Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Gautam Khanna
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 81on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 11%9 of 81 questions
- Companies
- 13questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 81 of 81 questions from 13 companies
TDGTransDigm Group12 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how you prioritize special dividends? Like how likely are we to see one of those
Show response
Sarah did not commit to a special dividend, saying the company continues to weigh buybacks (subject to IRR criteria) against dividends while sitting mid-range on leverage.
Calendar 2026 Q1
are you seeing a good mix of both aerospace and defense-oriented firms, or is it concentrated one way or the other?
Show response
Mike said the pipeline is a good mix of both with a bias toward commercial, mostly small to mid-size targets.
any evidence in the discretionary aftermarket of slowing anywhere?
Show response
Joel said no material shift in either discretionary or non-discretionary work, with Q2 CAM bookings at an all-time high and solid growth across the board.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how would you characterize the pipeline?
Show response
Mike said M&A pipeline is active in the small to midsize range. Working hard but M&A is impossible to predict.
is there any structural limitation to moving the margins of the acquired businesses up towards the company average?
Show response
Mike said PMA acquisitions were not modeled to reach TransDigm-level margins. Good volume growth drives the 20% IRR instead. Both businesses have internal engines for developing new PMA parts with sizable annual introductions.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was curious if you could give us an update on the sell-in versus sell-through, how the distributors
Show response
Joel said distributor POS outpaced aftermarket partly due to engine overweight in distribution. Channel inventory ended fiscal year with about half a month less than prior year, creating a 1-2 point impact to commercial aftermarket. On defense reform, TransDigm optimistic as a commercial manufacturer bidding firm fixed price contracts.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you could categorize certain products that are being destocked more heavily than others?
Show response
Mike said destocking was generally consistent across the group, not disproportionately weighted to any product area. On aftermarket, non-engine passenger segment saw more muted growth but engine outpaced. Nothing expected to persist.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any incremental elasticity on those parts? Do you expect to?
Show response
Mike reiterated domestic manufacturer status and said internal cost savings and actions aim to ensure no net EBITDA impact from tariffs.
Have you seen any change in behavior of late with respect to discretionary aftermarket?
Show response
Mike said no behavioral difference between discretionary and non-discretionary aftermarket. Interiors (biggest discretionary bucket) continues performing well with no signs of slowing.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what you're seeing in the distribution channel into the aftermarket point-of-sale data relative to what you guys were experiencing on the manufacturing side?
Show response
Joel confirmed distribution POS running ahead into double digits vs 9% total aftermarket. Kevin said several quarters of leading indicators point to continued strength.
your thoughts on DOGE, and I'll just leave it open ended
Show response
Kevin said TDG is 0.3% of DLA budget, less than 1% of revenue at risk. Has met with DOGE folks in D.C. Views it as opportunity to improve procurement processes.
Calendar 2024 Q3
the status of that OEM contract renegotiation renewal, which -- if I recall, the terms kind of expired on the old contract
Show response
Mike deflected specifics on the Boeing contract renegotiation but confirmed it is actively being worked. Declined to discuss what happens if December 31 deadline passes.
HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the 9%-10% eventual goal at shipbuilding is not consistent with the terms of the submarine contracts
Show response
Kastner said nothing about the terms was different or special and they are very consistent with the long-term margin profile the company expects.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I know you guys pushed through some wage increases at the Ingalls shipyard. I was wondering if you've seen any notable improvements in attrition since then
Show response
Ingalls wage increase implemented through positive labor agreement. Seeing increased applications but meaningful improvement will take a couple of quarters to work through, similar to the Newport News experience.
I was wondering if you could just describe whether the fit up delivery schedules aligned with what you're expecting as of a quarter ago.
Show response
Kastner said LPD-30 delivery is tracking better than Navy J-book dates suggest. High confidence in 2026 delivery. Beyond LPD-30, all other milestones consistent with expectations.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what's sort of the timing on that?
