Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Jason Gursky

Citigroup · covers Industrials, Technology

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2025 Q2 (4 quarters).

Questions
29on tracked calls
Challenge rate
3%1 of 29 questions
Companies
12questioned at least once
Reporting periods
4with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 29 of 29 questions from 12 companies

TDGTransDigm Group6 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 6 challenging
TDG company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

the one that kind of has piqued my interest is on a rewriting of the federal acquisition regulation and DFARS on the defense side

Show response

Kevin said regulatory changes haven't been raised by DOD/DLA in working group discussions. Very early days, TDG prefers to react to actual changes rather than speculate.

what you're seeing out there in the market as far as PMAs and whether there's been any change in either your approach to PMA parts

Competitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Kevin said no meaningful increase in PMA competitive activity. TDG's product nature makes it a smaller target for PMA efforts. Nothing of note in recent quarters.

Calendar 2024 Q4

it does seem like it is going to be tied to airlines getting more consistent supply from their OEM partners, so that they can do some fleet planning

DemandSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Joel confirmed interiors recovery depends on airlines taking planes out of service. Not a significant piece of total business but the one area still lagging 2019.

you just went through a big contract negotiation with them. I'm wondering if you just can't give us a little bit more insight on what you're hearing

InventorySupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Kevin said conservative OEM guide reflects supply chain confusion. Not getting clear directed input from OEMs. Joel noted operating units build bottoms-up forecasts accounting for potential over-shipping.

Calendar 2024 Q3

what you're seeing from an inventory perspective and whether there has been any interesting movement in inventory here

Show response

Mike acknowledged limited visibility into airline inventory. Distribution partners are at about normal months-on-hand supply levels.

talk about valuation multiples and where we are today relative to where we were maybe pre-pandemic 2018, 2019 time frame

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Kevin acknowledged higher M&A multiples but said discipline is about targeting high-IP businesses and maintaining 20% IRR hurdle on every deal.

NOCNorthrop Grumman4 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 4 challenging
NOC company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

There seems to be this growing view that in the future, the future of warfare and the systems that we're gonna need are gonna be plus exquisite

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Warden said Northrop spans the full continuum from exquisite to attritable except very low-cost fully disposable units. Beacon approach enables new teaming constructs.

I was wondering if you could spend a bit more time talking about one of the phrases you used in your opening remarks on making some investments in some new areas

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Warden described Beacon as an autonomous mission test bed leveraging 500,000 flight hours of data, partnering with smaller companies to accelerate autonomous capabilities.

Calendar 2024 Q4

what you're hearing from the customer, and what you're seeing them say and do as it relates to maybe enabling some of these VC-backed defensive

Regulation PolicyCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Warden noted broad set of acquisition strategies matching different needs, emphasizing leading technology still essential for top capabilities.

I was wondering if you could just maybe comment on your top two or three priorities for the year and how you see yourself spending your time

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Warden outlined three priorities: technology differentiation for warfighter, efficiency improvements working with government, and smart capital deployment.

GDGeneral Dynamics3 questions · 2 reporting periods · 1 of 3 challenging
GD company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

You mentioned the -- you made some comments about NASSCO, maybe a small negative EAC there

ChallengingMarginSupply ChainTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Deep attributed NASSCO EAC to flood damage reducing to one production line plus subsequent rework issues, expects resolution by year-end with both lines restored

Calendar 2025 Q1

your take on the administration's desire to stand up, I don't know, Office of Shipbuilding inside the White House

Regulation PolicyCapex InvestmentTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Expressed strong support for new Office of Shipbuilding, cited productive conversations on accelerating throughput and commercial shipbuilding opportunities

this administration's approach to procurement reform. Seems like every administration comes in and wants to reform how acquisition is done

Show response

Supportive of acquisition reform goals, emphasized importance of preserving what works while removing impediments and cost drivers

GEGE Aerospace3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
GE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

just kind of curious how you think the company is going to participate in the growth of European defense budgets

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Larry highlighted Avio Aero as native European defense position with exposure to Eurofighter, Eurodrone, and GCAP. International contracts structured more like commercial agreements with better margins. Open to partnerships but likes current positioning.

Calendar 2025 Q1

just wanted to get a sense from you all on what impact that might have on the industrial base

Regulation PolicyDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Rahul highlighted FMS reform benefiting F110, T700, and F-15EX export programs, and acquisition process improvements reducing bureaucratic barriers.

Calendar 2024 Q4

spend a few minutes on labor productivity across the Company and where you think you are relative to pre-pandemic levels

Labor MarketCost PressureTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Larry said FLIGHT DECK is driving waste reduction but inbound material disruptions prevent full translation into on-time delivery and productivity metrics.

RTXRTX Corporation3 questions · 3 reporting periods · 0 of 3 challenging
RTX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

just kind of curious when you think, based on the feedback that you're getting from customers, we might begin to see some awards flowing on some of this outlook.

DemandGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Calio highlighted 25% backlog growth since end of 2023, $25B each for Golden Dome and effectors in reconciliation bill. Investing $250M in capacity this year.

Calendar 2025 Q1

I was wondering if you -- just a clarification one, if you'd be willing to talk about the gross impacts of tariffs.

Trade TariffsRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Mitchill steered to net impact as most important, noting USMCA and military duty-free mitigate significantly. Calio called procurement reform streamlining a net positive.

