Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jade Rahmani
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).
- Questions
- 29on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 3%1 of 29 questions
- Companies
- 4questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 8with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 29 of 29 questions from 4 companies
CBRECBRE Group14 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 14 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
In terms of the 2027 commentary for EPS growth of at least 15%, is it reasonable to expect double-digit revenue growth?
Show response
Giamartino walked segment by segment, flagged advisory moderating from this year and REI roughly flat, and said leverage exists but is not substantial.
whether you see any risk of unbundling of services within property and facilities management
Show response
Sulentic addressed the disintermediation risk head-on across transactions, project management and facilities management, arguing labor intensity and platform tools protect the work.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Could you quantify what percentage of your teams are using it? And if you're limiting who can use it
Show response
Bob acknowledged AI cost control challenges without quantifying adoption percentage. COO Vikram Kohli oversees AI usage and cost management. Taking a measured approach where benefit must balance cost before expanding.
wondering if you can give any comment as to whether the pipeline has slowed at all. driven by the increase in rates
Show response
Emma confirmed no pipeline slowdown with Q2 pipeline stronger than beginning-of-year expectations. Activity continues to grow as long as 10-year remains around 4% to 4.5%.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Had CBRE experienced any of that? It doesn't seem that way from the disclosure, but I wanted to ask
Show response
Emma confirmed no fraud in CBRE's loan portfolio, citing rigorous underwriting. Loan loss reserves at ~$70M increase steadily with book growth but no spikes seen.
Do you expect there to be room for further improvement? Do you see margin expansion in 2026
Show response
Emma said BOE margins flat in 2026 due to proactive growth investments (data center solutions, Industrious, local Americas) offsetting operating leverage, with incremental expansion expected beyond 2026. Project Management expects some margin expansion.
Calendar 2025 Q3
It seems like the market has clearly turned a corner. Could you comment on what you think drove the growth in the quarter
Show response
Bob attributed growth to large leases in premium buildings plus smaller lease renewals in second-generation spaces. Expected vacancy to start declining by midyear next year.
Are you expecting kind of steady-ish full year EBITDA margins going forward? Or do you believe that there's still areas of growth
Show response
Emma provided segment-level outlook: Advisory near peak margins and sustainable; BOE delivering margin expansion this year with more synergies next year; Project Management also expecting incremental expansion from cost synergies.
if you believe it's becoming more widespread and that below Class A, Class B such assets, in secondary submarkets, is the next leg of growth
Show response
Bob confirmed demand spreading from Class A to lower-quality buildings being upgraded, with new office development starting. Cited a CBRE-owned Dallas site where large users are now interested, something that wouldn't have happened 3-4 years ago.
Calendar 2025 Q2
On free cash flow for the quarter, did it track with your expectations
Show response
Emma clarified Q1 slightly above and Q2 slightly below expectations due to timing; combined H1 tracking at 85% FCF conversion, high end of target range.
Are you focused on growing infrastructure services and asset management or Investment Management
Show response
Bob detailed extensive infrastructure exposure across Turner & Townsend, a $10 billion AUM infrastructure fund, Trammell Crow data center land work, and 700-800 managed data centers.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you're seeing any slowdown in activities within data centers, whether it be new deals or leasing
Show response
Bob noted Turner & Townsend at capacity despite some hyperscaler pullback; Trammell Crow development pipeline well protected by GMP contracts and contingencies against tariff-related cost increases.
Can you give any color on what drove the margin gains in Advisory and BOE? Net revenue was pretty close to our forecast
Show response
Emma attributed Advisory margins to higher-margin transaction revenue beating expectations; BOE margins driven by continued run-rate benefit from mid-2024 cost savings.
Calendar 2024 Q4
if you could comment on a few discrete earnings items, including integration and cost reduction charges, tax rate and share count
Show response
Emma confirmed GWS restructuring is complete with costs dropping to near-zero in 2025, tax rate normalizing to 22%, and $500M Q4 buyback plus remainder in Jan-Feb.
DHID. R. Horton11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 11 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
what's the outlook for stabilizing and moving that inventory?
Show response
Paul said DHI aims to hold total rental inventory around $3 billion, split $2.7 billion multifamily and about $320 million build-for-rent.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is there a multiple at which above book value, you don't think it makes sense and where you would look to rather lean on the dividend
Show response
Wheat said valuation is a component of distribution strategy but committed to distributing majority of cash flow. Dividend kept consistent with reluctance to reduce; share repurchase is the toggle mechanism.