Show response
Kastner expects Ingalls union wage negotiation to complete in Q1 2026. Engaged heavily with the union on an almost daily basis.
what is your best sense on timing of when that might get awarded? Formally?
Show response
Kastner said contracts need to be done by end of H1 2026 to maintain production schedules. Engaged heavily with Electric Boat and Navy. FY26 budget completion and FY27 budget clarity will help finalize. Described it as a big, complicated three-party contract.
Calendar 2025 Q3
did you receive the modules for CVN-80 that were delayed in the quarter?
Show response
CVN-80 delayed modules were received and will be installed in Q4 to resume the erection schedule.
on the Q4 implied shipbuilding EBIT, pretty wide range, but you did mention that it's going to be somewhere around the midpoint with or without the submarine contracts signed.
Show response
Stiehle said extremes of margin range would require many things breaking one way. Performance has been very steady quarter-to-quarter and not expected to inflect significantly. Expects incremental year-over-year improvement.
Can you remind us what it is this year? And what do you expect it to be in 2026?
Show response
Stiehle declined to give specific percentages but confirmed over 50% post-COVID by 2027. Currently ramping down from the 70-80% pre-COVID range. Every ship delivery retires pre-COVID work.
Calendar 2025 Q2
on CVN 79 and the timing slip to 2027, could you characterize any economic impact from that? And was there a negative EAC or could there be because of that schedule change
Show response
Kastner confirmed no material financial impact from CVN 79 schedule change, which was already factored into guidance. Ship at 95% compartment turnover with only 90 compartments remaining.
Calendar 2024 Q4
you guys had thought about a cash inflow associated with signing the seventeen submarine contracts. I think it was a release of contract assets to receivable
Show response
Kastner confirmed cash upside from executing contracts but refused to quantify. Stiehle noted the contracting approach shifted from omnibus 17 boats to incremental FY24 two-boat approach under the CR.
Is there any movement afoot? Have you heard anything from the new advanced station about their inclinations to revisit some of the recommendations
Show response
Kastner said no conversations yet with new administration on fleet composition changes as leadership was still being confirmed.
GDGeneral Dynamics10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the shipbuilding contracts, the submarine contracts you're awaiting, is there any -- like what forces the urgency
Show response
Phebe cited industrial base stabilization and long-lead material as the drivers but again said only that awards are coming soon.
I was wondering, Phebe, if you could opine on Aerospace margin potential a couple of years out.
Show response
Phebe interrupted to rule out out-year margin guidance, consistent with the leadership team's stated practice.
given the model introductions you're doing, et cetera, is that a reasonable baseline to prior peak margins?
Show response
Phebe rejected the prior-peak comparison as structurally invalid but declined to offer a substitute ceiling.
Calendar 2025 Q4
You made a reference to a tariff impact at Gulfstream at Aero. I was wondering how much you guys absorbed in '25 and what are you expecting in '26
Show response
Danny quantified 2025 tariff impact at $41 million, explained timing mismatch between cash outlay at import and earnings impact at aircraft delivery, noted 2026 will be higher than $41M but is contemplated in margins
the increase in 18% sequentially. How much is that at the yard itself in terms of productivity versus in the supply
Show response
Danny declined to split productivity vs supply chain contributions to margin improvement, but confirmed both are material drivers and expects durable, steady improvements continuing the 2024-to-2025 trajectory
Calendar 2025 Q3
I wanted to get your expectations around timing and the form of that contract
Show response
Confirmed operating assumption of contract execution this year for next Columbia and Virginia blocks, declined specifics but noted closer government partnership
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you could elaborate on the G800 delivery cadence. You mentioned 13 in the second half
Show response
Confirmed G800 lot 1 starts at higher margin than G700 lot 1 due to lower developmental cost burden, expects similar lot-over-lot margin expansion trajectory
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you remind us what percentage of the pipeline of opportunities on the large cabin side are with non-U.S. customers
Show response
Confirmed large-cabin pipeline is approximately 60% U.S. and 40% international
Have you actually seen dose or whatever we want to call this book terminate contracts with GDIT? Has that happened?