Calendar 2024 Q4

I was wondering if you could spend a few minutes talking about your top three or four priorities for the year.

Show response

Calio outlined three priorities: executing $218B backlog, driving productivity (11% sales vs 2% headcount growth), and Iron Dome as significant opportunity.

LHXL3Harris2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
LHX company page →

Calendar 2025 Q2

has there been any change, Ken, to your expectations on how much of the LHX NeXt savings you'll pass on

MarginInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Bedingfield confirmed 30-40% margin retention rate unchanged. Kubasik highlighted weather satellite technology with military applications and international expansion opportunities.

Calendar 2025 Q1

these efforts obviously are geared towards speeding things up and saving money. And I'm kind of curious on the saving money part

Show response

Kubasik advocated for FAR reform, raising TINA threshold to $500M-$1B, eliminating cost accounting standards, and commercial-like DoD practices.

Show 6 more companies
RKLBRocket Lab USA, Inc.2 questions · 2 reporting periods · 0 of 2 challenging
RKLB company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

the strategic rationale behind purchasing Mynaric. Was it more for that purpose and enabling your future constellation?

M&ACapital AllocationTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Beck said Mynaric serves both a merchant-supplier role and Rocket Lab's own future constellation needs.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Maybe you could just walk us through the things that have caused the delays at each point.

Show response

Beck attributed delays to third-party structure suppliers and early COVID lead times, with no single failure.

TXTTextron2 questions · 1 reporting period · 0 of 2 challenging
TXT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'm just kind of curious what you're seeing, both on the demand side and whether there are new programs of record that are being stood up

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Donnelly highlighted unmanned capabilities across FTUAS, FLRAA optional unmanned modes, high-speed VTOL, RCV, and CUSV mine hunting programs.

I'm just kind of curious on the munitions side or, you know, attritable mass seems to be a phrase that we hear quite a bit coming out of DOD

Innovation & R&DCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Donnelly acknowledged classified and IRAD work on attritable systems but said Textron's historical focus has been on higher-value platforms.

BAThe Boeing Company1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
BA company page →

Calendar 2024 Q4

what does the margin cadence look like for BCA over the next six, eight quarters as you're ramping in production

MarginRevenue GrowthTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

West said BCA margins negative in 2025 but improving, and IAM agreement cost pressure is less than 5% of airplane cost, offset by shadow factory closures and rate ramp productivity.

HIIHuntington Ingalls Industries1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
HII company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

I'd like to just ask kind of a step back, bigger picture question about the timing of the transition from pre-COVID to post-COVID chips

MarginGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Confirmed 2027 as when majority of revenue comes from post-COVID contracts. CVN-80 equipment delays noted but no change to overall milestone balance.

LDOSLeidos1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LDOS company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

from your view, what's broken and what it's going to take to get this fixed, quantum of money that might need to get spent

DemandRegulation PolicyTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Bell described high-level FAA engagement and Leidos capabilities across ocean, land, ground, and terminal air traffic systems including international Skyline deployment, but deferred on spending quantum to the administration.

LMTLockheed Martin1 question · 1 reporting period · 0 of 1 challenging
LMT company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

whether this is just strictly reducing red tape and speeding the process up or if there are going to be some longer-term structural consequences for the industrial base

Show response

Jim strongly endorsed executive orders to reduce bureaucratic red tape, advocating for faster acquisition paths for both physical and digital technology, and broader industry participation.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
TDG TransDigm Group60%none of 6 questions
NOC Northrop Grumman40%none of 4 questions
GD General Dynamics333%1 of 3 questions
GE GE Aerospace30%none of 3 questions
RTX RTX Corporation30%none of 3 questions
LHX L3Harris2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
RKLB Rocket Lab USA, Inc.2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
TXT Textron2—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
BA The Boeing Company1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
HII Huntington Ingalls Industries1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • TDG
    TransDigm Group · 6 questions
    0%none of 6 questions
  • NOC
    Northrop Grumman · 4 questions
    0%none of 4 questions
  • GD
    General Dynamics · 3 questions
    33%1 of 3 questions
  • GE
    GE Aerospace · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • RTX
    RTX Corporation · 3 questions
    0%none of 3 questions
  • LHX
    L3Harris · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • RKLB
    Rocket Lab USA, Inc. · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • TXT
    Textron · 2 questions
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • BA
    The Boeing Company · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • HII
    Huntington Ingalls Industries · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
Show all 12 companies
CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
LDOS Leidos1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
LMT Lockheed Martin1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • LDOS
    Leidos · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions
  • LMT
    Lockheed Martin · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q320%none of 2 questions1
2024 Q480%none of 8 questions6
2025 Q1130%none of 13 questions10
2025 Q2617%1 of 6 questions5
  1. 2024 Q32 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q48 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 8 questions) · 6 companies
  3. 2025 Q113 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 13 questions) · 10 companies
  4. 2025 Q26 questions · challenge rate 17% (1 of 6 questions) · 5 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Regulation Policy9
  • Demand7
  • Competitive Dynamics7
  • Innovation & R&D6
  • Margin5
  • Supply Chain3
  • Geographic Expansion2
  • M&A2
  • Capital Allocation2
  • Inventory2
Show all 17 topics
  • Capex Investment1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Trade Tariffs1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Labor Market1
  • Cost Pressure1
  • Product Launch1