Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Gautam Khanna

TD Cowen · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
81on tracked calls
Challenge rate
11%9 of 81 questions
Companies
13questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 81 of 81 questions from 13 companies

TDGTransDigm Group12 questions · 8 reporting periods · 1 of 12 challenging
TDG company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

how you prioritize special dividends? Like how likely are we to see one of those

Capital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Sarah did not commit to a special dividend, saying the company continues to weigh buybacks (subject to IRR criteria) against dividends while sitting mid-range on leverage.

Calendar 2026 Q1

are you seeing a good mix of both aerospace and defense-oriented firms, or is it concentrated one way or the other?

Show response

Mike said the pipeline is a good mix of both with a bias toward commercial, mostly small to mid-size targets.

any evidence in the discretionary aftermarket of slowing anywhere?

Show response

Joel said no material shift in either discretionary or non-discretionary work, with Q2 CAM bookings at an all-time high and solid growth across the board.

Calendar 2025 Q4

how would you characterize the pipeline?

Show response

Mike said M&A pipeline is active in the small to midsize range. Working hard but M&A is impossible to predict.

is there any structural limitation to moving the margins of the acquired businesses up towards the company average?

Show response

Mike said PMA acquisitions were not modeled to reach TransDigm-level margins. Good volume growth drives the 20% IRR instead. Both businesses have internal engines for developing new PMA parts with sizable annual introductions.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was curious if you could give us an update on the sell-in versus sell-through, how the distributors

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Joel said distributor POS outpaced aftermarket partly due to engine overweight in distribution. Channel inventory ended fiscal year with about half a month less than prior year, creating a 1-2 point impact to commercial aftermarket. On defense reform, TransDigm optimistic as a commercial manufacturer bidding firm fixed price contracts.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could categorize certain products that are being destocked more heavily than others?

Show response

Mike said destocking was generally consistent across the group, not disproportionately weighted to any product area. On aftermarket, non-engine passenger segment saw more muted growth but engine outpaced. Nothing expected to persist.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you seeing any incremental elasticity on those parts? Do you expect to?

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Mike reiterated domestic manufacturer status and said internal cost savings and actions aim to ensure no net EBITDA impact from tariffs.

Have you seen any change in behavior of late with respect to discretionary aftermarket?

Show response

Mike said no behavioral difference between discretionary and non-discretionary aftermarket. Interiors (biggest discretionary bucket) continues performing well with no signs of slowing.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what you're seeing in the distribution channel into the aftermarket point-of-sale data relative to what you guys were experiencing on the manufacturing side?

Show response

Joel confirmed distribution POS running ahead into double digits vs 9% total aftermarket. Kevin said several quarters of leading indicators point to continued strength.

your thoughts on DOGE, and I'll just leave it open ended

Show response

Kevin said TDG is 0.3% of DLA budget, less than 1% of revenue at risk. Has met with DOGE folks in D.C. Views it as opportunity to improve procurement processes.

Calendar 2024 Q3

the status of that OEM contract renegotiation renewal, which -- if I recall, the terms kind of expired on the old contract

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Mike deflected specifics on the Boeing contract renegotiation but confirmed it is actively being worked. Declined to discuss what happens if December 31 deadline passes.

HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 2 of 11 challenging
HII company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the 9%-10% eventual goal at shipbuilding is not consistent with the terms of the submarine contracts

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kastner said nothing about the terms was different or special and they are very consistent with the long-term margin profile the company expects.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I know you guys pushed through some wage increases at the Ingalls shipyard. I was wondering if you've seen any notable improvements in attrition since then

Show response

Ingalls wage increase implemented through positive labor agreement. Seeing increased applications but meaningful improvement will take a couple of quarters to work through, similar to the Newport News experience.

I was wondering if you could just describe whether the fit up delivery schedules aligned with what you're expecting as of a quarter ago.

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kastner said LPD-30 delivery is tracking better than Navy J-book dates suggest. High confidence in 2026 delivery. Beyond LPD-30, all other milestones consistent with expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what's sort of the timing on that?