Show response
Confirmed GDIT received stop-work orders from DOGE but declined to quantify, noted conservative backlog methodology provides buffer, outlook unchanged
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could talk about the mechanics of how the [indiscernible] funding actually gets to General Dynamics
Show response
Distinguished between CR program funding (for specific boats) and industrial base funding (goes to suppliers), clarified GD role as potential contract executor
GEGE Aerospace7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you could just talk to us about what happened in June and kind of the components within service orders
Show response
Ghai attributed the gap to normalization from unsustainable early-quarter order levels, with H1 orders up 34%.
Calendar 2026 Q1
If you could just characterize how material improved sequentially and where, and maybe just an update you have given in the past on how many suppliers
Show response
Culp highlighted double-digit sequential and YoY supply chain improvement, engine output up 43% and commercial services up 39% as proof of supplier progress. Credited Flight Deck collaboration approach.
aftermarket exposure to low-cost carriers or business models in the airline industry that might be more affected by a high oil environment
Show response
Ghai said no disruptive customer behavior observed; Q1 was $300M above expectations. Momentum carrying into Q2 with high-teens services growth expected. H2 caution is precautionary, not reaction to observed risks.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Customer behavior in the aftermarket, any change anticipated on overhauls scope, on wide-body engines or CFM56, any pricing pushback
Show response
Larry said no notable changes in customer behavior, demand environment remains robust post-pandemic with airlines wanting maximum fleet support. CFM56 stability continues with expanded workscopes.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was wondering if you could elaborate on where you're seeing the greatest improvement in supply chain material availability
Show response
Larry said no single breakthrough, improvement is cumulative across wide-body, narrow-body, legacy, and new platforms. Key is deep collaborative problem solving with priority suppliers on factory floors. Looking ahead to readiness for Airbus rate 75 and Boeing rate increases.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was wondering if you could elaborate on the state of the supply chain. You guys have given us good updates in the past
Show response
Larry cited 10% sequential volume improvement from critical suppliers (12 companies, 18 sites) with 95% commitment delivery. Rahul said supply chain remains tight with no inflation letoff expected; pricing expected to cover inflation through 2028.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I was wondering if you could elaborate on your pricing strategy and how it might differ from normal years
Show response
Rahul confirmed standard mid-to-high single-digit catalog increases in summer plus a temporary tariff surcharge to cover remaining cost after operational mitigations.
RTXRTX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
if you could talk a little bit about Raytheon Defense's margin opportunity over several years
Show response
Calio credited Raytheon's margin trajectory to mature-program mix, strong supply-chain material receipts and a 48% international backlog.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could give us some help on how to think about AOGs on the GTF, because it's very hard from the outside to track those which were powdered metal impacted and not
Show response
Calio confirmed AOGs down 15% with 23% MRO output growth and 20% turnaround time improvement on heavy visits. Declined to give point estimate but cited improving indicators: inductions up 7% sequentially, castings up 10%, forgings up 18%.
Calendar 2025 Q4
what's your updated thoughts on eventual margin entitlement for that segment? And then wanted to just ask on GTF, could you remind us again in the guidance for 26% what the cash customer compensati...
Show response
Mitchill confirmed $700M powder metal in 2026 guide, cumulative $2.8B through 2026 vs ~$3B total. Raytheon margins approaching 12% with international backlog at 47%. No reason margins can't exceed 12% given mix and productivity trends.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Was wondering if you could just update us on your expectations through '26 on the GTF compensation payments.
Show response
Mitchill confirmed no change to powder metal outlook. On track for $1.1-$1.3B in 2025 with residual in 2026. Provision remains adequate.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you could just give us an update on how that gets spiraled in both for OE and aftermarket. And if you could also just update us broadly on supply chain.
