Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Harsh Kumar
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters; questions recorded in 7).
- Questions
- 39on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%2 of 39 questions
- Companies
- 7questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 39 of 39 questions from 7 companies
MCHPMicrochip Technology9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Is this a sort of a strategic shift where you will target more of leading-edge data center products
Show response
Steve confirmed strategic shift to include advanced-node, high-performance products alongside traditional MCU/analog. Data Center Solutions, AI business unit, and FPGA initiatives will pull overall CAGR higher. Series of new products planned across all three areas.
the analog business was a little bit slow to catch up. Most of the sales came from microcontroller on the incremental side
Show response
Steve noted MCU and analog growth alternate quarter to quarter. June quarter analog led; September quarter MCU led with 9.7% growth. With thousands of customers, contributions are never perfectly linear.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I was hoping that just outside of defense, if you could just talk about in September, which ones -- how do you see auto versus pure industrial playing out
Show response
Steve declined to break out specific end market performance, instead emphasizing broad-based growth across all product lines and geographies.
you feel like sell-through is equal or higher than the sell-in at your distributors? And if there's a gap, what kind of gap are
Show response
Eric confirmed $49.3 million sell-through gap versus $103 million prior quarter. Steve noted inventory declined from 266 to 251 to 214 days with target of 195-200 by September end.
Calendar 2025 Q1
maybe talk about the demand signals that you're seeing, which you kind of did, but there is also another aspect of maybe potential pull-ins from tariffs
Show response
Steve confirmed demand signals predated tariff concerns and cited A&D growing to 17-18% of revenue as a standout market. Semiconductors currently exempt from tariffs.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Sounds like from the answer you just gave to Blayne, I think you said that OpEx will come down from the current level in absolute dollars
Show response
Steve confirmed the plan assumes some recovery driven by inventory depletion and new design wins, but details deferred to March 3.
how your organization would even try to gauge the correct level of channel inventory or direct inventory
Show response
Steve cited 2.5-3 months of sell-through as the historical norm for distributor inventory and sees no reason it wouldn't return to that level.
Calendar 2024 Q3
I was curious if you could give us some color on these green shoots. Are these green shoots getting stronger for you
Show response
Ganesh candidly said green shoots have lost some intensity. Expedites and pull-ins continue rising but customer confidence to place backlog remains lacking.
are you starting to see any pressure at this point in time or is pricing still pretty firm
Show response
Ganesh acknowledged pressure from purchasing managers but said pricing is not the gross margin driver; underutilization is the real issue.
MRVLMarvell Technology7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
what is your comfort level? And what is the visibility on some of this long-term revenue materializing that you're talking about
Show response
Murphy explained multi-year visibility comes from customer planning cycles requiring 6-8 quarter forward coordination on R&D, capacity, and ramps. Called FY2027 and FY2028 forecasts 'base case, not dream the dream.'
at least 20% to me seems like that's what's in the bag. But maybe you could give us a sense of what -- if everything worked out right
Show response
Murphy guided to model 20% as safe base case, noting it's tied to handful of programs. Upside possible but being conservative given historical noise. Second half and exit rate much higher than first half, building momentum into FY2028.
Calendar 2025 Q3
how many of them are actually producing revenues today? I want to understand kind of like where we are today
Show response
Koopmans confirmed several programs already in production since late 2024, with new programs moving to production every quarter. Murphy cited strong design win momentum since AI Day across hyperscalers and emerging customers.
Calendar 2025 Q2
hopefully, can talk about the on-prem piece if possible, or other parts that are moving
Show response
Murphy noted on-prem enterprise is small and relatively stable, not a meaningful drag going forward. Spending has shifted so dramatically to AI that on-prem is no longer a major contributor.
there's a desire on part of investors for the data center business to grow faster than, let's say, what you've been putting up mid-single
Show response
Murphy contextualized that Q1 followed a 20%+ sequential Q3-Q4 step-up. Year-over-year data center growing 70%+ at scale. AI is fastest growing portion and tracking toward majority of total company.
Calendar 2025 Q1
what are some of the triggers that might cause some of these customers to go look for another design partner
Show response
Murphy outlined barriers to entry: technology leadership, manufacturing scale, supply chain relationships, business model flexibility. Noted only Marvell and one competitor can service the market.