Could you talk about what's driving these warranty and litigation benefits, which you've experienced for more than this quarter
Show response
Wheat said last 3 quarters had one-off warranty/litigation events. This quarter's 40bp benefit from favorable litigation outcome plus lower warranty costs. Expects normal 40-50bp negative impact going forward.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Could you give any color as to whether you think an allowance of four zero one k savings to be used for deposit, down payment would move the needle
Show response
Romanowski said anything helping buyers reach monthly payment or down payment thresholds would be helpful. First-time buyers need to solve for both. Impact depends on policy details.
If rate do move lower, do you think homebuilders will choose to pass along that saving to buyers rather than take
Show response
Murray said it depends on the community, where pace drives better returns they'll pass savings through, where supply is scarce they may improve margins. A balanced approach.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you think a step down in mortgage rate will translate into further mortgage buydowns. In other words, if you will pass on that improvement to buyers
Show response
Romanowski said they still solve for monthly payment. Lower market rates reduce buydown cost but they may also step down further if needed. Expects a balance of both outcomes.
have you seen any shift toward outright lower home base prices or savings in other areas over mortgage buy-downs
Show response
Romanowski said buyer preference still favors lower rate over base price cuts as it produces the most attractive monthly payment and builds more principal equity over time.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Can you discuss what you're seeing in the market in terms of home prices across the board? If you could quantify any, you know, range of price decline you're seeing
Show response
Hansen said they mainly use incentives rather than base price cuts, which are limited to targeted situations on completed aged inventory. Did not quantify price declines broadly.
And are you seeing competitors with your product primarily new home builders, but also any existing home market cut price
Show response
Murray said competitive pressures exist market by market but builders are generally taking a rational approach. Hansen echoed that most builders are balancing pace and price rather than slashing prices.
Calendar 2024 Q4
Can you comment on the pricing environment that's out there and whether the guidance assumes any price cuts
Show response
Modest ASP declines expected to continue, largely driven by incentive costs rather than base price cuts. Generally 1-2% sequential changes.
Calendar 2024 Q3
What level of rates would need -- would you need to see to spur demand and get buyers off the sidelines
Show response
Management emphasized rate stability over a specific rate level. Noted tighter trading band in Q3 correlated with stronger sales environment.
INVHInvitation Homes2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
if there are any markets that you were surprised with either their outperformance or underperformance relative to your expectations
Show response
Dallas praised operational teams on turnover and cost management. Florida renewals strong even while new lease softer. Atlanta generally strong. Chicago and Minneapolis outperforming for 4-6 quarters due to virtually no new supply over last decade creating catch-up growth.
Calendar 2025 Q2
It's clear that the Midwest has seen stronger rent growth recently. So do you view this trend as sustainable? And have you evaluated any acquisition opportunities there
Show response
Dallas attributed Midwest strength to decade of no development creating catch-up growth. Not a reason to pivot strategy, remains long on Sunbelt/Southeast for household formation and net migration.
LENLennar2 questions · 1 reporting period · 1 of 2 challenging
Calendar 2025 Q3
Can you say what quantity or percentage of year-to-date deliveries have come from Millrose?
Show response
Diane estimated about 25% of YTD deliveries from Millrose. Stuart expanded that they're focused on managing option costs across all land banking structures, not just Millrose.
as the 25% grows toward 100%, shouldn't that -- I think the market is assuming that would be a negative, an incremental headwind
Show response
Stuart pushed back on the single-source concern, emphasizing the business benefits from diverse land bank partners competing on cost. He framed it as building an industry solution rather than being dependent on Millrose alone.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| CBRE CBRE Group | 14 | 0%none of 14 questions |
| DHI D. R. Horton | 11 | 0%none of 11 questions |
| INVH Invitation Homes | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
| LEN Lennar | 2 | —Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions |
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q3 | 1 | 0%none of 1 question | 1 |
| 2024 Q4 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 2 |
| 2025 Q1 | 2 | 0%none of 2 questions | 1 |
| 2025 Q2 | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q3 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 4 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 2 |
| 2026 Q2 | 3 | 0%none of 3 questions | 2 |
- 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 0% (none of 1 question) · 1 company
- 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
- 2025 Q12 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
- 2025 Q25 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q38 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 4 companies
- 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 2 companies
- 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Margin8
- Capital Allocation7
- Demand7
- Pricing7
- Macroeconomic3
- Capex Investment3
- Revenue Growth2
- Guidance Reliability2
- Cloud & AI2
- Competitive Dynamics2
Show all 18 topics
- Cost Pressure2
- Innovation & R&D2
- Credit2
- Regulation Policy2
- Inventory1
- Supply Chain1
- Geographic Expansion1
- Trade Tariffs1