Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free
Analyst
Jason Gabelman
Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q4 – 2026 Q2 (7 quarters).
- Questions
- 77on tracked calls
- Challenge rate
- 5%4 of 77 questions
- Companies
- 10questioned at least once
- Reporting periods
- 7with questions
These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.
How to read these numbers
Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.
Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.
No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.
Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.
Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.
Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.
Questions asked
Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.
Showing 77 of 77 questions from 10 companies
VLOValero Energy13 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 13 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
do you have any sense of the extent of damage at these Russian plants
Show response
Quantified the outage and the trend, with the caveat of no direct insight; concluded recovery takes longer rather than shorter.
Are there other kinds of levers that the administration has and, you know, anything incremental
Show response
Addressed the policy environment broadly and named Jones Act waivers, the RVO and small refinery exemptions, but did not engage on export quotas or bans.
Calendar 2026 Q1
pretty massive dislocations in the market change your way you think about investment opportunities
Show response
Lane Riggs outlined investment framework: commercial leverage (reduce VGO dependency), reliability, yield improvements (FCC project), and ethanol growth tied to global demand.
Do you think we see a similar dynamic as during the Russian war where cracks kind of in the back-end trend higher
Show response
Gary Simmons confirmed the back end of the crack curve is undervalued. High freight and backwardation are hindering necessary trade flows. Curve expected to roll up.
Calendar 2025 Q4
sustaining CapEx is down a couple of $100,000,000 versus what you've you've done the past couple years. So is that an indication that mechanical availability should be higher
Show response
Lane attributed most of the sustaining CapEx decline to Benicia closure (one less refinery to maintain) plus some year-over-year timing differences, rather than signaling a step-change in mechanical availability.
you think that the levels we're at today are sustainable? Are there reasons why the differential should be wider now than they were prior to COVID
Show response
Randy acknowledged uncertainty on sustainable levels but noted the factors pushing differentials wider (OPEC, Venezuela, Canada, freight enforcement on shadow fleet vessels) are unlikely to reverse through the year.
Calendar 2025 Q3
if you could provide some numbers around the amount of disruption that you're seeing on Russian product exports
Show response
Gary noted effective targeting of high-complexity Russian capacity, with Russia ramping lower-complexity units as substitutes, and today's spike being geopolitical hype, not actual disruption.
are you going to have to kind of import products from Asia in order to meet your contractual obligations
Show response
Lane confirmed continued wholesale supply commitment post-closure, sourcing waterborne barrels from anywhere in the world for optionality rather than locking into pipeline commitments.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how much of these Middle East barrels do you think will flow to North America
Show response
Gary noted re-engagement from Middle East crude suppliers after a period of limited U.S. purchases, signaling intent to direct OPEC volumes to the Gulf Coast.
it seems like some of the output from other regions is a bit lower
Show response
Gary traced the diesel tightness to weak late-2024 margins limiting restocking, cold winter depleting inventory, refinery shutdowns, new capacity struggling, jet fuel prioritization, and lower renewable/biodiesel production.
Calendar 2025 Q1
In The US, you see natural gas prices move higher in impacting your operating expense
Show response
Greg noted U.S. natural gas volatility has kept Valero on spot purchasing, while Pembroke operations remain unaffected by current European gas levels.
Calendar 2024 Q4
do you think you would be able to, if the tariffs are implemented in a very direct way, you’d be able to sidestep those tariffs
Show response
Rich Walsh confirmed Valero has foreign trade zones but said their applicability depends entirely on how tariff programs are structured.
I’m wondering if that is an indicator of above average turnaround activity in your system for 2025
Show response
Lane confirmed the $1.5B average baseline means the $1.6B implies above-average turnaround activity in 2025.
MPCMarathon Petroleum12 questions · 6 reporting periods · 3 of 12 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
we've seen a bit of inverse performance there in land was, I'd say, weaker than normal seasonality in 1Q
Show response
Rick explained Mid-Con performed per seasonal expectations in Jan-Feb, widened in March. Now tightest market with low inventories from unplanned maintenance and strong ag demand. West Coast still robust despite pullback.
Should we expect those contracts to get renewed at kind of similar terms as what they're currently at
Show response
CEO confirmed intent to renew MPLX contracts, citing inextricable relationship. CFO quantified derivative impact: $500M unrealized losses in Q1, $63M midstream, $340M margin call working capital impact.
