higher memory cycle

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO emphasized portfolio diversification: whether chips go to consumer or data center, Qnity captures demand either way. Data center content potentially even higher-margin than consumer.

KLACKLA Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
KLAC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

You mentioned having procured enough hits now. Is that through calendar year '26 or possibly longer?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CFO confirmed DRAM supply is secured through next year, providing confidence in KLA's ability to support build plans beyond calendar 2026.

can you bridge your updated '26 WFE view of greater than $140 billion and your expectation of growth in 2027

Cloud & AICapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

CEO argued WFE is supply-constrained, not demand-constrained. The gap between demand and available silicon has expanded, and short-term hyperscaler CapEx fluctuations cannot be directly correlated to WFE.

Calendar 2025 Q3

are you seeing any change in engagement there?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bren and Rick confirmed constructive discussions with non-leading foundry customers who are seeking KLA's advice on what they need for advanced logic, with many not fully understanding how process control needs have changed in recent nodes.

is the semi-cap industry position to serve that scale of demand? Or is the ecosystem discounting some of these projections as aspirational?

Show response

Rick noted the industry has been prudent adding capacity, with not enough wafers available to meet stated demand timelines, making overshoot unlikely because building fabs is harder than announcing data center CapEx.

LRCXLam Research1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LRCX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

This is the third consecutive quarter where you've not only beat numbers, but the guidance has also exceeded consensus by double digits.

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Doug attributed the beats to a combination of slightly better revenue, margin, and a lower-than-expected tax rate, not deliberate conservatism.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
Q Qnity Electronics, Inc.617%1 of 6 questions
KLAC KLA Corporation40%none of 4 questions
LRCX Lam Research1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • Q
    Qnity Electronics, Inc. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • KLAC
    KLA Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • LRCX
    Lam Research · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
2026 Q1425%1 of 4 questions2
2026 Q220%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand4
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Revenue Growth3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Supply Chain2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Margin2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Capex Investment1
  • Labor Market1