Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Glenn Santangelo
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (3 quarters).
- Questions
- 18on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 22%4 of 18 questions
- Companies
- 8questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 3with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 18 of 18 questions from 8 companies
VTRSViatris5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I was kind of curious if you could comment on the durability of the strength there. And then should these fire-related disruptions be contained to just 2026?
Show response
Scott affirmed China durability into 2027; Paul said Nashik impact peaks in Q3, moderates in Q4, and is short-term; direct.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the growth rate doubled in that geography. And so I'm trying to get a better sense of the stability of -- or I shouldn't say stability, the durability of that strength
Show response
Scott cited strongest China market he has seen since the late 1990s. Paul noted China outlook raised from low single digits to mid-to-high single digits but acknowledged dynamic policy risk. Corinne highlighted e-commerce doubling and business transitioning from hospitals to retail/e-commerce for policy resilience.
boil it down a little bit for investors in terms of what you think the biggest opportunities are here over the next 12 months
Show response
Philippe confirmed US priorities: XULANE LO (PDUFA July), meloxicam (PDUFA TBD). Japan: pitolisant approval and Nefecon data. Longer term: cenerimod data late 2026/early 2027, selatogrel first half 2027.
Calendar 2025 Q4
if we call it net $400 million of savings over the next three years, maybe for modeling purposes, if you could just sort of help us
Show response
Doretta provided 30/30/40 phasing over 2026-2028 with full run rate benefits in 2029. Sequencing reflects timing of workforce actions and efficiencies. Savings expected to support EBITDA growth and margin expansion.
you seemed to mention a path to mid-single-digit revenue growth, and I fully understand that is not where we are today
Show response
Scott laid out the path: growing base business at low single digits, plus 2026 launches (EFFEXOR, Quinlo, Ryzumvi, potentially meloxicam), plus 2027+ data readouts (selatogrel, cenerimod), plus BD growth assets. All together supports mid-single-digit trajectory.
CORCencora3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
I want to separate specialty into Part D versus Part B, as I think there's a very important distinction here
Show response
Bob framed biosimilars as good for Cencora overall: Part D is only incrementally positive (revenue pressure when brands convert, limited profit), while Part B buy-and-bill is the larger profit opportunity through distribution, GPO, and MSO wraparound services. Eva added utilization rebounded sequentially.
Calendar 2026 Q1
we're hearing concerns from investors that the lower-priced biosimilars could potentially have a negative impact on some of the profit pools in your specialty
Show response
Bob separated Part D (biosimilar bypasses wholesaler like oral generics, revenue hit but not meaningful profit hit) from Part B (biosimilar conversion incrementally beneficial to practices and Cencora). Both dynamics contemplated in planning.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I think what the market's kinda confused a little bit about is the deceleration, Jim, that we saw in that in the US segment from the September to the December
Show response
Jim explained Q1 US OI of 21% growth, ex-RCA still at high end of 7-10% LRP despite oncology customer headwind. Core drivers unchanged: utilization trends, specialty performance, health systems strength. FY26 ex-RCA/OneOncology still within LRP range.
CAHCardinal Health2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you get squeezed in any way at the distributor level from the IRA price reductions
Show response
CEO emphasized that distribution fee-for-service economics should not change as Cardinal is the lowest-paid component of the supply chain. MSO drug spend exposure is diversified with only about 1/3 being drug spend.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm kind of curious if you could just give us a little bit more details there and what's maybe driving that? Is it greater generic introductions or is it greater penetration
Show response
Jason attributed generics strength to utilization/volume rather than spread or new item launches. Consistent market dynamics maintained. Good service levels supportive of volume trends. Aaron noted business managed to average margin per unit, with new customer onboarding also contributing to volume.
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In the past, you told us that Eucalyptus was currently generating about a breakeven margin. Is that still the case?
Show response
Yemi put Eucalyptus at breakeven to moderate losses and said international would be near or at breakeven, but declined to speak to 2027 margins specifically.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I just want to follow up on the 4Q U.S. revenue number being up 17%.
Show response
Yemi acknowledged a shift to lower revenue per order and larger GLP-1 ticket sizes but did not quantify the compounded GLP-1 contribution.
HSICHenry Schein2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
give us maybe a better sense for where the market share is coming from
Show response
Fred cited own-brand outgrowth, DSO strength, episodic-to-active customer conversion and exclusive products; Ron said the quarter was steady April to June.
Calendar 2026 Q1
can you give us some color about how the quarter maybe played out sequentially
Show response
Fred confirmed sequential improvement through Q1 with March stronger than February, driven mainly by flu season softness rather than weather. April continues to be strong.
MCKMcKesson Corporation2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
more than 1/3 of the oncology market that's clearly going to be impacted by either the IRA or a biosimilar transition
Show response
Brian explained biosimilar economics sit between generics and brands. Network effects in U.S. Oncology enable uniform rapid adoption, creating manufacturer value that compensates GPO and distribution.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I'm just kind of curious if you're seeing anything that registers on on your radar screen positively or negatively heading into fiscal four q and fiscal twenty seven
Show response
Britt pushed back on deceleration concern, emphasizing the NAP OP guidance raise from 5-9% to 8-12% reflects strong specialty distribution growth, operational excellence, and stable utilization. Width of range unchanged.
Show 2 more companies
ALGNAlign Technology1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you confirm, is that in the right ZIP code? And I'm just kind of curious if there's been any impact on the iTero manufacturing facility there.
Show response
John confirmed Middle East is single-digit percentage of revenue. Joe said no iTero production/shipment disruption in Q1, team responded well. On buybacks: constrained by 20% U.S. cash ratio; disciplined $200M tranches is their plan.
ZTSZoetis1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
is it fair to say that the first quarter will have the strongest growth, or you are saying no because it will be comparable versus restated numbers in 1Q 2025?
Show response
Wetteny declined to guide by quarter. Confirmed recast financials will be provided when fiscal year alignment is implemented. Reiterated full-year guidance and pointed to puts and takes around comp timing and competitive launch windows.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VTRS Viatris | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| COR Cencora | 3 | 33%1 of 3 questions |
| CAH Cardinal Health | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| HIMS Hims & Hers Health, Inc. | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| HSIC Henry Schein | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| MCK McKesson Corporation | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ALGN Align Technology | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| ZTS Zoetis | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- VTRSViatris · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- CORCencora · 3 questions33%1 of 3 questions
- CAHCardinal Health · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc. · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- HSICHenry Schein · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- MCKMcKesson Corporation · 2 questions—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ALGNAlign Technology · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
- ZTSZoetis · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q1 | 7 | 29%2 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2026 Q2 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 4 |
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q17 questions · challenge rate 29% (2 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 4 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth7
- Pricing5
- Competitive Dynamics5
- Guidance Reliability3
- Demand3
- Regulation Policy2
- Margin2
- Supply Chain2
- Product Launch2
- M&A1
Show all 14 topics
- Geographic Expansion1
- Macroeconomic1
- Innovation & R&D1
- Cost Pressure1