Show response

Kastner expects Ingalls union wage negotiation to complete in Q1 2026. Engaged heavily with the union on an almost daily basis.

what is your best sense on timing of when that might get awarded? Formally?

ChallengingDemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Kastner said contracts need to be done by end of H1 2026 to maintain production schedules. Engaged heavily with Electric Boat and Navy. FY26 budget completion and FY27 budget clarity will help finalize. Described it as a big, complicated three-party contract.

Calendar 2025 Q3

did you receive the modules for CVN-80 that were delayed in the quarter?

Show response

CVN-80 delayed modules were received and will be installed in Q4 to resume the erection schedule.

on the Q4 implied shipbuilding EBIT, pretty wide range, but you did mention that it's going to be somewhere around the midpoint with or without the submarine contracts signed.

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Stiehle said extremes of margin range would require many things breaking one way. Performance has been very steady quarter-to-quarter and not expected to inflect significantly. Expects incremental year-over-year improvement.

Can you remind us what it is this year? And what do you expect it to be in 2026?

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Stiehle declined to give specific percentages but confirmed over 50% post-COVID by 2027. Currently ramping down from the 70-80% pre-COVID range. Every ship delivery retires pre-COVID work.

Calendar 2025 Q2

on CVN 79 and the timing slip to 2027, could you characterize any economic impact from that? And was there a negative EAC or could there be because of that schedule change

ChallengingMarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kastner confirmed no material financial impact from CVN 79 schedule change, which was already factored into guidance. Ship at 95% compartment turnover with only 90 compartments remaining.

Calendar 2024 Q4

you guys had thought about a cash inflow associated with signing the seventeen submarine contracts. I think it was a release of contract assets to receivable

Capital AllocationDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kastner confirmed cash upside from executing contracts but refused to quantify. Stiehle noted the contracting approach shifted from omnibus 17 boats to incremental FY24 two-boat approach under the CR.

Is there any movement afoot? Have you heard anything from the new advanced station about their inclinations to revisit some of the recommendations

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kastner said no conversations yet with new administration on fleet composition changes as leadership was still being confirmed.

GDGeneral Dynamics10 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 10 challenging
GD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

on the shipbuilding contracts, the submarine contracts you're awaiting, is there any -- like what forces the urgency

ChallengingDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phebe cited industrial base stabilization and long-lead material as the drivers but again said only that awards are coming soon.

I was wondering, Phebe, if you could opine on Aerospace margin potential a couple of years out.

Show response

Phebe interrupted to rule out out-year margin guidance, consistent with the leadership team's stated practice.

given the model introductions you're doing, et cetera, is that a reasonable baseline to prior peak margins?

ChallengingMarginProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Phebe rejected the prior-peak comparison as structurally invalid but declined to offer a substitute ceiling.

Calendar 2025 Q4

You made a reference to a tariff impact at Gulfstream at Aero. I was wondering how much you guys absorbed in '25 and what are you expecting in '26

Trade TariffsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Danny quantified 2025 tariff impact at $41 million, explained timing mismatch between cash outlay at import and earnings impact at aircraft delivery, noted 2026 will be higher than $41M but is contemplated in margins

the increase in 18% sequentially. How much is that at the yard itself in terms of productivity versus in the supply

MarginSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Danny declined to split productivity vs supply chain contributions to margin improvement, but confirmed both are material drivers and expects durable, steady improvements continuing the 2024-to-2025 trajectory

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wanted to get your expectations around timing and the form of that contract

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Confirmed operating assumption of contract execution this year for next Columbia and Virginia blocks, declined specifics but noted closer government partnership

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could elaborate on the G800 delivery cadence. You mentioned 13 in the second half

Product LaunchMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Confirmed G800 lot 1 starts at higher margin than G700 lot 1 due to lower developmental cost burden, expects similar lot-over-lot margin expansion trajectory

Calendar 2025 Q1

could you remind us what percentage of the pipeline of opportunities on the large cabin side are with non-U.S. customers

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Confirmed large-cabin pipeline is approximately 60% U.S. and 40% international

Have you actually seen dose or whatever we want to call this book terminate contracts with GDIT? Has that happened?

ChallengingRegulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Confirmed GDIT received stop-work orders from DOGE but declined to quantify, noted conservative backlog methodology provides buffer, outlook unchanged

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could talk about the mechanics of how the [indiscernible] funding actually gets to General Dynamics

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Distinguished between CR program funding (for specific boats) and industrial base funding (goes to suppliers), clarified GD role as potential contract executor

GEGE Aerospace7 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
GE company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you could just talk to us about what happened in June and kind of the components within service orders

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Ghai attributed the gap to normalization from unsustainable early-quarter order levels, with H1 orders up 34%.

Calendar 2026 Q1

If you could just characterize how material improved sequentially and where, and maybe just an update you have given in the past on how many suppliers

Show response

Culp highlighted double-digit sequential and YoY supply chain improvement, engine output up 43% and commercial services up 39% as proof of supplier progress. Credited Flight Deck collaboration approach.

aftermarket exposure to low-cost carriers or business models in the airline industry that might be more affected by a high oil environment

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ghai said no disruptive customer behavior observed; Q1 was $300M above expectations. Momentum carrying into Q2 with high-teens services growth expected. H2 caution is precautionary, not reaction to observed risks.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Customer behavior in the aftermarket, any change anticipated on overhauls scope, on wide-body engines or CFM56, any pricing pushback

Show response

Larry said no notable changes in customer behavior, demand environment remains robust post-pandemic with airlines wanting maximum fleet support. CFM56 stability continues with expanded workscopes.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was wondering if you could elaborate on where you're seeing the greatest improvement in supply chain material availability

Supply ChainRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Larry said no single breakthrough, improvement is cumulative across wide-body, narrow-body, legacy, and new platforms. Key is deep collaborative problem solving with priority suppliers on factory floors. Looking ahead to readiness for Airbus rate 75 and Boeing rate increases.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was wondering if you could elaborate on the state of the supply chain. You guys have given us good updates in the past

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Larry cited 10% sequential volume improvement from critical suppliers (12 companies, 18 sites) with 95% commitment delivery. Rahul said supply chain remains tight with no inflation letoff expected; pricing expected to cover inflation through 2028.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was wondering if you could elaborate on your pricing strategy and how it might differ from normal years

PricingTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rahul confirmed standard mid-to-high single-digit catalog increases in summer plus a temporary tariff surcharge to cover remaining cost after operational mitigations.

RTXRTX Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
RTX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you could talk a little bit about Raytheon Defense's margin opportunity over several years

Show response

Calio credited Raytheon's margin trajectory to mature-program mix, strong supply-chain material receipts and a 48% international backlog.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could give us some help on how to think about AOGs on the GTF, because it's very hard from the outside to track those which were powdered metal impacted and not

Supply ChainDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Calio confirmed AOGs down 15% with 23% MRO output growth and 20% turnaround time improvement on heavy visits. Declined to give point estimate but cited improving indicators: inductions up 7% sequentially, castings up 10%, forgings up 18%.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what's your updated thoughts on eventual margin entitlement for that segment? And then wanted to just ask on GTF, could you remind us again in the guidance for 26% what the cash customer compensati...

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mitchill confirmed $700M powder metal in 2026 guide, cumulative $2.8B through 2026 vs ~$3B total. Raytheon margins approaching 12% with international backlog at 47%. No reason margins can't exceed 12% given mix and productivity trends.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Was wondering if you could just update us on your expectations through '26 on the GTF compensation payments.

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mitchill confirmed no change to powder metal outlook. On track for $1.1-$1.3B in 2025 with residual in 2026. Provision remains adequate.

Calendar 2025 Q2

if you could just give us an update on how that gets spiraled in both for OE and aftermarket. And if you could also just update us broadly on supply chain.

Product LaunchSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Calio said GTFA production underway with deliveries end of year. Hot section plus kit (90% of durability improvements) entering MRO next year. Supply chain steadily improving.

Calendar 2025 Q1

are you seeing any sort of production rate expectation declines on the A350 or other products?

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Calio confirmed no material production rate changes, airframers focused on ramping. Heat exchanger production for 787 now at needed levels.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could just broadly comment on the supply chain. Where you're still seeing constraints?

