Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Emmanuel Rosner

Wolfe Research · covers Consumer Cyclical

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
46on tracked calls
Challenge rate
15%7 of 46 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 46 of 46 questions from 5 companies

GMGeneral Motors14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 14 challenging
GM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are there any headwinds we should consider, such as commodities or further DRAM inflation

Cost PressureMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jacobson wouldn't quantify 2027 but acknowledged some inflationary pressure, framing warranty, EV profitability, and digital revenue as multi-year tailwinds.

Is there also a volume opportunity as you move into 2027 reflecting the fact that you have fairly lean inventories now

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Barra said record truck production carries into 2027, but the real volume growth arrives in late 2027 to 2028 once engine plants and Orion capacity ramp.

Calendar 2026 Q1

In terms of things that could move the needle for this year that you're monitoring

MacroeconomicCost PressureDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mary identified the Iran conflict as the primary variable, noting oil prices drive logistics and commodity costs; portfolio breadth positions GM well for potential demand mix shifts.

What are you assuming for commodities in the back half or for how long they stay high as a base case scenario

Cost PressureMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul explained guidance assumes current commodity forward curves persist, with staggered steel contracts providing partial buffer against price swings.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it was hoping to ask you about the warranty cost benefit of a billion dollars for this year

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Paul said warranty improvement begins with stabilized monthly cash outlays which must happen before accruals come down. L87 V8 fixes showing good progress with oil change solutions and dealer testing. Also addressing inflationary pressure at dealerships for warranty repair pricing.

Can you talk a little bit about how you're thinking about the mixed benefits implied or assumed in this year's outlook?

Show response

Paul said EV volumes expected down for full year. ICE volumes somewhat constrained by truck platform transition. Recent severe weather impacted production industrywide with makeup work needed.

Calendar 2025 Q3

is there any opportunity or appetite to reduce overall CapEx for the company? Or is there a lot of need for this to be reallocated elsewhere?

Show response

Paul said inflation-adjusted CapEx similar to pre-COVID levels while cash generation up exponentially. Next few years focused on lowering EV costs, battery structural improvements, and incremental ICE investment. Comfortable at $10-12B range for next couple years.

Can you maybe help us better understand or dimension some of the recent actions you've taken in Q3 and Q4, writing down some of the EV assets and sort of like shifting your own capacity?

Cost PressureCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Paul explained sequential EV production step-downs wreaked havoc through supply chain and logistics. Additional charges expected in Q4 not yet fully sized. Will provide better view of 2026 impact once Q4 review is complete.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Can you get give us any sense of you know, how much you're hoping or planning to buy in the in in the second half?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Paul said $4.3B remaining on authorization. Resumed open market repurchases in early July after completing $2B ASR. Would not telegraph specific amounts but pointed to seasonally stronger second-half cash generation.

Is there any also an opportunity or appetite at GM to try and reduce the overall capital intensity of the business

Capex InvestmentRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Paul said CapEx at $10-11B for 2025 and $10-12B for 2026-2027 on inflation-adjusted basis similar to 2018 with much better cash flow. Composition shifting from portfolio expansion to structural cost reduction in batteries, aero, and materials.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you confirm this $4 billion to $5 billion impact, this is essentially what you're getting from Robux [ph], call it nine months of the year

ChallengingTrade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mary said regulatory requirements unchanged so must remain compliant. Evaluating EV spend for cost efficiency. Will work within existing $10-11B CapEx guidance. Won't make broader decisions until regulatory environment clarifies.

can you just give us a little bit more color on what is going into that 30% plus offset from self-help

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mary detailed: increased Fort Wayne production by 50K units, building more US battery modules, working with suppliers on USMCA compliance, discretionary spending discipline, and extending Cadillac XT5 production.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I think some investors may have expected a bit of a higher exit rate in terms of margin. I know you mentioned about [130] (ph) basis point of one-time-type items

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Paul attributed margin shortfall to legal settlement on oil consumption case and breach of warranty pressure worth 1.3pp. Also Q3 had $300M pull-forward from Q4 and 11 fewer production days. Said EV mix wasn't a meaningful factor.

it would leave again some considerable amount of capital to return to shareholders. I think you're probably through most of your existing authorizations for buybacks

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mary said they will work with the board on the next phase and follow the capital allocation framework. No specifics on new authorization timing.

FFord Motor Company13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 3 of 13 challenging
F company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

do you expect further improvement in EBIT next year in 2027?

Guidance ReliabilityCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

House walked 2027 puts and takes (Novelis non-repeat, cost reductions, launch costs, AIIA benefit non-repeat) but said it is too early to say whether EBIT nets higher.

