Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jamie Friedman

Susquehanna · covers Technology, Financial Services, Consumer Cyclical

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).

Questions
30on tracked calls
Challenge rate
10%3 of 30 questions
Companies
8questioned at least once
Reporting periods
7with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 30 of 30 questions from 8 companies

EPAMEPAM Systems8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
EPAM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

when can we expect it to lift total consolidated company growth?

Cloud & AIRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Fejes said AI native is 11% of the business on a deliberately narrow definition (excluding AI-assisted revenue) and expects it to start lifting overall growth once it crosses a threshold.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I want to get your perspective on the outlook that you had provided longer term at the Analyst Day for -- for the period 2027, 2028

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CFO confirmed profitability improvement on track with price gains in Q1, utilization improvements, lower bench costs, and improving seniority index. SG&A optimization expected more in out years as 2026 focuses on go-to-market investments.

you were mentioning that you're seeing opportunities in AI-enabled vendor consolidation. So I was hoping you could elaborate on that

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO described deploying AI/Run Transform playbook combining global capabilities augmented with AI to challenge the status quo in vendor landscapes. Leverages Level 1-3 AI SDLC maturity capabilities demonstrated at Investor Day to bring differentiated propositions to larger clients.

Calendar 2025 Q4

in terms of the journey to fixed price, which you've been talking about for a while, and it clearly evolved last year quite a bit. How should we be thinking about that as the impact on, say, free c...

PricingCapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO expects fixed-fee mix to continue increasing in 2026 but not dramatically (not going from 20% to 50%). Different fixed-fee types have varying cash flow impacts. Milestone payments could improve cash collection timing. Reiterated FCF conversion expected in 80-90% range. Share repurchases to remain active especially in H1 2026.

is that revenue per utilized had reflecting a better pricing environment?

PricingRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CFO acknowledged revenue per head improvement but attributed to multiple factors: FX, price, utilization, revenue recognition timing, and contractor mix not in denominator. Some specific Q4 revenue recognition where work done earlier was recognized in Q4. Even adjusted for these benefits, still had a beat vs original guidance.

Calendar 2025 Q3

in terms of like the vectors or phases that the customers need in order to proceed with agentic delivery

Cloud & AICompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO explained agentic development lifecycle is as complex or more complex than SDLC. Requires automating previously manual processes with ROI considerations. Companies will need to partner with firms like EPAM for AI factory model implementation.

Calendar 2025 Q1

The fixed price Jason, that you call it out, that did grow 19.4% up from 15.1%. I'm just be interested in your perspective both on your confidence on the delivery side

MarginCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO distinguished between traditional fixed-price risk and monthly fixed-fee arrangements. Noted acquisitions contributed to mix shift.

Calendar 2024 Q4

is the pricing, do you have any exposure to the run the business opportunities? Is it all really the change the business transformational side

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

CEO acknowledged pricing pressure across both run and change engagements, but expects change demand to help pricing improve.

ACNAccenture4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
ACN company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I was wondering if you could unpack some of the consulting by type of work, for example, technology consulting, strategy consulting.

DemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Julie said clients buy ROI-driven solutions across functions rather than discrete strategy vs technology consulting.

Can you talk about the evolution of fixed price? Is that type of work in particular demand?

Show response

Angie said fixed-price work is over 60% and rising, with no material margin difference versus other constructs.

Calendar 2025 Q3

how do you think about that requirement, which you have tremendous mindshare at, which is to do technology at scale?

Labor MarketCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Julie said this wave is moving faster than prior technology evolutions. They started from a strong base of 500K people already trained on classical AI from FY2019.

I'm actually asking about why you're saying you're not including data because we've sort of been trained that data is foundational

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Julie explained the metric isolates genuinely new AI spend. Data is critical and growing but is part of the digital core. One out of every two GenAI projects has significant data pull-through.

AFRMAffirm Holdings, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
AFRM company page →

Calendar 2026 Q1

I don't mean to front run the conversation next week, but if you might have any perspective on how that's evolving.

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Max said Adapt and Boost are now sold together and will be rebranded Affirm Checkout, with more stats reserved for the forum.

Calendar 2025 Q3

I wanted to ask about the continued hyper growth that you're seeing in 0% APRs.

Show response

Max said 0% participants skew higher credit quality and were mostly existing consumers; full 0% Days learnings come next quarter.

Calendar 2025 Q2

the AdaptAI deployments that show an average 5% increase in GMV. What is that about?

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Max explained AdaptAI automatically tunes the best financing offer per consumer, an early 5% GMV lift with more expected.

Calendar 2024 Q4

periodically though, you you do max share your own observations about market share?

Competitive DynamicsDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Michael did not break out a number but said Affirm is the fastest-growing of its large competitors, helped by distribution.

CTSHCognizant4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 2 of 4 challenging
CTSH company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you could help us think about how you are thinking about the sequential Q4 in particular on an organic basis

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Direct. Dalal named the three modeled variables, new/expansion bookings mix, deal ramps moving to billable, and lower assumed furloughs.

how is, Products and Resources performing relative to what you had expected when you closed the deal?

Show response

Partial. Kumar described Belcan-driven public sector traction and physical AI opportunity but gave no figures against the original deal expectations.

