Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Guy Hardwick

Barclays · covers Technology, Industrials

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q3 (9 quarters; questions recorded in 8).

Questions
40on tracked calls
Challenge rate
8%3 of 40 questions
Companies
7questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 40 of 40 questions from 7 companies

ZBRAZebra Technologies11 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
ZBRA company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

in EMC, what do you think kind of just in EMC, what sort of price increases are you realizing?

Show response

Winters said pricing realization is fairly well split, though EMC takes a bit longer given the project-based deals. The vast majority of the Q2 price increase was for the mobile computing portfolio, roughly half the quarter's increase, with strong realization also in print and other parts of the portfolio. Management expects mobile computing pricing to increase further into the back half of the year.

can you tell us what's happening in pricing? Is pricing being realized more quickly than you realized?

PricingCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Winters confirmed the expected pricing benefit against the $120M gross memory headwind rose from $60M to $90M, primarily due to Q2 strength. A key difference this time: the team proactively quoted deals at the higher price starting early in the year, ahead of the late-March price increase, embedding incremental pricing into pipeline projects. That execution gives confidence to deliver the back-half offset and continue increasing it into Q4 and 2027 to fully mitigate the exposure.

Calendar 2026 Q1

whether the changes in the tariff regime could have had any impact on the business, either positive or negatively in Q1

Show response

Winters said IEEPA elimination largely offset by Section 122. Minimal Q1 P&L impact due to timing and inventory carryover. Small Q2 benefit. Full year assumes replacement rates in H2 (Section 301 or similar). No material change to full-year guidance from tariff regime changes.

do you expect any impact from a lag of recovery in any 1 quarter

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Winters said Q2 is the cost inflection point with a step-change from Q1. Modest sequential increases in Q3 and Q4 but mitigated by increasing price realization on Zebra's products. No particular macro or market-driven reason beyond inventory timing and cost flow through the P&L.

Calendar 2025 Q4

it appears the midpoint of your Q1 revenue guidance suggests revenues are above Q4, which is much better than seasonality. Any particular reasons for that

DemandGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Burns cited entering 2026 with momentum from manufacturing recovery, machine vision pipeline, and RFID. Winters added atypical linearity over past two years, no Q4 year-end spending surge, and Elo's more linear revenue pattern all explain Q1 in line with Q4.

do you have much visibility to the back end of the year in terms of what could be the annualized impact

Cost PressureSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winters said pricing visibility extends through mid-year from supplier quotes, with back-half assumptions incorporated into guidance. Suggested annualizing the Q2-Q4 run rate to approximate the ongoing impact. Not materially different from what 2026 guide reflects.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what point does technological obsolescence on the installed base in EMC actually force customers to drive to upgrade if they really want to benefit from Agentic AI

Show response

Burns said AI requires faster processors and more memory for on-device model execution. Combined with cloud AI depending on application. Mobile device base has grown since pre-pandemic. Refresh cycle will be multiyear sustainable growth driver, not a compressed acceleration cycle. Cybersecurity and device health are additional refresh drivers.

Where do you think that goes to long term? And what do you think the kind of the footprint of contract manufacturers will look like, say, a year from now

Supply ChainTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Winters said China mix will reach into the teens but faces a floor from sole-source components and service parts. Focus is broader resilience with multiple manufacturing options globally. Learned over past 5 years that disruptions are inevitable, so building a supply chain that can flex across geographies.

Calendar 2025 Q1

it looks like seasonality Q1 was better than normal seasonality. Like, on a sequential basis

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Burns attributed above-seasonal performance to broad-based growth, with retail/e-commerce and healthcare leading at double digits, T&L strong, and manufacturing at high single digits.

Calendar 2024 Q4

could you talk maybe what you think the business model could look like for Zebra Companion three to four years out

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Burns outlined three revenue streams: premium hardware, market share gains from innovation leadership, and recurring SaaS from AI agents, but noted projections are still being developed.

I'm just wondering whether you saw any pre-buy activity in Q4 or early Q1 in getting ahead of tariffs by customers

Trade TariffsDemandTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Burns stated no tariff-driven pre-buying activity was observed; the larger Q4 retail orders were driven by yearend spending, not tariff front-running.

GWWW. W. Grainger6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 6 challenging
GWW company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm wondering if you could maybe expand a little bit more about the impact of large projects.

Show response

CEO confirmed large project spend is dilutive to gross margin but not to operating margin, and is a revenue tailwind.

Calendar 2026 Q1

does that give you room for investing more for organic market share gains, or do the inflationary pressures preclude that?

Capex InvestmentCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO said budgets unlikely to change mid-year. Investment decisions based on long-term cause-and-effect, not short-term trading results.

on SG&A growth of 6%, is that a sensible number to use for the rest of the year?

Cost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed 5.5% to 6% SG&A growth is the right range for the full year.

