Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Gil Luria

D.A. Davidson · covers Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q3 (8 quarters).

Questions
14on tracked calls
Challenge rate
14%2 of 14 questions
Companies
2questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right. See how we grade analysts on earnings-call questions.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 14 of 14 questions from 2 companies

SOUNSoundHound AI, Inc.12 questions · 7 reporting periods · 2 of 12 challenging
SOUN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

talk about what the components are for those -- for that deal what's the scope?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Described it as a channel customer 8-figure commitment to use OASYS across customers in 20 countries.

reviewing the guidance that we have as of today for the two scenarios.

Guidance ReliabilityM&ATranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Said guidance excludes LivePerson and it will update once the deal closes; next-year target at least $350-400M.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I think it will help investors get into your mindset, especially as you're making larger and larger acquisitions

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Explained buying distressed but strong-customer businesses at attractive valuations and turning them around.

which is to say you do plan on some attrition of that business, planned attrition of that business moving forward

ChallengingM&AGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

COO said it models ARR, churn and pipeline conservatively, targeting a transformational turnaround.

Calendar 2025 Q4

is there anything to call out as to why you had particularly prominent success in that vertical this quarter?

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Cited China, India and a prominent Japan OEM win, and the Pillar 3 voice commerce flywheel.

Calendar 2025 Q3

which verticals do you think they will specifically have an impact?

Show response

Cited enterprise adjacencies in retail, auto, tech, financial services and healthcare, contemplated in the outlook.

Is it too much for us to think of this as maybe a humanoid robotics?

Product LaunchRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Confirmed a robotics company, not a humanoid, with double-digit-million committed over 2 to 3 years.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Who are you competing with to get that business and how are you able to differentiate

Competitive DynamicsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Said it competes with similar and legacy names in China and wins on technology quality and language coverage.

How would you rank the contribution of the different verticals in terms of the contribution to the sequential growth?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Declined to rank precisely, citing broad-based momentum led by enterprise.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how should we think about the levels that the first verticals are at?

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Described well-balanced contribution across auto, restaurants, financial services, healthcare and hospitality.

Are the solutions that we're talking about solutions that we're still experimenting with customers?

ChallengingCloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Argued SoundHound has pioneered agentic-style behavior for over a decade and has live production experience.

Calendar 2024 Q4

that backlog number has grown quite a bit. Can you give us a couple more parameters around it?

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Answered duration (~6 years) and described vertical balance shifting from auto toward restaurants and enterprise.

PLTRPalantir Technologies2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
PLTR company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

When you get a CEO that's still unconvinced, what kind of analogies and metaphors can you use

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Karp said demand exceeds capacity so Palantir rarely tries to win lab customers and called Anthropic a symbiotic partner; he gave no analogies, only noting it educates clients on closed-model risk.

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you choose a lab and you buy the orchestration and the consulting and the harnesses from them

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Karp said Palantir already lets government customers swap models and cast lab lock-in as monopoly behavior; Sankar added customer-specific benchmarks let clients pick the right model per workflow.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
SOUN SoundHound AI, Inc.1217%2 of 12 questions
PLTR Palantir Technologies2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • SOUN
    SoundHound AI, Inc. · 12 questions
    17%2 of 12 questions
  • PLTR
    Palantir Technologies · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q410%none of 1 question1
2025 Q1250%1 of 2 questions1
2025 Q220%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2025 Q410%none of 1 question1
2026 Q1250%1 of 2 questions1
2026 Q230%none of 3 questions2
2026 Q310%none of 1 question1
  1. 2024 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  3. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  4. 2025 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q41 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
  6. 2026 Q12 questions · challenge rate 50% (1 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  7. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  8. 2026 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Revenue Growth6
  • Demand5
  • M&A4
  • Cloud & AI3
  • Competitive Dynamics3
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Product Launch1
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Innovation & R&D1