Calendar 2025 Q4
was there some work that needed to be done there, or was it around inflation and and workforce costs
Show response
CEO attributed overrun to El Paso project start plus minor inflation creep on LAR; 2026 guidance incorporates inflation expectations. No further inflation uptick anticipated.
if the team could talk about maybe elaborate a bit on some of the comments you made in your opening remarks about how her background
Show response
CEO cited Maria's 25 years of operational excellence, cost competitiveness, and capital deployment experience; board involved in strategic decisions but CEO did not detail departure reasons.
Calendar 2025 Q3
just wondering what's driving that? And then more broadly, it looks like turnaround spend is going to be a bit higher than what you had previously guided to
Show response
Mike attributed higher spend to growth/reliability opportunities at LAR and GBR; CFO confirmed turnaround costs expected to decline in 2026 and beyond as COVID backlog clears.
can you just talk about your ability the past couple of quarters to capture the strength in the Pacific Northwest and the Rockies
Show response
Rick noted PNW-California spread dynamics shifted within the quarter; higher distribution costs reflect commercial decisions to go after higher margins. CFO noted per-barrel cost flat YoY.
Calendar 2025 Q2
One of them being targeting moving more barrels from kind of Eastern PAD to further East. One on interest in petchem bolt-ons
Show response
Rick confirmed continued push east with new third-party pipeline expected early-to-mid Q4; Nashville and Gulf Coast markets being served; East Coast as incremental new market.
can you talk about if your targets for net debt have changed? Or if there are one-offs in the quarter that impacted net debt
Show response
CFO explained targets unchanged; ethanol JV sale proceeds arrived post-quarter-end, and cash was back to ~$1B by end of July. No change to $7B gross debt or $1B cash targets.
Calendar 2025 Q1
how willing are you, if at all, to go above the $7 billion debt target either to absorb working capital volatility and/or support buybacks
Show response
CFO firmly stated no appetite for increasing debt to fund buybacks; will use revolvers for working capital management but remain committed to $7B long-term debt target.
would you be open to a larger deal if the right one came across?
Show response
CEO emphasized size-agnostic approach but strict capital discipline lens requiring mid-teens returns and support for mid-single-digit growth objective.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I think you're going to be refinancing $750 million of debt at the parent. So should we think about that being available for use towards buybacks?
Show response
CFO confirmed $750M from September maturity is available for allocation; CEO said potential MPLX drops would not count against MPLX's mid-single-digit growth target.
I noticed in the press release there wasn't a quarter-to-date buyback figure for 1Q, '25. I think that's the first time you've excluded that figure
Show response
CFO explained the change: post-Speedway era of outsized returns justified the disclosure, but as balance sheet normalized, one month's data was less useful.
PSXPhillips 6610 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 10 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
just wanted to level set where we are right now if 2Q kind of represented a normalized environment for that segment
Show response
Don pegged Midstream at roughly $1B/quarter with commodity/volume swings, cited record June Permian volumes, and reaffirmed the $4.5B-by-2027 EBITDA target.
Calendar 2026 Q1
Can you just help us, I guess, bridge quarter-over-quarter decline and remind us how you get to that $4.5 billion
Show response
Don attributed Q/Q decline to winter storm volume impact and noted proactive customer renewals at 10-year-plus terms validate the growth trajectory toward $4.5B by 2027 and beyond.
I neglected to ask about the LPG export ARB opportunity in the current environment
Show response
LPG windows mostly committed; Singapore team optimizing delivered time charter market. Mark noted Ferndale and Western Gateway are complementary, Northern vs Southern California, and RODEO renewable diesel asset running well.
Calendar 2025 Q4
wondering if you're seeing any headwinds in the first half from recontracting on the NGL pipes and if that's something that'll be a feature in future years
Show response
Don confirmed H1 2026 fairly flat at ~$1B quarterly run rate incorporating contract renewals and fee escalations. Q4 OpEx step-up attributed to timing and seasonality. Cost efficiencies from refining blending into midstream operations through scale leverage.
Calendar 2025 Q3
do you still view those as core? I mean, there are some good assets there. But obviously not as well integrated
Show response
Mark noted Ferndale gaining value as California capacity tightens. Bayway-Humber Atlantic Basin integration creates optimization opportunities. Core strategy is Central Corridor but coastal assets still create value.
wondering if you could just elaborate on what drove the increase quarter over quarter, how much of that is kind of underlying versus some timing impacts?