Show response
Calio said GTFA production underway with deliveries end of year. Hot section plus kit (90% of durability improvements) entering MRO next year. Supply chain steadily improving.
Calendar 2025 Q1
are you seeing any sort of production rate expectation declines on the A350 or other products?
Show response
Calio confirmed no material production rate changes, airframers focused on ramping. Heat exchanger production for 787 now at needed levels.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could just broadly comment on the supply chain. Where you're still seeing constraints?
Show response
Calio detailed progress: Pratt castings +12%, Collins microelectronics lead times normalized. Still constrained on rocket motors and isothermal forgings.
LDOSLeidos6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
besides the VBA contract, if you could update us on what are the big upcoming recompetes
Show response
Bell cited DHMSM extension expected through near-term continuity mechanism and Antarctic program continuity while customer decides future approach. Cage emphasized nothing at major program level beyond what was discussed, with almost 70% of next-12-month pipeline focused on new business and takeaway. Above 90% recompete win rates.
Calendar 2025 Q4
What your expectations are for you know, how the terms might change, what you guys are doing to maybe, you know, sustain the profitability of it because typically recompetes, you know, gotta sharpe...
Show response
Bell confirmed recompete bid expected in summer, with focus on technology investment to deliver exams better, faster, and cheaper. Cage pointed to Health long-term margin guidance of above 20% as already contemplating the recompete outcome, citing proven ability to sharpen the pencil and still deliver for shareholders.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could just call out what percentage of sales? And if there are any lumpier recompetes out there
Show response
Cage highlighted reserve health readiness program and Australian airborne ISR as larger recompetes. Overall 2026 more weighted toward new business and takeaways. VBA recompete at end of 2026 already being shaped.
Calendar 2025 Q2
it sounds like the aggressive DOGE engagement with the industry is starting to wane a bit. Is that -- would you say that's true
Show response
Bell confirmed DOGE disruptions flattened over last 3 months. Fourth VBA vendor share loss estimated at less than 1% of volume so far. Tone shifting from slash and burn to constructive efficiency conversations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could elaborate on the Health & Civil profitability in the quarter because it was very strong
Show response
Cage attributed strong margins to broad portfolio strength plus favorable EAC adjustments company-wide. Noted VA volumes sustaining or increasing with no bottlenecks from VA staffing reductions.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could opine directionally on bookings this year and maybe the growth reacceleration in '26 and beyond
Show response
Bell highlighted strong Q4 bookings and retooled BD team but deferred specific growth targets to Investor Day. Cage hinted financial expectations through 2028 will show compelling momentum.
Show 7 more companies
LMTLockheed Martin6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In the past, you've talked about a couple of classified programs at Arrow and missile in Fire Control.
Show response
Jim said the classified programs were rebaselined and have shown execution stability, and framed portfolio risk around scaling and resilience.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Was wondering if you could comment on the pinch points in ramping MFC capacity
Show response
Taiclet detailed 650-to-2,000 ramp over 3 to 4 years. Key pinch points: solid rocket motors (GD JV, Northrop entry, L3Harris spinout) and Boeing seekers. Government strategic capital and capital markets financing for small/medium suppliers.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I was wondering if you could give us a quick refresher on how the Aero classified program is performing. And also, Evan, if you could just speak to 2027 pension requirements given where things sit ...
Show response
Jim confirmed no Q4 charges on Aero classified, monthly senior executive monitoring now in place, and confidence in current team execution. Evan noted 2025 FCF strength enabled prefunding all required 2026 pension, with at least $1B required starting 2027 depending on pension performance this year. May opportunistically prefund 2027 as well.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was curious if you could talk a little bit about some of the bigger international campaigns you're pursuing right now
Show response
Evan outlined international pursuits across all four BAs: air/missile defense at MFC, Black Hawk and radars at RMS, satellite opportunities at Space, F-35/C-130/F-16 at Aero.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how ready are some foreign customers to take delivery earlier if the U.S. cuts back the buy?
