Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Evie Koslosky

Goldman Sachs · covers Healthcare

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2026 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (2 quarters).

Limited coverage. Only 7 questions of coverage. Treat these numbers as directional — sample too small for reliable averages.
Questions
7on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 7 questionsLimited sample
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
2with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 7 of 7 questions from 2 companies

WATWaters Corporation4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
WAT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

How much of this is incremental versus just kind of shifting geographies?

Capex InvestmentGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Batra framed reshoring as incremental in the short-to-medium term (2027-2030) with ~70% of tracked sites being Waters accounts, but declined to quantify the tailwind yet.

how much of the guidance raise in the acquired business is related to pricing?

Show response

Chaubal quantified net price realization at 0.9% in Q2 vs the traditional 0.5%, raising the assumption to 0.9% for the rest of the year toward the 150bps goal.

Calendar 2026 Q1

can you talk to the decision to localize the manufacturing in flow cytometry in China

Geographic ExpansionCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Udit framed China localization as replicating the Analytical Sciences playbook. Noted pharma in China grew 50%+ and roughly 1/3 of all biotech molecules licensed by large pharma now come from China. Manufacturing starts Q3 at Suzhou site.

can you talk to the mid-teens growth in chemistry

Revenue GrowthProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Udit credited R&D investment in bioseparations and new product stream. Upgraded mid-to-long-term chemistry growth from 7% to 9%-10%. Amol guided 6.5% for full year, noting Q2 had some pull forward and strong prior year comps.

MTDMettler Toledo3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
MTD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Are you starting to see pharma invest more heavily in sort of lab in the loop and automation capabilities

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Patrick cited innovation and automation broadly across the lab portfolio, with Shawn adding that increased certainty is helping biopharma spend.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what sort of demand are you seeing for your bioreactor sensors as people look to drive automation in their facilities?

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Patrick said MTD competes strongly in bioprocessing with new digital sensors and sees no slowdown amid GLP-1 build-outs.

Can you remind us what your exposure there is as a percentage of revenue

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Patrick sized semiconductor exposure as low single-digit of revenue, growing well including data center cooling demand.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
WAT Waters Corporation40%none of 4 questions
MTD Mettler Toledo30%none of 3 questions
  • WAT
    Waters Corporation · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • MTD
    Mettler Toledo · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
  1. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand3
  • Innovation & R&D2
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • Revenue Growth2
  • Capex Investment1
  • Pricing1
  • M&A1
  • Competitive Dynamics1
  • Product Launch1