Show response
Brian credited cost cuts, domestic feedstock logistics, Pacific Northwest product placement, new pathways, doubled SAF production, and European credit timing. Q4 margins improving with weaker soybean prices.
Calendar 2025 Q2
I'm wondering if the company is thinking about doing a deep dive on that segment and the structure that makes sense
Show response
Mark confirmed ongoing evaluation of strategic alternatives with industry experts and board engagement. Nothing off the table but must create long-term value.
just want to know if your outlook for when we reach mid-cycle in that industry has changed at all?
Show response
Mark said chemicals recovery view consistent: firming through 2026-2027 with European/Asian rationalization. Brian confirmed RD running at reduced rates with regulatory headwinds in 2026.
Calendar 2024 Q4
There was a pretty large decline quarter-over-quarter, larger than what would seasonally be expected
Show response
Brian attributed $100M sequential negative impact to Q3 inventory hedging reversal. Underlying volumes remained strong. Q1 expected to follow historical trend.
do you see further potential to rationalize some of your refining assets? Or do you feel like after the L.A. refining shutdown, you're in a pretty competitive position
Show response
Mark said ongoing asset evaluation continues but no immediate closure candidates. Focus is on getting better, not bigger, in Refining.
KMIKinder Morgan9 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 9 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
is it the total cash plus asset that you're contributing to the joint venture? Or is it just the cash portion?
Show response
Kim clarified only Western Gateway's cash contribution, not KMI's asset contributions, would count toward the $1B of new project additions.
Calendar 2026 Q1
is it in your project backlog? I know it hasn't been to this point, but I want to confirm, it's still not in there
Show response
Confirmed Western Gateway is not in the backlog. Projects only enter backlog after FID. Garthwaite expressed confidence in regulatory path forward based on experience in relevant states.
Thinking back to the Permian pipeline going west that you didn't win, were there any lessons learned in that process
Show response
Dang dismissed the premise of lessons learned, stating they approached it the same as all other projects. No reflection on competitive positioning offered.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how much of that project backlog, if any, is tied to servicing incremental projects
Show response
Kim said only 12% of shadow backlog is LNG-associated. Most shadow backlog is power-focused. Also noted incremental LNG projects don't require new facilities, existing facilities often seek further-reach competitive supply. Take-or-pay contracts of 20-25 years protect against utilization risk.
just wondering what drove the earnings upside on the natural gas segment in 4Q
Show response
Kim cited Texas intrastate market, Eagle Ford and Haynesville gathering, and interstate markets especially in the Northeast. Function of tight pipeline/storage network creating volatility-driven upside from supply/demand dislocations.
Calendar 2025 Q3
Should we assume the large projects in the backlog are kind of similar in markets they serve
Show response
Kim declined detail on competitive grounds but confirmed larger projects in the shadow backlog support LNG export and power themes.
I wonder if there's opportunities out there or holds in the portfolio that you'd be interested in filling
Show response
Kim said M&A remains opportunistic, targeting fee-based energy infrastructure assets at appropriate risk-return within 3.5-4.5x debt/EBITDA range. Has capital or can find capital for deals. Recent track record includes Outrigger and prior-year acquisition but nothing large-scale.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what the strategy is on gaining volumes there and kind of securing potentially higher rates
Show response
Sital said Outrigger integration going well with network optimization underway. Highland Express customer discussions making progress but nothing to report this quarter.
hearing anything around a potential slowdown in contracting or need for additional piping into future plants
Show response
Kim said no slowdown in LNG customer discussions. Builders continue announcing new projects and signing new contracts. Favorable US permitting environment and trade balance benefits supporting continued momentum. Tom added US market share is growing due to rule of law, advanced network infrastructure, developer track record, and abundant supply resources.
CVXChevron Corporation7 questions · 7 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
how are the contract negotiations going to unlock additional volumes there?
Show response
Bonner said debt recovery completes by early 2027 and JV production is targeted to grow up to 50% by end of 2028. Specific.