Calendar 2025 Q4

should we assume that your OpEx is factored in that higher merchandising and marketing expense for 2026

Competitive DynamicsMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

DG confirmed higher merchandising and marketing expense is factored into 2026 OpEx to support improved outgrowth.

the growth in underlying operating expenses was 5%. It looks like the guidance for this year is better than that, like just on the 4%

Show response

DG attributed OpEx improvement primarily to Cromwell exit plus leverage improvement in both EA and High Touch segments.

Calendar 2025 Q3

warehousing is down mid-teens, which is sharply against the kind of trend or slightly up, slightly down

ChallengingDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

DG attributed warehousing decline entirely to a single customer contract adjustment.

TDYTeledyne Technologies6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TDY company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering if you could maybe update us on your margin outlook, particularly in digital imaging, where it seems that you've had a positive mix effect with the industrial scientific cameras pic...

Show response

Full year margins up ~60bps led by DI at 105-107bps expansion. A&D not far behind at ~70bps. FLIR improving plus legacy DI recovery driving margin mix.

just generally talking about your, say, long cycle versus short cycle trends, it sounds like you don't think there's a bump to the order book in the defense side

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Corrected misconception, defense orders are way up and expected to accelerate further. Munitions consumption in Middle East driving replacement demand.

Calendar 2025 Q4

In digital imaging, was the FX contribution in the quarter?

Show response

Full year FX ~40bps total company. Started negative, ended Q4 at 80bps positive. Not a significant driver.

I just wonder how you guys feel about M and A, particularly maybe larger M and A versus share repurchases.

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

More encouraged about M&A pipeline for 2026 vs 2025. Range of ~$1B deals coming (PE exits). Q4 buybacks were opportunistic, not systematic. $1.2B total buybacks in 26-year history. Prefer acquisitions and organic investment (CapEx +40%, R&D +10% in 2025).

Calendar 2025 Q3

is R&D a permanent step-up effectively funded by the reduction in the cost base? And kind of looking a bit further forward for 2026 as a follow-up to Damian's question about the top line, what kind...

Innovation & R&DMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

R&D investment targeted: protocol/oscilloscope convergence, infrared sensor development (supplier to nearly all U.S. drone makers), high-end oscilloscopes. George: 2026 margin mix roughly neutral, MV recovery positive, defense growth slightly negative on mix. Cost reduction benefits carry forward.

Calendar 2025 Q1

could you mind just maybe explain a little bit more about the Canadian business? I mean, your filings reveal it's a substantial business.

Trade TariffsGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

~2,000 employees in Canada, ~$500M revenue. ~70-80% commercial, 20-30% government. DoD exemptions apply to Canadian-made unmanned vehicles for U.S. military. Manufacturing spread across Western countries reduces concentration risk.

TRMBTrimble Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TRMB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

what could we hear about 2028 targets or beyond? Is that something you would look at maybe later this year

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rob affirmed 3-4-30 on track for 2027. Not ready for 2028 targets yet. Planning first developer conference as part of Trimble Dimensions in Las Vegas in November, inviting analysts to see company in action.

you beat by $0.07, you lifted the guide by $0.04. So I'm just kind of wondering

Guidance ReliabilityMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Rob explained his policy of not raising full-year guide significantly after just Q1. No pull forward. Beat and raise within framework of holding the model for the year. Will update in 3 months.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Just wondering if you could point to any contribution to ARR or ACV from AI products

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Rob quantified autonomous procurement as double-digit millions standalone. Broader AI-enabled revenue well over $100 million. Reality capture AI classification highlighted as growth area within Field Systems.

How much do you think AI has contributed to that? And maybe a sense of how much -- give us a sense of how much you can contribute in 2026

Show response

Rob detailed efficiencies across stack: COGS (20% case deflection), R&D (95%+ engineer adoption, double-digit productivity gains), sales (AI call coaching and pipeline creation), G&A (expects more unlocks in next couple of years).

Calendar 2025 Q3

That's for Q4 guidance in terms of the margins relative to the revenue in terms of the revenue growth

MarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Rob explained continued investment in marketing, systems, and process work to accelerate 2026 bookings. Putting pedal on investments to ensure ARR trajectory aligns with 3-4-30 model.

how do you feel about 2026 as that's stepping stone to 2027 and the 2027 framework? Do you feel kind of ahead or behind

Revenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Phil said current performance improves confidence around 2027 numbers. Still early in 2026 planning but previewed mid- to high single-digit growth. More details at next earnings call.

APHAmphenol5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 1 of 5 challenging
APH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

CommScope is generally known, correct me if I am wrong, as a scale out and scale across company and data center.