Show response
Lot 19 expected second half of 2025. Jim cited very strong international demand from Munich discussions with defense ministers pressing for faster deliveries.
Calendar 2024 Q4
is there an opportunity on that program as you scale it to improve the profitability dramatically?
Show response
Jay noted margins will improve beyond fixed-price phase but not immediately to MFC-level; Jim added this is expected to be a long-lived program. Limited detail due to classified nature.
NOCNorthrop Grumman5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
the $10 billion of SRM opportunity over 7 years and how we should think about the company's protection against inflation
Show response
Kathy said pricing and fee negotiations are ahead, and NOC will incorporate risk into pricing assumptions as contracts definitize into next year.
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could elaborate on some of the Sentinel developments that you mentioned on IOC and how that program is progressing with respect to timing
Show response
Warden gave clear timeline: Milestone B later this year, first flight 2027, IOC early 2030s. Described silo prototype as one of numerous design maturation activities.
Calendar 2025 Q4
LHX entered into this transaction with their missile portfolio and the government. You guys obviously have orbital ATK. Does that does that transaction with LHX disadvantage Northrop in any way
Show response
Warden said Northrop not in discussions for similar government arrangement. Already self-funding capacity expansion with doubled SRM production and tripling underway. Feels well positioned to compete on capacity, performance, and investment commitment.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if in fact there is kind of an end to the Ukraine-Russia hostilities, what impact, if any, would be felt at Northrop and over what time frame
Show response
Warden said direct Ukraine-related revenue is less than 1% and expects multi-year stockpile replenishment regardless of peace outcome.
I'm curious how much mix is a driver of it, mix of cost plus moving to fixed price. Does that percentage change materially in 2025
Show response
Crews clarified mix shift to FFP is gradual over five years; near-term margin expansion driven by performance and efficiency, not contract type.
RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you still expect a surge of orders once the first test flight goes successfully?
Show response
Beck said Neutron demand is not a concern before or after the first test flight, having sold full-price Neutrons pre-flight, and expects the constrained launch market to persist because much of the new competitor capacity is already spoken for internal programs.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Is this kind of more of an early Q4 story or late Q4 story? And then the second part was just
Show response
Beck said there isn't enough visibility yet to pin Neutron's first launch within Q4; the previously stated follow-on cadence plan remains consistent.
Calendar 2025 Q4
are you high certainty that it was that manual layup process.
Show response
Beck said a complete failure analysis, reproduced via coupon testing, gives high confidence the defect was the hand-layup process.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how soon after Neutron arrives at the complex realistically it can launch?
Show response
Beck said the pad-to-launch interval depends on what testing uncovers; a clean fueling and static-fire campaign means a quick turnaround.
Calendar 2025 Q1
could you just elaborate on the launch margins in the quarter, what may have drove that variability down a little bit
Show response
Beck tied launch-margin variability to fixed-cost absorption via cadence and ASP mix, with improvement expected in the back half.
TXTTextron5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
on the booking rate adjustment, did you assume some learning curve loss, if you will, in the adjustment?
Show response
CFO directly separated the booking rate change from learning curve assumptions and scoped it as a Q2 impact.
Calendar 2026 Q1
do you think this is kind of the end of the portfolio review? Or what will be part of the AMD franchise is that you're looking to maybe scale back
Show response
Atherton reiterated growth focus, not rationalization. No plans to scale back A&D assets, intent is to lean in and potentially add to the portfolio.
Wanted to ask if there are any dissynergies that you can point to
Show response
Rosenberg said dis-synergies are minimal with very low stranded costs that are manageable. Nothing significant from a dis-synergy perspective in any potential structure.
Calendar 2025 Q2
would you say that you haven't really seen much demand erosion due to tariffs and all the trade policy uncertainty across the portfolio
Show response
Donnelly confirmed no evidence of tariff-driven demand erosion. International helicopter business, including FMS, continuing despite tariff dialogue.