Can you help us think about what you mean by that? What is double-digits? Is it teens or higher than that
Show response
Murphy declined to give more precision beyond 'above 10%' for Q1 cloud+AI sequential growth, deflecting the request for teens-level detail.
ONON Semiconductor7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
it looks like industrial is rising faster. But I would think with the content and just the growth in the market, is it not fair for me to assume
Show response
El-Khoury said auto grew 70% over 5 years on flat SAAR from content growth. Sticking with high single-digit auto growth above SAAR. Trent said ~25% higher revenue needed for full utilization from consistent mix.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Could you give us a hint of maybe what backlog or bookings were? I'm trying to gauge that relative to your stabilization comment.
Show response
El-Khoury said don't read into QoQ, look at H2 vs H1. Auto bottomed in Q2 as guided. Growing closer to demand but no restocking. Visibility improved but not where they'd like. Managing with discipline.
is there a revenue number that I can think of where you start to get close to that 40% number? Or is it just purely a function of utilization
Show response
Trent confirmed 25-30bps per utilization point math still holds. Utilization will drive margin into 2026. El-Khoury added auto content grew 70% over 5 years on flat SAAR, sticking with high single-digit growth model.
Calendar 2025 Q2
if you can help us understand what are the major components of the other outside of the AI data center
Show response
El-Khoury said AI data center is the primary driver of Other segment growth. Client computing is a small piece. May provide more detail as AI DC becomes sizable.
Can I ask if there's an element of written-off inventory here as well that might come into play as you look at recovery?
Show response
El-Khoury said no inventory write-off benefit in recovery. 900bps is purely utilization-driven. Base inventory at 121 days is healthy within target. Strategic inventory will burn through.
Calendar 2024 Q4
are you trying to pad for some level of decline that you're building in based on your judgment, or are you strictly giving us a guide based on what you see?
Show response
El-Khoury said guidance is purely ON-specific data-driven, no padding. Highlighted internal and disti inventory discipline, disti down $55M in Q4.
if you were just to kind of give us an idea of what's your true demand estimate is. In other words, how much are you under-shipping
Show response
El-Khoury said exact under-shipping magnitude is unknown because demand itself hasn't stabilized. Managing to visible data rather than forecasting a snap-back.
QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc.6 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
How do you feel about how things are going there in terms of your ability to commercialize by that time frame that you mentioned?
Show response
Harsh Kumar now at BMO (previously Piper Sandler). Baratz said QCI integration is going well, remains on track for the 17-qubit system this year, with a mixed annealing/gate customer pipeline.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Can you help us think about the advantage with the built-in error correction that you have?
Show response
Baratz said dual-rail plus cryogenic control needs far fewer physical qubits per logical qubit and fewer control lines, giving a scaling and timing advantage.
Calendar 2025 Q3
is this a shift towards -- some attention towards an easing by the U.S. government?
Show response
Baratz said D-Wave seeks to solve government problems today rather than R&D funding, and agencies are starting to realize its systems can deliver value.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Is it possible that you could have libraries kind of like how NVIDIA does offer to its customers
Show response
Baratz said prebuilt libraries are possible but D-Wave is currently building applications on customer data with Japan Tobacco and Triumph rather than templated offerings.
Calendar 2025 Q1
Maybe you could clarify possible for us if this is another one of the three that you have been referring to previously.
Show response
Baratz said Davidson is a separate partnership focused on US defense optimization applications, not one of the previously referenced system-sale opportunities.
Calendar 2024 Q4
what does this mean for opening up the market for other people to be able to solve super complex problems
Show response
Baratz said this is the first tight integration with an exascale supercomputer, with joint AI-workflow research expected at Jülich.
SWKSSkyworks Solutions5 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
Was wondering if you could hit upon what maybe specifically are color-wise what you expect to see out of this deal on these kinds of fronts
Show response
Phil highlighted complementary technology portfolios, particularly in intensified products. Combination expected to reduce volatility, increase RF scale, bring valuable engineers, and create broad market synthesis.
how do you see the combined company having the right kind of portfolio? What will you be focused on within that portfolio to address your customers' needs?
