Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Francois-Xavier Bouvignies
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).
- Questions
- 19on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%2 of 19 questions
- Companies
- 2questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 19 of 19 questions from 2 companies
NXPINXP Semiconductors10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Can you maybe help us quantify it for this year or the growth rate? Anything on that would be great.
Show response
Gave the accelerated-growth-driver figure and called SDV the fastest growing piece, but did not break out an SDV revenue number.
is there any drag we should be aware of that is limiting your growth or it just to come or it could come later?
Show response
Reframed to year-over-year as the right lens for content growth and argued the Q3 auto guide is above the long term model.
Calendar 2026 Q1
should we impact the pricing move for the rest of the year as an upside potential if it's getting tighter?
Show response
Rafael acknowledged selective pricing adjustments for high input cost pressure areas but noted Q2 impact is immaterial. Will update if things change.
do you see as well China still strong year-on-year in Q2 and for the remainder of the year?
Show response
Rafael acknowledged China production weakness but emphasized content growth overcomes unit volatility. China grew YoY in Q1 and continues into Q2.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how should we think about the gross margin direction after this Q4? Are you going to decrease the loading at the expense of gross margin
Show response
Bill confirmed Q4 gross margin up 50bps driven by higher revenue, operational costs, and utilization offset by unfavorable mix. Full year 2026 expected within 57-63% model. Prebuilds add 6-7 days to inventory by year-end.
Should I read this comment as today, with your visibility, you are comfortable with seasonality, assuming there is no stockpiling and demand is stabilizing
Show response
Rafael confirmed pre-COVID Q1 seasonality of high single-digit sequential decline is reasonable to model, without guiding Q1 explicitly. Expressed confidence in the setup into 2026.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how should we think about your own inventories in Q3 and Q4? Do you want to work it down more aggressively
Show response
Bill expects Q3 DIO to be similar to Q2 given higher revenue needs plus prebuild. Holds additional inventory strategically including 14 days of channel stock on balance sheet.
What are you waiting for exactly to increase? I mean what are the signs that you would make you -- make the decisions
Show response
Kurt said channel fill could begin as early as Q3 if recovery signals continue strengthening. Emphasized competitiveness of right products on shelves, not revenue creation.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you were seeing some pull-in at some point, would you allow your customer to increase their inventories or would you control it the way you did during COVID
Show response
Kurt confirmed no pull-ins observed through Q1 and quarter-to-date Q2. Policy remains against supporting pull-ins, especially with distribution still at 9 weeks and Tier 1 inventory still digesting.
how should we think about the gross margin here? Because it seems tricky to get a big improvement of gross margin with inventories having to come down
Show response
Bill provided a gross margin rule of thumb by revenue level and listed upside levers: utilization from 70%, 200mm consolidation, channel refill, accelerated growth drivers, and VSMC 300mm JV.
ASMLASML Holding9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q3
I was wondering if you were considering any change of the way you want to contract with your customers in those times?
Show response
Roger said orders already carry meaningful down payments and hard-to-exit POs, and ASML will accept 2029-2030 orders only after mapping total demand.
if we should think about High-NA shipments in 2028 to increase significantly on the back of it
Show response
Christophe said High-NA units will grow every year and cited the 12-inch mask effort as a sign of wider adoption, but gave no 2028 unit figure.
Calendar 2026 Q2
is there any scope for pricing adjustments for Low-NA over time to ensure that the system pricing remains aligned
Show response
Roger confirmed value-based pricing gives ASML more flexibility today given higher customer value, but noted long order lead times delay any pricing effect.
Calendar 2025 Q2
So is it truly neutral for ASML, the multi-patterning Low NA versus single High NA?
Show response
Christophe confirmed productivity and overlay gains let ASML price for value, and said High NA's benefit translates into increased litho intensity at future nodes, mirroring the EUV and immersion transitions.
So I was just wondering if you had any change in EUV underlying, although still strong, but is there any change? Why is it coming a bit lower than maybe people expected?
Show response
Roger explained the 10pp delta from 40% to 30% EUV system growth sits in installed base upgrades bringing tools up to 220 wph, and the 3800-heavy mix means fewer units deliver the same capacity at higher ASP and better gross margin, it is a wash vs the start of the year.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was wondering, if you would consider some flexibility around the pricing of High NA to facilitate adoption
Show response
Christophe pushed back firmly on pricing as an adoption lever, arguing that tool maturity, not price, gates customer uptake, and that discounting an immature tool would only hurt customers.
Can you help us on the timing? You mentioned DRAM specifically that you see more adoption on single expose? I mean what timing should we look at this opportunity?
Show response
Christophe said Low NA single-expose adoption is incremental and already underway as the NXE:3800E rolls out, 30% productivity gain over the 3600 is already opening the door node by node.
Calendar 2024 Q4
How do you think about the capacity of 2-nano given it's going to be potentially a very significant node?
Show response
Roger confirmed a normal multi-year N2 ramp extending into 2026 and 2027, pointed to the TSMC call for ramp profile color, and flagged possible acceleration if AI demand sustains, but declined to quantify.
do you think it's, AI is big enough to offset some downside in the -- if we see downside on the iPhone
Show response
Christophe said the smartphone market is not spectacular but TSMC called out early mobile recovery, and the AI/advanced-logic ramp supports utilization of incremental capacity, leaving the net balance tilted to upside.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| NXPI NXP Semiconductors | 10 | 10%1 of 10 questions |
| ASML ASML Holding | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q2 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q4 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q4No questions recorded
- 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand8
- Inventory5
- Product Launch4
- Margin4
- Pricing3
- Innovation & R&D3
- Revenue Growth3
- Guidance Reliability2
- Trade Tariffs2
- Competitive Dynamics1
Show all 13 topics
- Supply Chain1
- Capex Investment1
- Cloud & AI1