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Calio detailed progress: Pratt castings +12%, Collins microelectronics lead times normalized. Still constrained on rocket motors and isothermal forgings.

LDOSLeidos6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
LDOS company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

besides the VBA contract, if you could update us on what are the big upcoming recompetes

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Bell cited DHMSM extension expected through near-term continuity mechanism and Antarctic program continuity while customer decides future approach. Cage emphasized nothing at major program level beyond what was discussed, with almost 70% of next-12-month pipeline focused on new business and takeaway. Above 90% recompete win rates.

Calendar 2025 Q4

What your expectations are for you know, how the terms might change, what you guys are doing to maybe, you know, sustain the profitability of it because typically recompetes, you know, gotta sharpe...

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Bell confirmed recompete bid expected in summer, with focus on technology investment to deliver exams better, faster, and cheaper. Cage pointed to Health long-term margin guidance of above 20% as already contemplating the recompete outcome, citing proven ability to sharpen the pencil and still deliver for shareholders.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you could just call out what percentage of sales? And if there are any lumpier recompetes out there

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Cage highlighted reserve health readiness program and Australian airborne ISR as larger recompetes. Overall 2026 more weighted toward new business and takeaways. VBA recompete at end of 2026 already being shaped.

Calendar 2025 Q2

it sounds like the aggressive DOGE engagement with the industry is starting to wane a bit. Is that -- would you say that's true

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bell confirmed DOGE disruptions flattened over last 3 months. Fourth VBA vendor share loss estimated at less than 1% of volume so far. Tone shifting from slash and burn to constructive efficiency conversations.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you could elaborate on the Health & Civil profitability in the quarter because it was very strong

Show response

Cage attributed strong margins to broad portfolio strength plus favorable EAC adjustments company-wide. Noted VA volumes sustaining or increasing with no bottlenecks from VA staffing reductions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

if you could opine directionally on bookings this year and maybe the growth reacceleration in '26 and beyond

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bell highlighted strong Q4 bookings and retooled BD team but deferred specific growth targets to Investor Day. Cage hinted financial expectations through 2028 will show compelling momentum.

Show 7 more companies
LMTLockheed Martin6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
LMT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

In the past, you've talked about a couple of classified programs at Arrow and missile in Fire Control.

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jim said the classified programs were rebaselined and have shown execution stability, and framed portfolio risk around scaling and resilience.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Was wondering if you could comment on the pinch points in ramping MFC capacity

Supply ChainCapex InvestmentRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Taiclet detailed 650-to-2,000 ramp over 3 to 4 years. Key pinch points: solid rocket motors (GD JV, Northrop entry, L3Harris spinout) and Boeing seekers. Government strategic capital and capital markets financing for small/medium suppliers.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I was wondering if you could give us a quick refresher on how the Aero classified program is performing. And also, Evan, if you could just speak to 2027 pension requirements given where things sit ...

Cost PressureCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Jim confirmed no Q4 charges on Aero classified, monthly senior executive monitoring now in place, and confidence in current team execution. Evan noted 2025 FCF strength enabled prefunding all required 2026 pension, with at least $1B required starting 2027 depending on pension performance this year. May opportunistically prefund 2027 as well.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I was curious if you could talk a little bit about some of the bigger international campaigns you're pursuing right now

Geographic ExpansionDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Evan outlined international pursuits across all four BAs: air/missile defense at MFC, Black Hawk and radars at RMS, satellite opportunities at Space, F-35/C-130/F-16 at Aero.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how ready are some foreign customers to take delivery earlier if the U.S. cuts back the buy?

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Lot 19 expected second half of 2025. Jim cited very strong international demand from Munich discussions with defense ministers pressing for faster deliveries.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is there an opportunity on that program as you scale it to improve the profitability dramatically?

Show response

Jay noted margins will improve beyond fixed-price phase but not immediately to MFC-level; Jim added this is expected to be a long-lived program. Limited detail due to classified nature.

