Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Itay Michaeli

TD Cowen · covers Consumer Cyclical

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2025 Q1 – 2026 Q2 (6 quarters).

Questions
36on tracked calls
Challenge rate
0%none of 36 questions
Companies
5questioned at least once
Reporting periods
6with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 36 of 36 questions from 5 companies

GMGeneral Motors12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 12 challenging
GM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I do think the second half implied pricing does kind of moderate off the first half

Show response

Jacobson attributed softer second-half pricing purely to lapping model-year 2026 price actions, with the incentive environment staying consistent.

whether there's also some potential variable cost tailwind you could enjoy, just given the easing emissions standards

MarginRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Jacobson said current trucks already capture the emissions benefit; Gen 6 adds efficiency, but variable-profit upside is more a 2027-and-beyond story.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how should we think about the ARPU opportunity for the company on the upcoming SDV platform in 2028

Innovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul acknowledged lower per-unit ARPU vs Tesla but emphasized GM's scale advantage in volumes and deferred revenue; deferred specifics on SDV 2.0 pricing.

Can you talk about the offsets from a cost perspective or otherwise to the higher commodity inflation

Cost PressureGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Paul outlined Q1 outperformance bank plus proactive cost playbook as offsets, with measured approach to avoid jeopardizing long-term initiatives.

Calendar 2025 Q4

a question on the full-size pickup launch this year. I'm curious kind of what's embedded into the guide at a high level

Product LaunchPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Paul said retooling downtime will impact volumes this year with some build-ahead to offset. Pricing benefit largely a 2027 tailwind. Not expecting a giant price pop given pricing has held up on later model years unlike historical norms.

what you're assuming the declines in EV volume this year, how much of that could translate to incremental ICE demand for GM?

Show response

Mary said still six months from understanding steady-state EV demand post-incentive removal. Looking across portfolio for additional ICE volume but constrained by truck retooling downtime. Ended year below 50-60 day inventory target.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm just curious if you could talk about the extent of which over the next few years, it could allow you to sell more ICE full-size pickups and SUVs

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mary said Equinox has unmet demand, full-size SUVs are supply-constrained, and Orion will unlock capacity for Escalade and next-gen pickups. Mix of tariff mitigation and genuine incremental demand upside from ICE volume.

Curious how you're thinking about your next generations of Super Cruise. And maybe if you can also talk about where you are in the journal to -- the journey to personal AVs

Innovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Mary said Super Cruise now integrated with Google Maps for planned route following. Cruise team and GM working with trained test drivers to develop next-gen features. Sterling Anderson from Aurora now leading this activity. Next-gen SDV platform will be step-function improvement.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Any thoughts on where, you know, US dealer inventory could end the year roughly?

Show response

Paul said inventory target unchanged at 50-60 days. Noted some component supply was shifted to customer care and after-sales to address warranty repairs, which impacted wholesales. Expects ability to improve wholesale as warranty parts availability normalizes.

just given still the wide range second half of the year, $3.5 billion to $6 billion I'm just curious what some of the factors that that could materialize

Guidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Paul said they aim for midpoint convention. Upside from overperforming on tariff offsets; downside from higher tariff rates for longer. Will tighten range as year progresses and more is known.

Calendar 2025 Q1

how does that shape your pace of investments in AV and AI to capture more of that installed base revenue

Innovation & R&DCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mary said Cruise team integration going well. SDV platform timeline details coming later this year. Continuing to add Super Cruise features. Hired new head of AI working across business.

with this week's relief on parts tariffs, is there scope for the industry to also receive similar relief on the imported vehicle tariffs

Show response

Paul outlined three buckets of tariff mitigation: go-to-market pricing, cost reductions using COVID playbook, and footprint/supply chain responses. Said supply chain moves will take time.

APTVAptiv10 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
APTV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

the Q4 revenue guide still implies a pretty healthy uptick versus Q3. Maybe just talk about some of the drivers and puts and takes and degree of visibility kind of into that Q4 ramp

Revenue GrowthDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Varun attributed the Q4 ramp to lapping the North America supplier-fire comp, a software/services rebound after Q3 timing, and Engineered Components growth.

how some of the changes you're seeing in the second half of the year kind of inform you in terms of just the prior 4% to 7% growth framework into 2027 and beyond

DemandRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin reaffirmed the long-term framework but declined to give specific 2027 numbers, citing a dynamic environment and lower IHS production outlook.

Calendar 2026 Q1

Kind of curious happening on the auto side. Like are we finally seeing major sourcing decisions being made next-gen architectures

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed OEMs now making sourcing decisions on next-gen ADAS, UX, and SVA that had been pending. High confidence in $20B target contingent on Middle East situation not deteriorating further.

could you actually end up seeing -- or leverage our supply chain capabilities with OEMs, maybe kind of win more business going forward?

Supply ChainCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin noted supply chain capability is differentiating - informing OEMs of their pinch points, presenting alternatives with more Aptiv content. 12 weeks semi inventory and multi-year supplier contracts. Same capability selling into robotics/drones.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Hoping to get a little bit more color as to kind of how you see regional revenue progress this year.

Revenue GrowthGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Varun expects NA to lead (non-auto/software strength), China to improve in H2 after lapping Intelligent Systems headwinds, strong Japanese/Korean/India growth, Europe flat to slightly down.

Curious how you're thinking about just the FX commodity impact on new Aptiv kind of beyond 2026?

Show response

Kevin confirmed 200bps target intact. Stranded costs are 2026-specific, will exit in 2027-2028. Engineering/go-to-market investments also more 2026-weighted. Both provide margin tailwind in outer years.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I'm curious how you frame the opportunity within the Gen 8 radar products, if you think you might be able to gain share from other Tier 1s?