Calendar 2026 Q1
You have guided to your equity affiliate distributions being at about 70% of the full-year guide by the end of 2Q
Show response
Bonner said affiliate distribution guidance raised by over $2B due to TCO at full rates, CPChem contributing, Angola LNG full. TCO now paying dividends monthly. Guidance at $60 Brent with upside.
Calendar 2025 Q4
how do you view using cash to fund acquisitions, you know, not of the Hess size, but of some of a smaller size
Show response
Wirth explained consideration type is part of negotiation. Equity preferred for large deals to hedge commodity price risk over long close periods. Cash can work for smaller, faster deals. Bonner noted shift to debt-to-cash-flow metric aligning with rating agency standards.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I think every quarter, it beats guide this year by about $700 million. Wondering what's driving that beat?
Show response
CFO attributed outperformance to TCO. Guidance unchanged for Q4 due to planned TCO pit stop and cash conservation for two 2026 loan repayments. Clear explanation of moving parts.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Should we expect a step-up from the current rate by that $2.5 billion that you guided to when the Hess deal was announced?
Show response
Wirth noted original step-up guidance was from a different price environment and that 50%+ of deal shares already retired pre-close. Deferred updated guidance to November Investor Day.
Calendar 2025 Q1
if you could provide any additional color on how to think of the pace of buybacks through the balance of the year
Show response
Wirth defended through-cycle buyback approach over formulaic methods. CFO added Q2 guide of $2.5-3B projects $11-13B annual rate, still within $10-20B range. Emphasized steadfastness.
Calendar 2024 Q4
I wanted to ask about the TCO distribution, and I appreciate the detail between first half and second half of this year
Show response
CFO confirmed TCO FCF guidance and explained drivers: production ramp, declining affiliate CapEx, and expected OpEx optimization at new 1M boe/d base.
TRGPTarga Resources7 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 7 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
would you expect the net impact from lower marketing margins in 3Q to be offset by an uplift in fee floors
Show response
Jen said Q3 will be a headwind versus Q2 as strong marketing benefits moderate and the portfolio stays below fee floors; higher Waha prices mainly benefit producers, supporting future activity.
Calendar 2025 Q4
it does look like, I guess, you'll be a bit short on Y-grade pipeline capacity. So how do you plan on managing those molecules as new fracs come online later this decade?
Show response
Meloy described a balanced position: operating leverage on NGL transport once Speedway comes online, balanced frac capacity with Trains 11-13, and significant excess export capacity with LAP 4. Post-2027, downstream spend is ratable fracs only. Multiple medium-term flexible offloads bridge to Speedway.
can you remind us how much of that is concentrated in '26 versus how much spend will be less than '27?
Show response
Kneale noted $1.6B total cost with spending ramping: 2025 < 2026, with 2027 finishing up at roughly similar to 2025 levels. Did not break out costs by year specifically.
Calendar 2025 Q3
How is the competitive landscape for going after that Permian acreage? Is it becoming more competitive there? And are you seeing some of, kind of, the fees that you're able to extract shrinking?
Show response
Kneale acknowledged perpetual competition but emphasized differentiation through sour gas capacity (2.5+ Bcf/d, 7 AGI wells), wellhead-to-water value proposition, 40+ interconnected plants, and continued commercial success adding to existing dedicated acreage.
how you feel about that $1.6 billion cost for the Speedway pipe. Is that kind of fully baked? Or do you have perhaps some contingency baked in there?
Show response
Kneale expressed confidence in the Speedway budget, noting pipe was procured well ahead of the public announcement. Contingency is always included, and the team aims to deliver under budget.
Calendar 2025 Q2
what the direction of travel is on the fees that you're able to secure from competitor -- or from customers? Is it up, down, flat
Show response
Meloy emphasized long-term contract protection (10-15 year terms) and competitive positioning through scale, reliability, and integrated system. Competition has always existed.
the risks to kind of coming in at the high end or the low end of that range
Show response
Kneale noted volume growth materializing as expected, with potential tailwinds from commodity prices and marketing not baked into guidance. Q4 typically strongest for marketing.
Show 4 more companies
OKEONEOK6 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
Do you need to kind of FID projects now to make sure they come online to support continued growth beyond 2027?
Show response
Lentz said ONEOK pre-secured long-lead equipment and another plant to stay ahead of Permian growth beyond 2027.
Calendar 2026 Q1
would you expect to kind of get back to capturing that upside next year based on where the commodity curves are right now?
Show response
Walt acknowledged the delayed realization of commodity benefit due to hedging and rig ramp timing, but expects strength building into 2027, especially if back-end curve strengthens.
Did I hear you right that the -- some of the data center-related projects you're pursuing you thought they were going to be in the $50 million range and they're coming in more like $400 million to ...
Show response
Walt confirmed the sizing increase. Early projects were small lateral taps from existing pipes. Now hyperscalers need 5GW facilities requiring new pipeline builds reaching deep into OKE's system, at attractive returns.
Calendar 2025 Q4
Is there a desire to further grow the refined products and crude business inorganically
Show response
Pierce deflected specific M&A plans, emphasizing execution focus with no portfolio gaps. Stated ONEOK will be intentional and disciplined, evaluating opportunities that fit strategic objectives across all segments.
Calendar 2025 Q3
I was hoping you could elaborate on those comments a bit more as I'm trying to understand the underlying earnings in the quarter
Show response
Sheridan explained NGL marketing business timing (holding product in storage, selling at better times) and refined products over/short positions sold opportunistically in Q3.
how important is it to maintain our competitive growth rate? Or do you think that your EBITDA growth rate is not necessarily a main determinant
Show response
Walt emphasized 12-year streak of positive EBITDA growth through cycles, with cash flow profile supporting buybacks as an additional value driver.
XOMExxonMobil5 questions · 5 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
are you looking to either accelerate LNG projects into your queue to help diversify away from the Middle East?
Show response
Woods said the LNG opportunity set (Mozambique, Papua New Guinea, Golden Pass) already diversifies away from the Middle East, but he would not shy from the region.
Calendar 2026 Q1
the opportunity that is potentially available in the UAE if they were to ramp up production
Show response
Darren declined insurance specifics but said portfolio approach with no material Qatar impact expected. On UAE, highlighted strong ADNOC relationship and active work to help UAE meet production growth ambition.
Calendar 2025 Q3
what do you think is driving this industry trend
Show response
Woods said he has been making the point since 2020 that with depletion curves the industry has to invest and find resources. Unconventional filled a hole short term but like all resources has finite life especially without technology portfolio to advance recoveries. Unlike competitors who see plateauing or declining production ExxonMobil continues to grow with technology. Industry now shifting to longer-term longer-cycle projects. ExxonMobil never took eye off this space. Resource owners want cost-efficient development that happens quickly on schedule without overruns. Guyana is great example. Company has been steadfast and does not blow with the winds which gives edge advantage in discussions.
Calendar 2025 Q2
when we should start to see that production plateau start to come off
Show response
Woods said 1.7 million barrels per day gross capacity by 2030 with production expected around 1.3 million reflecting best estimates of declines. Planning basis is reasonable based on experience and history. Nobody on Guyana team satisfied without keeping boats full with lots of work on infill drilling and optimization. Teams will never completely offset physical nature of depletion but looking for every opportunity to beat the plan. Deferred on specific timing saying he is betting on the organization to outperform.
Calendar 2024 Q4
the overall potential earnings number from all the projects combined
Show response
Mikells said focused on projects where ExxonMobil is operator as opposed to TCO where not the operator. Also focused on newly starting up projects as opposed to projects like Permian crude venture already underway. Incremental benefits from already underway projects and non-operated projects included in plans. Woods added all elements baked into plans and volumes shared at Corporate Plan Outlook. On earnings versus cash flow Mikells said typically on projects there is a little bit of a lag on earnings relative to cash flow.
EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P.4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q1
How are those spreads looking right now? Do you see that repeating this year
Show response
Jim noted Oleflex turnaround limited current capacity but expects strong performance through the quarter as unit comes back online.
Calendar 2025 Q4
does that kind of support you filling up your y grade pipelines out of the Permian Basin, to get over the 60% utilization on Avaya pipeline
Show response
Jim corrected utilization at 80% on Shin Oak integrated system, not 60%. Natalie confirmed Piñon expansion and OxyRock volumes in 2027 are good for NGL pipeline fill.
Can you just talk about what you're seeing in that system moving, propane up the product pipelines
Show response
Tyler confirmed strong propane pipeline demand in Q4 and January as strong as or stronger than January 2025.
