Start 30 days free, no card. Full Pro access for a month, then decide. Start free

Back to analysts list

Analyst

Javier Escalante

Evercore ISI · covers Consumer Defensive

Period: Reporting periods mapped to calendar 2024 Q3 – 2026 Q2 (8 quarters).

Questions
25on tracked calls
Challenge rate
36%9 of 25 questions
Companies
4questioned at least once
Reporting periods
8with questions

These figures cover the whole profile: every tracked question, all reporting periods.

How to read these numbers

Challenge rate is the share of questions that pushed back, pressed for specifics or questioned management’s assumptions. It describes how questions were asked on the calls tracked here; it does not measure whether any view turned out to be right.

Rounding. Rates are rounded to whole percentages, so a small share can show as 0% even when some questions were challenging. The count beside each rate is exact; “none of N questions” means no question was challenging.

No questions recorded. “—” means there is nothing to calculate: no questions were recorded for that period on the calls tracked here. It does not mean there was no activity.

Fewer than 3 questions. A company-level rate is withheld when fewer than 3 questions were recorded for that company; the questions are still counted everywhere else.

Small samples. Profiles with fewer than 10 questions are marked Limited sample.

Reporting periods. Questions are grouped by the calendar quarter each company’s fiscal reporting period maps to, not by the date of the call. Periods without a calendar mapping are listed separately under their fiscal label.

Questions asked

Grouped by company, most questions first. Open a company to read its questions, newest reporting period first.

Showing 25 of 25 questions from 4 companies

CLXClorox11 questions · 7 reporting periods · 8 of 11 challenging
CLX company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

if you can dimension the offset basically the mix or savings or pricing, what have you

ChallengingMarginPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q4 →
Show response

Luc framed the gross-margin bridge qualitatively -- productivity primary offset plus strategic pricing -- without quantifying each lever.

Calendar 2026 Q1

what category growth and pricing assumptions you guys built as you presented the capital spending model to the Board when you value the acquisition

M&ACompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Linda declined specifics. Saw opportunity to move faster with full control vs JV structure. Getting innovation to market faster, making changes faster, seeing inflection in Glad as result. Board evaluates multiple factors: buyer interest, strategic fit, organizational capacity. Ending JV was right decision.

reported was flat, right? But Circana data shows pricing running down mid-single digits. So trying to bridge the difference

ChallengingPricingInventoryTranscript · FY2026 Q3 →
Show response

Luc: ~1pt price/mix headwind at company level, consistent with full-year plan. Quarterly noise from club promo timing not fully reflected in same P&L period. Don't expect big Q4 shift, tracking as expected on price/mix for remainder of year.

Calendar 2025 Q4

The clarification is with the ERP already done, so why I would still going to see investment in digital capabilities.

Capex InvestmentPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Luc: ~8¢ Q3 adjustment remaining, then done with one-time digital investment spend. Ongoing tech investment normal course OpEx offset by automation savings. Household: consumption/share loss is volume-driven, price/mix headwind from size shift to larger packs and channel shifting. NRM plans offsetting at total portfolio level.

what Sucana data suggests is that it's you that is promoting. It's not competitors. Is that the case that is is is reflective of what is the negative price mix that you have in the P and L?

ChallengingCompetitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Linda confirmed both CLX and competitors promoting more in litter. CLX intentionally increased promo to rebuild share. Scoop Away Costco promotions disproportionately impact Circana readings due to large event size and consumer shift to club. Overall competitive category, nothing different than expected.

Calendar 2025 Q2

Could you help us understand why price mix in the quarter got so negative?

ChallengingPricingDemandTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Luc said -4% price/mix in Q4 includes one-time trade accrual adjustment. Excluding that, -2% (consistent with full-year average). Household -6% driven by lapping significant merchandising events from prior year. Expect -1% going forward in FY26.

Have you considered a price realignment, so you can stabilize market share? And if not, why not?

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

Linda rejected price realignment. Cat Litter: superiority gap is the issue, not pricing. Plans for innovation and execution improvement. Glad: value creation through innovation (stronger bags, better experiences) remains the strategy. Bahama Bliss doing well. Consumers willing to pay premium for better experience.

Calendar 2025 Q1

Organic sales is two if you exclude the ERP transition. And since you just point that Q4 organic sales, you are guiding to minus 4 around. Is that correct?

