Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Erik Rasmussen

Stifel · covers Real Estate, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
11on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 11 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 11 of 11 questions from 4 companies

RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Where are the margins today in that business, and what is the target margin profile

Show response

Spice declined to give specific Mynaric margins after less than a quarter of ownership but said they are low out of the gate following the asset's insolvency and should reach Space Systems merchant levels within a few quarters, faster than the SolAero turnaround, aided by rising volumes and cost efficiencies.

Calendar 2026 Q1

could see an acceleration of the signings of Neutron and those Neutron launch contracts

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Beck said Neutron signings should accelerate after successful flights as customer confidence and insurance rates improve.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what you think then that first revenue flight? What do you think the timing around that could be?

Show response

Beck said Flight 2 timing depends on Flight 1; the first flight will attempt reentry and a soft ocean splashdown before the barge is used.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what does that do from a timing perspective for things like the NSSL

Product LaunchRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Beck said NSSL awards require a successful flight first, so the push-out is largely irrelevant to that timeline.

Calendar 2025 Q2

at what point will you start to include Neutron into the backlog?

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Spice said three Neutron missions are already in backlog, with demand expected to be unleashed after a successful test flight.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are there any sort of sticking points remaining to closing this deal at this point?

Show response

Beck said the German bankruptcy and regulatory process is the main gating item to closing Mynaric, with no major concern.

Calendar 2024 Q4

have you seen any changes in customer behavior or demand that maybe suggest things are slower than what you expected?

Show response

Beck said the lower launch count reflects caution on customer readiness, not slowing demand; Spice cited growing backlog and ASPs.

DLRDigital Realty2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
DLR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

Maybe you could just comment on the economics that you're seeing with AI deals versus prior hyperscale deals?

Show response

Power noted AI economics similar to prior hyperscale deals driven by supply-demand dynamics; Sharp described inference inflection with agents creating 5x to 30x token demand multiplier.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what are some of the factors that maybe could derail this thesis as you think about some of the things that might impact the business

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Power explained near-term execution hinges on 0-1MW momentum and cash mark-to-markets, with hyperscale bookings building 2026-27 growth runway.

EQIXEquinix1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
EQIX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you give us a sense of where customer demand is for liquid cooling activity today

Innovation & R&DDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Adaire reported 36 liquid cooling deployments across the global footprint with 7 new orders in Q1, up 50% quarter-over-quarter. Active across all regions as customers increase workload density.

LUNRIntuitive Machines, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LUNR company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

Any insights that maybe you can share that gets you to this range?

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Pete said the lower end of the $250 million to $300 million range is underpinned by existing contracted backlog, with upside from new CLPS and potential LTV awards.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.70%none of 7 questions
DLR Digital Realty2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
EQIX Equinix1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • DLR
    Digital Realty · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • EQIX
    Equinix · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LUNR
    Intuitive Machines, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q110%none of 1 question1
2025 Q210%none of 1 question1
2025 Q310%none of 1 question1
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2026 Q210%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  2. 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Product Launch4
  • Demand3
  • M&A2
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Margin1
  • Cloud & AI1
  • Pricing1
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Regulation Policy1
Show all 11 topics
  • Macroeconomic1