Calendar 2025 Q2
Have your upstream customers kind of told you that you need to more or less have that egress to compete for additional volumes from them
Show response
Tug cited brownfield economics and Mont Belvieu pricing hub as competitive advantages. Jim emphasized 40+ year international relationships creating sticky customer base.
WMBWilliams Companies4 questions · 3 reporting periods · 1 of 4 challenging
Calendar 2026 Q2
it does seem like we should be looking at the acquisition net of the LEG connector and then the Delta expansion project.
Show response
Chad clarified the quoted multiple is current run rate and excludes future growth projects; direct.
Calendar 2025 Q4
I wanted to ask about the growth capital.
Show response
Gabelman asked whether 2026's $6.4B growth capex represents a peak or will be sustained. Porter said 2026 is a lumpy year given four power innovation projects plus Southeast Supply Enhancement construction, but added that balance sheet capacity will expand significantly by 2028 and they expect to sustain higher capex levels if the right organic investment opportunities materialize.
Calendar 2025 Q2
how do those steel tariffs impact the CapEx to EBITDA multiples and how do you manage that risk moving forward
Show response
Larsen said steel is 5-15% of project cost with tariff impact of 1-3% on total cost, manageable within contingencies. Zamarin emphasized permitting reform has much bigger cost reduction potential than tariffs add.
how does that kind of impact your outlook for additional projects that you could build in the U.S. Gulf Coast
Show response
Zamarin said Haynesville needed 10 Bcf/day growth even before latest LNG upsides. Announced 400 MMcf/d South Mansfield expansion online 2027. Storage demand exceeding Pine Prairie capacity with next round already being worked.
Challenge rate by company
Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.
| Company | Questions | Challenge rate |
|---|---|---|
| VLO Valero Energy | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions |
| MPC Marathon Petroleum | 12 | 25%3 of 12 questions |
| PSX Phillips 66 | 10 | 0%none of 10 questions |
| KMI Kinder Morgan | 9 | 0%none of 9 questions |
| CVX Chevron Corporation | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| TRGP Targa Resources | 7 | 0%none of 7 questions |
| OKE ONEOK | 6 | 0%none of 6 questions |
| XOM ExxonMobil | 5 | 0%none of 5 questions |
| EPD Enterprise Products Partners L.P. | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions |
| WMB Williams Companies | 4 | 25%1 of 4 questions |
- VLOValero Energy · 13 questions0%none of 13 questions
- MPCMarathon Petroleum · 12 questions25%3 of 12 questions
- PSXPhillips 66 · 10 questions0%none of 10 questions
- KMIKinder Morgan · 9 questions0%none of 9 questions
- CVXChevron Corporation · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- TRGPTarga Resources · 7 questions0%none of 7 questions
- OKEONEOK · 6 questions0%none of 6 questions
- XOMExxonMobil · 5 questions0%none of 5 questions
- EPDEnterprise Products Partners L.P. · 4 questions0%none of 4 questions
- WMBWilliams Companies · 4 questions25%1 of 4 questions
Activity by reporting period
Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.
| Calendar period | Questions | Challenge rate | Companies |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 8 | 13%1 of 8 questions | 5 |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 0%none of 4 questions | 3 |
| 2025 Q2 | 15 | 0%none of 15 questions | 9 |
| 2025 Q3 | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions | 8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 14 | 7%1 of 14 questions | 9 |
| 2026 Q1 | 13 | 0%none of 13 questions | 8 |
| 2026 Q2 | 9 | 11%1 of 9 questions | 8 |
- 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 13% (1 of 8 questions) · 5 companies
- 2025 Q14 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 4 questions) · 3 companies
- 2025 Q215 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 15 questions) · 9 companies
- 2025 Q314 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 8 companies
- 2025 Q414 questions · challenge rate 7% (1 of 14 questions) · 9 companies
- 2026 Q113 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 8 companies
- 2026 Q29 questions · challenge rate 11% (1 of 9 questions) · 8 companies
Topics
Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.
- Capex Investment24
- Capital Allocation21
- Competitive Dynamics15
- Demand11
- Revenue Growth11
- Margin9
- Supply Chain8
- Pricing8
- M&A7
- Geographic Expansion6
Show all 17 topics
- Regulation Policy6
- Macroeconomic5
- Guidance Reliability5
- Cost Pressure5
- Trade Tariffs3
- Cloud & AI1
- Inventory1