Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Frank Louthan
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 23on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 4%1 of 23 questions
- Companies
- 6questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 23 of 23 questions from 6 companies
AKAMAkamai Technologies9 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How challenging is it to get power at the facilities where you are doing CIS?
Show response
Mgmt said Akamai is well positioned for power and capacity given backbone flexibility (can site in cheaper-power states) and acts as an anchor tenant for 5-20MW builds.
Calendar 2026 Q1
does all of that come in as revenue, or will any be counted as paid-for upfront CapEx?
Show response
Ed confirmed the entire $1.8B comes in as revenue with no CapEx offset. Tom described the Inference Cloud footprint: functions as a service across all 4,300 locations, managed container service in well over 100 cities, full IaaS in several dozen cities, and a couple dozen equipped with new 6000-series GPUs. Vision is to orchestrate workloads across the right compute resource closest to the user, aligned with NVIDIA's AI grid concept.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what sort of revenue commitments are you guys able to get from customers today relative to before?
Show response
Tom said they're seeing longer commitments across all services, partly by design and partly driven by customer interest. Delivery growth expected at mid-single-digit decline this year. Ed added that RPO is growing significantly due to longer-term commitments. Sales force is incentivized for longer commits. No major dynamic change in delivery committed vs uncommitted mix, but security and compute driving bigger and longer commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q3
anything early that you see in the trends in Q3, to give us an indication of how that seasonality is shaping up
Show response
Ed described normal Q3 seasonal softness pattern. Traffic growth is the biggest driver, with pricing declines moderating consistently throughout the year. Longer contracts do not elongate sales cycles with existing customers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you maybe give us a little more color on what's going on in the part of that business besides Linode that's growing a little bit less?
Show response
Ed explained other cloud applications includes image/video management, legacy NetStorage (~$50M annualized being end-of-lifed), and cloudlets. Some being transferred to compute partners in exchange for CIS commitments. Growing 3-4% but expected to decline over time.
to what extent is the uptick in the guide coming from including TikTok for the rest of the year?
Show response
Ed quantified TikTok U.S. revenue at $40-50M annually, about half included in back-half guidance. But guidance midpoint is up much more than that, driven by strength across the board.
Calendar 2025 Q1
can you talk about the recent sales changes? Where are you as far as the new folks you need to hire moving people around within their different roles
Show response
Tom said about one-third complete. Shifting toward hunting, hiring specialists, incentivizing longer-term contracts. Ed outlined three margin drivers: compute scale-up, security mix shift, and delivery stabilization.
Calendar 2024 Q4
can you give us an idea of what the -- of what logo growth was in the quarter? That would be great
Show response
Ed noted Edgio was the biggest driver, adding a few hundred logos with over 100 new to Akamai. Organic growth strongest in Guardicore, API security, and compute.
what's your outlook for being able to retain those Edgio contracts? Do you think some of those will churn off
Show response
Ed confirmed migration is complete, no significant churn expected. They were selective on which Edgio contracts they acquired. Upsell opportunity exists.
EQIXEquinix6 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the right level to think of the normal for non recurring revenue in the long term guidance
Show response
CFO answered in one sentence with a specific modelling assumption, directly addressing how much of the raised revenue guide is non recurring.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there any difference in the incremental capital required that you're seeing to fulfill those new workloads
Show response
Adaire said no capital difference expected as metro-focused strategy is already embedded. Phillip added that new facilities are being built toward higher densities suited for customer requirements.
Is that increasing or decreasing the returns that you're looking at going forward with that higher density requirement
Show response
Management confirmed mid-20% return targets are maintained even at higher densities, consistent with long-standing underwriting standards.
Calendar 2025 Q4
where are you today with regards to your ability to meet that customer demand for folks needing incrementally new levels of power from enterprises?
Show response
Adaire confirmed 3 GW of powered developable land under control, building only against powered land, and AI workloads already 33% more dense than non-AI. Keith noted 52 energized retail projects underway.
Calendar 2025 Q3
talk to us about the uptick in the cross-connect revenue and the ARPU there. What's driving that?
Show response
Adaire attributed interconnection strength to Americas-led demand from technology and infrastructure providers and clouds, driven by customer mix rather than power densities.
Calendar 2025 Q2
can you walk us through why you weren't doing that before? And then how much of an impact could that bring going forward?
Show response
Keith clarified Equinix does capitalize interest but historically less due to lower debt costs and fewer assets under development; expects this to increase but declined to quantify the forward impact.
DLRDigital Realty5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you give us an idea of the additional gigawatt that you've secured?
Show response
Wright described the 870+ acre contiguous Atlanta parcel for a gigawatt campus with power alternatives being explored, plus additional Hillsboro land for 160MW.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what your thoughts are on how that might affect your bookings and demand
Show response
Power sees no significant competitive unleased capacity in 2027-2028, with DLR taking more development risk by greenlighting shells and suites before customer lease signing.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what is your average size deployment that you're seeing for enterprises now?
Show response
Power confirmed taking market share with AI at 18%+ of 0-1MW signings (up from single digits), deal sizes growing, and inference still beyond nascency in enterprise.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I wanted to ask about the executive order for permitting data center infrastructure
Show response
Power saw two positives: streamlining domestic data center permitting and promoting US AI tech stack exports, both benefiting Digital Realty's global platform.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what percentage of your facilities you're going to set aside for sort of less than 1 megawatt, where do you see that going
Show response
Management is increasingly building dedicated buildings for enterprise customers on campuses, targeting 22%+ growth in this category with further acceleration planned.
CHTRCharter Communications1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
how long do you see the need for for price locks?
Show response
Chris said price locks here to stay as competitive tool giving customers comfort to switch. On Cox mobile penetration: expects faster ramp than original Charter curve given better platforms, sales channels, marketing, and national brand awareness. Improvement to original curve is good starting point.
TMUST-Mobile US, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
can you walk us through the economics of the financial services business with the credit cards? What is sort of the opportunity there in terms of revenue and EBITDA
Show response
Srini outlined structural advantages: 34M trusted account relationships, TLife with 24M monthly actives, advantage credit decisioning from subprime/near-prime capabilities, and dramatically lower customer acquisition costs; André added greenfield advantage with no legacy backbone to protect.
VZVerizon Communications Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you talk to us about the pace of the fixed wireless deployment
Show response
Hans said the FWA deployment pace is unchanged, Verizon is still gearing up to cover 80-90% of planned C-band sites this year, with nearly all basic C-band layer complete by next year. Capital is being allocated primarily to mobility because where C-band is deployed Verizon sees better step-ups and customer upgrades. Hans said CapEx efficiency is a separate win, the network team is executing all 2025 plans more efficiently within budget, which is important heading into the Frontier integration. He declined to discuss July promotional dynamics or forward competitive positioning specifically.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| AKAM Akamai Technologies | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| EQIX Equinix | 6 | 17%1 of 6 questions |
| DLR Digital Realty | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| CHTR Charter Communications | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| VZ Verizon Communications Inc. | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- AKAMAkamai Technologies · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- EQIXEquinix · 6 questions17%1 of 6 questions
- DLRDigital Realty · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CHTRCharter Communications · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- TMUST-Mobile US, Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- VZVerizon Communications Inc. · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q4 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q11 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q45 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2026 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth9
- Capex Investment8
- Demand6
- Competitive Dynamics6
- Supply Chain4
- Cloud & AI4
- Guidance Reliability2
- Margin2
- Pricing1
- M&A1
Show all 14 topics
- Subscriber Growth1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Regulation Policy1
- Capital Allocation1