ChallengingRevenue GrowthGuidance ReliabilityTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Luc confirmed math: full-year organic 4-5%, Q4 organic 4-8% (including ERP 7-11%), ex-ERP Q4 about -3%. Driven by consumption slowdown persisting plus retailer inventory headwinds.

what gives you confidence that you do not have a pricing issue, a structural pricing initial beyond promotions given that you have value players with very strong business propositions

ChallengingPricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Linda differentiated: Glad facing deep discounting from branded competitor (below private label in some cases, viewed as unsustainable). Innovation (Bahama Bliss) doing well. Litter competitive but innovation-driven category with many unmet needs. New strongest odor control product doing well.

Calendar 2024 Q4

Is this the same thing or not? Are these two different kind of spending? And something that has stood out from one of your peers is that they are doing an upgrade to the same SAP system that you ar...

Capex InvestmentInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q2 →
Show response

Linda said this is a full greenfield S/4HANA implementation replacing 20+ year old system, plus global finance, innovation capabilities, AI, and data lake. Not just an ERP upgrade. Kevin added admin should go from 15-16% to 13% of sales as productivity is realized.

Calendar 2024 Q3

if you can remind us what is the underlying category growth that you're assuming for, which is equivalent to the 3% to 5% organic sales growth

ChallengingDemandMacroeconomicTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Linda confirmed 0-1% category growth assumption. Dismissed hurricane impact as immaterial. Strong demand plans and advertising are the real drivers of outperformance.

CHDChurch & Dwight8 questions · 6 reporting periods · 0 of 8 challenging
CHD company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

But did you say that Henkel increased promotional activity by how much?

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Rick confirmed Henkel raised promotion 1,100 basis points and said tariff refunds are fueling elevated promotion rather than the usual commodity-driven pullback.

Calendar 2026 Q1

I was expecting a more muted outlook for gross margin given oil derivatives going into detergent. Can you explain how much oil derivatives go into your COGS?

Cost PressurePricingTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

$25-30M is full-year incremental inflation from oil derivatives. Company enters each year ~60% hedged. Offsetting with productivity. CFO: original 160bps inflation now ~200bps but covered by additional offsets.

If this externality continues and commodities remain very high, would you expect then value players to lead in calibrating the promotional environment and then potentially price increases? Is that ...

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

CEO deflected competitor-specific question. Emphasized CHD's advantaged position: promoting less yet gaining share. ARM & HAMMER at half the price of leading detergent with great efficacy.

Calendar 2025 Q4

what does it mean to leave that behind and refocus those resources against all the innovation that you have?

Capital AllocationMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q4 →
Show response

CEO called VMS exit one of the biggest strategic pivot points in company history. Private label exposure dropped 12% to 5%. Every minute on Vitamins was a minute not spent growing ARM & HAMMER and core brands.

Calendar 2025 Q3

Why do you think that the broader personal care sector is premiumizing in an environment like this?

DemandProduct LaunchCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

CEO attributed premium growth to: problem-solution efficacy, fresh branding vs tired legacy competition, social media presence, and low household penetration with large runway.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you can unpack a little bit, I mean you mentioned it, but it was very briefly that there is a lot of moving pieces

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO detailed laundry dynamics: one competitor catching up on concentration, one raising prices at top end/spending in lower tiers, one retailer launching premium private label.

if there is anything to learn about categories and the type of retailers where you're seeing greater lag in terms of reorders

InventoryDemandCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CEO noted drug stores have flat traffic and heavy vitamin promotions. Online is half of all vitamins, requiring specific innovation strategy for that channel.

Calendar 2024 Q4

to what extent what is happening in drug stores has been incorporated into this repositioning or upgrade of the business

Competitive DynamicsProduct LaunchTranscript · FY2024 Q4 →
Show response

Dierker acknowledged online channel is critical for vitamin recovery. On laundry, expressed extreme satisfaction with Deep Clean incrementality beating all metrics and confirmed ARM & HAMMER has no brand confusion issues unlike the failed OXICLEAN premium detergent launch.

KMBKimberly-Clark5 questions · 4 reporting periods · 0 of 5 challenging
KMB company page →

Calendar 2026 Q2

what does it mean for operate for you operating without the international tissue business

M&AGeographic ExpansionTranscript · FY2026 Q2 →
Show response

Mike said the Arbex JV creates a world-class tissue competitor while sharpening the company's focus and execution in international personal care.

