Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Fei She

Barclays · covers Utilities

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q4 (6 quarters; questions recorded in 5).

Questions
15on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 15 questions
Companies
3questioned at least once
Reporting periods
5with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 15 of 15 questions from 3 companies

ATOAtmos Energy8 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
ATO company page →

Calendar 2025 Q3

Would you be able to just parse out how much incremental reg like improvement are you seeing in this refresh plan? Is it mostly coming from the Texas legislation? Or is there something else baked i...

Regulation PolicyGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO confirmed all incremental regulatory lag improvement is from HB4384, which now includes APT capital in deferral treatment. No other new regulatory features assumed in the 5-year plan.

just on O&M budgeting for '26. Could you just help clarify on how are we getting to a lower assumption for '26 and how those ramping to a 4% annual increase would evolve going deeper into the longe...

Show response

CFO explained FY2026 O&M midpoint is consistent with FY2025, noting FY2025 included opportunistic pull-forward of compliance spending as APT market conditions allowed. O&M to grow 4% annually from compliance, monitoring, and employee costs.

Calendar 2025 Q2

how does that affect your thoughts on financing the future growth, and do you see any possibility to moderate external equity needs?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

IR VP confirmed the stronger operating cash flow was already contemplated in the 5-year financing plan, so no expected moderation in external equity needs.

it sounds like we should annualize that. Just Wondering how should we think about that lumping that into the 6% to 8% annual CAGR going to long term?

Guidance ReliabilityRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CFO cautioned against simple annualization, noting impact depends on timing of assets placed into service. Full update to come with November 5-year plan.

Calendar 2025 Q1

can you update us on the equity financing for the rest of the year, if there is any changes from the messaging from last quarter?

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CFO reaffirmed balanced financing strategy with $1.7B priced on ATM covering FY2025 and FY2026 equity needs. Interest rate swap locked in for anticipated fall 30-year issuance.

is there any pipeline of projects you're working on or if there's any quantifiable backlog that you can discuss?

DemandCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

CEO cited WA Loop and Bethel-Groesbeck as priority projects and 85% safety/reliability capital focus, but declined to quantify a demand project pipeline.

Calendar 2024 Q3

going forward and deeper into the plan, how should we think about doing more interest rate swaps, and kind of maintaining the current debt-to-capitalization ratio

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO confirmed comfort with current debt-to-capitalization ratio and signaled continued opportunistic interest rate hedging strategy.

how should we think about the run rate going forward? And also, could you, just discuss a little bit of about how should we think about financing this higher capital plan

Capital AllocationCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CFO provided clear framework: assume 50% equity / 50% debt split on $15B incremental financing, satisfied through ATM and long-term debt issuance.

PNWPinnacle West5 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
PNW company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

Can you discuss the cadence to reach that mid-teens level target and where you 2025 year end metric landed?

Show response

Andrew confirmed year-end HoldCo debt at 17%, within mid-teens target range. 2026 financing plan intends to keep levels modest and within bandwidth.

Can you just update us on the latest thinking on the IRP planning, including timing this year? And generally, how should we think about the incremental transmission and gas generation opportunities

Capex InvestmentDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Ted confirmed IRP midyear. Will reflect committed 4.5 GW demand plus organic growth but NOT uncommitted queue. Subscription contracts would be incremental to both IRP and current capital plan.

Calendar 2025 Q3

What's the true incremental equity needs for '26 through '28, especially when we look at the $1 billion to $1.2 billion total equity used for the 3-year guidance period?

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew noted 85% of 2026 equity derisked. $1-1.2B total for 2026-2028. Mitigation comes from rate case improving retained earnings and subscription model securing upfront cash from large customers.

Could you just comment on your assumption on annual transmission CapEx post 2028? And how should we interpret the $6 billion plus, especially on what's contributing and driving the upside?

Show response

Andrew explained base run rate now $300-400M (up from under $200M). The $850M+ in 2028 represents core plus strategic projects from 10-year plan with 500-600 miles of high-voltage lines.

can you comment on your confidence level to possibly extend the 7% to 9% rate base growth further into the horizon?

Capex InvestmentGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Andrew noted larger projects come into service in 2029-2030. Long runway of confidence but specific rate base growth rate post-2028 depends on Desert Sun and strategic transmission development progress.

AESAES Corporation2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
AES company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

on new project construction time line, so seeing 80% of the projects completed for the remaining 1.3 gigawatts. Can you talk about the project online timing for the rest of the year?

Capex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ricardo confirmed bulk of remaining 1.3 GW coming online Q3 with small portion in Q4. Steve added tax attributes roughly split between Q3 and Q4. Guidance extension expected at February 2026 call.

do you see private markets would still value your business higher than where the public market is currently?

Capital AllocationCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Andres acknowledged persistent undervaluation, citing backlog strength, execution track record, customer base, and all-of-the-above technology flexibility including gas capabilities.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ATO Atmos Energy80%none of 8 questions
PNW Pinnacle West50%none of 5 questions
AES AES Corporation2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ATO
    Atmos Energy · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • PNW
    Pinnacle West · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • AES
    AES Corporation · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q4No questions recorded——
2025 Q120%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions2
2025 Q420%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q4No questions recorded
  3. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  5. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2025 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Capex Investment7
  • Capital Allocation5
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Regulation Policy2
  • Margin2
  • Demand2
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Competitive Dynamics1