I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on commercial helicopter demand, how that's trending
Show response
Donnelly said helicopter demand strong across all product lines with good delivery trajectory and solid order activity for the full year.
LHXL3Harris4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I was wondering if you could give us some color on the asset sale in the quarter, the legal settlement?
Show response
CFO quantified asset sale at 30-40 bps margin impact in Missiles, offset by negative EAC adjustments. No specific product line sales built into full-year guidance.
Calendar 2025 Q4
do you anticipate that we'll start to see some of that stuff get funded in the '27 request?
Show response
Kubasik expressed confidence in core capabilities being funded in larger budget. Bedingfield said 2026 margin improvement driven by execution, not asset gains.
Calendar 2025 Q2
In the President's budget request, you may have seen the military radio, line items were a little bit softer in '26
Show response
Kubasik pointed to NGC2 line item as new funding source. Combined HMS, COTS, and NGC2 are several hundred million more than 2025. Armed Overwatch has international opportunity.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I was wondering if you could elaborate on some of your objectives now with your increased role at AJRD?
Show response
Bedingfield outlined priorities: capacity expansion for missile solutions, space propulsion efficiency improvements, and Artemis/SLS program continuation.
BAThe Boeing Company2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
I'm curious if you could just talk about the big order campaigns you're pursuing on the BCA side
Show response
Ortberg tied China order entirely to U.S.-China negotiations and upcoming Trump-Xi summit. Expressed high confidence in aircraft orders if country-level agreement reached, noting Trump's support for international campaigns, but declined to give airplane count.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you can talk about where you see the pinch points in the supply chain today and kind of across the programs as you move forward in rate
Show response
Ortberg said seats remain primary constraint. Engine demand across forward-fit, aftermarket, and durability upgrades needs watching. Supplier confidence in Boeing production growing.
HWMHowmet Aerospace1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was curious if you could opine on pricing expectations next year and perhaps thereafter, if you expect any change to kind of the rate of net increases you've had?
Show response
Plant confirmed pricing discipline continues unchanged. Same process of LTA renewals capturing volume, variety, and OEM-to-service transitions. Similar annual increments expected through 2027.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| TDG TransDigm Group | 12 | 8%1 of 12 questions |
| HII Huntington Ingalls Industries | 11 | 18%2 of 11 questions |
| GD General Dynamics | 10 | 30%3 of 10 questions |
| GE GE Aerospace | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| RTX RTX Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| LDOS Leidos | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| LMT Lockheed Martin | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| NOC Northrop Grumman | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc. | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
| TXT Textron | 5 | 20%1 of 5 questions |
- TDGTransDigm Group · 12 questions8%1 of 12 questions
- HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries · 11 questions18%2 of 11 questions
- GDGeneral Dynamics · 10 questions30%3 of 10 questions
- GEGE Aerospace · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- RTXRTX Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- LDOSLeidos · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- LMTLockheed Martin · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- NOCNorthrop Grumman · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc. · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
- TXTTextron · 5 questions20%1 of 5 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 7 |
| 2025 Q2 | 10 | 20%2 of 10 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q4 | 13 | 15%2 of 13 questions | 10 |
| 2026 Q1 | 15 | 7%1 of 15 questions | 11 |
| 2026 Q2 | 11 | 27%3 of 11 questions | 9 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
- 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q413 questions · challenge rate 15% (2 of 13 questions) · 10 companies
- 2026 Q115 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 15 questions) · 11 companies
- 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 27% (3 of 11 questions) · 9 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Demand33
- Margin20
- Supply Chain11
- Regulation Policy10
- Cost Pressure9
- Competitive Dynamics9
- Pricing7
- Capital Allocation6
- Product Launch6
- Revenue Growth6
Show all 19 topics
- Guidance Reliability6
- M&A6
- Capex Investment4
- Trade Tariffs4
- Macroeconomic3
- Geographic Expansion3
- Labor Market2
- Innovation & R&D1
- Inventory1