Eric Stine

so next step then would be to see a firm PPA with Meta. I mean is that the right way to think about this here

So maybe just talk about or characterize the PPA discussions with other potential customers.

the topical report accepted by NRC, I mean, is there a way to think about the timing of that process?

should we still think about timing of the actual COLA submission to be

as you get closer to submitting the COLA, I mean, is your confidence higher, or what has maybe changed in your view

how is that kind of changed discussions or driven discussions around prepayments such as you've got with Equinix

Could you just lay out some of the signposts to look for, you know, so we can kinda track if, in fact

can you just maybe talk a little bit more about ENTRA1's project pipeline and how that's evolving just in terms of end users?

did the sizable financial and trade commitments from Japan and South Korea play into the timeline at all for converting TVA into firm PPA?

I would assume that just the fact all of the things that have been done in the supply chain

did they appreciate the fact that it's light water technology that you're using a readily available fuel

I know that it's committed to 20 modules a year committed to being able to take that higher

Is that something that's firm that gets triggered on the signing of a PPA?

But we should view this as this is a very critical step getting to your goal, which is a firm agreement by 2025.

set off maybe a higher number of discussions, maybe taking those discussions to an elevated level of engagement

I'm just curious the importance of light water technology rather than some of the other advanced reactors

are you seeing any change to the view of traditional nuclear and restart plants that are out there

can you detail kind of the steps that are left? Or is it just getting through the process