NOCNorthrop Grumman5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
NOC company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the $10 billion of SRM opportunity over 7 years and how we should think about the company's protection against inflation

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kathy said pricing and fee negotiations are ahead, and NOC will incorporate risk into pricing assumptions as contracts definitize into next year.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could elaborate on some of the Sentinel developments that you mentioned on IOC and how that program is progressing with respect to timing

Innovation & R&DRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Warden gave clear timeline: Milestone B later this year, first flight 2027, IOC early 2030s. Described silo prototype as one of numerous design maturation activities.

Calendar 2025 Q4

LHX entered into this transaction with their missile portfolio and the government. You guys obviously have orbital ATK. Does that does that transaction with LHX disadvantage Northrop in any way

Competitive DynamicsCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Warden said Northrop not in discussions for similar government arrangement. Already self-funding capacity expansion with doubled SRM production and tripling underway. Feels well positioned to compete on capacity, performance, and investment commitment.

Calendar 2024 Q4

if in fact there is kind of an end to the Ukraine-Russia hostilities, what impact, if any, would be felt at Northrop and over what time frame

MacroeconomicDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Warden said direct Ukraine-related revenue is less than 1% and expects multi-year stockpile replenishment regardless of peace outcome.

I'm curious how much mix is a driver of it, mix of cost plus moving to fixed price. Does that percentage change materially in 2025

Show response

Crews clarified mix shift to FFP is gradual over five years; near-term margin expansion driven by performance and efficiency, not contract type.

RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

Do you still expect a surge of orders once the first test flight goes successfully?

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Beck said Neutron demand is not a concern before or after the first test flight, having sold full-price Neutrons pre-flight, and expects the constrained launch market to persist because much of the new competitor capacity is already spoken for internal programs.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Is this kind of more of an early Q4 story or late Q4 story? And then the second part was just

Show response

Beck said there isn't enough visibility yet to pin Neutron's first launch within Q4; the previously stated follow-on cadence plan remains consistent.

Calendar 2025 Q4

are you high certainty that it was that manual layup process.

ChallengingProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Beck said a complete failure analysis, reproduced via coupon testing, gives high confidence the defect was the hand-layup process.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how soon after Neutron arrives at the complex realistically it can launch?

Show response

Beck said the pad-to-launch interval depends on what testing uncovers; a clean fueling and static-fire campaign means a quick turnaround.

Calendar 2025 Q1

could you just elaborate on the launch margins in the quarter, what may have drove that variability down a little bit

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Beck tied launch-margin variability to fixed-cost absorption via cadence and ASP mix, with improvement expected in the back half.

TXTTextron5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
TXT company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

on the booking rate adjustment, did you assume some learning curve loss, if you will, in the adjustment?

ChallengingMarginRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

CFO directly separated the booking rate change from learning curve assumptions and scoped it as a Q2 impact.

Calendar 2026 Q1

do you think this is kind of the end of the portfolio review? Or what will be part of the AMD franchise is that you're looking to maybe scale back

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Atherton reiterated growth focus, not rationalization. No plans to scale back A&D assets, intent is to lean in and potentially add to the portfolio.

Wanted to ask if there are any dissynergies that you can point to

Show response

Rosenberg said dis-synergies are minimal with very low stranded costs that are manageable. Nothing significant from a dis-synergy perspective in any potential structure.

Calendar 2025 Q2

would you say that you haven't really seen much demand erosion due to tariffs and all the trade policy uncertainty across the portfolio

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Donnelly confirmed no evidence of tariff-driven demand erosion. International helicopter business, including FMS, continuing despite tariff dialogue.

I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on commercial helicopter demand, how that's trending

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Donnelly said helicopter demand strong across all product lines with good delivery trajectory and solid order activity for the full year.

LHXL3Harris4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
LHX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could give us some color on the asset sale in the quarter, the legal settlement?

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO quantified asset sale at 30-40 bps margin impact in Missiles, offset by negative EAC adjustments. No specific product line sales built into full-year guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q4

do you anticipate that we'll start to see some of that stuff get funded in the '27 request?

Show response

Kubasik expressed confidence in core capabilities being funded in larger budget. Bedingfield said 2026 margin improvement driven by execution, not asset gains.