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin highlighted Gen 8 radar as industry-leading with share gain potential. Separate Pulse product leverages radar to replace ultrasonics, reducing OEM costs significantly.

I was hoping you could just share a bit more detail on some of the underlying assumptions for LVP, maybe mix, EV, anything you can share as well as if there are any puts and takes we should think o...

Revenue GrowthMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Kevin expects flat-to-slightly-down market for 2026 planning. Strong bookings, launch activity, annualized EV headwinds, and non-auto growth provide revenue acceleration. FX-adjusted margins expanding 120bps in 2025.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'm curious whether that does present any content opportunities for you on that presumably mix shift that may happen next year?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin confirmed content growth on large North American trucks already offsetting slower EV adoption headwind this year.

Just first question on the degree of visibility you have at the moment for Q4 production, the guidance I think implies healthy decline year-over-year

DemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin noted firm EDI schedules 2-4 weeks out, no significant changes, but conservative H2 assumption reflects potential pull-forward in H1.

FFord Motor Company6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
F company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was hoping we could do a bit of a second half versus first half, bridge for Blue and Pro

Guidance ReliabilityRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Management pointed to second-half volume recovery, with Ford Pro EBIT guided to $3.6-4.1B in H2 on additional Super Duty capacity, offset by higher commodities and UEV/Ford Energy investment.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I'm just curious sort of what's left to do here as you prepare for next year's launch?

Product LaunchCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Galhotra laid out four launch work streams (hardware, software, supplier readiness, equipment install), all on track, but declined to disclose top-hat count.

Calendar 2025 Q3

To what extent would that optimization end up pushing up your ATPs?

PricingRegulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Frick said ATPs already strong and above segment average. Emissions flexibility provides headroom to manage mix within vehicles, especially off-road derivatives like Tremor and Raptor.

if you could talk through the drivers behind Blue's improved pricing, I think $400 million was better

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Frick attributed Blue pricing to retail up 1.7% driven by tariff pricing, with fleet van business down but Super Duty and full-size pickup pricing remaining very strong. Pro services approaching 20% of EBIT.

Calendar 2025 Q1

How should we be thinking about Ford's plans for Level 3 autonomy? Any changes we should think about

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Farley said Level 3 is on track as an internally sourced product, BlueCruise above 370 million miles with 15% usage increase, and Level 4 partnerships being evaluated.

whether you would generally prioritize gaining some market-share due to your strong US position or whether you would look to participate

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTrade TariffsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Frick said Ford will evaluate share vs pricing trade-off vehicle-by-vehicle, channel-by-channel, taking profitable share gains where available.

LCIDLucid Group, Inc.6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
LCID company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I'm curious what the go forward kind of marketing and branding campaign might look like

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Napoli said a brand audit was just initiated to reposition the brand consistently with the product, promising more detail next quarter.

how you're able to improve unit economics and sort of maybe some targets there would be helpful

MarginCost PressureTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Napoli cited supplier support and configurator/trim simplification as levers but declined to give unit-economics targets.

Calendar 2025 Q4

I'm just curious if you're seeing any constraints with DRAM memory at all in production.

Supply ChainCost PressureTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winterhoff said no DRAM shortage now, only cost increases that are negligible relative to total BOM, but monitored daily.

kind of curious what sort of other milestones are there left to do between now and then

Product LaunchCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Winterhoff cited building four rounds of production validation vehicles and finishing Saudi equipment installation, validation and homologation.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how you're thinking about the time line for achieving Level 4 on consumer-owned vehicles?

Innovation & R&DProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Winterhoff declined a firm L4 date but said an L2+/L2++ release comes with Gravity and the Midsize launch by end of 2026, with OTA upgrades toward L4.

how should we think about just the deliveries with -- in relation to that production level

Show response

Winterhoff declined delivery guidance but expects a significant Q4 ramp led by Gravity; Boussaid said volume plus BOM gains should lower COGS per unit.

RIVNRivian Automotive, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
RIVN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

if it has any impact on your previous long-term financial targets of 25% gross margin

Show response

RJ said the capacity increase reflects confidence in the product after strong early R2 media and customer reception, and set up a foundation for R2, R3 and variants out of Georgia.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Curious how initial feedback has been since December

Innovation & R&DSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

RJ said universal hands-free covers about 3.5 million miles of roads and that point-to-point capability is coming later in the year, framing autonomy as an increasingly central purchase criterion.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
GM General Motors120%none of 12 questions
APTV Aptiv100%none of 10 questions
F Ford Motor Company60%none of 6 questions
LCID Lucid Group, Inc.60%none of 6 questions
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • GM
    General Motors · 12 questions
    0%none of 12 questions
  • APTV
    Aptiv · 10 questions
    0%none of 10 questions
  • F
    Ford Motor Company · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • LCID
    Lucid Group, Inc. · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • RIVN
    Rivian Automotive, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2025 Q140%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q240%none of 4 questions2
2025 Q380%none of 8 questions4
2025 Q470%none of 7 questions4
2026 Q160%none of 6 questions4
2026 Q270%none of 7 questions4
  1. 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q47 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2026 Q16 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  6. 2026 Q27 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 7 questions) · 4 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Demand9
  • Innovation & R&D8
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Margin6
  • Product Launch6
  • Revenue Growth5
  • Pricing5
  • Guidance Reliability3
  • Regulation Policy3
  • Cost Pressure3
Show all 19 topics
  • Subscriber Growth3
  • Supply Chain2
  • Capex Investment2
  • Inventory2
  • Cloud & AI2
  • Trade Tariffs2
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Fx1
  • Macroeconomic1