Calendar 2026 Q1

that means you're guiding at midpoint for $6 billion combined over the next 3, which is quite low

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

House cited non-repeat of IEEPA, back-half commodity build and higher launch investment, calling the Q2-Q4 pace fairly consistent.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how should we think about the CapEx needs for these investments over the next few years? Is this sort of like a new run rate

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

House said $9.5-10.5B CapEx driven by $1.5B Ford Energy investment (largest portion in 2026). 75% of capital going to higher-return truck and multi-energy portfolio; 25% to Ford Energy and Model e (UEV, BREV). Farley confirmed goal is 8% EBIT margin.

Is the improvement towards breakeven is that gonna be back end loaded towards 2029, or can we expect some steady improvement

Cost PressureInnovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

House expects steady improvement from UEV products launching 2027, improving profitability in 2028+ with additional variants, plus European B-segment EVs via Renault. Gen 1 volumes decline over time. Breakeven target remains 2029.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if I basically take the current guidance adjusted for the Novelis fire, but also the $1 billion benefit from lower tariff outlook, it seems like it's essentially an unchanged guidance

ChallengingGuidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

House confirmed underlying business performing at high end of original guidance. Improvement from credit, material costs, pricing/volume. No unfavorable factors offsetting, guidance math reflects Novelis and tariff changes only.

Is there a sense that those were supply constrained -- like you were constraining supply of those and that there's a large amount of like unmet demand in there?

Regulation PolicyPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Frick confirmed Ford was suppressing natural demand for compliance-negative vehicles like Tremor and Raptor. Will match build mix to customer demand, vehicle by vehicle. Farley added hybrid pricing flexibility as big F-150 opportunity.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Ford's appetite to potentially be more strategic about some of the spending on the EV side

Capital AllocationRegulation PolicyInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Farley confirmed EV launches moved out, products canceled, capital reallocated to Pro. CO2 credits descaled by $1.5B. Mix changes could be multibillion-dollar opportunity.

what are the drivers by bucket of improvement versus your previous outlook? And if at all possible, I'm curious about the EBIT

Guidance ReliabilityCost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

House highlighted guidance only came down $1B despite $2B tariff headwind, driven by cost improvement performance. FCF guidance maintained at $3.5-4.5B.

Calendar 2025 Q1

what goes into this $2.5 million? Could you give us maybe buckets in terms of whether -- how much is from complete vehicle, from parts

Trade TariffsCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

House broke down $2.5B as roughly half parts (including steel/aluminum pricing) and half imported vehicles, with 3.75% US content credit already included.

I was hoping you could give us a little more color on some of these offset actions. Is it price, is it costs?

Trade TariffsPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

House explained $1B offset combines market equation optimization (segment-by-segment pricing/volume scenarios leveraging 100% US pickup production) plus supply chain cost mitigations like bonded carriers.

Q1 was a stronger than expected performance to the tune of about $1 billion versus your previous expectations

Guidance ReliabilityMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Farley confirmed solid start driven by warranty, material costs, and strong new vehicle pricing but declined to specify where within the original range they'd land.

Calendar 2024 Q4

How should we think about the risk of something that is more than just price moderation here?

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsInventoryTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Farley acknowledged competitor dealer cash programs on pickups and committed to inventory discipline below 60 days to protect pricing power.

Can you give us a little bit more color around what the drivers are for that -- the buckets?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

House detailed granular business plan with 90% of design cost pipeline already filled and specific quarterly implementation timelines for savings.

APTVAptiv10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
APTV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

it seems that the EBITDA line, maybe the implied decremental would be pretty high, like around maybe 40%, which seems maybe a little bit above the normal. So can you maybe just talk about the chang...

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Varun and Kevin attributed the high decremental to the ~$50M software revenue reduction, which carries higher-than-average flow-through.

Can you maybe just give a little bit more color around what's going on the ground and just sort of like how do you think about growth in the software on a go-forward basis?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said enterprise software can be lumpy by quarter but expects double-digit growth continuing, targeting mid-teens.

Calendar 2026 Q1

What is sort of like your estimate of when you believe China would, sort of, like become more neutral and then eventually positive to your growth?

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed China returns to positive growth in Q2. Drivers: new program launches, normalization of top China OEM production comp in ECG, and H2 lapping of 3 cancelled programs from mid-2025.

Can you just remind us holistically, what are some of the drivers of revenue acceleration as we move past this year and towards the next couple of years of the plan?

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin cited China local OEM mix improvement (exports + overseas manufacturing), APAC ex-China growth (Japan/Korea/India bookings acceleration), non-auto expansion, and software portfolio growing mid-teens.

Calendar 2025 Q4

if you could just give us a sense of what that walk looks like, landing you around stable margins.

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Varun walked through: volume flow-through adds >1pp, commodities -50bps, net price downs -1 to -1.5pp, investments/stranded costs -40bps. Offset by manufacturing, material, labor performance. Pro forma margins up ex-stranded.

would you be able to provide a similar framework for Spinko?