Calendar 2025 Q2

In the President's budget request, you may have seen the military radio, line items were a little bit softer in '26

ChallengingDemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kubasik pointed to NGC2 line item as new funding source. Combined HMS, COTS, and NGC2 are several hundred million more than 2025. Armed Overwatch has international opportunity.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could elaborate on some of your objectives now with your increased role at AJRD?

M&ACapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Bedingfield outlined priorities: capacity expansion for missile solutions, space propulsion efficiency improvements, and Artemis/SLS program continuation.

BAThe Boeing Company2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
BA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm curious if you could just talk about the big order campaigns you're pursuing on the BCA side

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Ortberg tied China order entirely to U.S.-China negotiations and upcoming Trump-Xi summit. Expressed high confidence in aircraft orders if country-level agreement reached, noting Trump's support for international campaigns, but declined to give airplane count.

Calendar 2025 Q3

if you can talk about where you see the pinch points in the supply chain today and kind of across the programs as you move forward in rate

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Ortberg said seats remain primary constraint. Engine demand across forward-fit, aftermarket, and durability upgrades needs watching. Supplier confidence in Boeing production growing.

HWMHowmet Aerospace1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
HWM company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

I was curious if you could opine on pricing expectations next year and perhaps thereafter, if you expect any change to kind of the rate of net increases you've had?

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Plant confirmed pricing discipline continues unchanged. Same process of LTA renewals capturing volume, variety, and OEM-to-service transitions. Similar annual increments expected through 2027.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TDG TransDigm Group128%1 of 12 questions
HII Huntington Ingalls Industries1118%2 of 11 questions
GD General Dynamics1030%3 of 10 questions
GE GE Aerospace70%none of 7 questions
RTX RTX Corporation70%none of 7 questions
LDOS Leidos60%none of 6 questions
LMT Lockheed Martin60%none of 6 questions
NOC Northrop Grumman50%none of 5 questions
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.520%1 of 5 questions
TXT Textron520%1 of 5 questions
  • TDG
    TransDigm Group · 12 questions
    8%1 of 12 questions
  • HII
    Huntington Ingalls Industries · 11 questions
    18%2 of 11 questions
  • GD
    General Dynamics · 10 questions
    30%3 of 10 questions
  • GE
    GE Aerospace · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • RTX
    RTX Corporation · 7 questions
    0%none of 7 questions
  • LDOS
    Leidos · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • LMT
    Lockheed Martin · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • NOC
    Northrop Grumman · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • TXT
    Textron · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
Show all 13 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
LHX L3Harris425%1 of 4 questions
BA The Boeing Company2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
HWM Howmet Aerospace1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • LHX
    L3Harris · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • BA
    The Boeing Company · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • HWM
    Howmet Aerospace · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q310%none of 1 question1
2024 Q4110%none of 11 questions8
2025 Q1911%1 of 9 questions7
2025 Q21020%2 of 10 questions9
2025 Q3110%none of 11 questions9
2025 Q41315%2 of 13 questions10
2026 Q1157%1 of 15 questions11
2026 Q21127%3 of 11 questions9
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q411 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 8 companies
  3. 2025 Q19 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 7 companies
  4. 2025 Q210 questions · challenge rate 20% (2 of 10 questions) · 9 companies
  5. 2025 Q311 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 11 questions) · 9 companies
  6. 2025 Q413 questions · challenge rate 15% (2 of 13 questions) · 10 companies
  7. 2026 Q115 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 15 questions) · 11 companies
  8. 2026 Q211 questions · challenge rate 27% (3 of 11 questions) · 9 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand33
  • Margin20
  • Supply Chain11
  • Regulation Policy10
  • Cost Pressure9
  • Competitive Dynamics9
  • Pricing7
  • Capital Allocation6
  • Product Launch6
  • Revenue Growth6
Show all 19 topics
  • Guidance Reliability6
  • M&A6
  • Capex Investment4
  • Trade Tariffs4
  • Macroeconomic3
  • Geographic Expansion3
  • Labor Market2
  • Innovation & R&D1
  • Inventory1