Calendar 2026 Q1

how will it help restore growth Kenvue?while preserving the competitiveness of the core stand-alone Kimberly-Clark

M&AInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2026 Q1 →
Show response

Hsu assessed Kenvue challenges as executional (NA skincare, NA oral care, China) not structural. Leadership team ~50-50 from both companies. Torres highlighted over 40 integration teams with good synergy line of sight.

Calendar 2025 Q3

what are you seeing in terms of consumer reaction to the Chinese diapers versus your intro?

Competitive DynamicsInnovation & R&DTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Hsu noted Chinese imports competing with private label at same tier. Torres expressed confidence in global product quality, citing testing data and market response.

give us an update on the competitive dynamics in U.S. diapers. When you spoke in early September, you indicated delays in marketing plans

Competitive DynamicsPricingTranscript · FY2025 Q3 →
Show response

Torres detailed promotional shift from Q3 to Q4 for trial driving, emphasized promotion below 2019 levels. Chinese diaper competition interacting more with private label than brands.

Calendar 2025 Q1

if you can split the discussion between emerging markets and North America, right? Particularly emerging markets, you see currency headwinds

PricingCompetitive DynamicsTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

Hsu emphasized PNOC discipline with focus on product quality improvement rather than pricing or promotion. Promotion viewed as trial vehicle for innovation, not growth driver.

KVUEKenvue1 question · 1 reporting period · 1 of 1 challenging
KVUE company page →

Calendar 2025 Q1

why your SG&A is so elevated in terms of percentage of sales if we exclude marketing and R&D reinvestment

ChallengingCost PressureMarginTranscript · FY2025 Q1 →
Show response

CFO noted SG&A includes advertising expenses and confirmed Our Vue Forward program is on track for $350M savings by 2026. J&J separation enabling lower cost base.

Challenge rate by company

Every company this analyst questioned, most questions first. A company-level rate is shown from 3 questions; below that it is withheld.

CompanyQuestionsChallenge rate
CLX Clorox1173%8 of 11 questions
CHD Church & Dwight80%none of 8 questions
KMB Kimberly-Clark50%none of 5 questions
KVUE Kenvue1—Rate withheld: fewer than 3 questions
  • CLX
    Clorox · 11 questions
    73%8 of 11 questions
  • CHD
    Church & Dwight · 8 questions
    0%none of 8 questions
  • KMB
    Kimberly-Clark · 5 questions
    0%none of 5 questions
  • KVUE
    Kenvue · 1 question
    —rate withheld: under 3 questions

Activity by reporting period

Questions recorded for each calendar quarter that companies’ reporting periods map to (not the call date), with the challenge rate for that period. Periods inside the range with no questions are shown as “No questions recorded”.

Questions by calendar reporting period
Calendar periodQuestionsChallenge rateCompanies
2024 Q31100%1 of 1 question1
2024 Q420%none of 2 questions2
2025 Q1650%3 of 6 questions4
2025 Q22100%2 of 2 questions1
2025 Q330%none of 3 questions2
2025 Q4333%1 of 3 questions2
2026 Q1520%1 of 5 questions3
2026 Q2333%1 of 3 questions3
  1. 2024 Q31 question · challenge rate 100% (1 of 1 question) · 1 company
  2. 2024 Q42 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 2 questions) · 2 companies
  3. 2025 Q16 questions · challenge rate 50% (3 of 6 questions) · 4 companies
  4. 2025 Q22 questions · challenge rate 100% (2 of 2 questions) · 1 company
  5. 2025 Q33 questions · challenge rate 0% (none of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  6. 2025 Q43 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 2 companies
  7. 2026 Q15 questions · challenge rate 20% (1 of 5 questions) · 3 companies
  8. 2026 Q23 questions · challenge rate 33% (1 of 3 questions) · 3 companies

Topics

Topics tagged on this analyst’s questions.

  • Pricing13
  • Competitive Dynamics13
  • Demand4
  • Margin3
  • M&A3
  • Innovation & R&D3
  • Inventory2
  • Capex Investment2
  • Cost Pressure2
  • Product Launch2
Show all 15 topics
  • Geographic Expansion1
  • Capital Allocation1
  • Revenue Growth1
  • Guidance Reliability1
  • Macroeconomic1