M&ACompetitive DynamicsCloud & AITranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Norwitt said future architectures remain to be seen but expects hybrids, and claimed CommScope has a seat at the table for scale up optics via Amphenol relationships.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Just how do we square that with the Q1 revenue guidance of $7 billion

ChallengingDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Norwitt explained extended order windows and capacity investment commitments from customers mean Q4 orders will carry through well beyond Q1. Declined to guide on future quarter orders.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you kind of allay any concerns about Amphenol content on, say, the the Khyber architecture due to coming 2027

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Norwitt declined to discuss specific architectures but emphasized multi-decade capability build-up in high-speed and power, with strong position on future platforms across the full AI stack.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how they respond in these environments to whether it's tariffs, or supply chain issues?

Trade TariffsSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Norwitt gave detailed explanation of decentralized tariff management approach, emphasizing product-level tailored responses rather than blanket pricing actions.

Calendar 2024 Q4

What's driving the growth beyond just broadening improvement in military budgets? Are you in particular areas where there is unmanned systems

DemandInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Norwitt described broad-based defense growth across space, vehicles, airframe, and communications with particularly strong European performance driven by next-gen electronics spending.

TELTE Connectivity4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
TEL company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

my question is actually on the 30%, which is AI or cloud related. enterprise telecom, which potentially could be squeezed for or competing for dollars from -- for AI because of AI investments

Show response

Terrence confirmed enterprise, telecom, and wireless spending is constructive with nice growth, though not at AI's 60% growth rate. Not seeing AI crowding out spending in these adjacent categories. Order trends showing growth in non-AI DDN product categories.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Was that down to easy comparatives? I know in the slide deck, you said that's growth driven by Asia and Europe. But in terms of order momentum, what would you say the outlook is for commercial tran...

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Terrence acknowledged easier comps contributed to 16% growth. China, Europe, and India seeing genuine truck and construction equipment build improvements. Global truck build expected up 200 bps for the year with TE confident in outgrowing that. North America truck still negative, the key wildcard to watch.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Can you tell me what's driving that? I assume it's cloud companies pushing their on-premise customers to the cloud, and they seem to be growing at 20%. So just wondering how much visibility you hav...

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Terrence confirmed cloud non-AI revenue doubled from $250M to $500M driven by infrastructure upgrades. May not have as much content per unit as AI but should sustain nice growth. Cascade effect from high-end compute driving broad infrastructure refresh. Next-gen server speeds benefit TE's broad product set.

Calendar 2024 Q3

in Q4, the Transportation margin was a little bit below consensus expectations, and I understand it's due to investment

ChallengingMarginCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Heath attributed Q4 softness to timing of investments. Not worried given full-year trajectory. Incrementals from commercial transport recovery plus auto growth would support margin expansion above 20%.

Show 1 more company
FASTFastenal2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
FAST company page →

Calendar 2026 Q3

helped by the headcount reduction or the natural reduction in head count. And is that sort of a trend going forward

Cost PressureLabor MarketTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Max named headcount then occupancy as drivers and called the labor productivity structural rather than a one-time blip.

should we assume that Q4 and perhaps into next year, you still have the mix headwind of large customers growing faster

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Max framed a 50 to 60bps annual mix headwind and said lapping Q4 2025's 50bps timing drag should largely offset it in Q4.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
ZBRA Zebra Technologies110%none of 11 questions
GWW W. W. Grainger617%1 of 6 questions
TDY Teledyne Technologies60%none of 6 questions
TRMB Trimble Inc.60%none of 6 questions
APH Amphenol520%1 of 5 questions
TEL TE Connectivity425%1 of 4 questions
FAST Fastenal2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • ZBRA
    Zebra Technologies · 11 questions
    0%none of 11 questions
  • GWW
    W. W. Grainger · 6 questions
    17%1 of 6 questions
  • TDY
    Teledyne Technologies · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • TRMB
    Trimble Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • APH
    Amphenol · 5 questions
    20%1 of 5 questions
  • TEL
    TE Connectivity · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • FAST
    Fastenal · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q31100%1 of 1 question1
2024 Q430%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q2No questions recorded——
2025 Q3813%1 of 8 questions6
2025 Q41010%1 of 10 questions6
2026 Q190%none of 9 questions5
2026 Q240%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q320%none of 2 questions1
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q43 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q2No questions recorded
  5. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  6. 2025 Q410 questions · challenge rate 10% (1 of 10 questions) · 6 companies
  7. 2026 Q19 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 5 companies
  8. 2026 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  9. 2026 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand12
  • Margin11
  • Cloud & AI9
  • Revenue Growth8
  • Competitive Dynamics6
  • Cost Pressure5
  • Trade Tariffs5
  • Guidance Reliability4
  • M&A3
  • Capex Investment3
Show all 18 topics
  • Supply Chain3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Pricing2
  • Labor Market1
  • Macroeconomic1
  • Fx1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Geographic Expansion1