Show response
Phil described broadest RF portfolio in the industry from antenna to pads. AI workloads moving to edge increase transmit capability requirements. Combination also provides platform for WiFi and other wireless innovation.
Calendar 2025 Q3
you mentioned in your comments that you've streamlined sales, which I think was part of the problem. I was curious what just at a very high level, what you've done
Show response
Phil moved product marketing functions from a centralized group back into business units for tighter engineering alignment. Sales team now focused on revenue generation and customer acquisition. New sales executive bringing fresh perspective.
what has changed or what didn't happen or maybe what went right for you, was it units? Or was it share or just traction in other areas
Show response
Phil attributed outperformance to both stronger units and favorable phone mix toward models with higher Skyworks content. Noted these factors are difficult to predict 3-4 quarters out. Forward guidance comprehends previously disclosed content decline.
Calendar 2025 Q1
I wanted to ask you about follow up maybe on the new modem at this large customer and what that means to you
Show response
Phil pointed to secular trends driving RF content growth: more transmit power, new frequency bands, MIMO. Baseband choice may create incremental opportunities. Would not confirm specifics.
AVGOBroadcom Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q4
your guide in AI Hock and Kirsten is calling for almost $1.7 billion of sequential growth. I was curious, maybe you could talk about the diversity of the growth between the three existing customers
Show response
Hock disclosed backlog mix: ~$53B XPUs, ~$20B networking/DSPs/optics. Said silicon photonics will be deployed 'not anytime soon', copper and pluggable optics still hold in scale-up.
Calendar 2025 Q3
why should I not think that your XPU share at these three or four customers that that are existing will be bigger than the GPU share in the longer term
Show response
Hock confirmed XPU share will grow multi-generationally at each customer as software stacks stabilize and models improve, progressive share gains across generations.
Calendar 2025 Q1
the importance of when the customer's making a selection, you know, choosing between a guy that has the best switch ASICs such as you, versus a guy that might have to compute there
Show response
Hock said hyperscalers choose proven networking technology above all, Broadcom's 10+ year track record in switching and routing plus doubled Tomahawk 5 radix for a specific hyperscaler drives preference.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Is there a simple dollar metric that we can think of for network attached to XPUs
Show response
Hock explained networking content expands near-exponentially as clusters scale, growing from 5-10% to 15-20% of AI silicon. Sovereign data centers stick to merchant silicon due to lacking custom software stacks.
Show 1 more company
ADIAnalog Devices1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q1
what is the confidence level that this is not a head fake? I know you're talking about increased orders and normalization of inventory, but there's a lot of geopolitical movement
Show response
Vince cited sell-through/POS as the key signal, diversity of recovery across markets and geographies (US and China strongest), while acknowledging geopolitical turmoil as the governor on recovery pace.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| MCHP Microchip Technology | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| MRVL Marvell Technology | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions |
| ON ON Semiconductor | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc. | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| SWKS Skyworks Solutions | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| ADI Analog Devices | 1 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
- MCHPMicrochip Technology · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- MRVLMarvell Technology · 7 questions14%1 of 7 questions
- ONON Semiconductor · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- QBTSD-Wave Quantum Inc. · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- SWKSSkyworks Solutions · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- AVGOBroadcom Inc. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- ADIAnalog Devices · 1 question—rate withheld: under 3 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q1 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q2 | 7 | 14%1 of 7 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q3 | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions | 6 |
| 2025 Q4 | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions | 5 |
| 2026 Q1 | No questions recorded | — | — |
| 2026 Q2 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
- 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2024 Q46 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q17 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q27 questions · challenge rate 14% (1 of 7 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q39 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 9 questions) · 6 companies
- 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 5 companies
- 2026 Q1No questions recorded
- 2026 Q21 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Revenue Growth14
- Demand14
- Cloud & AI11
- Innovation & R&D9
- Competitive Dynamics8
- Guidance Reliability5
- Inventory4
- Margin4
- M&A3
- Supply Chain2
Show all 17 topics
- Trade Tariffs2
- Cost Pressure1
- Capex Investment1
- Regulation Policy1
- Pricing1
- Product Launch1
- Macroeconomic1