Show response

Varun disclosed Versagen margins up 40bps pro forma: volume flow-through positive, commodities -50bps, net price downs -60bps, stand-alone costs $15M. Manufacturing/material performance adds back ~130bps.

Calendar 2025 Q2

ECG margins, they decreased in the quarter versus last year, even though organic revenues were actually up a very good [ lift ].

ChallengingMarginFxTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin attributed ECG margin decline entirely to peso headwinds with hedges at 19%. Expects seasonal recovery in H2 with longer-term trajectory to 22%+ EBITDA.

can you lay out the growth narrative for this business? I think you have launches in the back half.

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin noted UX headwind worth 200-300 bps will end after Q4 2025. Active safety growing ~6% this year. Mid-single-digit ASUX growth expected 2026.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What is the potential for Aptiv to take further cost actions or the appetite for it beyond just ceramic performance and inefficiencies?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin highlighted continued payroll reduction, accelerated footprint rotation in EDS, and material cost engineering as structural opportunities.

can you maybe just give a little bit of color on what you expect for this year? Why just stable if electrification, you know, accelerates

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin cited mid-double-digit EV growth, commercial vehicle diversification, and new program roll-ons as 2026+ growth drivers.

TSLATesla, Inc.6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
TSLA company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

You signal a pretty large increase to over $20 billion for this year

ChallengingCapex InvestmentCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Vaibhav said six factories are starting production, plus compute for Optimus training and existing factory expansion; the $20B does not include solar or semiconductor fab investments. Framed as a multi-year investment phase with $44B cash on hand, plus potential debt financing against robotaxi fleet cash flows.

Calendar 2025 Q3

would this basically be prioritizing volume over near-term profitability

Show response

Musk expressed 100% confidence in solving unsupervised FSD and framed demand as the 'killer app', once people can text while in the car, 'anyone who can buy the car will buy the car.'

How should we think about that in the context of your existing capacity of 3 million units

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Musk said 3M annualized within 24 months aspirationally, with CyberCab starting production in Q2 next year as the biggest incremental unlock, and expects the supply chain to move in tandem.

Calendar 2025 Q2

working to drive down the cost per mile on robotaxis, maybe towards $0.30 or $0.40 per mile

MarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Musk said Cybercab has sub-$0.30/mile potential but the existing fleet will be over $0.50, and guessed robotaxi will have a material impact on financials around end of next year.

are you able to share any KPIs with us in terms of the robotaxi business

Product LaunchCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ashok disclosed 7,000+ miles in Austin with a handful of vehicles, speed limited to 40 mph, no notable safety-critical incidents, but no fleet size or intervention rate given.

Calendar 2025 Q1

the public version of the FSD software still has a decent amount

Product LaunchCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Autopilot team said they are focused on solving issues specific to Austin and adding audio input (absent in customer builds) for emergency vehicle handling.

RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
RIVN company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

is that your expectation for R1 plus EDV for this year in 2026?

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Claire said R2 deliveries begin in the second quarter and are back-half weighted, with R1 and the commercial van roughly in line with 2025 volumes for the full year.

Calendar 2025 Q3

curious if you could characterize the demand environment in the U.S.

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

RJ acknowledged an industry-wide pull-forward of demand into September and softer October, but framed the longer-term opportunity around R2 addressing the underserved sub-$50,000 SUV segment.

Calendar 2025 Q2

How should we think about the growth there going forward, the trajectory, your profitability profile for it?

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Claire cited remarketing, service infrastructure and charging-network integration as growth drivers, and said the Volkswagen joint venture will contribute more to 2027 via background-IP revenue.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GM General Motors1414%2 of 14 questions
F Ford Motor Company1323%3 of 13 questions
APTV Aptiv1010%1 of 10 questions
TSLA Tesla, Inc.617%1 of 6 questions
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.30%none of 3 questions
  • GM
    General Motors · 14 questions
    14%2 of 14 questions
  • F
    Ford Motor Company · 13 questions
    23%3 of 13 questions
  • APTV
    Aptiv · 10 questions
    10%1 of 10 questions
  • TSLA
    Tesla, Inc. · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • RIVN
    Rivian Automotive, Inc. · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q4633%2 of 6 questions3
2025 Q1617%1 of 6 questions3
2025 Q2911%1 of 9 questions5
2025 Q3714%1 of 7 questions4
2025 Q4813%1 of 8 questions5
2026 Q1520%1 of 5 questions3
2026 Q250%none of 5 questions3
  1. 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 33% (2 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  4. 2025 Q37 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
  6. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Margin15
  • Cost Pressure15
  • Demand9
  • Revenue Growth6
  • Guidance Reliability6
  • Product Launch6
  • Capex Investment6
  • Capital Allocation5
  • Regulation Policy5
  • Pricing4
Show all 20 topics
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Competitive Dynamics2
  • M&A1
  • Fx1
  • Subscriber Growth1
  • Inventory1