Calendar 2025 Q2

I'd just be curious if you could update us your perspective as to which of those because the chronology that you described was that it's now for all of them

Cloud & AIInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ravi confirmed Vector 1 (productivity) well ahead, with code generation at 30%. Vector 3 (agentification) surprisingly catching momentum with projects nearly doubling to 2,500.

When you say innovation, does that mean short duration discretionary? Because it doesn't seem like your guidance contemplates much cadence there

ChallengingDemandCloud & AITranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Ravi clarified innovation means using AI/Agentic to change processes, better experience, faster throughput, lower cost, not purely discretionary growth spend. Still runway on Vector 1.

FISVFiserv, Inc.4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
FISV company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

The organic revenue was down 8%. At the same time, looking at the slides, Finxact and core accounts grew pretty nicely

Revenue GrowthSubscriber GrowthTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Paul attributed the Financial Solutions -8% to nonrecurring revenue comps concentrated in the segment, arguing underlying volumes (Finxact, Zelle, accounts) continued to grow.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was wondering at a high level, if you could share your perspective on the competitive dynamic of Financial Solutions, specifically in Issuing and Banking

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Mike Lyons highlighted Finxact as largest modern core platform by accounts. Named Best SaaS for FinTech at 2026 FinTech Awards. Emphasized cloud-agnostic, asset-agnostic positioning and growing embedded finance space.

Calendar 2025 Q4

Obviously, posted negative organic growth in the quarter. I'm just wondering what from your perspective needs to change for that segment to reaccelerate

ChallengingRevenue GrowthCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Mike Lyons pointed to healthy underlying volumes not translating due to comparable headwinds. Paul Todd expects growth in all 3 FI business lines in H2 2026.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you could revisit where we are in the processing journey because it sounds like you're expecting that to improve

Show response

Bob Hau clarified processing grew 4% ex-term fee comp. Expects roughly flat to slightly positive over extended period as smallest merchant business line.

MELIMercadoLibre4 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
MELI company page →

Calendar 2025 Q4

In terms of the mix of on and off platform acquiring TPV, how does that mix impact, say, that the consolidated take rate of acquiring

Revenue GrowthRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Osvaldo clarified on-platform is in marketplace economics, not acquiring. Online has higher take rate than POS. Mexico interchange cap was postponed by the regulator.

Calendar 2025 Q3

one, how you're defining principality. And two, are there any services that you currently don't offer that you may contemplate offering

Subscriber GrowthCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Osvaldo defined principality as 50%+ of income flowing through Mercado Pago. Key missing feature is salary deposit capability, pending banking license in Mexico.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Is there any way to help unpack the mix shift to credit cards impacting the NIMAL. It was still good at 23%

Show response

Osvaldo explained NIMAL for credit card remains flat but improving for older segments. Argentina's declining inflation compressed its high NIMAL while its portfolio share increased.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was wondering if you could share any data that you might have on Credito (ph), the credit portfolio and it's attached rate to the marketplace

Show response

Osvaldo disclosed blue money (credit + Mercado Pago account) represents 20-30% of marketplace GMV depending on country, trending upward across all markets.

Show 2 more companies
VVisa Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
V company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

I wanted to ask about the delta between cross border and international revenue, the volume versus revenue mix.

Show response

Suh named both drivers directly: lapping last year's Q3 volatility peak and yield mix across clients, products and regions.

XYZBlock, Inc.1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
XYZ company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

does it lead to increased engagement or changes in ticket size? What sort of cohorts are embracing it?

Product LaunchDemandTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Thomas said tags launched in three form factors, sold out faster than expected with zero marketing, and Block is ramping production plus new colorways and collabs.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
EPAM EPAM Systems80%none of 8 questions
ACN Accenture40%none of 4 questions
AFRM Affirm Holdings, Inc.40%none of 4 questions
CTSH Cognizant450%2 of 4 questions
FISV Fiserv, Inc.425%1 of 4 questions
MELI MercadoLibre40%none of 4 questions
V Visa Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
XYZ Block, Inc.1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • EPAM
    EPAM Systems · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • ACN
    Accenture · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • AFRM
    Affirm Holdings, Inc. · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • CTSH
    Cognizant · 4 questions
    50%2 of 4 questions
  • FISV
    Fiserv, Inc. · 4 questions
    25%1 of 4 questions
  • MELI
    MercadoLibre · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • V
    Visa Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • XYZ
    Block, Inc. · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q130%none of 3 questions3
2025 Q2425%1 of 4 questions3
2025 Q350%none of 5 questions4
2025 Q4425%1 of 4 questions3
2026 Q140%none of 4 questions3
2026 Q2813%1 of 8 questions6
  1. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  2. 2025 Q13 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 3 companies
  3. 2025 Q24 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  4. 2025 Q35 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 5 questions) · 4 companies
  5. 2025 Q44 questions · challenge rate 25% (1 of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  6. 2026 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
  7. 2026 Q28 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 6 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Cloud & AI9
  • Revenue Growth9
  • Competitive Dynamics8
  • Demand5
  • Pricing5
  • Margin4
  • Innovation & R&D4
  • Credit3
  • Guidance Reliability2
  • Subscriber Growth2
Show all 17 topics
  • Fx1
  • M&A1
  • Product Launch1
  • Labor Market1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Capex Investment1
  • Regulation Policy1